Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 6.

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Quote from: LoyceV on August 23, 2021, 11:12:29 AM

The casino's main ANN-thread was created by user eGoldgg, who last posted 3 years ago. The thread is "maintained" by user Buff88.
I'd like to show a scam warning above the topic, which means user eGoldgg should have a Flag. I'm in doubt if this fits the Flag-rules, but if it doesn't fit the rules, it means there's a loophole to avoid a warning on a thread.

I'm in doubt as well, as I never faced this situation before. At first glance, I supported the second flag, the one against Buff88, since he is maintaining the thread. However, I am not so sure if eGoldgg is out of any suspicion. He last posted 3 years ago indeed, but he is still active in the forum (he was active even today).

However, it seems to be a loophole indeed. Is there any way to obtain such a warning for the said thread by requesting it to mods or global mods? Users should be warned somehow. I mean to have that warning posted even though the first flag, the one against eGoldgg would not find support. Alternatively, maybe mods can make Buff88 as new OP of the thread (it would not be the first time this happened) and having a flag against him would make the warning to be displayed...

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

I'm in doubt: A casino closed a user's account, and took 399 mBTC without valid reason. The casino's main ANN-thread was created by user eGoldgg, who last posted 3 years ago. The thread is "maintained" by user Buff88.
I'd like to show a scam warning above the topic, which means user eGoldgg should have a Flag. I'm in doubt if this fits the Flag-rules, but if it doesn't fit the rules, it means there's a loophole to avoid a warning on a thread.

The scammed user created 2 Flags, both type 2:

Quote

2816 Insufficient support. (Support | Oppose) GekkeBelg flagged eGoldgg (type 2, see why). Supported by GekkeBelg. Opposed by nobody.
2815 Insufficient support. (Support | Oppose) GekkeBelg flagged Buff88 (type 2, see why). Supported by LoyceV, GekkeBelg. Opposed by nobody.
(source: loyce.club)

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

I supported the flag. Please be aware that aTriz may not, in fact, be the original aTriz. I have my reasons to believe that the account changed hands in time.

aTriz returned to the forum in October last year, having a very suspicious behavior. For those not aware, this is what happened:

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on October 26, 2020, 02:11:37 AM

aTriz just made his first posts after 10 months. Four of them were applications in various signature campaigns ([1], [2], [3], [4]). Like any manager would select him after a pause of 10 months lol.

His 5th and 6th posts were other posts where he is looking for a job ([5], [6]). Actually, the 6th post is a bump of his topic where he announces that he is looking for a job as campaign manager. Like anyone would hire him as a manager after what he did with Gunbot campaign.

Anyway, excepting the ridiculous posts, the main problem is that the account can be owned by someone else. Be careful when dealing with this account.

Now seeing this flag does not surprise me at all, as I was almost sure that aTriz was walking on a very thin ice since returning here. Excepting the "Alia incident" (which I will not reiterate again), his behavior was sort of weird back then as well, but now "weird" is not the adequate term anymore, as he went on the Dark Side. Thanks nutildah for bringing this up.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Please support my flag on aTriz:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2812

He is still working hard at cheating bounties with his alt accounts, one of which is jamalaezaz.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57652170

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

An old scammer created a new account, please support this new type 3 Flag too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2810

Quote from: LoyceV on August 06, 2021, 10:10:40 AM

Quote from: LoyceV on March 20, 2019, 12:40:26 PM

Accounts involved
BetKing.io (Trust: !!!: +2 / =2 / -8) (10 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
BetKing Support (Trust: !!!: +0 / =0 / -7) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
PocketRocketsCasino (Trust: !!!: +2 / =1 / -7) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
dean nolan (Trust: !!!: +0 / =0 / -6) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Update:
Betking Manager

This scammer created another account, hoping to get rid of his negative feedback and Flag. I can't let that happen, his Flags don't expire before March 2029.

As a victim of this scammer, the Flag system allows me to create a Flag for all his accounts:

Quote from: theymos on June 12, 2019, 01:12:30 AM

Quote from: LoyceV on June 12, 2019, 12:52:52 AM

Can I also create a scammer flag for alt-accounts of the contract violator? Example: BetKing.io violated a contract, but BetKing Support, dean nolan and PocketRocketsCasino are his alt-accounts.

Yes, one of the victims can.

I created a new type 3 Flag, please support it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2810

nullius

copper member

Activity: 630

Merit: 2614

If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!

#2693768 “UpAgain” is creating a spate of ridiculous threads and soliciting money in various ways. I created Flag #2737 with the requisite scam accusations thread to gather the evidence in one place, and get a warning banner on his threads before some newbie gets suckered into sending him money somehow. Please support.

(In my personal opinion, this user does not deserve his own thread; but that’s how the flag system works, so—I waste my time with flag bureaucracy.)

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 3507

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: rajatabbey1234 on April 20, 2021, 06:04:33 AM

Support will be highly appreciated. Your support may be able to save me from the disaster. Thanks Everyone and Anyone.

Accusation/Reference : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56686275

Type 3 Flag : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=154563;page=iflags

This case needs more attention.
Cloudbet holds 25000 USDT user funds for more than 40 days without any explanation.
they were already accused and only after the pressure here and open scam accusation, they refunded money to the player. everything indicates that they are making the same mistake again

rajatabbey1234

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Support will be highly appreciated. Your support may be able to save me from the disaster. Thanks Everyone and Anyone.

Accusation/Reference : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56686275

Type 3 Flag : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=154563;page=iflags

logfiles

copper member

Activity: 2198

Merit: 1837

🌀 Cosmic Casino

Our friend here opened a type 2 flag and needs a couple of DT members to support it so that it becomes active;

Accusation/Reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-hunter-who-is-a-scammer-sold-tokens-but-did-not-deliver-5330951
Type 2 Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2707

shasan

copper member

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1313

Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook

Need support:

User: Continuous
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2701
Referenced: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/loan-defaulted-continuous-5330427

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Quote from: savetheFORUM on March 16, 2021, 10:09:22 PM

I am sorry to say but you should watch your language. This is the reason why maybe BTC whitepaper was not given to you for translation because you add a bit too many feelings from your own side.

Apologies for the late reply. I kept wanted to reply for also forgot. So... I think you are a bit confused here, about the procedure of submitting a change for bitcoin.org, including about translations. They are not given to someone per se. You have to submit a pull request, if you want to submit a change. Your change is then analyzed by the site's maintainers and, if your proposal is good, it will be accepted. So it seems you don't know what you are talking about in this case. There was not even a discussion about the translation not being given to me lol. I just observed the existing translation is a mess and I started working on a completely new one. Which I finalized, and the pull request was made already, for having it submitted and checked by bitcoin.org's maintainers.

Coming back to Timelord, it is obvious that the poor man is mentally challenged. You can see that in >90% of his posts.

savetheFORUM

full member

Activity: 1176

Merit: 140

Quote from: GazetaBitcoin on March 13, 2021, 01:44:24 PM

Quote from: icopress on March 04, 2021, 05:12:35 PM

Does anyone remember the events that were raging about the flag created by marlboroza? I skimmed the attached thread but found no mention of why Timelord2067 opposed this flag. I hope someone has a few minutes to satisfy my curiosity.

Oh well, this happenes because Timelord is a very ill person and he can not judge properly anymore. Once I thought he is the village idiot, but I was wrong. Somehow, even c******unter observed (in one of his few good observations), that Timelord is a mentally disturbed person, which needs to be institutionalized for receiving proper medical attention. As you can see in the pointed link, his mental condition is not very stable, as he also started to accuse theymos for various things. He also accused me of FUD (lol?!) and many others for various imbecile suppositions.

The same is true in your inquiry.

The man is mentally challenged and I advise you to ignore him. A Romanian proverb says to not mess with crazies, as their brains are well rested

You decide what to understand from here. Do you really want to challenge a guy which accuses theymos and protects game-protect...? I doubt that lol.

I am sorry to say but you should watch your language. This is the reason why maybe BTC whitepaper was not given to you for translation because you add a bit too many feelings from your own side. A simple reason was given by suchmoon because TimeLord didn't want to support the second flag for the same issue, you said so much without actually knowing the reality.

"My understanding is that @theymos stated two flags cannot be created for the same issue." by Timelord2067

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: icopress on March 04, 2021, 05:12:35 PM

Does anyone remember the events that were raging about the flag created by marlboroza? I skimmed the attached thread but found no mention of why Timelord2067 opposed this flag. I hope someone has a few minutes to satisfy my curiosity.

He stated the reason quite clearly on page 1:

Quote from: Timelord2067 on July 10, 2019, 08:43:06 AM

According to your second link there is already a flag that has been created for this issue:

[...]

My understanding is that @theymos stated two flags cannot be created for the same issue.

GazetaBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 6524

Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker

Quote from: icopress on March 04, 2021, 05:12:35 PM

Does anyone remember the events that were raging about the flag created by marlboroza? I skimmed the attached thread but found no mention of why Timelord2067 opposed this flag. I hope someone has a few minutes to satisfy my curiosity.

Oh well, this happenes because Timelord is a very ill person and he can not judge properly anymore. Once I thought he is the village idiot, but I was wrong. Somehow, even c******unter observed (in one of his few good observations), that Timelord is a mentally disturbed person, which needs to be institutionalized for receiving proper medical attention. As you can see in the pointed link, his mental condition is not very stable, as he also started to accuse theymos for various things. He also accused me of FUD (lol?!) and many others for various imbecile suppositions.

The same is true in your inquiry.

The man is mentally challenged and I advise you to ignore him. A Romanian proverb says to not mess with crazies, as their brains are well rested

You decide what to understand from here. Do you really want to challenge a guy which accuses theymos and protects game-protect...? I doubt that lol.

icopress

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 5874

light_warrior ... 🕯️

Does anyone remember the events that were raging about the flag created by marlboroza? I skimmed the attached thread but found no mention of why Timelord2067 opposed this flag. I hope someone has a few minutes to satisfy my curiosity.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Please support a Type 3 flag against a long-time scammer under a new alt account:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2648

Somewhat amazingly, there's been a fair number of newbs complaining about getting scammed by accounts that have negative trust and flags. There's seemingly no way to prevent these people from getting scammed. Maybe there's been an uptick in people looking for deals too good to be true.

SiNeReiNZzz

legendary

Activity: 1022

Merit: 1043

αLPʜα αɴd ΩMeGa

Quote from: Csmiami on February 24, 2021, 01:22:54 PM

I'm requesting support for my flag against a casino here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2646

In depth information is presented on the thread, but I'll however make a short explanation here too:

I participated in some free prediction game, being the prize of it some freebets to be spent on the casino with some requirements. I managed to end in a winning position, but never received a notification of the bet being credited. Later, I was made aware elsewhere that the bets had been paid, so I contacted the casino owner over PM in telegram. I was told that the bet had been credited but expired when it was accepted and that it'd be looked into. 18 days have passed ever since, and the version has changed to "you were credited and it expired because it wasn't used" here on the forum; I'm still missing the bet, and the operator has tried to publicky "shame" (?) me for never having deposited in the platform; as if that was reason enough to not credited me my winnings

Okay I will first read up on the subject and then I will certainly support your flag.
If no agreement can be found with this casino...

Csmiami

copper member

Activity: 1652

Merit: 1325

I'm sometimes known as "miniadmin"

I'm requesting support for my flag against a casino here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2646

In depth information is presented on the thread, but I'll however make a short explanation here too:

I participated in some free prediction game, being the prize of it some freebets to be spent on the casino with some requirements. I managed to end in a winning position, but never received a notification of the bet being credited. Later, I was made aware elsewhere that the bets had been paid, so I contacted the casino owner over PM in telegram. I was told that the bet had been credited but expired when it was accepted and that it'd be looked into. 18 days have passed ever since, and the version has changed to "you were credited and it expired because it wasn't used" here on the forum; I'm still missing the bet, and the operator has tried to publicky "shame" (?) me for never having deposited in the platform; as if that was reason enough to not credited me my winnings

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Vareole is a scammer - 1 DT member from activity.
Original Thread.

Coin-1

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2334

I am requesting support for this "Type 2" flag:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2567

As far as I understand, due to the described incident, many honest traders lost their cryptocurrency worth over $58000 at the current price. I personally suffered a financial damage of about $1700. I consider that the project team scammed me.

Topic: Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here! - page 6. (Read 50394 times)