My idea of increased coinage to fund games and gambling is just a hypothetical idea, assuming that these games can be incorporated into the BEECOIN -QT client (don't bother if they cannot).
This idea would be good because it would encourage people to access the qt client more often. Teenagers on the train, office workers during lunch break, would access the client in an attempt to earn very fee BEES, as rewards would be limited per wallet, per game, per day.
This idea would be useful, as BEECOIN approaches pure POS. The gaming reserve (2 -3 billion BEES) would be highly sought after, by gamblers who would compete viciously to earn a slice of the cake, as mining equipment becomes obsolete. This competition, just to earn very few bees, would secure the network and make BEES expensive.
What do you think? Is this just a crazy idea OR IS IT USEFUL?
This idea would be good because it would encourage people to access the qt client more often. Teenagers on the train, office workers during lunch break, would access the client in an attempt to earn very fee BEES, as rewards would be limited per wallet, per game, per day.
This idea would be useful, as BEECOIN approaches pure POS. The gaming reserve (2 -3 billion BEES) would be highly sought after, by gamblers who would compete viciously to earn a slice of the cake, as mining equipment becomes obsolete. This competition, just to earn very few bees, would secure the network and make BEES expensive.
What do you think? Is this just a crazy idea OR IS IT USEFUL?
It is a good idea, however putting a game inside the wallet is quite a tough task .... although yes maybe you are correct, perhaps not like hunter coin, but a simple game or competition not related to blockchain at all...but just makes people keep their wallet open could work. Soopy is not a games designer though so that would be something for the future.
The projects % can be used for this anyway so no need to make it 6%, although if everyone wants it that high that's okay with me
i would say 4% projects and services of which that is included anyway.
2% soopy
4% projects and services
2% bees
seems enough if we roll with it now while blocks are still large.
I understand that the games may be hard to implement, but a simple flip flap game would do, a game where it is almost impossible to win 5 bees without losing 4. We want games that people will almost never win 5 bees at a time, per day, per wallet.
What do you think about 27bn bees?
WE CAN ABANDON THE GAME CONCEPT, IF IT IS NOT POSSIBLE, BUT STILL HAVE A GENEROUS RESERVE FOR GIVEAWAY FAUCETS THAT PAY MINIMUM WAGE
A game is a good idea, flappy coin has one in there wallet.
However for winning coins it is better to have a method where they pay to have a go at the game and the tops scorers win most of the coins, small fee taken first.
That way the players are funding the prizes.
However a game to keep the wallet open is quite a good idea... this is something for the future though i guess when we have funds to pay for games developers ect.
