I liked ICO Spokzzz more. There was a reward system. Only 21 posts per week. You have to write for the whole company more than 31 posts. To get a reward. And steaks for each individual member.
For each post you received an award of the corresponding rank. jm.member 1 steak per post. 21 post = 21 stakes . I really liked the system. Very convenient and simple.
Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 13. (Read 3945 times)
It is very difficult to obtain satisfaction from the very small amounts that projects pay out this year. This cannot be called a good enough payment because this money can only be enough to go to a cafe once, for example.
For me anytime i join signature campaign, i always make more than the required post and i always get my stake, i think making more than required is a good idea, and of course if you make below the required post, you shouldn't get a stake because it is clearly stated before you join?
I think that the requirements are not so high, 10-15 posts7answers a week is not an impossibile contition, there are some bonities like sylon ones that requires also more than 20 posts a week. If you don't do at least these minimum posts it's correct that you won't receive stakes.
Yes, it's really easy to make 10-15 posts per week. We can complete it within 2 - 3 days and just around 30 - 60 minutes per day. That's the rule and we have to accept its rule if we want to do something.I see the laws of the signature campaign need to post within 3 days or more, if less will not be counted because it is spam
I found the DAEX project a few weeks ago and joined it in just one week. The great thing is that they quickly paid me a bonus, however the value of the token was only $ 60 per week involved, I found it quite a
Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?
This is a very nice analogy. Lets consider signature campaign as a reality world business and we are the employee, companies wanted a product which is fully presented and complete. If we give them unfinished jobs or products, they will deny the entire batch of our product. Just like this.
I think with such rules there must be, because if there is someone who does not reach the limit of the post, while others exceed the specified post limit, but the result is the same as the stake, then it is unfair, if you want to get a stake but the number of posts is not reach the minimum limit, it is better to count the stake based on the number of posts, so it will be fair for those who are diligent in posting
we can only follow the rules that apply, fair or unfair we must keep following. because they pay us.
I think, if I have a project, the regulation is very appropriate.
especially as a tool for filtering people who are serious and not participating in the bounty.
there is no tolerance even though there are deficiencies, this is only a matter of consistency or not the participants.
I think, if I have a project, the regulation is very appropriate.
especially as a tool for filtering people who are serious and not participating in the bounty.
there is no tolerance even though there are deficiencies, this is only a matter of consistency or not the participants.
I think that the requirements are not so high, 10-15 posts7answers a week is not an impossibile contition, there are some bonities like sylon ones that requires also more than 20 posts a week. If you don't do at least these minimum posts it's correct that you won't receive stakes.
Yes, it's really easy to make 10-15 posts per week. We can complete it within 2 - 3 days and just around 30 - 60 minutes per day. That's the rule and we have to accept its rule if we want to do something. 
At the moment you cannot earn a lot of money with bounty, but from all bounties signature are still most profitable from all of it. So you need just to wait. At the moment all project are at low level!
Still about to find out. My first signature campaign will end in a couple of weeks. They switched from excel reporting to a public sheet on a bounty website, which is not showing the correct stakes for weeks now. Im just sitting this one out to see what happens and how much stakes i will end up with.
so far satisfied
but why has it been for the past 7 months, the process of listing tokens to exchangers is so long that I can't sell all the tokens I have.
but why has it been for the past 7 months, the process of listing tokens to exchangers is so long that I can't sell all the tokens I have.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
I think that rules is some kind of agreement that are created and should be agreed before we are join that bounty, for me that is acceptable.(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
And for participant that aren't meet that requirement that is absolutely won't get any stakes even if they just lacking 1 post.
For me yes like the project I participating now they rewarding me or paying me a good price for my signature campaign on them. Find a project like this that they are paying you rightly so I'm very thankful that I participate on this project specially to their signature campaign. And I'm very satisfied to my signature on them.
I am pleased that the percentage distributed to the signature campaigns of the bounty. However, I was very disappointed when the ABLE project scoured the bounty hunter and blocked all connections to their community groups and official social networking sites.
I am quite satisfied with the Bounty program I have been involved in! The value is not high but I noticed it has development association!
I regularly participate in signature campaigns to earn bonuses. Recently I was very disappointed with the signature campaigns. Paid very slowly and very little. I want when the campaign is over to receive money.
every project must have its own rules, we as a bounty hunter must comply with the terms and regulations of the project, if we expect a reward, so obey And do what has been determined, then you will get a Benefit, try and pray that can only we do.
Rules should always be so strict so people won't try to cheat. By joining the Bounty Campaign you agreed to the rules and so you should follow it. If you think making almost the amount of quota but failed to reached it should have a consideration and receive stake then Bounty will become chaotic if the manager do this. How about those people who doing the right job than you.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
It is absolutely fair because there are campaign rules you have to obey. (a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Another problem is when you make those, say, 15 posts and while the stakes are being calculated (which usually takes several days) the btt forum's moderators delete the topics you wrote in will all the comments. So you end up with 14 or 13 posts instead of 15 and are not given the reward.
That's why I usually make 2-3 posts more in order to avoid such a situation.
Jump to: