Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 14. (Read 3945 times)
Their conditions don't bother me and for me it is not a problem that we have to respect a certain number of posts. I think it is worth it.
I am not satisfied on this matter, because sometimes part of my posts got deleted and I don't receive stakes for that week and it hurts me.
I believe this rule should be adjusted accordingly to your efforts.
They will not adjust that because it's not the fault of the manager, it's all your fault because you do not really try and work hard to help the project, you just work at the bare minimum and this laziness has hurt you. You can not complain, instead of trying to complain and encourage them to adjust, you should write more every day, that will be a guarantee for your reward and efforts, I always did so when I first faced situations where the post was deleted, the reward is always consistent with each of your actions, this is what I noticed in the signature campaign I believe this rule should be adjusted accordingly to your efforts.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
I do not have any problem with that, thats rules and we have to follow them. If you are not satisfied and you do not want to agree that rules, you can always leave the campaign. I am very thankful for bounty campaigns (a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
. So I try to do my best to help them.
I've got your point about the task it makes me clear that bounty manager must give some coordination about the work we didn't reached. But still we read and accepted their requirements in their bounty campaign and I think that it is enough to follow their rules and regulation in order to get the given stakes after the end of the week.
10 or 15 posts per week is not much. There are requirements and higher.
and if you enter the company, you automatically accept its requirements. Do not do - it means no steaks
Yes of course, there requirements are appropriate to the reward you will get after. Also signature campaign is one of the way to earn especially to those newbie in cryptocurrency. Also I like how they give reward because they rules are easy to do and to follow, that's why lot of people are take that opportunity to participate in signature campaign. Signature campaign is the good start to world of cryptocurrency. and if you enter the company, you automatically accept its requirements. Do not do - it means no steaks
10 or 15 posts per week is not much. There are requirements and higher.
and if you enter the company, you automatically accept its requirements. Do not do - it means no steaks
and if you enter the company, you automatically accept its requirements. Do not do - it means no steaks
I think their rules are easy and with some time we can accomplish them. Anyway I am frustrated when my posts are deleted and I do not accomplish the number of posts because of that.
full member
Activity: 468
Merit: 100
The world’s first Play, Learn and Earn
I am not satisfied on this matter, because sometimes part of my posts got deleted and I don't receive stakes for that week and it hurts me.
I believe this rule should be adjusted accordingly to your efforts.
I believe this rule should be adjusted accordingly to your efforts.
I think that the requirements are not so high, 10-15 posts7answers a week is not an impossibile contition, there are some bonities like sylon ones that requires also more than 20 posts a week. If you don't do at least these minimum posts it's correct that you won't receive stakes.
An absolutely good question as this kind of conditions would promote unnecessary comments and that would, in turn, pollute the forum. Emphasis should be laid out on more and more constructive posts.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Some managers will give a fraction of a complete stakes for one week like for example if the stakes for one week is 8 then you've posted only 9 instead of 10 per week , so they will give 7 , but the other ICO managers will not give any considerations , if you'll not able to make 10 post per week or 15 post per week , it automatically you've got zero , but we can't do nothing about it since it is very clear on the rules .
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
That actually depends on the bounty manager and it's his/her prerogative. I have once participated in a bounty campaign [signature campaign] which i failed to complete the total posts required in a week (17 out of 20 posts) but still the bounty manager gave me a corresponding stake.
Before joining a campaign bounty, you should familiarize yourself with all the rules and tasks that you should follow to get the reward. if you are ready to do it - then participate, it's simple. Each campaign bounty has its own rules, choose those campaigns, the rules of which suit you best.
I think this all depend on the project, in some project you may earn less than 300 dollar as junior member and it could give you x4 profits on exchange . Signature campaign or any other bounty campaign rewards depends on how many hunters promote the project.
Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?
I got your point bro! Good scene example about the situation or to the concern of the thread creator, however, yes the rules must be followed because it is the requirements of the certain campaign if you can't complete the required post then, of course, a participant is not worth it to get the rewards it's simple. I am not against the rule of signature campaign because I know the signature is one of highest percentage to get rewards that is why we need to work hard to complete all the need to qualify for rewards.
The same is applicable to signature campaigns, do your bit, and as long as you get certified with your post, you get what you deserve and obviously, you will always know your possible potential earning or close to, beforehand.
It's depends on bounty manager rule. If you want participate "some bounty" let's follow the rule. Simple like that
In each campaign, their terms of participation and their unequivocal implementation. If you do not comply with the conditions you will immediately be excluded from the list of participants.
Conditions are like a parameter or guideline to follow to achieve a task and signature campaign always come with its own specific tasks and it is left for you as a person to complete your own task and then get paid at the end of it. There is nothing hard to understand in it, and another thing that may make some people to always get screwed with most especially bounty signature campaigns is that they always fail to do what is important when it comes to verifying the authenticity of the ICO they are participating in.
It's sort of a contractual agreement. You meet this condition, and then I pay you. You fail to meet the condition, I dont pay you. It's as simple as that. But if the campaign managers are kind enough to reward one's efforts, I'll be very glad 
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
The reward on the signature campaign you have joined or any bounty is always depending on how many people who invested in their campaign so it will be so high or so low but if you are a higher rank then it will be always high and good enough to sustain your daily needs.
I think everyone should read and follow the rules of the signature in order to get a reward. Many do not receive remuneration when they stop fulfilling the conditions specified in the rules and then complain, although they do not fully perform the work.
Jump to: