Pages:
Author

Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 15. (Read 3945 times)

full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 102
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
in my opinion this kind of thing doesn't need to be questioned because it's obvious before following an ICO project we have to read every rule given before joining the project and if indeed we cannot follow it, they also do not force it into the program, Regarding you have posted more or less than what has been determined but get a reward, it all goes back to each of the project managers. so the point is if you are ready to take part in an ICO you must also be prepared with all the ICO rules.
jr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 1
I think it's fair when counting is for a completely done job and I think it's right if you had 9 posts allowed, but you need 10 that the stake will not be counted!
full member
Activity: 753
Merit: 100
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Each campaign bounty has its own rules that must be followed. If you do not comply and do not follow these rules and do not carry out assignments, then why pay a reward? Of course there are exceptions, and there are managers who can count you bets, even though you have not made the minimum number of messages.
sr. member
Activity: 2030
Merit: 269
They have set up rules if you cannot meet the rules and the guidelines then don't participate at all, if they allow it, it will be abused by people, it's not that hard to create 15 post a week, you just allocate your time it will not cost you a lot of time to post 2 or three times, you will have a problem if you have a lot of altcoins.
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 100
I think that it is impossible to divide the award. Either you complete the task in a week and get a reward - or not.
full member
Activity: 983
Merit: 100
👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh | 🔥 Ultimate Launc
In my point of view is the reward deserved to the hard worker bounty hunter. I already satisfied of reward from signature campaign. I think person who constribute more for the project deserve bonus like bonus stakes maybe. Just do the job and wait for big reward.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 1
Easks in bounty companies in particular in the signature are not significantly different only in the number of posts per week and each time they are more and more difficult to fulfill them especially for the minimum status of the award is very small,i think many partipicant do min post to do their report,becouse why do more?
member
Activity: 262
Merit: 10
I do not see anything complicated or unpleasant in the signatures. If I'm already interested in this subject, then in any case I will read and talk on the forum, so the signature does not bother me in any way.
But you need to consider some rules. If the rules of the signature are such that they interfere or complicate communication, then it is up to the participant to decide. I do not take on complicated rules that will interfere with me. But personally I do it for my pleasure, and the signature is a nice bonus.
jr. member
Activity: 126
Merit: 1
In each campaign, their terms of participation and their unequivocal implementation. If you do not comply with the conditions you will immediately be excluded from the list of participants.
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 38
Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?

I got your point bro! Good scene example about the situation or to the concern of the thread creator, however, yes the rules must be followed because it is the requirements of the certain campaign if you can't complete the required post then, of course, a participant is not worth it to get the rewards it's simple. I am not against the rule of signature campaign because I know the signature is one of highest percentage to get rewards that is why we need to work hard to complete all the need to qualify for rewards.
hero member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 518
OrangeFren.com
Yes, I am participating in a signature campaign. And yes, I'm very satisfied with joining the signature campaign. I think we must follow that rules in order to have the stakes for the week. It's not a hard thing to make 10/15 posts per week. If you make 3 posts per day I think it is enough.
Actually we are satisfied in rewards of the bounty campaign that we participate if the rewards was big or enough for us. But if not maybe we are not satisfied but for this reason maybe to be blame of this is ourselves because we did not make sure of the campaign that we participated has have enough bounty rewards to distribute.
member
Activity: 448
Merit: 10
awards are different everywhere, but I am quite satisfied with the reward received everywhere it is worthy
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 502
The strict rules provided by the Bounty Manager are just marketing for the ICO marketing to succeed.
So if we violate these rules it will suppress the success of the ICO, we better follow the rules so that we are appreciated.
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Yeah, as I'm still here in the crypto currency community I'm definitely satisfied by joining different bounty campaigns especially signature campaign. Though, some of them can't really be assure since there is a lot of scammers here in the cyberworld. I believe someday that I can have a great return on my effort by joining signature campaign.
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 251
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I have observed of course as that is mentioned in the rules when we participate in any campaign and yes I somehow feel cheated when that happens when you fall short with only 1 post. But then again rules are rules and we need to follow them otherwise there is no relevance of having rules.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 10
There is no reward if you didn't reach post count goal.
In some cases if there is good bounty manager ( not in case of Amazix) , I try to suggest more posts in following week and usually they accept it.
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 106
Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?

Very smart for your questions and my appreciation.

With an answer like that, I am sure that the Bounty manager applies the right rules and I agree exactly the same as what you are talking about.
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
This is the rules and regulations that each project regulates. Each project has their calculations and direction. Joining yourself will be based on it, to have decisions to join each program
newbie
Activity: 201
Merit: 0
I like joining in signature campaign.
you have to read carefully the rules before you join to get stakes.
and i think the rules is fair enough.
for me, it is not hard to make 10-15 post in a week.
to gain more stakes you have to do some effort and responsibility.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
It certainly has been set based on existing regulations and with the intention for the sake of running a good promotion. If hope still gets paid but do not comply with the minimum rules it is recommended then surely everyone would be doing it and it's just the same as not agreed on rules that have been created. so I guess there is no relief in this case because if you want big results then obviously the professionals should be the main one.
Pages:
Jump to: