Pages:
Author

Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 16. (Read 3945 times)

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1001
Well it's fair, before you joined you need to read and make sure you understand the rules, if you don't fulfill the requirements then you won't get paid, even if you only completed 99% it still consider as failed, but some campaign does give a little compensation, but it's your responsibility to complete the requirements
sr. member
Activity: 623
Merit: 251
A rule is a rule. I think the rule was made  in order to make the participants having more qualified posts. Besides the rule will require the participants to b emote responsible for their job. So,  if we can't make 10 or 15 post a week,  we wouldn't get the reward,  and that's true.
sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 253
l0tt0.com
I think it's fair Smiley. Everyone need to read rule before joining and I think everything about rule of any signature campaign is really clear and I don't think it's too difficult to follow rule of signature campaign Smiley. Beside there is 7 days a week so I think it's really easy to make enough 10 - 15 posts everyweek.
jr. member
Activity: 224
Merit: 1
In my opinion, we cannot fight these rules. indeed it looks heavy we have made a post according to the target number and suddenly some of our posts are deleted by the moderator. The best solution is not to make a post according to the minimum target. If you can make more than the target number.
jr. member
Activity: 196
Merit: 2
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

For me it depends of the bounty campaign manager or the persons who evaluate and check your post. It is good to know that not only completing the 10 or 15 post are the qualifications for as to recognize our works but it is only for the content of our works. If it is very knowledgeable post or great constructed post I think it is convincible to count or to recognize as a good post. So it is mean all of those issues are depends on the persons who will check our works and activities.
newbie
Activity: 134
Merit: 0
I think it is not heavy. It is a rule that is applied by the organizers that they reserve the right to give the rules because they give us a wage or salary. If we state joined in the projects then we should be ready with the rules set forth. in my own experience it ever so my postings amount to less than the provision in the week, but the BM provides a policy I still get value although it is not full.
jr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 1
Personally, I think that's the law and the bounty managers will follow the lead they gave from the beginning, most no one will complain about that either
full member
Activity: 559
Merit: 102
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
10 or 15 posts per week is not too much, so 90% of people finish it easily and smoothly. If you do not meet the bounty manager's minimum requirements, you will not be eligible to receive a reward for that week. But sometimes I see some BM still give priority and give reward to those who only perform 9 posts. But it is very rare because they broke the rules
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 11
The reason why signature campaign was created is because it is one the best type of advertisement for an ICO to reach out to a true investors. You wears the their ICO banner which will be attach to your name and by posting your thoughts, their banner will also be posted and will be advertise. The many you post, the higher the chance for their ICO to be seen by many. Rules are created for us to have meet the companies expectation since bounty hunters are their employee or free lancers. As an employee, we are obligated to follow the instructions given by the boss right? I don't have a problem if I were unable to get a stake because of my own mistake since it is my responsibility from the beginning.
ukw
sr. member
Activity: 616
Merit: 250
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I personally will not comment on whether this is fair or not. But I think when someone agrees to do something (10/15 posts) to get something else in exchange (tokens), it is right for both sides to be correct to each other and to make the arrangement just as described in the "contract".
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 100
participating in a good bounty program is everyone's dream, but when we are faced with a bounty that has a problem, we must be ready,
but as long as I follow the bounty according to what I want.
full member
Activity: 773
Merit: 100
If you started participating in the signature campaign, you accordingly agreed to the rules and requirements that were put forward to the participants.
To be honest, I do not see a problem for 7 calendar days to write whether it's 10 or 15 constructive messages.
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 11
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

      It is very clear rule that post will be 15 post per week so if ever you are not able to reach that 15 post then you're not entitle to receive tokens , as per the rules specified but one of my friends experiencing this case which instead of 15 post but he was able to reach 14 and he still got his tokens so it depends of the manager,
full member
Activity: 854
Merit: 100
It's fair because the rules are stated clearly that only if you reached that post count per week then you will receive your stake. It is not that hard to make a constructive post rather than work from morning until late afternoon compared to posting 2-3 constructive posts per day.

So far I am satisfied with the projects I joined.
full member
Activity: 391
Merit: 100
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Well agreement is an agreement. It actually depends on them whether they'll give extra credits for people who met more than the required posts but, I haven't encountered any campaigns like this before. The best reward would probably higher stakes.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 500
All projects have their own conditions. If you take part in their bounty campaigns, then you must work according to their rules.It does not matter how many posts you do not have 1 or 2 you still will not get a reward.
sr. member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 267
Buy $BGL before it's too late!
I joined in a signature campaign right now. I read the first the mechanics and rules of the signature campaign before i start, because it is very important to follow the rules. If you dont met the required posts before the cut off, i think it is right that you dont have a stakes for that week. Rules is rules. We must obey.
Very simple if logic will be used, you are required to meet the qualification as dictated from the rules, if you didn't meet that then don't ask further, if you are concerned about missing out some required post then talk to the manager and gentle informed them, there's no any issue if you missed he first week and surpass the other one around, just keep in mind that things will be determined by the manager and it's him to decide if he will give you the stake or not.
jr. member
Activity: 158
Merit: 2
Signature campaign is one of my favorite campaign due of signature sometimes have the highest bounty allocations among other campaigns but the best on this is if you are owning a high ranked account the rewards you will receive in distribution was huge sadly there are some bounty managers won't accepts less posts and concluding to don't have stakes on the week.
member
Activity: 352
Merit: 11
I joined in a signature campaign right now. I read the first the mechanics and rules of the signature campaign before i start, because it is very important to follow the rules. If you dont met the required posts before the cut off, i think it is right that you dont have a stakes for that week. Rules is rules. We must obey.
I was satisfied because there's no money I invest for which it is called as opportunities in crypto. It's not hard those task where it is more worth that we involve here.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 1
I joined in a signature campaign right now. I read the first the mechanics and rules of the signature campaign before i start, because it is very important to follow the rules. If you dont met the required posts before the cut off, i think it is right that you dont have a stakes for that week. Rules is rules. We must obey.
Pages:
Jump to: