Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 17. (Read 3945 times)
Not sure about that. The rewards for the bounties overall seem to of gone down a lot though. I think the %s should be put up personally.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
i think its fair, because making 9 post out of 10 is definitely against the rules,Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
maybe in the future there will be new regulations that mention making 1 very high quality post worth 2 or 3 posts, bounty manager has the right to assess the quality,
maybe this kind of regulation will make this forum cleaner from spammers
In my opinion, everything is true, the conditions are simple - to make a certain number of posts, and it is for this number of posts to get a stake!
Yes, I am participating in a signature campaign. And yes, I'm very satisfied with joining the signature campaign. I think we must follow that rules in order to have the stakes for the week. It's not a hard thing to make 10/15 posts per week. If you make 3 posts per day I think it is enough.
Actually we us a bounty hunter participating signature campaign maybe we must follow in what the rules said.10/15 post a week for me it was enough than to post 20 post per week.
I think it's not that hard to write 10 or 15 comments a week. Sometimes it's a shame when delete comments, although I like not wrote that the delusional, but that do about it. So I write with a margin.
For you to have read the instructions clearly written means you accepted to follow the rules, hence yoh should abide by them in strict compliance. Some bounty managers are considerate to a point because I once participated in a bounty campaign where I ought to make three post in a week but I ended up making two posts, the manager would then give me 75% of my stake for my efforts.
Each bounty manager has different rules about signature campaigns. Starting from the number of posts in a week, the spread of posts within a few days, and the number of stakes obtained. Of course this rule must be obeyed so that the results obtained will be maximum.
I personally am satisfied with one company in one company, but I participated in another one, not very much, the greedy team got caught, I will not sound names, but still, when you expect 30% of you and give you a penny, this does not please
For you to have read the instructions clearly written means you accepted to follow the rules, hence yoh should abide by them in strict compliance. Some bounty managers are considerate to a point because I once participated in a bounty campaign where I ought to make three post in a week but I ended up making two posts, the manager would then give me 75% of my stake for my efforts.
There have to be rules and we have to follow them as without rules it would be a chaos and everybody would complain.
Biggest problem is when you write 15 constructive comments and the bounty manager not giving stakes immediately but
on the end of the campaign and if some of the threads you made a post is deleted in the meantime together with your comment
and suddenly you have only 14 comments and not meeting the criteria.
I've had cases where I still counted a week when I had fewer posts than I needed. Because my post was deleted, and I did not immediately notice it. But I guess I just got the inconsiderate bounty manager. I'm still trying to write a little more posts than I need to. It's safer.
the applicable rule is in compliance and not incriminating and also even paid for this encounter. When it was not qualified to do this job then it is natural when not getting paid. 10-15/week is not heavy and I think anyone can do that because there is a 7 day a week to finish it. There is no reason for them because a lot of people working on it and they were able to in the finish.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Here in this platfrom everyone wants to make profit of his simple hardwork and make more money from more hardwork .(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Here if the campaigns will make strict rules then surely they can easily cut out the payout of the participants and from that they can save to run Thier campaign for long term .
Well here i would like to suggest you that , you should make posts 2-3 more than what the maximum amount of the posts , in that way they will not deny you to pay in any case .
if you please let to share information in this forum of Bitcoin is a very tedious task and very annoying thing to write topic and give opinion and suggestion for the better results then I would like to suggest that don't give your time in this forum long time in a day you should divide your timing in 3 to 4 interval per day , and in this way you will be able to work more efficiently then what are the required by the campaign .
I think the rewards for signatures campaign is still okay Because they do allocate up to 20% of the bounty for it and it makes it look good to sometime. So I'm still satisfied to some extent.
For me anytime i join signature campaign, i always make more than the required post and i always get my stake, i think making more than required is a good idea, and of course if you make below the required post, you shouldn't get a stake because it is clearly stated before you join?
If you post more than required, you will still get the same stake, but if you post less than required, you won't take a stake, rules are rules, so it is always good to post more than required, just in case some of your post gets deleted.
recently very often our messages are deleted by moderators and thus one can not get their steaks. While many Bounty companies have a manager who does not maintain spreadsheets on time. That as a result can lead to minimum earnings.
If you post more than required, you will still get the same stake, but if you post less than required, you won't take a stake, rules are rules, so it is always good to post more than required, just in case some of your post gets deleted.
The biggest problem now is not the number of replies, but not a few bounty is worth participating. Most of the rewards give you a small return.
For me 10-15 posts per week is acceptable. You need to do 2-3 fasts a day, it's very simple. They pay very good money for signature, so these conditions are acceptable.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
For me, doing a job about 75% of post a week is like to be considered to have any amount of stakes instead of putting nothing, it is very unfair to us hunters to be given a zero stakes for about 75% posting a week. Even a half of stakes per week is enough, because if you do a lot of post for example 15/18, the 3 post is no adding any stakes right. So it is more likely with this op concern.
rules are changed during signature bounty some times and nowadays more often not in real time! and I find this unfair
Jump to: