Pages:
Author

Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 19. (Read 3945 times)

full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 145
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

You cannot jump just half the pit. You either jumped it completely or didn't jump at all. There is no third option.
full member
Activity: 532
Merit: 100
it is a condition that the bounty hunters must follow. it is not the problem of the campaign but the bounty hunter. bounty hunters should be responsible to their work. i joined signature campaign and i give my best effort to meet the condition.
member
Activity: 644
Merit: 10
Regulation of gifts I think is not difficult. And the regulation already clearly suppose that rules, the gift of reads every participant must post a minimum of 10 posts. Means we have to do a total of 10 posts if it does not reach the figure is certainly not going to get the value.
full member
Activity: 363
Merit: 100
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Well, since the rule or condition says you have to complete 10 or 15 posts in a week, and not completing the requirement will result to no stakes, those who don't complete should not get rewarded may it sound too harsh. I guess this is still the best ways to reward signature participants.

Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?
I don't think the story is parallel to the topic. But still, I get your point.

newbie
Activity: 155
Merit: 0
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I don't think that someone even has finished and made more than 75% of the posts should be rewarded by stakes or etc. It means that he/she has not done the tasks yet, or even they were not responsible of the jobs. While they has been fill the form of any signature campaign, they should read the rules and they do it. The reward should be given for them who can finish and follow the rules well. It is like an agreement of work.
member
Activity: 448
Merit: 15
TREEBLOCK
If you do not do the requried work you get Zero stakes and that is all you deserve. The rules are there so people actually make the effort 10 posts is less than 2 per day and anyone that cannot manage that is not trying hard enough. I am statisfied with the current rules and have never failed to do the required work.
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 263
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

It depends on the bounty management, ultimately from the people you deal with, as always. My advice is to read the requirements very well before engaging your time.
jr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 1
I tend to accept my faith if I do not follow the bounty rules and miss out on my stakes. I do not blame anyone except myself. This is why, I follow all the rules carefully and abide by it. Am satisfied with all the bounty rules
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 100
In my opinion the rules for the signature campaigns are simple and fair. It's not a hard thing to make 15 posts per week, it's enough to just make 2-3 posts per day.
newbie
Activity: 361
Merit: 0
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Good post really makes a lot of sense. I think that if a participant is able is able to make 75%+ post there should be a reward for that. However, some managers will give you half of the stakes which are fair. The policy which doesn't reward such people is really bad and must be stopped.
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?
A great example and it is quite right with the question that this topic has given. I see everyone doing more than the minimum number of posts required per week. And those who did not follow the rules will surely never receive rewards
hero member
Activity: 2716
Merit: 904
The signature bounty rules is very simple and we must follow that in order to have the stakes for the week, rules is rules to be follow and it always easy to do just divide your target total post for the week or make 3 post per day I think it is enough and easy.
copper member
Activity: 336
Merit: 0
I think this is a matter of debate someone will tell you that you are right but others will tell you that you are wrong. My opinion it is totally depends on the team of that project what they want . They want 15 post in particular week then right you have to do and it is their right if you did 14 post in that week instead of 15, whether they entertain you or not . So for me that is there right and after completing 15 post you didn't get your stakes then this is your right to get your stakes. You have to follow their norms.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 250
There may be a solution like this. For example we must make 10 constructive posts per week to get full stakes for a week. But if we make 9 posts, we can get %90 of weekly stakes, 5 posts gets %50 of weekly stakes, 1 post gets %10 of weekly stakes. I think this is more fair.
newbie
Activity: 140
Merit: 0
Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?

Agree rules is rules so we need to follow the rules to meet the requirements. Anyway as long as the rules is not impossible to meet. Its need to have good decision and discipline to meet all requirements to get reward at signature campaign.
newbie
Activity: 93
Merit: 0
Well it's ok cos we have the rules if you break the rule's it's your fault and don't tell that you can't read cos we always check and clear the terms and condition before you go inside or do something with the rules so anything you can't get from stake it's all about you but we have telegram that you can talk to the admin if you think they made a wrong works from campaign. Must of the bounties campaign is got a good percentage for cooperation
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 10
Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?
Just the seller does not want to think and earn more. He could sell half of the ice cream for $ 1.5, but he did not bother. I saw that cigarettes are sold like that.
full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 100
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Rules are rules. And these rules have been set from the very beginning of the campaign. And before we join any campaign, we should have understood and accepted these rules. Conditions that must be met in order for us to be rewarded. Now we cannot blame the project or the manager for our short comings. It just doesn't work that way.
member
Activity: 308
Merit: 49
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
I think that depends on the policies of the campaign manager, the Bounty Hunter is like a guest who will come to the house with the owner, but the house owner is not obliged to provide drinks and food for guests, just my opinion.
member
Activity: 481
Merit: 11
satisfied or not is in fact dependent with the reward given, but all reward already described at the beginning of the campaign before we join the bounty signature we can see and count them. If it is not suitable and not satisfied you can find a bounty of other project.
Pages:
Jump to: