Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 20. (Read 3945 times)
i dont think about those conditions as long as we work and then they pay us and it's not that easy tho.
I'm joining Vertex signature campaign and this is the first signature campaign i join. Stake for Jr.member rank seems too low.
Yes I am not satisfied with the allocation of stakes for signature campaign. Junior member like me are distributed very low stakes as compared to other members. But we have to contribute the same as other members. Other thing is that some projects run away without rewarding bounty hunters while some others delay in the distribution.
I don't see anything complicated to make it 15 posts per week for a subscription, I always do even with a reserve just in case 15+2. And as you say 13 posts, you simply will not be paid, as clearly stated at least 15 posts...
Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?
You nailed it, my friend! I think it is just rational that we have to follow the minimal rules so that we can be rewarded. This is a give-and-take situation and we can't get what we want if we are not doing the things we should do. Though I understand that maybe OP is trying to say that it can be good if maybe points can also be given to someone who failed to finish what should be done...I am talking of the 10 or 15 posts required but then all of these things can be at the discretion of the project manager and there is nothing we can do on that. This is a take-it-or-leave-it kind of a situation. We have to follow the rules as nobody is exempted anyway.
regulation remains the rule. It was established by the manager and at least be made a condition for getting paid. Maybe if the objection to it is better just create their own bounty such rules that you want. with a minimum amount specified will certainly help the marketing of course also effect conferring on the number of sales going on. so the only reason if not able to reach the target and not paid.
I think that if your post or comments are usually not off topic, then most likely it will be counted and not deleted. On the other hand, if you want to be more sure that you had complied the requirement, perhaps you should have a buffer post and this is what usually other members were doing. Just continue to do good and non off topic comments and rest assured you will not have to worry much for your stakes. Also, you should have to monitor your profile from time to time and check for the activity for the existing no. of post.
normally if you have big repuatation on comments, they will grant the full stakes even though they have low comments. it depends on your popularity.
In my own opinion, I would suggest that you need to add additional 5 post to be sure that you could get the stakes per week and I had been doing this after a month I started in signature campaign. I had also experience such thing wherein there were weeks I got zero (0) stakes and that is why I started to put additional postings until the present since I find it effective.
yes, with big bonuses; because is a tough job, no more participants should be much reward. So happy to receive a large number of tokens and high prices leaving the floor
I've asked to one of manager campaign related that question regarding posts made by participant. I got the answer that manager will give 1/2 stake for participant who need 1 or 2 posts for current week. Hm, its really depending on manager of campaign, hope this will help you.
Yes i really believe it all depends on the manager itself.But to avoid some circumstances,just follow the rules.Anyways,we are given enough time to complete the required posts per week.It's up to us how we will handle our time management.If we want to make an income,then we are bound to follow the rules. My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
It is fair. The rules are written before you signed up for the campaign. If you want to sign up then you have to agree and respect the rules. If you don't like the rules, then don't join in the first place. As simple as that. That rule isn't the only way to run a campaign though. For example, there is a "pay per post" system in signature campaign, which I think would be more suitable for you.Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
For signature campaign, I don't really mind for both fixed payment or pay per post system, although I would prefer the pay per post one.
Rule is still a rule. if anyone cant complete the task, will dont get reward too
i think that's good rule so we must do it
i think that's good rule so we must do it
I've asked to one of manager campaign related that question regarding posts made by participant. I got the answer that manager will give 1/2 stake for participant who need 1 or 2 posts for current week. Hm, its really depending on manager of campaign, hope this will help you.
Almost all the companies whose signatures I participated in gave me a good income. I believe that signature companies are the most profitable of all kinds of bounty.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
There's nothing wrong with the current system of rewarding in signature campaign. If one fails to accomplish the number of posts required to be eligible with the stakes on that week, that's his fault. As bounty participants we should do our task if we are wanting to earn rewards at the end of the campaign. (a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Yes i am satisfied especially when i am paid because it is much more better if it going to pay you . Doing all that hardwork and you did not been paid it is much more worse than you think so if im getting paid that is enough to satisfied me
Although it will be fair to give them something but my senior colleague i think rules are rules and they are meant to be followed so i personally think we should be mindful of the task we choose. If you think you cannot accomplish the set target just don't engage in it. Also always remember that if it must be done it must be done well.
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.
If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.
My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?
Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?
Need to follow the rules of evry signature campaign required mininum post per week
Requiring a mininum and maximum post is fair for the participants if the rate is fair also
a pay per post requirements is the best way to be fair for both parties
I think the best way to reward the signature is that each post should count as a stake and then there should be maximum number of post anyone can make in a week, this way people will be rewarded properly
I think I will have to agree with your suggestion, it will reward everyone for their work, most times even when you make the complete post, sometimes it will get delete and you will not receive any stake because the post doesn't reach the required post per week, so i think this rewarding per post is a good one for me.
Jump to: