Pages:
Author

Topic: Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied? - page 21. (Read 3945 times)

member
Activity: 378
Merit: 13
Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?

This perfectly explains the scenario because not able to afford the ice cream means it will be dropped
In other words, not completing the tasks means no reward

It is harsh but still it is fair rightly because the rules were stated
member
Activity: 279
Merit: 11
Xircus
Not that the initial rules of the kah before participating in the signature campaign?
so I dropped it it reasonable if any participant does not receive any shares if the requirement of a signature campaign should make constructive 10/15 post per week but the participants did not reach that number.
I'm still thankful to earn reward tokens in signature campaign even how small I can take, I was satisfied for that as a participants because it's clear that you not having investment money for them and still it was earning good. It was depended on you wether you like to hodl and achieve there ICO price per token, to earn much bigger.
full member
Activity: 756
Merit: 111
cro.baby
Not that the initial rules of the kah before participating in the signature campaign?
so I dropped it it reasonable if any participant does not receive any shares if the requirement of a signature campaign should make constructive 10/15 post per week but the participants did not reach that number.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

What really baffles me is when I have made the 10 posts for the current week and probably one of threads I posted to was deleted by the mods, I would still not have stakes for that week even after completing it and it wasn't my fault that the thread that I post to was deleted.
full member
Activity: 352
Merit: 100
Though this conditions really come up in signatures maybe due to lack of time and later end up not getting stakes for that week and I think this should not be a problem because before you join a campaign, you would have read the rules and regulations of the campaign and know what it will take but in situations like this, some managers may consider the participant but it is a very rare case.
newbie
Activity: 322
Merit: 0
if we want to join the bounty campaign we must first read the rules and we also have to comply with the rules established. So in my opinion it is only natural that we do not obey the terms they give and we will not get anything in each week.

member
Activity: 252
Merit: 11
It all depends on the team, some bounty managers reward even those who have not made enough posts.
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 2
The ProFish online marketplace & tournaments
I believe rules are rules and it should be kept, if the rules are changed the way you suggested, many people will manipulate the bounty, so it is good to spell out the rules and let people abide by it.
jr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 2
I think the best way to reward the signature is that each post should count as a stake and then there should be maximum number of post anyone can make in a week, this way people will be rewarded properly
jr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 1
People who have not made/created the required post should not receive a stake.
It wouldnt be fair to the people who followed the rules and posted enough.
If you cant make enough post, you shouldnt participate in signature bounties.
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 500
📱 CARTESI 📱 INFRASTRUCTURE FOR SCA
There are rules of signature campaign. If this rules was not executed for 100%, you should not expect BM rewarding, that's simple. Good luck.
newbie
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
Bounty campaigns are agreements between distributor tokens and you as a translator. So if you make all the work you approve, you get a salary. If not then you don't get it. Obviously, they don't give money, they pay for work.
You must understand your duties and obligations as a forum member.
full member
Activity: 235
Merit: 100
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I do not have a problem with these rules. It you have more than enough posts for that week then you cannot carry that post for the next week since the posts are for weekly basis. It is up to you if you post more for assurance, but you cant blame the manager if you lack some during counting.
newbie
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
Jr member like me won't be satisfied of the payment because bounty allocation for jr member is very low. We just hope there are no much higher rank that would join the bounty so we could get a higher payment because of the staking scheme.
member
Activity: 250
Merit: 10
not all signature bounty campaign gives satisfactory results. some of the campaign even gave a very mercenary is not satisfactory. but for those who are already working as a bounty hunter I guess the signature campaign is the bounty that give results that are quite satisfactory.
jr. member
Activity: 126
Merit: 1
Yeah I know that feel, I actually posted 10 posts for the week but unfortunately one of them deleted by moderator at the last day so I didn't receive my stake that week.  Because that was the rule, I can't complain.  I just posted more for the other weeks just in case.
jr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 2
First-off it's all about the rules if you read the rules and it's clear to you, if it says there that 10 post or 15 post it's exactly what you need to do, there's no exception right there! you need to be compliant with everything and the first thing that you need to remember is that you accepted the terms beforehand. So if you will not follow that exactly sorry but it's  not accepted.
hero member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 514
Your question really made me confused, like you are a child. If you wish to participate in a signature campaign you have to follow its rules, which written straight in the first post of the campaign, so, if you fill the weekly minimum you will get the payment, if not - you will not. In the case when you made more comments when it's necessary you will never give more than the weekly payment which discribed in rules. The only thing you may hope for is a bonus for being extra productive commentator of the week, but not every signature campaign gives that.
Another case is to be payed by each post, but again here there are minimums and maximums, which you should to follow to stay payed and not to become rolled out the campaign for shitposting.
member
Activity: 336
Merit: 15
“Revolutionising Marketing and Loyalty”
Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?
Yes! great comparison. If you agreed to certain conditions, be kind - follow them.  If managers will begin to consider the proportion of stakes for everyone on the number of posts, then soon he will be asked to consider the length of the posts. Grin
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 520
Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

As per rules they will not be rewarded at all for that week. That is the most of the campaign managers follow when they are checking the stakes for the any campaign. Next to that some managers like yahoo partially pay the partcipants if they made the good number of posts and missing one or posts means.

Really wait for some months you will more signature campaign with the big payments soon. All the people will be enjoyed with it bro.
Pages:
Jump to: