Pages:
Author

Topic: Russian Gas ban - A problem for Europe or suicide for Russia? - page 4. (Read 14455 times)

legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
What the current condition about Russian gas still banned or not? its give bad impact for European countries due some countries has bad economic condition after long moment Russia gas banned. Due war invasion between Russian and Ukraine not stop yet I don't sure until how long this problem will be stop. Looks serious crisis what did by European Union banned Russia because they are the only one country has a lot of gas and all European country need with Russian.

I think for European stop did by asking from United State and stop helped sending weapon to Ukraine for stopping war invasion between Russian and Ukraine will give impact how easy getting  Russian's gas.
It must be clearly understood that it was Russia that attacked Ukraine, and Ukraine is only defending itself. In order to make Russia less able to continue attacking the territory of Ukraine and bombing it every day and shelling peaceful cities with cruise and ballistic missiles, sanctions were imposed both on oil and gas, since they brought Russia the most profit, and on goods that can be raw materials for the military-industrial complex. Therefore, in order for the war to end quickly, it is necessary to inflict a military defeat on the aggressor country, that is, Russia, and for this Ukraine needs even more help with weapons.

The cessation of the supply of weapons to Ukraine will lead to the fact that Ukraine will be conquered and cease to exist as a state, and the people of Ukraine will be killed and tortured to a large extent by the occupiers, and some will be forcibly resettled across the territory of Russia.

But you don't seem to care about tens and hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians killed, the main thing for you is to have cheap and bloody Russian gas.


Europeans, especially residents of countries that suffered from the Soviet Union, are well aware that after Ukraine it is Europe's turn. The new brown plague will not stop in Ukraine.
The rest of Europe, listening to the Kremlin's parody of the Führer, has already begun to understand this, and this means the end of a quiet, measured, well-fed life. It means terror, it means death, it means war in their homes.  But before the invasion of Ukraine, the "old Europe" entertained fantasies that it was possible to negotiate with the Kremlin, to find compromises, and after all, the "second world army" and the "alpha-male" president. Ukraine has destroyed these myths, and Europe has realized that the new Nazism in the form of RASHISM can only be destroyed, one cannot live with it.

The Kremlin's big mistake was economic terrorism against Germany. Germany, from the time of Schroeder to the time of Merkel, was a friend, an associate, and in a sense a "willing hostage friend. But repeated direct threats and real economic attacks after Merkel's departure undermined this status, as the Kremlin undermined its Nord Stream. by 2027, and I am sure before that, russia will lose the European market for hydrocarbons forever, even using "bypass schemes" involving for example Indian oil refineries.

And it is already showing: Gazprom's board of directors has approved the long-term development program for 2024-2033 and made several instructions to Alexei Miller, the head of the company's management board. Among them is on the European market.
"Instruct the Chairman of PJSC Gazprom's Management Committee, A.B. Miller, to ensure that amendments are made to PJSC Gazprom's planning procedure ... to exclude from PJSC Gazprom's strategic planning system the strategic target indicator of the first level of gas business "Share in the gas market of European region countries"."


hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 757
China is not a friend of any country that recognizes Taiwan's independence from it. And it considers it an extension of it after the cancellation of the recognition of the State of China (now Taiwan), and the recognition of the People's Republic of China (now China). Throughout the post-World War II history and China's independence from Japan, the island of Taiwan did not represent any importance to the countries of the world until China's influence increased. On the other hand, as important as Taiwan is to China, it has become equally important to the rest of the world since it monopolizes the largest part of the semiconductor industry.
         In China, they can not establish the production of semiconductors? Yes, it's just ridiculous. Most likely it's something else. I never learned information about Taiwan, but still have to read about this island. I learned that this republic controlled all of China. This might be the highlight. In addition, it ranks 21st in terms of GDP in the world. Of course, such a tidbit beckons with its potential (naturally, money comes first).
A specific Taiwanese company here is the largest in the world, the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company [TSMC], which alone controls more than half of the global production of the best-selling electronic chips, complemented by a group of other Taiwanese companies, bringing the total Taiwanese proportion to about two-thirds of chip production chips worldwide.
Even if China is able to enter this field, it will not be able to acquire two-thirds of global production in a short period. Taiwan fully secures its needs and gives it an element of pressure with which it can confront the whole world, which currently has no alternatives to the Taiwanese industry.
After Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan, it was reported in the media that China attended the import of some fruits and seafood from Taiwan, and no one emphasized that it also attended the export of sand to Taiwan. Sand contains silicon, which is the main component of the semiconductor industry. This step raised the price of semiconductors in the global market due to the crisis that the whole world is going through in this sensitive vital sector.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864

And weapons, our European colleagues have been and are still supplying, and have even accelerated and increased the assistance with heavier weapons !

Europeans and Americans have been supplying all the latest military hardware to Ukraine (recently they received Storm Shadow, HIMARS and Leopard MBTs). And despite all this the Ukrainians have just managed to capture around 130 sq.km of land during the last 4 weeks, which is around 0.15% of the total area that is under Russian control (and this is despite the rebellion by PMC Wagner). At this rate, Ukraine will take around 50 years to liberate all the land that is under Russian control, with millions of soldier deaths.

This time I completely agree with you!
But I will clarify!
1. Mass deliveries, but not all of the necessary weapons, our friends began to deliver only after the 10th Ramstein. And now we still very much need Petriot systems (to protect peaceful cities from almost daily terrorist attacks on civilian objects and houses), and many other things...
2. In 4 weeks we really haven't liberated much. BUT !
in 14 months, of all the "successes of the second world army" that was reinforced by Russian criminals (PMC Wagner), it was the territory of Bakhmut, which is about 41 square kilometers Smiley Do you have a real complaint about the successes of the Armed Forces of Ukraine ?  Grin

At the same time, they "put many tens of thousands of their "soldiers" in the ground there !
The fact is that Ukraine uses tactics that allow it to inflict maximum, systemic damage to the enemy, rather than pelt it with the corpses of its soldiers, as Russia does...

3. Believe me, the liberation of Ukraine and the collapse of Russia - you will see quite soon, no more than 50 years !
hero member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 576
China is not a friend of any country that recognizes Taiwan's independence from it. And it considers it an extension of it after the cancellation of the recognition of the State of China (now Taiwan), and the recognition of the People's Republic of China (now China). Throughout the post-World War II history and China's independence from Japan, the island of Taiwan did not represent any importance to the countries of the world until China's influence increased. On the other hand, as important as Taiwan is to China, it has become equally important to the rest of the world since it monopolizes the largest part of the semiconductor industry.
         In China, they can not establish the production of semiconductors? Yes, it's just ridiculous. Most likely it's something else. I never learned information about Taiwan, but still have to read about this island. I learned that this republic controlled all of China. This might be the highlight. In addition, it ranks 21st in terms of GDP in the world. Of course, such a tidbit beckons with its potential (naturally, money comes first).
         At the moment it is difficult to say how events will develop, but the country of the rising sun will not leave it just like that, knowing the mentality of the Chinese.
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 757
The United States wants to keep the situation acrimonious in Taiwan in order to use it as an element of pressure in a region over which China extends its full influence. And China, on the other hand, is aware that there is no point in attacking Taiwan or fueling tension with it as long as it is under its control in one way or another, and that Taiwan does not have any solutions outside the authority of China, without forgetting that Taiwan is the most important economic partner for China. If China wanted to formally annex Taiwan, it would have done so in a short time, but it avoids the sanctions that will follow as a result and its image that it wants to preserve in front of the world and its friends countries.
         This, of course, is just my guess, but China took an example from Russia, but it wasn’t there. The states caught on in time and did not allow Taiwan to be seized. Of course, who would like this in today's world? Now is not the time to use barbaric methods to annex the territory. The best way is to show the high level of development of the country, so that the neighbors themselves show a desire to become part of the country. But not everyone understands this.
China is not a friend of any country that recognizes Taiwan's independence from it. And it considers it an extension of it after the cancellation of the recognition of the State of China (now Taiwan), and the recognition of the People's Republic of China (now China). Throughout the post-World War II history and China's independence from Japan, the island of Taiwan did not represent any importance to the countries of the world until China's influence increased. On the other hand, as important as Taiwan is to China, it has become equally important to the rest of the world since it monopolizes the largest part of the semiconductor industry.
hero member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 576
The United States wants to keep the situation acrimonious in Taiwan in order to use it as an element of pressure in a region over which China extends its full influence. And China, on the other hand, is aware that there is no point in attacking Taiwan or fueling tension with it as long as it is under its control in one way or another, and that Taiwan does not have any solutions outside the authority of China, without forgetting that Taiwan is the most important economic partner for China. If China wanted to formally annex Taiwan, it would have done so in a short time, but it avoids the sanctions that will follow as a result and its image that it wants to preserve in front of the world and its friends countries.
         This, of course, is just my guess, but China took an example from Russia, but it wasn’t there. The states caught on in time and did not allow Taiwan to be seized. Of course, who would like this in today's world? Now is not the time to use barbaric methods to annex the territory. The best way is to show the high level of development of the country, so that the neighbors themselves show a desire to become part of the country. But not everyone understands this.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

And weapons, our European colleagues have been and are still supplying, and have even accelerated and increased the assistance with heavier weapons !

Europeans and Americans have been supplying all the latest military hardware to Ukraine (recently they received Storm Shadow, HIMARS and Leopard MBTs). And despite all this the Ukrainians have just managed to capture around 130 sq.km of land during the last 4 weeks, which is around 0.15% of the total area that is under Russian control (and this is despite the rebellion by PMC Wagner). At this rate, Ukraine will take around 50 years to liberate all the land that is under Russian control, with millions of soldier deaths.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
What is the current condition about Russian gas still banned or not? Its give bad impact for European countries due to some countries has bad economic condition after long moment Russia gas banned. Due war invasion between Russia and Ukraine did not stop yet I am not sure until how long this problem will be stopped. Looks serious crisis what did by European Union banned Russia because they are the only one country has a lot of gas and all European country need with Russian.

I think for European stop did by asking from United State and stop helped sending weapon to Ukraine for stopping war invasion between Russia and Ukraine will give impact how easy getting Russian's gas.


I can assume you haven't read what the European Energy Charter is, what were the goals, and what are the EU's goals in the energy market after the terrorist economic attack on the EU in 2022, after the terrorist attack on Ukraine ?

I'll remind you:
As part of security issues, back in 2020 (I could be wrong but roughly so), the EU came to an agreement that no supplier of gas could have more than 30% of the EU and individual country market. After 2022, adjustments were made, to which were added clauses on "adequacy and predictability of hydrocarbon suppliers", thereby - cut out the future supply of resources (oil and gas) to the EU from Russia. The goal, which is already being implemented before the plans - FULL rejection of Russian oil and gas in the EU by 2027 ! FULL ABORTION !

And weapons, our European colleagues have been and are still supplying, and have even accelerated and increased the assistance with heavier weapons !
sr. member
Activity: 2352
Merit: 245
What the current condition about Russian gas still banned or not? its give bad impact for European countries due some countries has bad economic condition after long moment Russia gas banned. Due war invasion between Russian and Ukraine not stop yet I don't sure until how long this problem will be stop. Looks serious crisis what did by European Union banned Russia because they are the only one country has a lot of gas and all European country need with Russian.

I think for European stop did by asking from United State and stop helped sending weapon to Ukraine for stopping war invasion between Russian and Ukraine will give impact how easy getting  Russian's gas.
It must be clearly understood that it was Russia that attacked Ukraine, and Ukraine is only defending itself. In order to make Russia less able to continue attacking the territory of Ukraine and bombing it every day and shelling peaceful cities with cruise and ballistic missiles, sanctions were imposed both on oil and gas, since they brought Russia the most profit, and on goods that can be raw materials for the military-industrial complex. Therefore, in order for the war to end quickly, it is necessary to inflict a military defeat on the aggressor country, that is, Russia, and for this Ukraine needs even more help with weapons.

The cessation of the supply of weapons to Ukraine will lead to the fact that Ukraine will be conquered and cease to exist as a state, and the people of Ukraine will be killed and tortured to a large extent by the occupiers, and some will be forcibly resettled across the territory of Russia.

But you don't seem to care about tens and hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians killed, the main thing for you is to have cheap and bloody Russian gas.
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 757
Frankly, I don't understand how you understood my position on the US-China rapprochement. Do you think that America is correcting a mistake it made in its stance in support of Taiwan? Or is the U.S.-China rapprochement itself a mistake?
In general, let me tell you that a confrontation of any kind is not in the interest of any party, especially the United States, which is well aware that any confrontation with China will be lost, especially if it will be in a Chinese sphere of influence.
I invite you to follow the latest news about the US attempt to get closer to both India and Iran after the visit to China, not to isolate Russia, but to stop the pressure that this alliance may cause.
         Naturally, no modern and developed country is interested in conflict. Everyone learned the lessons of history perfectly. It is a pity that such an understanding does not reach everyone, but this is not about that. I still wonder how the states will react if China decides to "join" Taiwan. After all, this will be a precedent that is not acceptable in the current realities.
        I believe that the Americans will continue to adhere to their point of view on this issue, but will not enter the acute phase. As always, they will find a legal justification or resort to sanctions that are clearly not in the hands of the Chinese.
The United States wants to keep the situation acrimonious in Taiwan in order to use it as an element of pressure in a region over which China extends its full influence. And China, on the other hand, is aware that there is no point in attacking Taiwan or fueling tension with it as long as it is under its control in one way or another, and that Taiwan does not have any solutions outside the authority of China, without forgetting that Taiwan is the most important economic partner for China. If China wanted to formally annex Taiwan, it would have done so in a short time, but it avoids the sanctions that will follow as a result and its image that it wants to preserve in front of the world and its friends countries.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
A bit of news from Russia's "friends of gas. Austria. The share of Russian gas in Austria's imports in 2022 decreased by 30%, but still accounts for half of all the blue fuel the country uses. This is the information at the beginning of 2023.
And here's June 2023 - Austria, Gazprom's last major Western European customer, will accelerate its withdrawal from Russian gas. "Supplies from Russia are unreliable and will remain unreliable," the country's energy minister, Leonor Gewessler, said Monday after a meeting with top energy company executives.

Austria, which still relies on Russia for more than half its gas consumption, is not moving "fast enough" to "eradicate Russian gas," according to the minister (quoted by Bloomberg).


And "fraternal China" has not let us down Smiley
China has excluded Russia from the CR929 airliner project, which has been under development since 2017, planning to create a competitor to Boeing and Airbus.
The Air Current writes about it.
At the Air Show in Le Bourget the new 280 passenger aircraft, the creation of which was estimated at $50 billion, was presented as China's own development, in which Russia was not involved.

India was smarter than that, rejecting the contract to develop many weapons with russia. India is smart, India does not want to wear the status of the owner of weapons of "analogue - shit" class Smiley


It was both funny and showed the dire situation that the European regimes are in because of the conflict NATO started over a year ago.

And tell me please - what conflict did NATO start over a year ago? Very interesting! ... Especially for practical psychiatry Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 262
What the current condition about Russian gas still banned or not? its give bad impact for European countries due some countries has bad economic condition after long moment Russia gas banned. Due war invasion between Russian and Ukraine not stop yet I don't sure until how long this problem will be stop. Looks serious crisis what did by European Union banned Russia because they are the only one country has a lot of gas and all European country need with Russian.

I think for European stop did by asking from United State and stop helped sending weapon to Ukraine for stopping war invasion between Russian and Ukraine will give impact how easy getting  Russian's gas.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
We should take a moment and appreciate the recent shenanigans involving Wagner group. Keep in mind that it doesn't matter what this group is and what the real story was. What matters and what falls under the topic of discussion here is the reaction of the Western propaganda machines and the brainwashed sheeple that were repeating it mainly in social media. It was both funny and showed the dire situation that the European regimes are in because of the conflict NATO started over a year ago.

There was a certain bafflement with the mouthpieces specially in UK that I was monitoring with rushed propaganda that they were producing every second. It went from changing the terminology they used for Wagner group from "terrorist" to "freedom fighters" to crazy fake news they reported from the usual "unnamed reliable sources" about how Russian government has fallen and Putin has fled the country because Moscow is occupied by the Wagner group!!!

Such a high level of confusion with rushed propaganda where their contents are all over the place and even contradicting each other at times, is very rare in Western Propaganda agencies which are the leaders of brainwashing techniques.
Historically speaking such a situation only happens when they are too desperate and all their previous plans have failed (clear from the increasing number of anti-NATO protests across Europe) so they have to go back to old schemes they've already tried in the past or in other countries.
hero member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 576
Frankly, I don't understand how you understood my position on the US-China rapprochement. Do you think that America is correcting a mistake it made in its stance in support of Taiwan? Or is the U.S.-China rapprochement itself a mistake?
In general, let me tell you that a confrontation of any kind is not in the interest of any party, especially the United States, which is well aware that any confrontation with China will be lost, especially if it will be in a Chinese sphere of influence.
I invite you to follow the latest news about the US attempt to get closer to both India and Iran after the visit to China, not to isolate Russia, but to stop the pressure that this alliance may cause.
         Naturally, no modern and developed country is interested in conflict. Everyone learned the lessons of history perfectly. It is a pity that such an understanding does not reach everyone, but this is not about that. I still wonder how the states will react if China decides to "join" Taiwan. After all, this will be a precedent that is not acceptable in the current realities.
        I believe that the Americans will continue to adhere to their point of view on this issue, but will not enter the acute phase. As always, they will find a legal justification or resort to sanctions that are clearly not in the hands of the Chinese.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Getting back to the main topic - I want to thank the people of India who have given up their "neutral status" and stand, represented by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, for respecting international law, agreements and sovereignty ! India has realized that any support for an international terrorist is not her choice, her choice is development, progress and full partnership with an adequate world !

And in the meantime a new story about how "russia has switched to trade in local currencies" and does not see the Indian rupee as...a currency ! That's the kind of partner Russia is ! Smiley

"Russia wants to be paid in Chinese yuan or any other currency, but not in rupees. Russia has failed to agree on a currency for which India could buy cheap oil from the aggressor.
According to Reuters, Moscow has refused to accept payment in rupees. For now, India and Russia have suspended efforts to resolve the situation.
Indian importers of cheap oil and coal from Russia had expected a permanent payment mechanism in rupees to reduce currency conversion costs."

Would you like to pay in rubles? Smiley

The payment will be made neither in INR nor in RUR. It has been decided sometime back that Indian importers will make the payments in AED (United Arab Emirates Dirham). Some of the state-run oil companies wanted the payments to be made in Indian Rupees, but after a few weeks Russians rejected this option because INR is not fully comfortable. Now the Indian government is OK with the option of AED as the trade currency. USD can't be used for this purpose because the payments can't be processed as a result of sanctions and embargoes against Russia.
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 10611
at the same time that it is conducting secret talks with Iran to renew the nuclear agreement with making more concessions in the enrichment rate proposed in the previous agreement in 2015,
That's a good point about US and its allies running around the world like headless chickens but I gotta say the talks with Iran are only about nuclear program in name but have very little to do with it. For example one of the main topics over the past couple of months is that they have been begging Iran not to sell any missiles to Russia and in return they have been giving Iran a lot of things.
Two main ones that we know of so far are the tens of billions of dollars that they had stolen from Iran over the past decade which is now being returned with interest.
Second one is European anti-terrorism forces cracking down hard on a terrorist cult called MEK (responsible for murdering 317000 Iranians directly and indirectly) that they were forced to give sanctuary to by United States ever since 2014. Two main news involving this are the terrorist's rally in France being prohibited and their leaders being arrested; and the Albanian anti-terrorist forces raiding the main cult's base in Tirana (capital of Albania) and arresting about a hundred of these terrorist while killing or wounding dozens more.
hero member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 757
It is not in the interest of the United States to open two fronts of conflict, especially since its allies are affected economically and logistically by the sanctions they themselves imposed on Russia to isolate it internationally and from the sanctions that Russia imposed on them. The Chinese-American rapprochement proves the weakness of the American position, and behind it the countries of the alliance supporting Ukraine.
Also, this rapprochement does not mean at all that China has stopped supporting its ally Russia, or that it has succeeded in overcoming the differences with the United States over trade exchanges that were raised during the Trump era. It's basically a strategic move.
          If the US is the biggest and most important player in the political arena, then they don't make mistakes? This, most likely, can be attributed to a rhetorical question. Yes, everyone is wrong. The most important thing is to learn from your mistakes. Not everyone is capable of this. Often, because Man is an emotional being, it is in this state that responsible decisions are often made. This is a minus for everyone due to the fact that people occupy the highest positions in the country. The fate of hundreds of millions depends on them, and here we are seeing this.
         It is not beneficial for China to start a conflict with the states. They are far from being idiots and weigh their final decision and conclusion many times over.
Frankly, I don't understand how you understood my position on the US-China rapprochement. Do you think that America is correcting a mistake it made in its stance in support of Taiwan? Or is the U.S.-China rapprochement itself a mistake?
In general, let me tell you that a confrontation of any kind is not in the interest of any party, especially the United States, which is well aware that any confrontation with China will be lost, especially if it will be in a Chinese sphere of influence.
I invite you to follow the latest news about the US attempt to get closer to both India and Iran after the visit to China, not to isolate Russia, but to stop the pressure that this alliance may cause.
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
- Armored Personnel Carrier BTR-4. Used along all front lines. During the defense of Mariupol, the city defenders destroyed both terrorist manpower as well as tanks and BMPs using the BTR-4.

Ukraine was trying to sell these to Iraq, but only managed to produce and send to the buyer 100 vehicles out of 420. The Iraqi military were not very happy with the APCs they received, claiming that the vehicles they received were "very old, rusty and generally unusable". 42 units were returned to Ukraine as they had cracked hulls!!!  Grin  Out of another batch of 88 APCs the Iraqis managed to start only 56 vehicles and only 34 were able to move. I really hope the Ukrainian military uses as few of these as possible as it's not safe to drive a rusty cracked APC along the frontlines.  Grin

All in all, all of these mentioned arms are very rare. We get to hear names like Bayraktar, HIMARS, Leopard etc all the time but none of these Ukrainian arms.


What's wrong here? You probably did not understand the point, but as always read the headlines, wrote a banner and ran "to bring the wild secret to the masses" Smiley))

In fact, thank you, you confirmed my words Smiley
What you have described is exactly what I was talking about - deliberate sabotage (from R&D to production) of the Ukrainian military-industrial complex. Since the first ascension of the Party of Regions, which has always been openly pro-Russian and just as openly anti-Ukrainian. Yes, there was such a period in Ukriane, it is silly to deny it!  Any pro-Russian power - be it politicians, businessmen, teachers, ...  - it will always be deception, lies, theft ...
It was this pro-Russian government that the people of Ukraine threw out of Ukraine in 2013\2014, which was the main reason for Russia's terrorist attack on Ukraine, which exemplified the overthrow of an anti-people, totalitarian government. From that point on, russia has FOREVER lost influence in Ukraine. And attempts to create quasi-republics, or, frankly, CLOACs, like the DNR/LNR/PMR...  - These are attempts to maintain influence in the territories that have gone out of the Kremlin's control and slavery forever!
And yes, back to your post - it is true - some related enterprises that still remained in the hands of pro-Russian oligarchs, after 2017, also sabotaged all the processes, from the supply of low-quality rolled steel to the factories producing armored vehicles, to directly disrupt the supply of other components, and even sabotaged the supply of fuel to the troops. Yes, this is all true, these are the FACTS. Unpleasant, but FACTS. And it is these pro-Russian metastases that we are actively and qualitatively destroying in Ukraine!

Thank you again, you raised a very good point !
legendary
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1864
We are two weeks in to the so called "summer offensive" from Ukraine. They have captured some 100 sq.km or so during the last three weeks in three sectors - Orekhov, Soledar and Lobkove. Meanwhile Russia is reported to be just 2km away from the outskirts of Kupyansk in Kharkiv Oblast. After thousands of deaths and loss of hundreds of tanks and armored vehicles, they just recaptured around 0.15% of the territory that is under Russian control. And before the offensive, they were making big claims of reconquering Crimea and Donbass.

That is, you state this, without giving any specific "promises" (which, by the way, did not happen), but selectively forgot about:
- Russia was launching the NWO as a 2-3 week "victorious" operation, the outcome of which would be a complete takeover of Ukraine and a change of government in Kiev. The 2-3 weeks have been going on for 14 months now Smiley
- Have you forgotten how the "second world army" fled from near Kharkov, leaving behind hundreds of pieces of equipment, squealing and shrieking?
- Have you forgotten how the representatives of the terrorist army went to the bottom of the Dnieper River, fleeing from Kherson, where in a few days about 20,000 of their soldiers and hundreds of units of equipment were destroyed !
- You forgot how for 12 months Russia, with the help of the regular army, the army of criminals (PMC WAGNER), mobilized, pelted with corpses and destroyed Bakhmut. For 12 MONTHS, killing up to 100,000 of its citizens. And this is only 40 square kilometers !
PS About "hundreds of tanks" - this nonsense you heard from that grandfather, who on the ECONOMIC FORUM, in each answer to any question, inserted a new number of allegedly "destroyed" Abrams, Leopards and Petriots Smiley Not forgetting to constantly remind us that Zelensky was a Jew Smiley This is a very serious source of information! Smiley

Getting back to the main topic - I want to thank the people of India who have given up their "neutral status" and stand, represented by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, for respecting international law, agreements and sovereignty ! India has realized that any support for an international terrorist is not her choice, her choice is development, progress and full partnership with an adequate world !

And in the meantime a new story about how "russia has switched to trade in local currencies" and does not see the Indian rupee as...a currency ! That's the kind of partner Russia is ! Smiley

"Russia wants to be paid in Chinese yuan or any other currency, but not in rupees. Russia has failed to agree on a currency for which India could buy cheap oil from the aggressor.
According to Reuters, Moscow has refused to accept payment in rupees. For now, India and Russia have suspended efforts to resolve the situation.
Indian importers of cheap oil and coal from Russia had expected a permanent payment mechanism in rupees to reduce currency conversion costs."

Would you like to pay in rubles? Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 576
It is not in the interest of the United States to open two fronts of conflict, especially since its allies are affected economically and logistically by the sanctions they themselves imposed on Russia to isolate it internationally and from the sanctions that Russia imposed on them. The Chinese-American rapprochement proves the weakness of the American position, and behind it the countries of the alliance supporting Ukraine.
Also, this rapprochement does not mean at all that China has stopped supporting its ally Russia, or that it has succeeded in overcoming the differences with the United States over trade exchanges that were raised during the Trump era. It's basically a strategic move.
          If the US is the biggest and most important player in the political arena, then they don't make mistakes? This, most likely, can be attributed to a rhetorical question. Yes, everyone is wrong. The most important thing is to learn from your mistakes. Not everyone is capable of this. Often, because Man is an emotional being, it is in this state that responsible decisions are often made. This is a minus for everyone due to the fact that people occupy the highest positions in the country. The fate of hundreds of millions depends on them, and here we are seeing this.
         It is not beneficial for China to start a conflict with the states. They are far from being idiots and weigh their final decision and conclusion many times over.
Pages:
Jump to: