"Israel is a separate matter – we are going to bring forward a standalone Israel funding measure (of) over $14 billion,” Johnson said in the interview. He said House Republicans will look for other areas to cut in the budget in order to finance the funding for Israel.
...
Yes, nothing new, Biden supports the effort in Ukraine and has good reasons to it. There is nothing indicating that democrats are reconsidering and we already knew Republicans are divided.
There are discussions going on. On the "separate matter", nothing is "separate" in politics.
The amphibious operations in the Kherson region are ongoing, there has been even a report of Ruzzian bombing near Oleshky, which is well inside the west bank of the river.
Three S-400 seem to have been destroyed by an ATACAMS, so yes, S-400 is very effective destroying ATACAMS once the missile reaches them. BTW this is a Ruzzian report it seems https://gagadget.com/en/342105-us-atacms-missiles-could-destroy-three-launchers-of-the-125-billion-s-400-air-defence-system/.
Judging from previous Ukrainian attacks this is not casual, there is an intent to clear the threats before the F-16 arrive or there is an intent to launch Stormshadows or more attacks in the area,...
I'm talking trends and macro level. From back in August Majority of Americans oppose more US aid for Ukraine in war with Russia that was too impossible for populists to ignore and now US has a Trumpist House speaker thus Ukraine Aid in Doubt as Johnson Moves to Drop It From Israel Assistance Bill. ....
So... you gather all the news that you find favourable to a certain position and you call that the direction of travel right? Including things like "a majority of Americans do not support further aid"? I mean, your own source says:
About weapons that are game changers, well they actually are. Two questions that you need to ask yourself:
- Why does Ukraine have a corridor that is working perfectly on exporting grain and other goods by sea? You did not know? Well it is there. Why?
- Why is Ukraine specifically targeting the S-400 and why are they actually able to do it?
From columns of tanks advancing in the early days - or just staying there like sitting ducks - all over the country, to loosing a year's worth of helicopters in a day, loosing a submarine, getting the Baltic fleet HQ bombed... Excuse me, but I think these weapons have changed the game, like a lot. This is a war of attrition and these weapons are great at blasting high-value targets.
And latest reports speak of even more troops being prepared for yet another assault in Avdiivka, after the loss of more than 200 vehicles in a week. Next week is going to be bloody for Ruzzia.
On the S-400, I will give you a hint: What is the single objective that could make a significant difference, requires a weapon that has not yet been used but it is on its way and might be bothered by S-400s? Another clue: It starts with Kerch and end with Bridge.
Ruzzia as of now has been reduced to WW I strategies - meat waves - with a 10% of other, such as gliding bombs, some Sahed (some say it is keeping them for winter, but it may be the case that there are not that many), missiles (nearly none las month), ... If Ukraine gets more modern aviation and over all the right munitions, the game will change again.
No, I don't gather ALL of the news, I gather news from "western" media sources exclusively, with a clear bias towards Ukraine. When CNN says that "Majority of Americans oppose more US aid" and when you adjust that for their bias, you get the idea of true magnitude, only way to change that is to claim that CNN is now a source for Russian propaganda? When i see that even the western media starting to pivot then yes i think that that's a point where even a blind should see a change in "direction of travel". If you wish i can also include FOX, Russian, Belarusian, Chinese, Indian, South American, African, Slovakian and Hungarian sources so you'd get a "full" picture, but i'm afraid that would only paint an even more dismal picture for Ukraine. Sorry if even CNN is too pessimistic for you there's not much left, the last stop to get a rosy picture would be switching to some Ukrainian news sources.
51% opposed more aid back in August, with the new US House speaker (who's not really pro Ukrainian aid) and everything else going on in the two month since then, that number could only have moved in one direction. Let me ask you this, if it's not over 50% then how many Americans in % term need to oppose sending aid to Ukraine for you to start feeling the shifting winds? But i'm afraid we all already know that answer.
We must have a different definition for a "game changing" weapon. But that's good, now all we have to do is just redefine the definition of "winning" for Ukraine, they'll just need someone like yourself to help convince the population.
Yes, yes things will get even worse for Russia next week as Ukraine possibly looses even more land and once again just saying that Russia lost trillion of people/vehicles doesn't say anything at all, you really expect people to know if that's low or high for themselves? You need to also make up a low number of Ukrainian loses so you could lead people to you conclusion. How would Russia loosing X vehicles in a week and taking Z meters help your point, if Ukraine lost Z meters and X+Y vehicles in the same time period? So to be able to make a comparison, you need say that Ukraine losses are much less than 1/3 of X (account for population difference), as well as mention tiny Russian manufacturing capacity which should also be much less than Y vehicles lost.
Wasn't Kerch Bridge already blown up by that vehicle IED? And then again by a remotely controlled boat? And already rebuilt and reopened twice since then? But i guess next time will be totally different, and surely will be yet another game changer right?
Any official that even hints at justifying this boondoggle with "we didn't expect Russia to use so many people" should really be laughed at and automatically fired from his position.