Topic: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress] - page 187. (Read 56926 times)

I doubt that such attack even happened in real life. "Ukrainian drones" is from the words of occupation administration, not from some video fact (unlike famous attack with a drone on oil refinery in Russia)

Looks like a russian provocation

For clarity, there are reports of the RF storing weapons and other means of war in Zapo. Who is the psycho that decided to use a nuclear plant as shield??.

How do Ukrainians dare to use Ukrainian as a language!

Since July 16 websites must have the main version in Ukrainian

https://jurliga.ligazakon.net/ru/news/211921_s-16-iyulya-sayty-dolzhny-imet-osnovnuyu-versiyu-na-ukrainskom-yazyke

.....

You don't seem to understand that Russia and the Ukraine are sister countries, and that the so-called war is simply big sister Russia straightening out little sister Ukraine. It's just like the police actions that the US has been doing around the world since WW2, except that this one is a civil dispute.

Meanwhile, today three Ukrainian kamikaze drones attacked the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant. An attack on a nuclear facility (such as a nuclear power plant) is nuclear terrorism. Another achievement in the track record of Ukraine.

Russian forces have taken control of Europe’s largest nuclear power plant after shelling the Zaporizhzhia facility in the Ukrainian city of Enerhodar.

The overnight assault caused a blaze at the facility, prompting fears over the safety of the plant and evoking painful memories in a country still scarred by the world’s worst nuclear accident, at Chernobyl in 1986. The site of that disaster is also under Russian control as of Feb. 24, 2022.

 
... tell your nurse - you have to be careful with haloperidol - an overdose gives very strange effects, well, like this "news" of yours!

Although stop! I apologize ! Wrong ! Reading your "news", I'm almost sure that you are the main author for this news site https://redburda.ru/

Meanwhile, today three Ukrainian kamikaze drones attacked the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant. An attack on a nuclear facility (such as a nuclear power plant) is nuclear terrorism. Another achievement in the track record of Ukraine.

The reason Putin calls Ukraine 'Nazi' is seen in the turmoil of the change of ambassador to Germany

Meanwhile, the planned rotation of the allied forces in the Donbas seems to have ended, and with it the operational pause. I think in the near future we should expect a significant increase in the intensity of fighting along the entire line of contact.

...

They also destroyed HIMARS loader vehicle. But there is one problem - such thing doesn't even exist
https://gagadget.com/en/war/147748-the-russian-ministry-of-defense-claimed-to-have-destroyed-the-himars-loader-which-actually-does-not-exist/

Marina Ovsyannikova, the Russian journalist who daringly interrupted a live TV broadcast to protest her country’s invasion of Ukraine, was briefly detained by Russian authorities for a second time over the weekend.

News of her arrest broke Sunday on her Telegram account after friends posted that she had been picked up by police in Moscow while cycling and was bundled into a white van.

I guess this is totally cool to you too?

Reply to 1miau


How do I know which German source you consider "credible"? We can play this football all day long. You can name a couple of sources that meet your criteria.


In your opinion, everyone who condemns the Nazis, opposes the killing of civilians and quotes Bild, are Putin's apologists? You have an interesting position in life, but in any case thank you for opening my eyes to Build.

Tell me then please also, how do people in Germany feel about the Der Spiegel, which removed from its website a video about Ukrainian soldiers held a woman hostage for two months? Such actions by Der Spiegel do not inspire much confidence.

https://www.jungewelt.de/artikel/425938.mariupol-halbe-wahrheit-im-spiegel.html

In fact, the Russian authorities do not care about almost everyone who calls this conflict a 'war'. And for much harsher statements about Putin and the Russian army, they don’t put them in jail at all. Many well-known Russian journalists, popular bloggers, military experts call this a 'war' and no one touches them. Live TV presenters call this conflict a 'war', and then after a couple of seconds they correct themselves, adding that the war is not against Ukraine, but against the collective West or NATO. In Russia, if the ruling elite wants to, anyone can be arrested - "If there was a man, there would be an article" <.
Specifically, this municipal deputy Gorinov received a prison term:
Officially - for the fact that he protested against the holding of a children's competition, saying that "entertainment is unacceptable" wildness "against the background of hostilities in a neighboring state".

Unofficially, this is an indicative flogging to demotivate other people with similar ideas, as well as for the fact that he supported the Navalnists (like Ilya Yashin), at the initiative of which sanctions were imposed on many members of the Russian elite in the West and their bank accounts were frozen.

Naturally, I consider this an unfair decision, as in principle with Assange. However, even such a punishment is much milder than in Ukraine. A few days ago, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine reported that it brought 163 people to criminal liability for collaboration activities. Simply put, if a person from Ukraine publicly supports Russia, then he will be imprisoned. I suspect that hotheads in the Ukrainian SBU, for the words "special operation", the Russian flag, for the symbols Z or V, not only hurt, but simply shoot, as they executed a member of the negotiating delegation for suspicions of pro-Russian views, despite the fact that there is no official death penalty in Ukraine.

I noticed that you write WAR in capslock. Thank you, this gave me courage, now I am one step closer to overthrowing the Putin's regime.

@1miau tell me your thoughts. How do Ukraine and Russia manage to fight each other, but at the same time, Russian gas continues to flow through Ukrainian territory and no one bombs this pipe?

Even during the military operations, European officials can freely travel to Kyiv, and why, during the WAR, Russia does not bomb the roads along which weapons are brought from Europe and does not bomb TV towers, as the main mouthpiece of Ukrainian propaganda? Somehow it does not fit, in my opinion, what do you think?

It would be even more fun to watch this guy running around the square somewhere in Tel Aviv in a nazi t-shirt. I wonder how many minutes would've passed before these good looking gals slaughtered him.

And your words about the fact that the Russians were not destroyed - you can go to Mariupol and ask locals there, what do they think about the Russian army and the Azov battalion. About the Nazi Azov last month, an article was published in a Greek newspaper, how Azov militants held Russian-speaking citizens of Mariupol as hostages. Here is a screenshot from there with translation into English.

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/09/10/mehtz.png

There is also a censored fragment from Spanish RTVE channel about Azov.
https://talkimg.com/images/2023/09/10/meoc2.jpeg

Meanwhile the glorious armed forces of Russia have successfully used a SAM against their own Su-34.

These facts would immediately convince us that it was Ukraine that attacked peaceful Russia!

......

I'll start from afar
Probably for the communist STAR it is necessary to destroy the US flag, where are the stars? Or destroy the ancient Slavic and ancient Indian epics where there is a Kolovrat or a swastika? Or everyone who has a star should be banned and destroyed symbolism? It is only communist, is it true that there are no others?
I brought these simple examples to what - you need to STUDY history, and not rush to the first visual coincidence.

Also, you have to be CAREFUL.
1. If you CAREFULLY look at the Wolfsangel of Nazi Germany, you will notice a noticeable difference. Well, at least it has a "mirror" display of the Azov symbol.
2. In the law, which you cite, there is:
- such an exception: "the swastika as a symbol of the Nazi Party, prohibited in all variants, including mirrored, inverted etc. (exceptions are only applied to swastikas used as religious symbols in Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain temples)"
- such a restriction: "Wolfsangel used by the 2nd, 3rd and 34th Waffen-SS, Hitler Youth and Junge Front", but there is no mention of the Old Slavonic symbol, the symbol of the Azov regiment.
Do you understand what is your mistake? The mistake is that the "Azov" symbol is NOT FORBIDDEN in Germany!

By the way, the “joke” is in the Russian Wikipedia, for some reason they cowardly cut off the information, and present it like this: “Wolfsangel - In Germany, the symbol is not officially banned, except for the case of using the banned neo-Nazi organization Junge Front (German: Junge Front, JF) as symbols )". Here they deliberately "forgotten" the Waffen-SS, where a huge number of Russians served, and the "Hitler Youth", on the basis of which the Russian "Yunnarmiya" was copied

And now I’m explaining where it came from and what the “Azov” symbol means. Combat formations of which, by the way, destroy the Nazis in the form of rashists with the highest quality
So - the central figure of the emblem of "Azov" is one of the most used symbols in the Ukrainian military tradition. The so-called "Hook" sign was extremely popular among the Volyn gentry and Cossack families (many centuries before the Nazis). In the modern interpretation of the patriots of Ukraine, it is a monogram, the intersection of two letters "I" and "N", which symbolize our central slogan - "The Idea of ​​the Nation". By the way, the letter N has the old Ukrainian spelling in the monogram (this is how it was written in ancient Russian and Cossack documents before the spelling reform of Peter's time).

History reference:
The wolf's hook, one of the most interesting subrunic symbols, was originally a pagan sign that "saved from werewolves." Later it became a heraldic symbol, meaning a wolf pit (hunting trap). It is still present on the coats of arms of many European cities, for example - Erwitt, Dassendorf, Burgwedel, Wolfstein. In the 15th century, the "wolf hook" became the emblem of several peasant uprisings, thanks to which it acquired the basic meaning of freedom and independence, and in military heraldry - power protection, protection of the owner, a mirror image of any attack. - the press service of "Azov" reports.


PS And the law to which you referred - I think it is excellent and fair! Symbols of totalitarian, bastard, misanthropic parties, formations, regimes must be destroyed! I absolutely agree with this law! By the way - why is the Vlasov (Russian fascist henchmen) tricolor not taken into account there? This is also a symbol of Nazism, not without reason Russia attached it to the Kremlin!

In the late 20th century, the Black Sun symbol became widely used by neo-fascist, neo-Nazi,[6] the far-right and white nationalists. The symbol often appears on extremist flags, t-shirts, posters, websites and in extremist publications associated with such groups. Modern far-right groups often refer to the symbol as the sun wheel or Sonnenrad.[5][7][8]

The name "Black Sun" came into wider use after the publication of a 1991 occult thriller novel, Die Schwarze Sonne von Tashi Lhunpo (The Black Sun of Tashi Lhunpo), by the pseudonymous author Russell McCloud. The book links the Wewelsburg mosaic with the neo-Nazi concept of the "Black Sun", invented by former SS officer Wilhelm Landig as a substitute for the Nazi swastika and a symbol for a mystic energy source that was supposed to renew the Aryan race.