Pages:
Author

Topic: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress] - page 22. (Read 75323 times)

legendary
Activity: 2833
Merit: 1851
In order to dump coins one must have coins
September 22, 2024, 11:28:47 PM
^^ Zoom out a bit, you are missing the part in which Ukraine is opening a new sector. Yes as expected Ruzzia sent troops to Kursk, what is yet to decide is if these will get encircled or simply fighting around.

[...]

So, in your view, is there a mobilisation either ongoing or about to be? Because some sources says that there is one, just not announced, going on since at least March, while other sources say that they are about to try recruit 300k more souls to send to the meatgrinder.

Ruzzia has not really stopped the recruiting ever, but it is about to get forcible and bigger I think. Probably there will not be a public announcement, but it will leak.

what do you make of the latest strikes in ammo depots? Some sources claim the size of the explosions registered in seismic sensors far away and are comparable to small-ish nukes.

https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2024C24/

Quote
How Russia Is Recruiting for the Long War
Deutsch
Covertly Mobilising Volunteers While Preparing for a New Round of Compulsory Mobilisation

SWP Comment 2024/C 24, 27.06.2024, 8 Seiten
doi:10.18449/2024C24

[...]
Covert mobilisation
In the third recruitment phase – which is ongoing – the Kremlin is focusing on so‑called “covert mobilisation”. This term refers to the continuous recruitment of “volunteers”, who fall into two categories: kontraktniki and fighters from a broad range of volunteer formations. The Kremlin’s calculation is that the potential for dis­content in society is lower under “covert mobilisation” than under a second round of compulsory mobilisation. That is because those who go off to fight are formally cat­egorised as volunteers even if they have been recruited through the exploitation of power imbalances or through the use of deception or coercion.


There have been some accusations around foreign workers signing a contract to work in construction and similar activities that, after arriving in Ruzzia, found out they were now volunteer soldiers. That's how Ruzzia is playing the war -  it requires plenty of meat, quality is not a problem.



Zoom out to where? Where is that new sector you're talking about? If you're talking about Vesele, that front is actually in the second picture in the lower left box with Novyi Put labeled.

"Because some sources says..."


I can't predict future like you, but there is definitely no forced mobilization of people currently happening in Russia. As the WSJ article you cited said "It’s dangerous for the Kremlin to carry out another partial or full mobilization". 'Not announced mobilization" is just impossible in current situation, we all saw the effects of the last mobilization in Russia, millions of videos, lawsuits, lines to Kazakhstan, sold out tickets out of Russia etc... This was the goal of the Kursk operation, but clearly currently it's not happening, so instead of just admitting that Kursk offensive was a complete failure, we get these amusing comments pretending as if Kursk offensive is working and there's now mobilization in Russia.

recruiting is not forced mobilization, don't act dumb. Just because you might think that aliens are coming doesn't mean you can claim that "there seems to be a clear indication of" aliens in Russia. Even if another partial mobilization will begin in Russia, you and all major media will be covering it within minutes, until then stop spreading propaganda.

I've been hearing that Russia is about to run out of missiles any day now since 2022. The fact that RU could store so many weapons at a single site, even spilling to above ground storage, hints at the scale of Russia's current missile production levels. Sword and shield, now RU will just have to adapt, and decentralize storage more.

"Mobilising Volunteers" they are called contractors and is not forced mobilization by definition! Stop making up stuff, Kursk is a failure and didn't bring mobilization in Russia as was expected.
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1632
Do not die for Putin
September 22, 2024, 03:51:37 PM
^^ Zoom out a bit, you are missing the part in which Ukraine is opening a new sector. Yes as expected Ruzzia sent troops to Kursk, what is yet to decide is if these will get encircled or simply fighting around.

[...]

So, in your view, is there a mobilisation either ongoing or about to be? Because some sources says that there is one, just not announced, going on since at least March, while other sources say that they are about to try recruit 300k more souls to send to the meatgrinder.

Ruzzia has not really stopped the recruiting ever, but it is about to get forcible and bigger I think. Probably there will not be a public announcement, but it will leak.

what do you make of the latest strikes in ammo depots? Some sources claim the size of the explosions registered in seismic sensors far away and are comparable to small-ish nukes.

https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2024C24/

Quote
How Russia Is Recruiting for the Long War
Deutsch
Covertly Mobilising Volunteers While Preparing for a New Round of Compulsory Mobilisation

SWP Comment 2024/C 24, 27.06.2024, 8 Seiten
doi:10.18449/2024C24

[...]
Covert mobilisation
In the third recruitment phase – which is ongoing – the Kremlin is focusing on so‑called “covert mobilisation”. This term refers to the continuous recruitment of “volunteers”, who fall into two categories: kontraktniki and fighters from a broad range of volunteer formations. The Kremlin’s calculation is that the potential for dis­content in society is lower under “covert mobilisation” than under a second round of compulsory mobilisation. That is because those who go off to fight are formally cat­egorised as volunteers even if they have been recruited through the exploitation of power imbalances or through the use of deception or coercion.


There have been some accusations around foreign workers signing a contract to work in construction and similar activities that, after arriving in Ruzzia, found out they were now volunteer soldiers. That's how Ruzzia is playing the war -  it requires plenty of meat, quality is not a problem.



legendary
Activity: 2833
Merit: 1851
In order to dump coins one must have coins
September 22, 2024, 12:47:22 PM
There seems to be a clear indication of a new major mobilisation in Ruzzia. I will link just one of the sources, but there are others. You need to feed 1200 to 1400 Ruzzians every day to the meatgrinder to keep the war going, so...

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/09/19/7475805/

Complete Disaster💥 Russians Have Broken Through Several Defensive Belts🎖 Military Summary 2024.09.21

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvzUl5X8yYA

Browse back in Military Summary - well know pro-Ruzzian - according to this guy Ruzzia is breaking through and winning the war every day, Kursk is a "Ruzzian victory".... It is good to listen to the guy if you want (or if you need) to get the "Ruzzian High Sugar" version of the news for any reason.

In what language "continues to put pressure" translate to "a clear indication of a new major mobilisation in Ruzzia"? Instead of making stuff up, lets take a look at what WSJ actually says

Putin Is Under Pressure to Call Up More Troops for War of Attrition
...
Putin dismissed the idea, saying he wanted to use only those who were voluntarily signing military contracts, the person said.
...
Now, Ukraine’s continuing incursion into Russia is further straining Russia’s manpower, underscoring chronic problems and leading the country’s military leaders to press for mobilization again, according to three people familiar with the discussions.
...
Dmitry Peskov said the recruitment of contract soldiers and volunteers is happening at a rapid pace. “This satisfies the needs of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation,” Peskov said in an email.
...
To be sure, Russia has a manpower advantage over Ukraine, which has a population less than one-quarter of the size of its giant neighbor.
...
Russia didn’t take the bait in sending crucial front-line soldiers to Kursk, but given their constraints, they’ve been forced to take troops from Kherson and Zaporizhzhia where they’re less needed,” said Rob Lee, senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, a U.S. foreign-policy think tank.

Troops that have been sent to the Kursk region include units from the 810th Naval Infantry Brigade based in Crimea, the 155th Naval Infantry Brigade and the 56th Airborne Regiment, which had been fighting in Zaporizhzhia, said a report from the Institute for the Study of War, a think tank based in Washington, D.C.
...
The Institute for the Study of War said the reshuffling of troops “avoided declaring general mobilization or another round of partial mobilization, both of which would be incredibly unpopular among Russian society.”
...
At the meeting with Putin earlier this year, Defense Ministry officials said the president should use his inauguration, and attendant boost in political support, to make the case for a mobilization.
Putin declined to do so, with memories of the unrest that followed the 2022 mobilization still fresh. Protests gripped some of Russia’s biggest cities, recruitment offices were attacked, and border crossings were choked with men fleeing.
...
“People want to continue their lives, which for them are peaceful. It’s dangerous for the Kremlin to carry out another partial or full mobilization,” said Andrei Kolesnikov, an independent Russia analyst, based in Moscow.

Summary: Russia did not fall for the Kursk's suicide mission, so lets just pretend like it did, because that's how wars are won on forums?  Roll Eyes

Totally objective and neutral interpretation of the article that it's a "clear indication of a new major mobilisation" and not just another cheap propaganda attempt on the ignorant people who cannot read themselves, while totally discrediting whatever has remained of your reputation.

Why not just post maps of Kursk offensive from a US think tank like you were doing before? Oh, i see why...

newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
September 22, 2024, 03:48:25 AM
Congratulations to the Ukrainians, they destroyed 2 more warehouses, then more!
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1632
Do not die for Putin
September 22, 2024, 03:29:47 AM
There seems to be a clear indication of a new major mobilisation in Ruzzia. I will link just one of the sources, but there are others. You need to feed 1200 to 1400 Ruzzians every day to the meatgrinder to keep the war going, so...

https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/09/19/7475805/

Complete Disaster💥 Russians Have Broken Through Several Defensive Belts🎖 Military Summary 2024.09.21

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvzUl5X8yYA

Browse back in Military Summary - well know pro-Ruzzian - according to this guy Ruzzia is breaking through and winning the war every day, Kursk is a "Ruzzian victory".... It is good to listen to the guy if you want (or if you need) to get the "Ruzzian High Sugar" version of the news for any reason.
sr. member
Activity: 2674
Merit: 328
September 21, 2024, 06:11:10 AM
Complete Disaster💥 Russians Have Broken Through Several Defensive Belts🎖 Military Summary 2024.09.21

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvzUl5X8yYA
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
September 21, 2024, 05:16:56 AM
Here's what Kursk produced after the Russians got through with it. Video included at the site.


“A NATO invasion of nuclear Russia is currently underway, and the world is unaware that it is in World War III”. Has President Putin’s Patience Reached Its Limits?




https://www.globalresearch.ca/has-president-putins-patience-reached-its-limits%E2%80%A8/5865408
All Red Lines Crossed – Multiple Times?

A NATO invasion of nuclear Russia is currently underway, and the world is unaware that it is in World War III, as reported by Megatron (14 August 2024).

The Kursk region of Russia is currently full of NATO weapons, troops, logistics, and more, many of them destroyed.

 

Video footage comes out of dozens of NATO vehicles, air defense systems, tanks and more; even if destroyed and captured by Russian forces in the Kursk Region.

The Kiev forces of about 11,600 under guidance of NATO troops have not managed to conquer the city of Kurchatov and its nuclear power plant. Apparently, President Zelensky used all of Kiev's remaining troops, plus extra Polish (NATO) forces.

Russian General Apti Alaudinov noted that the purpose of invading the Kursk Region was to secure a strong position for upcoming negotiations with Russia. However, with Kiev's and their western masters' defeat, the Kiev Regime signed their own death warrant.

Kiev's losses are more than 2,000.

General Allaudin further predicts that the Kiev Special Operation will be terminated by the end of 2024, with a total victory of the Russian Army, and the surrender of the Kiev Regime and its masters in Washington and London. (Borzzikman Aug 15, 2024)
...



Cool
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
September 20, 2024, 06:40:08 PM
...
I think now they will start blowing up such warehouses, after all, 30 kilotons were on it, it's gorgeous.

If the event is 1) for real and 2) close to as advertised as a kinetic attack and conflagration, then it's Russia's bad.  Bad engineering in storage primarily, and not unlike the series of explosions in Western Ukraine when uranium shells were stored carelessly by NATO.  Clearly a win for NATO tactically speaking.  That's war.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP2z3NKvaaM

The euro-faggot voice makes it unlistenable even if the content were interesting enough to waste time with.  But whatever.  This Western intel production saying it was a standard conflagration adds or subtracts exactly zero from a factual understanding of what happened.

Probably it indeed was a standard conflagration within facilities which were either not designed for modern ordnance, or poorly designed.  The same problem seems to have vexed the (probably) Soviet era facilities in the Ivan-Frankist areas or Ukraine or wherever it was that those DU rounds went pop.   Russia should have learned and been more careful.  Again, Russian bad.  NATO seems to have learned given that mega-explosions of such facilities have become rare.  I've little doubt that Russia will as well, and am a little surprised that they did not learn from the mistakes of others.  We are now in the 'strikes deep inside Russia' phase of escalation which is pretty new so maybe they have a minor excuse, but it's a lame one.

legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 1632
Do not die for Putin
September 20, 2024, 06:09:25 PM
...
I think now they will start blowing up such warehouses, after all, 30 kilotons were on it, it's gorgeous.

If the event is 1) for real and 2) close to as advertised as a kinetic attack and conflagration, then it's Russia's bad.  Bad engineering in storage primarily, and not unlike the series of explosions in Western Ukraine when uranium shells were stored carelessly by NATO.  Clearly a win for NATO tactically speaking.  That's war.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP2z3NKvaaM
sr. member
Activity: 2674
Merit: 328
September 20, 2024, 02:39:37 PM
Actually, there were 10+ so far on the other side.
Example:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JmtWtkvxeS9a
Yeah, yeah, 10+ strikes that caused little earthquake, I smell no bullshit here at all. It would be stupid to deny that Ukraine didn't suffered strikes on their weapons depots, but hat only video that you posted, scale of explosion wasn't even close to what happened in Russia. And that building in video, I doubt that it was supposed to whitstand little nuclear strike, unlike facilities in Russia Smiley


https://www.bitchute.com/video/WDmsJ2J7HUOF

https://www.bitchute.com/video/QQvCBqCJdi65

legendary
Activity: 3262
Merit: 1376
Slava Ukraini!
September 20, 2024, 02:14:50 PM
Actually, there were 10+ so far on the other side.
Example:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JmtWtkvxeS9a
Yeah, yeah, 10+ strikes that caused little earthquake, I smell no bullshit here at all. It would be stupid to deny that Ukraine didn't suffered strikes on their weapons depots, but hat only video that you posted, scale of explosion wasn't even close to what happened in Russia. And that building in video, I doubt that it was supposed to whitstand little nuclear strike, unlike facilities in Russia Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
September 20, 2024, 01:38:59 PM
Russia, with a fair and growing number of battle hardened troops, a war economy which is firing on all cylinders, and an enviable collection of geopolitical allies, is well poised to gobble up piss-ant states like the Baltics, and choice territories of others like Poland, Finland, etc, IF things can stay slow and steady.  e.g., don't go nuclear.

It would appear Russia never learns.

"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the face."
— Mike Tyson

When you know it all, like Russia does, it's best to never learn. Why? Anything else you might learn is a lie.

How many times did Mike Tyson's words happen to him?

Cool
jr. member
Activity: 82
Merit: 1
September 20, 2024, 12:58:57 PM
Russia, with a fair and growing number of battle hardened troops, a war economy which is firing on all cylinders, and an enviable collection of geopolitical allies, is well poised to gobble up piss-ant states like the Baltics, and choice territories of others like Poland, Finland, etc, IF things can stay slow and steady.  e.g., don't go nuclear.

It would appear Russia never learns.

"Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the face."
— Mike Tyson




legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
September 20, 2024, 10:17:29 AM
...
I think now they will start blowing up such warehouses, after all, 30 kilotons were on it, it's gorgeous.

If the event is 1) for real and 2) close to as advertised as a kinetic attack and conflagration, then it's Russia's bad.  Bad engineering in storage primarily, and not unlike the series of explosions in Western Ukraine when uranium shells were stored carelessly by NATO.  Clearly a win for NATO tactically speaking.  That's war.


I think it will be allowed to hit deep into Russia soon, then it will be hot.

A lot of people seem convinced that this was a result of a kinetic strike launched from within the Baltic states.  If true, the excuses for Russia to end up with access to the Baltic sea AND land access to said keep piling up.  (An earlier one was the brief temporary stoppage of the railroad Kalinengrad.)

It's noteworthy that some of the minor NATO states in the South have been publicly stating that they don't need to be involved militarily in NATO offensive adventurism or the fallout of said.  The Baltic states have said no such thing, and as if to prove to the world that they are true morons, Sweden actually joined up.  Perhaps because their lands are worthless for any purpose and are thus not under threat?  Who knows?  Who cares?

Russia, with a fair and growing number of battle hardened troops, a war economy which is firing on all cylinders, and an enviable collection of geopolitical allies, is well poised to gobble up piss-ant states like the Baltics, and choice territories of others like Poland, Finland, etc, IF things can stay slow and steady.  e.g., don't go nuclear.  This is especially the case since it will be harder for decadent Western states to round up cannon fodder than it was the near-indigent Slavs in Ukraine who had been milked dry in the time-frame between the fall of the Soviet Union and now.

As I often do, I again have to wonder if a more ice-free Russia was not part of a deal struck for doing the deed of ethnically cleansing Ukraine of the Slavs in order to make way for a new group of 'settlers'.  Settlers being corporations controlled by a certain tribe and displaced fundamentalists wackos of same.


legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
September 20, 2024, 09:23:19 AM
What do you say about the strike on the ammunition depot in the Tver region?

Every attack that Ukraine does to/on Russia challenges and stretches-thinner the general love Russia has for Ukraine. With a million troops in standby in Russia, when Russia has had enough, they will simply overrun Ukraine.

Personally, to gain more support from his people, Putin should start offering 250 acres of Ukrainian homestead farmland to any Russians (or others) who will go in and fight Ukrainians to prove the homestead land up. There are incentives Putin could offer that would make it even more attractive to the people of Russia... including general military support.

However, while Russia might be corrupt, Ukraine is way more corrupt than Russia.


Ukraine and Poland continue to disagree over Volhynia genocide where Ukrainians murdered at least 120K ethnic Poles



https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-09-18-ukraine-poland-disagree-over-volhynia-genocide.html
The World War II-era Volhynia genocide continues to be a source of tension between Poland and Ukraine despite the Polish government's strong support for the Ukrainians in their current conflict with Russia.

From 1943 to 1945, Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) and the ultra-nationalist Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) murdered at least 120,000 ethnic Poles. Most of the casualties were women and children.

The slaughter was set in motion in then-German-occupied eastern Poland, a territory owned by modern-day Ukraine because of Soviet-orchestrated land transfers.

Many of the killers were ordinary Ukrainians armed with agricultural implements who used the German occupation as an excuse to ethnically cleanse the area ahead of its incorporation into an independent Ukrainian nation-state.

The Ukrainian government continues to deny that the Polish massacres were acts of genocide.

Dmytro Kuleba, Ukraine’s Foreign Minister, was hesitant when asked whether Ukraine would defer to recent Polish requests for the exhumation of Polish massacre victims. He suggested that Kyiv and Warsaw should agree to disagree on the subject of genocide, adding that the matter is something that historians should discuss.

Poland to block Ukraine from joining EU and NATO if Ukrainian crimes remain unaddressed
...



Cool

Even Ukraine would be agreeing with Putin offering Ukrainian farmland homesteads to Russians, if they thought of it.


Ukrainians increasingly willing to cede land for peace: survey



https://asiatimes.com/2024/09/ukrainians-increasingly-willing-to-cede-land-for-peace-survey/
The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, is trying his best to shake up the dynamics of the Russia-Ukraine war. He recently undertook a major cabinet reshuffle in which he replaced no fewer than nine ministers, including his foreign minister, Dmytro Kuleba.

Announcing the changes, Zelensky said he wanted his government to be "more active" in pressing for aid from its Western allies.

These cabinet changes came as Ukraine pressed ahead with its offensive in the Kursk oblast in Russia. Zelensky has said that holding some Russian territory will give Kiev leverage for future territorial exchange negotiations with Russia.

And, while criticism of Zelensky's gamble has increased as Ukraine's position in the Donbas in the east of the country has deteriorated, seeing Ukrainian soldiers turn the table on Russia has undeniably given Ukrainians a morale boost.

Ukrainians needed this. As the war has endured and its costs mounted, morale and public health have suffered.

We have tracked Ukrainian sentiment for years. In June and July 2024, in cooperation with the Kiev International Institute for Sociology (KIIS), we conducted a telephone public opinion survey of 2,200 respondents representative of the adult population of government-controlled areas of Ukraine. This was to follow up on a survey from October 2022.

We should treat wartime polls with caution. But our survey findings suggest people are worried about war weariness among their fellow Ukrainians. It also suggests that there is growing, if reluctant, support for negotiations and territorial concessions.

Open to compromise

Attitudes among Ukrainians toward territorial concessions have also started to shift – but only slightly. Most people have opposed giving up land since 2014, but KIIS's own regular omnibus survey provides evidence of growing recognition, now shared by one-third of Ukrainians, that territorial concessions may be necessary.
...



Cool
sr. member
Activity: 2674
Merit: 328
September 20, 2024, 07:32:32 AM
What do you say about the strike on the ammunition depot in the Tver region?
What can I say is that explosion was very impressive. In these more than 2.5 years I so lot of stuff, but this one is something what you won't see daily.

Actually, there were 10+ so far on the other side.
Example:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JmtWtkvxeS9a
jr. member
Activity: 73
Merit: 1
September 20, 2024, 02:30:05 AM
...
I think now they will start blowing up such warehouses, after all, 30 kilotons were on it, it's gorgeous.

If the event is 1) for real and 2) close to as advertised as a kinetic attack and conflagration, then it's Russia's bad.  Bad engineering in storage primarily, and not unlike the series of explosions in Western Ukraine when uranium shells were stored carelessly by NATO.  Clearly a win for NATO tactically speaking.  That's war.



I think it will be allowed to hit deep into Russia soon, then it will be hot.
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
September 20, 2024, 02:06:03 AM
...
I think now they will start blowing up such warehouses, after all, 30 kilotons were on it, it's gorgeous.

If the event is 1) for real and 2) close to as advertised as a kinetic attack and conflagration, then it's Russia's bad.  Bad engineering in storage primarily, and not unlike the series of explosions in Western Ukraine when uranium shells were stored carelessly by NATO.  Clearly a win for NATO tactically speaking.  That's war.

jr. member
Activity: 59
Merit: 1
September 20, 2024, 01:37:55 AM
What do you say about the strike on the ammunition depot in the Tver region?

I am surprised that Ukraine pulled it up. It was huge, to the point that BA Decker has thrown one of his usual walltexts to prevent people from actually reading about it. Let's undo this and have a look a Toropest

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uH7-krNAOQA

This is before. Not a small depot, lot's of small depots as usual in these cases, but... the Ruzzians apparently were so confident on not getting attacked that they piled up stuff out of the protected depots. Perhaps they were given the order to store much more than they really could... who knows... but...


Before:


After:


...
Where is the escalation? Ruzzia has put many red lines, all of them have been passed and there is no escalation...

Forces within the Western decision making centers are clearly and increasingly desperate to get some sort of WW-III going.  There are multiple hypothesese as to who and what drives these objectives, and why.

If some sort of a WW-III is not in Russia's interest at this time, it would be foolish to react inappropriately.  
[...]
The way to really screw ones adversary is to NOT give them what they want.   At least not when they want something which would server their interests at a given point in time.  

[...]

A classic example of patience was Israel back in Gulf-I.  Saddam insulted Israel with some meaningless scud bottle-rockets and Israel did exactly the right thing.  Nothing! ..


So the adversary want you to nuke them, and Putin's strategy is to screw them by not nuking them. Ok.. I am sure that makes sense in Ruzzia.

In the rest of the world, Putin knows he has nothing to gain by escalating, so if "the West" sends weapons he copes with it.


I think now they will start blowing up such warehouses, after all, 30 kilotons were on it, it's gorgeous.
legendary
Activity: 2833
Merit: 1851
In order to dump coins one must have coins
September 20, 2024, 01:21:33 AM
Front update: Ruzzia has slowed down the already slow advance in the East, while there are signs of Ukraine succeeding at getting more Pow at Kursk.

On the rumours side, the conscripts that surrendered to Ukraine and are exchanged are sent back to the front (I am not sure how they expect a different result?) and the Tik-tok army of Ahmad is saying that they are not interested in recovering captured soldiers. So... I guess they pow from Chechenia need to apply for Ukrainian citizenship.

^^^ More territory, more power and rebuild the Ruzzian domains. If you are going to argue do it correctly.
I do not see Ukrainians massively taking the streets in favour of Putin's puppet, so there must be some reason why - who knows, maybe they are absolutely ok with getting rid of Moscow and what you call a coup is simply the people taking over their own destiny into their own hands? Maybe is not about cookies after all, but about having  a future?

Your whole philosophy is built on the people of Ukraine not having an opinion nor a will of their own and that is being proven wrong.

Meanwhile the situation in Kursk is extremely fluid, with a contingent of Ruzzians near encirclement after a failed counter-attack.

It's refreshing to see that even you don't consider people in Crimea and Donbas as Ukrainians now, this is a great indication for me that there's a good chance that negotiations can happen by November.

Yes people taking their own destiny into their own hands, while a third top senior US politician just happened to give out cookies to them that day while saying "Fuck the EU", and then more javilins magically showed up per square meter in Ukraine than in any other place on earth, which were enough to stop Russian initial offense of 250k soldiers. It's as if they planned this all along and were actually expecting the Russian offense, and armed Ukraine to the teeth with all they could after giving out those cookies. But guess you're going to try and convince everyone that it's all just a coincidence, right?

Your whole philosophy conveniently disregards the roll US played in all of this from the very beginning. You base your arguments on absolutes, totally disregarding the realities of this world and double standards. I'm yet to hear a reason why Ukrainians should be able to take destiny into their own hands while Cubans are not allowed to?

The road to hell is paved with good intentions

Edit:
Wondering why more people don't voice their opposing positions, it's not like someone is oppressing them from even speaking in their mother tongue, and now to this...  
The city of Ivano-Frankivsk in western Ukraine is to be patrolled by “language inspectors” tasked with limiting the use of Russian while simultaneously promoting the use of Ukrainian among its residents, Mayor Ruslan Martsinkiv announced on Monday.

Martsinkiv attributed the decision to introduce language inspectors to the increasing frequent use of Russian in the city, which he described as a problem for Ukraine that would be solved by “introducing a public initiative”.

“Because, unfortunately, the Russian language is being spoken more in Ivano-Frankivsk, and this is a problem for our country and for our city in particular,” he added.


Nothing says freedom like "language inspectors"  Roll Eyes



why are you so eager for peace? Is anything not going plan?

I consider people in all the regions Ukrainians under a military invasion by Moscow. Are you trying to imply that the fake referendums are anything but a mockery of democracy? I am not surprised, as said you mind does not accept free people taking decisions. They have to be under a tyrant - you probably justify it to yourself in terms of that's how it works or it is all the same or most likely, I do not care. Is like a medieval world and it is the reason why Ukraine wants to move on from it.

And here we go again with the narrative that Putin is going to protect Ruzzians, that they were mistreated, bla bla bla... Not a single part of it is true and we have gone through it a million times.

Regarding peace:

a) I do not see Putin accepting only the taken terriotories. I do not see Ukraine accepting the statu=quo on the terrain as permanent.
b) I do not see Ukraine accepting to be neutral to wait for the next invasion, I do not see Putin accepting Ukraine in NATO.
c) I do not see Ruzzia being able impose the stated objectives (4 regions) by force. I do not see Ukraine stopping to create economic pain and stiff resistance.
d) I do not see the US loosing anything by keeping the fight ongoing.

Too many things to solve in just a couple of months.

"slowed down the already slow advance" is that just another way of saying still advancing?

I'm "eager for peace" because...well because war is bad, people dying/suffering is bad, is that not obvious to everyone? Now why don't you want peace?

Russia didn't close borders, people are free to leave when they wish to. Do you see mass exodus of people from Crimea coming into Ukraine through other countries? What would Ukrainian "language inspectors" even do with all those people that don't even speak Ukrainian? Want to look up statistic on the population of Crimea?

"fake referendums are anything but a mockery of democracy" oh you mean like the Kosovo independence precedent?
‘For my friends, everything; for my enemies, the law’

Would you mind going through your justification for "language police inspectors" one more time? I must've missed you explaining how democratic and freedom loving that is.

a) I do not see Putin accepting only the taken terriotories. I do not see Ukraine accepting the statu=quo on the terrain as permanent.
-Well yeah. Russia is on record saying that this is not about the territory, Russia must have neutral Ukraine and without " language inspectors"
b) I do not see Ukraine accepting to be neutral to wait for the next invasion, I do not see Putin accepting Ukraine in NATO.
-It's really close now, but poll trends indicate it changing anytime now. Plus what are the alternatives you'd recommend to Ukraine? To go into the winter without electricity, with reduced aid from Germany and possible no aid from US? Because you honestly see less people in Ukraine accepting to be neutral coming out of the winter and going into spring in 2025? Same end result but with more suffering.
c) I do not see Ruzzia being able impose the stated objectives (4 regions) by force. I do not see Ukraine stopping to create economic pain and stiff resistance.
-Russia is on the offensive. And mostly has been for almost 3 years now. Do you see financial support for Ukraine from US/Germany reducing or increasing in 2025? And now, do you see financial support for Russia from China reducing or increasing in 2025? Follow the money  Roll Eyes
d) I do not see the US loosing anything by keeping the fight ongoing.
-It's in US's interest to keep solidarity in EU. EU collapsing would not benefit US in long term. They must do all they can to stop the spread of ultra rights in EU, this must become a top priority for US policy above all else. The question if they can actually stop ultra-rights from spreading is another matter.

Zelenskyy is being squeezed financially, and it's hard to gauge Ukraines manpower shortages after this Kursk fiasco ends. It's not what he wants to do, but what he can do, and whether waiting will improve or worsen his situation coming out of winter.

No, you are not seeking peace you are seeking surrender. You "care" when it comes to asking Ukraine to give up, but you are all about justifying Putin actually starting this war and give all the "good reasons why Ruzzia invaded and why this war actually exist. Do not pretend to care about peace, it is so hypocritical and evident as things get.

You say:
- Ukraine will surrender because the power infrastructure is damaged and the support will be less in the future. - Both of these are your wet dreams, nothing that is here and now. Ukraine has enough to keep the war going for years.

- Ukraine is ok with not joining NATO - again, your wishes. But if can be some other military alliance or pact, because I think it is NATO that is not ready for Ukraine. What peace are you accepting if it guarantees Ruzzia will invade after recovering.

- EU solidarity is collapsing - You have a massive misunderstanding of the situation. EU is not defending Ukraine, it is defending the EU. Survival comes first and Germany in particular understands it very well as half of it was soviet for quite a while.

I do not need to justify your claims nor argue about them. You say "stuff", anyone is free to check. If it gives you a clue, you rarely present proven facts, just a few cherries here and there, even occasionally saying the opposite of what the source say.

So you are saying that Ukraine cannot go into winter because of the damage to the infrastructure. Ok, so you think Ukraine will surrender in winter or before. Let me quote you on that.

I did not defend other referendums, it is for you to prove that the ones you argue are "valid" or at least "credible" if you need to lower the standard. You despise anything that means people deciding, you belong in the middle ages. Again,  you will never understand why an Ukrainian soldier signs in to defend his country because for you all is a mockery. I suggest you and Branko open a thread about the war in former Yugoslavia so that topics that belong there can be discussed.

That is a good point, people can leave Ruzzia - unless they are forcibly conscripted and sent to the borders, or they are imprisoned for political reasons or they are so poor that they simply cannot - like most - (to leave a country you need to be able to live somewhere else). And certainly many have take the decision to leave, probably in the range of millions by now - those who can work anywhere because they are qualified.

Russia has not been on the offensive for three years. They have been in the defensive at least three times - when loosing Kherson, during the previous summer and in Kursk as of now. At the pace Russian economy is going, they are not going to be on the offensive in the long term.

"Slower advance" means exactly that, but if you need an interpretation have it: "advancing at such a pace that makes reaching the military objectives impossible within a 5 years framework of time". If you are happy with that you should apply for a position in Putin's General Command.


Peace is the absence of war. I guess going back to the status quo of 2013 is now termed surrender by those who want to continue the war? If we go back to how things were before the cookies arrived, then why would Russia want to invade?

Blah blah blah back to NATO is helpless and apparently it's Ukraine that's protecting NATO nonsense, we all believe that right?  Roll Eyes

The best terms Ukraine could've gotten were in 2021 when Russia, which has alarmed the West with a military buildup near Ukraine, laid out an array of security demands late last year, including a demand that Kyiv never join NATO. It also asked for a halt to the Western military alliance's expansion. we can all guess the response it got. The second best terms Ukraine can get is now. The problem with that is what to do with Zelenskyy. When fighting stops he stops being a president and he won't want to be in Ukraine when the real losses of a 10-1 RU advantage in artillery will be revealed.

More Ukrainians Want to Negotiate an End to the War. Soldiers Don’t Agree.
Opinion polls show that support for some kind of negotiations with Moscow has been creeping upward since Ukraine’s counteroffensive last year failed to retake significant territory—though a majority of Ukrainians still say they want to keep fighting to retake all Russian-occupied land.
...
“There’s war fatigue in Western society, and certainly in Ukrainian society,” said Col. Andriy Biletskiy, the commander of one of Ukraine’s largest brigades. “This is not the most optimistic moment for Ukraine, but no military catastrophe has occurred. This war is not lost.”
...
But he said he decided to speak publicly—something he has rarely done since the start of the invasion in February 2022—in response to the shifting national mood, which he said was hurting the motivation of troops at the front.
...
Though polls show that the general public also remains skeptical of deals with Putin, many—especially younger people—are ready to accept an imperfect peace to stop the war.
...
“People want peace,” she wrote. Soon after, Umka said, Ukraine’s domestic intelligence agency, the SBU, called her in to speak. Umka declined to comment on what happened.
...
Still, Volodymyr Dubovyk, director of the Center for International Studies in Odesa, Ukraine, said the shifting public opinion has given Zelensky an opportunity to forge some kind of deal.
“The very fact that people appear to be more ready to have negotiations with Russia is a big change,” Dubovyk said. But he added that any cease-fire came with significant political risk: “It would probably be seen by a lot of Ukrainians as a bad deal.”  
Yet, continuing the war presents its own political challenges for Zelensky.
Ukrainian brigades on the eastern front are desperately short of men and weaponry. Continued support from the U.S. may depend on the results of the election in November.

UN predicts winter power outages of between 4 and 18 hours per day.

What percentage do you think will want to negotiate coming out of the winter? And will Ukraine be in a better position or worse on the front lines after the winter?

Also, i'm guessing a lot rests on US elections in November, that in itself will probably dictate the outcome for Ukraine.

You despise Cubans deciding for themselves. You embrace hypocrisy and double standards of who should and who should not be able to decide. The only logical conclusion that can lead to is either a one world government, or a nuclear annihilation, neither of which sound good to me. I'd rather nuclear powers each stay in their own sand box and don't infringe on others spheres of influence by sponsoring coup detat. You know the whole existential threat for each power that have kept us safe since the cold war.

Russia does have a lot of problems with its demographics, low birth rates, people leaving, population declining etc. But all those problems are exponentially worse in Ukraine to the point of a full demographic catastrophe. If Ukraine decides to go into the winter like this, they'll have to somehow prevent younger generation from leaving.

Negotiations, is not about what you wish for, but what you can realistically get, and whether you think you can improve that with time. Fighting until either last Ukrainian or 1991 borders, will not lead to desired outcome for Ukraine.
Pages:
Jump to: