Author

Topic: Russian Invasion of Ukraine[In Progress] - page 301. (Read 77310 times)

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Rumor is that it was a failed Ukrainian crossing attempt so of course they tried to pass it off as a win.

Yes, Ukrainians teleported to the Russian side of the river to conduct a failed crossing attempt. Makes perfect sense in Putinland.
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
...
Epic levels of failure continue:


...

Rumor is that it was a failed Ukrainian crossing attempt so of course they tried to pass it off as a win.  Wanna know how to tell that something is fake and gay?  Easy: just look if it's published in the Western mainstream press.

---

Russians have fun with a new toy:

Azovstal: Russians are using captured Azov combat vehicles to attack them with; Reporter Sladkov
https://www.bitchute.com/video/k1adviMikMqD/

'Still got that new car smell!"

sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty

Did not know Ukraine is such a rich country

legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
The video from the CNN report raises a lot of questions if you start to analyze it in detail.
As a result, it seems that frames from different time periods were taken and mixed with each other.

Again the damn Ukrainians infiltrated Russian-occupied territory to fake a video so that they could post it two months later Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Video
00:40 The shadows in the very beginning of the scene are in front of people
00:45 In the shooting scene, the shadows are already shifted to the left of the people, at a noticeable angle. But the CNN report gives the impression that only a few seconds elapsed between these two scenes.




Looks like the ground is sloped.  Shadows make sense with perspective of second angle when you watch it.  

Reminds me of the dead body moving in bucha claim https://twitter.com/Shayan86/status/1510698253964222464

You guys are too gullible.

legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385

Maybe Putin does not exist because you did not see him in person. How about Australia? Or the globe? Earth is probably flat and Americans never went to the moon, lol.

Maybe Russia did not attack Ukraine. Maybe it is all fake propaganda perpetuated by gay drug addicts at the CIA?

Maybe dead Russian soldiers are just actors hired by an international cabal of Nazis.

Maybe Russian soldiers are protecting civilians from evil, global Nazisism.

Maybe there are green mice living on the moon.  You never know.

This is what actually happened:

Russia invaded Ukraine because it wanted to annex the territory of Ukraine and Russify the land by exterminating Ukrainians and any anti-
Russia elements.  Then it planned to install nuclear warheads closer to the Polish border and install air-defense systems all over Ukraine.
Russia wanted to get the farmland, resources, and full control of the Black Sea. All under the disguise of 'protecting the Russian speakers'.

BTW, the have been raping, killing and torturing Russian speakers by the truckload.

You really need to lay of the alcohol while you are posting in here, af_newbie. I mean, fictional war ideas are okay. And alcohol is okay. But mixing them makes you sound kinda funny.

All the things that you say Russia was planning, are the things the US and NATO are doing.

And you even admit that Ukranians "have been raping, killing and torturing Russian"s ... "by the truckload."

Looks totally like Russia isn't the aggressor, but the US is. Thanks for pointing this truth out to us.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ

The video from the CNN report raises a lot of questions if you start to analyze it in detail.
As a result, it seems that frames from different time periods were taken and mixed with each other.

There are two versions of CNN's coverage of the event: on the CNN website and on YouTube.
For scene timing, I will use the one posted on YouTube, as there is a more convenient player, in my opinion.

Video
00:40 The shadows in the very beginning of the scene are in front of people
00:45 In the shooting scene, the shadows are already shifted to the left of the people, at a noticeable angle. But the CNN report gives the impression that only a few seconds elapsed between these two scenes.



01:18 A suspicious white civilian car with the inscription "Tank Special Forces V RUS". According to a Russian military expert: 1) the Russian Federation doesn't have such a unit; 2) none of the military would let such a transport through; 3) it is extremely dangerous to drive such vehicles in a war zone, as there is a great vulnerability to any type of small arms.



01:57 In the upper frame, a yellow car is visible standing outside the gate, but in the lower frames (supposedly filmed at the same moment), this car is not visible.



Many of the shots have the date cut off. On a few scenes the dates are visible, but they change from Friday to Saturday and from Saturday to Friday. The frame with the word "FRI" (Friday) is not fully visible in the Youtube footage, but it is on the CNN home site, watch the video from 2 minutes 19 seconds.



More information is in the detailed analysis of this video in English.

Also, in early May 2022, the NYPost published an article providing additional food for thought: "Biden’s new press secretary sparks conflict-of-interest concerns over relationship with CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux".
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1360
Don't let others control your BTC -> self custody
Glorious Russian army of liberating looters bravely denazifies apartment buildings, trees, and cars:

https://twitter.com/adagamov/status/1525159029873451008


They must be drunk.
Idiot backs into a tree and loses a spare fuel tank.

They should search the nearby cars for a backup camera or parking sensors. That could help with their lack of skill although a moron won't park well even with park assist.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 3439
Man who stares at charts (and stars, too...)
Glorious Russian army of liberating looters bravely denazifies apartment buildings, trees, and cars:

https://twitter.com/adagamov/status/1525159029873451008


Of course these are NATO battle cars, driven by Azov Nazis!

legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
You guys might want to check BADeckers post history so you know what you're getting into if you intend to keep engaging.  Just pick a few random pages from the list of topics he's started...



Cool



Epic levels of failure continue:




https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/russian-battalion-devastated-as-it-crosses-river-989vvnj9v
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Glorious Russian army of liberating looters bravely denazifies apartment buildings, trees, and cars:

https://twitter.com/adagamov/status/1525159029873451008
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385

You forgot to read the article. Civilians die in wars just like soldiers. For the past 8 years, Russian civilians were dying at the hands of Ukranians by the thousands. And Putin is supposed to stand for the US not listening to his pleas for the US to stop supporting the Ukraine? Click the links to the article, above.

Cool

You mean you defend that, yet two month lasting attack with tens of thousands of dead russian soldiers and ukrainian RA-"volunteers", as well as a huge number of civilians as being adequate?
Correct countermeasures, no?

Putin's Russia gave birth to the first major threat to "world peace" in the 21st century.
Great achievement, no?

Everyone but the wrong people will be paying a high price for all this.
Fair developments, no?

The thing is, i can temporarily take over someone's viewpoint, for understanding, while you seem like you can not (or do not want to).
You might want to try to get at eye level in this discussion, no?



Of course I don't agree with all that death. So, to keep the dying from continuing, the US should move out of the Ukraine entirely... and stop supplying the armaments. As long as the US continues its aggressive activities in that area, there will be war... Russia protecting itself.

Why don't you simply come out and say that you don't believe what's written in the article?

Besides, if you believe the journalists who tell you what's going on over there, without going to check it out yourself, you might as well believe in Santa.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 3439
Man who stares at charts (and stars, too...)

You forgot to read the article. Civilians die in wars just like soldiers. For the past 8 years, Russian civilians were dying at the hands of Ukranians by the thousands. And Putin is supposed to stand for the US not listening to his pleas for the US to stop supporting the Ukraine? Click the links to the article, above.

Cool

You mean you defend that, yet two month lasting attack with tens of thousands of dead russian soldiers and ukrainian RA-"volunteers", as well as a huge number of civilians as being adequate?
Correct countermeasures, no?

Putin's Russia gave birth to the first major threat to "world peace" in the 21st century.
Great achievement, no?

Everyone but the wrong people will be paying a high price for all this.
Fair developments, no?

The thing is, i can temporarily take over someone's viewpoint, for understanding, while you seem like you can not (or do not want to).
You might want to try to get at eye level in this discussion, no?

hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 792
Watch Bitcoin Documentary - https://t.ly/v0Nim
Trump was promoting free trade with Russia and the Ukraine and the US. Putin liked it. No war there.

Biden stopped the free trade with Russia. War is the result.
Was there ever free trade with the USA and Russia?

Putin doesn't want war. How do we know? He hasn't nuked the free world as he could if he were a war monger.
He can't nuke the world, do you really believe that he moves with a suitcase and once he clicks on the red button then the world gets fucked?
No one wants a nuke, there are people behind Putin who have families, who think a little different, who have their own ambitions, their goals that may include getting power in their hands, we can't really talk around this subject easily because there are some decision-makers.

The whole thing is about bringing countries into NATO, countries that are bordering Russia. Quit threatening Russia. If there had been no serious threat to them, there would be no war right now, just like there was no threat to them with Trump.
Ask yourself one more time, why do countries, such as Sweden and Finland, that have a high quality of life, happy and peaceful days, want to join the Nato? Why don't they want to join the former USSR? Because visit yourself Russia and then the western and Scandinavian countries and you'll get the answer. Ask yourself why Poland hates Russia more than Germany, why Ukraine hates Russia, why Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) hate Russia?
Because they have been in the Soviet Union and they know how it feels, how Russia was treating them. They want to join NATO to protect themselves from Russia. Russia has imperialistic dreams and goals, everyone knows and sees this, these countries don't want to go back to the Soviet era and that's why they want to join NATO.
Is it really hard to understand?

Canada and Mexico have no strength to oppose Russia. If Russia moved into Canada or Mexico, and had friendly relations with them, wouldn't that irritate the US government?
This really made my day Cheesy
Have they tried? Cheesy They can try it.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1634
Do not die for Putin
...
...

So, why does the media keep repeating the lie that Russia started the war when it is clearly false?

The fact is, Putin sent in the troops to put out a fire not to start one. If ever there was a situation where the Responsibility To Protect (R2P) could be justified, it’s in east Ukraine prior to the invasion. 14,000 ethnic Russians had been killed before the shelling began.
...

Some readers might remember that –before sending in the tanks– Putin invoked United Nations Article 51 which provides a legal justification for military intervention. Here’s an excerpt from an article by former weapons inspector Scott Ritter who defended the Russian action like this:

...


Cool

This has already been discussed over and over on this thread. Putin had effectively an army corps under command of the Russian Army in Donetsk and Luhansk. The fighting in the region was paid for and directed from the Kremlin. Invoking defence on this case is cynical to the max - there was no fight before he decided to.

I can see you are one of those here that just throw shit and see if it sticks. It does not.


Breaking news!  Western media releases footage, provided by high level sources from within Ukraine, from the catacombs of Avozstal showing preparations for stunning breakout and subsequent recapture of Mariupol.



That seem to be the odessa catacombs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odessa_Catacombs

Tash, I am going to quote you on this one. I just want to make sure this comment is there. In case UKR can go to Mariupol now they are done with Kharkiv. Who would think that Russian population would need to be evacuated from Russia uh?

The best thing Putin could do now is start bringing back all the Ukrainians deported.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


It's still mind blowing to me the fact that, with very few exceptions, the people that defended Trump the hardest are the ones defending Putin the hardest.  Such a gullible bunch of skeptics you guys are.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1192
Quote
Putin’s 83% public approval rating proves that the Russian people understand what he is doing and fully support him.

Ever thought how those ratings are checked? They call random people and ask them questions, but the trick is that if they know the number, they know who they're calling. Russians fear repressions so they either say they support Putin or act dumb and say they don't care about politics.
What repressions? Those that get you arrested for every little thing. A guy was arrested for wearing shoes in the colors of the Ukrainian flag. An old lady was arrested for walking with a "no to war" card.
A commander of the fleet was arrested when Moskva sunk and a local mayor of a town where a couple houses burned due to forest fires was also arrested because in Russia when things go wrong somehow you look for someone to blame and put in jail.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 3439
Man who stares at charts (and stars, too...)

Congratulations. You are still alive, even though you are living with politics.

Trump's method of communicating isn't a problem for anyone except himself, maybe. Anybody who doesn't like it can stop listening.

Now you are simply lying. Trump didn't shoot or attempt to shoot anyone.

The videos show the Capitol police welcoming everyone in on January 6.

Trump was promoting free trade with Russia and the Ukraine and the US. Putin liked it. No war there.

Biden stopped the free trade with Russia. War is the result.

Putin doesn't want war. How do we know? He hasn't nuked the free world as he could if he were a war monger.

The whole thing is about bringing countries into NATO, countries that are bordering Russia. Quit threatening Russia. If there had been no serious threat to them, there would be no war right now, just like there was no threat to them with Trump.

Canada and Mexico have no strength to oppose Russia. If Russia moved into Canada or Mexico, and had friendly relations with them, wouldn't that irritate the US government?

Stop irritating Russia. Pull the US out of the Ukraine before the war goes worldwide with no chance of stopping it.

Did you have a good sleep?

Cool

Mostly. Unfortunately what Trump does affects the US and the rest of the world and it is not possible to ignore it. A few of the things you mention, like the "police was welcoming people" do not match with the police dead. Perhaps the party got out of control or what's the cover for that?

If Russia wants friendly relations with his neighbours that's what they should be aiming for. They failed and used violence (they did not get the chick and decided to rape).

Anyway, back to Ukraine. I hope you slept well too.



Time to look at the rest of the story. You are missing it.


'Russia Started the War' and Other Fallacies



...

So, why does the media keep repeating the lie that Russia started the war when it is clearly false?

The fact is, Putin sent in the troops to put out a fire not to start one. If ever there was a situation where the Responsibility To Protect (R2P) could be justified, it’s in east Ukraine prior to the invasion. 14,000 ethnic Russians had been killed before the shelling began. Should Putin have looked the other way and allowed another 14,000-or-so to be slaughtered without lifting a finger?

No, Putin did what he had to do to save lives and defend Russia’s national security. Even so, he has no territorial ambitions and no desire to recreate the Soviet Empire. His “special military operation” is, in fact, a defensive operation designed to remove emerging threats that could no longer be ignored. Putin’s 83% public approval rating proves that the Russian people understand what he is doing and fully support him. (A political leader would never garner that level of support if the people thought he had launched a war of aggression.)

Some readers might remember that –before sending in the tanks– Putin invoked United Nations Article 51 which provides a legal justification for military intervention. Here’s an excerpt from an article by former weapons inspector Scott Ritter who defended the Russian action like this:

...


Cool

That's why Putin's troops attacked and tried to conquer Kyiv, while "accidentally" murdering civilians, yes?
"special military operation" my ass!
You're delusional, my brainwashed friend.

sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty

Breaking news!  Western media releases footage, provided by high level sources from within Ukraine, from the catacombs of Avozstal showing preparations for stunning breakout and subsequent recapture of Mariupol.





That seem to be the odessa catacombs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odessa_Catacombs
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385

Congratulations. You are still alive, even though you are living with politics.

Trump's method of communicating isn't a problem for anyone except himself, maybe. Anybody who doesn't like it can stop listening.

Now you are simply lying. Trump didn't shoot or attempt to shoot anyone.

The videos show the Capitol police welcoming everyone in on January 6.

Trump was promoting free trade with Russia and the Ukraine and the US. Putin liked it. No war there.

Biden stopped the free trade with Russia. War is the result.

Putin doesn't want war. How do we know? He hasn't nuked the free world as he could if he were a war monger.

The whole thing is about bringing countries into NATO, countries that are bordering Russia. Quit threatening Russia. If there had been no serious threat to them, there would be no war right now, just like there was no threat to them with Trump.

Canada and Mexico have no strength to oppose Russia. If Russia moved into Canada or Mexico, and had friendly relations with them, wouldn't that irritate the US government?

Stop irritating Russia. Pull the US out of the Ukraine before the war goes worldwide with no chance of stopping it.

Did you have a good sleep?

Cool

Mostly. Unfortunately what Trump does affects the US and the rest of the world and it is not possible to ignore it. A few of the things you mention, like the "police was welcoming people" do not match with the police dead. Perhaps the party got out of control or what's the cover for that?

If Russia wants friendly relations with his neighbours that's what they should be aiming for. They failed and used violence (they did not get the chick and decided to rape).

Anyway, back to Ukraine. I hope you slept well too.



Time to look at the rest of the story. You are missing it.


'Russia Started the War' and Other Fallacies



...

So, why does the media keep repeating the lie that Russia started the war when it is clearly false?

The fact is, Putin sent in the troops to put out a fire not to start one. If ever there was a situation where the Responsibility To Protect (R2P) could be justified, it’s in east Ukraine prior to the invasion. 14,000 ethnic Russians had been killed before the shelling began. Should Putin have looked the other way and allowed another 14,000-or-so to be slaughtered without lifting a finger?

No, Putin did what he had to do to save lives and defend Russia’s national security. Even so, he has no territorial ambitions and no desire to recreate the Soviet Empire. His “special military operation” is, in fact, a defensive operation designed to remove emerging threats that could no longer be ignored. Putin’s 83% public approval rating proves that the Russian people understand what he is doing and fully support him. (A political leader would never garner that level of support if the people thought he had launched a war of aggression.)

Some readers might remember that –before sending in the tanks– Putin invoked United Nations Article 51 which provides a legal justification for military intervention. Here’s an excerpt from an article by former weapons inspector Scott Ritter who defended the Russian action like this:

...


Cool
Jump to: