Topic: [SCAM] BC Game closed account with my winnings! >$90.000 - page 2. (Read 2237 times)

Oh, no. No, no, no. Nooo...

Please, by all means, me thinking that it's resolved and the truth has been revealed doesn't necessarily mean you need to stop posting or closing this thread. In fact, please keep posting, do what you threaten you'll do,


Keep on writing and keep this thread [and your other ones] alive. It helped me a lot in studying your writing quirk, I can probably [or... hopefully] identify your next other account easier with the ever-growing list of your quirk. As I keep on reading your posts, I found and noticed more and more similarities between them.

As the old proverb said, one can probably a coincidence, but two? Three? I've find others aside from the "or wtv", so please, keep on. Aren't you curious how many uncanny similarities I've already noticed between the accounts? Three? Four, maybe? More?

And no, this is not sarcasm, I actually really hope you'll keep writing.

Edit: oh, just you won't think I'm just bluffing, here:




I mean, I can understand if ghostingura2 a.k.a. SimpleMachin34 misused the word. FYI: "aswell" is not a correct English word ^{[1] [2]}, he probably thought the word is a valid English word. But you? How does Google translate misspelled the same word being used by ghostingura2?

Need more? Nahh, let me keep the list for myself so you can't use it against the forum to avoid us identifying you on your next account.

IMH I think you are exaggerating.
WTV you mean with this I really don't understand.  
You should answer holydarkness's questions about your sudden loss of English and/or the use of imo/wtv.
Even I, and I think my English is quite ok, never use imo or wtv. I even had to google wtv just now, so I can use it.  


I think we bought our bullshit detector at the same shop.

It isn't resolved to me. So I'm not closing any topic. Only people here defending BC is those with BC signatures and you

Simple, I just needed your confirmation that you're very limited in English, that you needed the help of google translate to string these posts, to cross the Ts and dot the Is.

Why? Here:


Interesting isn't it?

Do you mind to tell us what's the exact prompt you wrote in Tamil in Google translate that it translated it into English, in abbreviation? I've never know Google translate deliberately abbreviating a translation. Unless, it's you the one who manually pressed backspace on "in my opinion" and replace it. But why?

If we take that you're the one who manually change it, I personally think it'll be quite dangerous to toy with a translation of a language that I am very limited at, lest it change the meaning, especially since it doesn't bring any added benefit.

So, which one is it? You're poor in English that you can't understand the interview and had to rely to your son to translate, or were you proficient enough to edit a translation, or better yet, string those words and sentences on this whole thread yourself?

Talking about stringing words, I can't help but recall this:


It's specifically ingrained into my mind because I find it so nicely written, so beautifully stringed use of metaphor... that I intended to borrow it for future use. Such phrase come from someone who barely understand English? I understand it's not a common expression? What's the prompt you use on Google translate or chatGPT again to bring this phrase into table?

And to think that those words come from someone or a translation and AI service who suddenly find it difficult to spell "casino", so abruptly that one may think she he they deliberately mistyped that to exagerrate the poor proficiency in English, don't you agree there's more than meet the eye? Unless you're saying google translate and chatGPT suddenly worked poorly after nine pages of perfectly spelling "casino" for you?


It's not. I've told you, at this point it's basically rhetorical.


Umm... I am neutral. Why do I asked you more than I asked BC? Not sure, maybe because so far you're acting more suspicious than the casino?


Why don't you? You previously said you'll record the session to serve as evidence in court. You didn't? Or was it just an attempt to threat BC, that you drag their ass to the court if they didn't settle? Hmm... it reminds me of someone, relying on threats and extortion.

I believe we can all agree that this case is as good as resolved and the bad actor on this case is very evident, unless anyone believe otherwise?

---

Edit: AHOYBRAUSE, stop stealing my words, LOL. We've been thinking alike and noticing similar things like...way too a lot on this case.

Now his "translation tool“ is suddenly misspelling casino as well, hilarious. What a try hard this clown is. If he actually believes he can convince anybody here ?
I mean, he looks smart doing the intentional grammar mistakes, but the execution is just too pathetic and inconsistent.
And the way he acts now that the evidence is overwhelming, he did the exact same thing in his gambling addiction scam accusation thread he published under ghostigura2. Once the jig was up he referred to rules and whatever that are explained bad ( now in this case there is no translation and such).
In this thread he did the blackmailing by threatening with a lawyer as well, nothing more than hot air .

You know why he wants bc to publish the picture/call? Because he wants them to violate the law. Posting this in a public forum would be against their license which protects player’s privacy. Even if he gave consent it’s a violation, and he knows for damn sure.
He wants to keep every possibility open to blackmail them.

My english is very limited yes.  How would help describing anything can you explain me?
That photo was 5 months ago and no, I don't remember in which wall was it neither what colors I was wearing. I already proof I exist. Why is it relevant for?
I'm not in touch with any woman but my little daughter. I'm the only woman here.

Why don't you ask a single proof from cassino? Can you be neutral?

I asked cassino to mention what rule of their terms I violated, is it too hard to reply? I also gave permission to them to publish the KYC video or photo. Did you realize you might be wrong and they aren't showing it because they haven't reason?

First, regarding English, just to confirm, all of this fluency of yours, down to the grammar and the use of tenses, it's because you use a translation service? To translate from Tamil to English? You don't speak English at all, have near zero proficiency in that language?

Second, regarding what else can you do, I wanted to say something about lawyer and multi-acc, but what I wanted to say was very nicely conveyed by Lakai01 and I can't say it better.

Third, regarding clueless about account and I can't believe we circled back to this but... actually, up to this second, you can't even describe to me what situation you were during that initial KYC. And no, I'm not only talking about the "under duress" situation, I'm talking about this:


So far, you can't even describe anything about that KYC, showing cluelessness about yourself, deflecting the questions by asking other things, conveniently keep missing details of that "duress", and instead you demanded to see the photo yourself. Why? Because you don't know how it looks like?

I believe you can answer them now? Given you've get in touch with the woman whose identity being used as your KYC? I believe she'll remember at least what's the background and where was she when she's forced to undergo that KYC, because people who did their KYC tends to at least remember --even the faintest hint-- of the situation revolving their KYC, like the room they're in. Hell, I can even perfectly recall the situation I was in during a KYC I did back in 2018.

This part is basically rhetorical at this point.

Thanks for the reply.

What if you are wrong this time and BC is making it wrongly? They would definetly won over 90000 doing this. It is not millions but it still a lot of money. I believe it is their interest confiscating money.
For some reason they chose a case where they don't provide any evidence apart of their words or opinions.

I didn't hire a lawyer. I contacted a lawyer (Roelof), to help answering me some questions about my case. Their job takes 25% of recoverable funds as payment and obviously it will take months to get settled.

The version of multi account doesn't fit here because my son account is still active while mine isn't - so why would he create an account in my name if he had his own account working?
I dont see any alarm bell on it sorry. I always prove my identity in documents uploaded, KYC photos and even video meeting.

I'm only asking for evidences or a neutral 3rd entity on it regulating it and cheking who is saying what.

BC.Game doesn't do KYC for fun, but has to do it as part of, for example, money laundering guidelines, otherwise they risk high fines and/or the closure of the company. Imagine a fictitious example where it is proven that some 100k were used to launder money from illegal activities. The trail then leads back to an account at BC.Game for which they did not perform KYC properly or the account was KYC-approved even though the KYC data was falsified. In such a case, BC.Game would also be liable to legal action.

---

Ask the question the other way around. Why would BC.Game refuse to pay you if everything was above board? 90k may sound like a lot of money, but BC.Game probably carries out such withdrawals several times an hour - at least other casinos of a similar size have such a turnover. Why would BC.Game put their reputation on the line in your case and refuse to pay out to you without justification?

I understand your situation, of course, but I completely trust BC.Game's assessment and think it's great that they gave you another chance to prove your identity in a video call. You really can't blame BC.Game for the fact that several alarm bells were ringing during this call and they had to refuse you the approval.

---

You've mentioned several times that you've already hired a lawyer to handle this matter. If this is true (which I honestly doubt), you will now have to await the outcome of the legal proceedings.
If this is not true, there is probably only one thing you can do: accept that you will not get the money and move on.

As a personal tip: It's best to stop using multiple accounts and stick to the ToS of the casinos you play at. Then you're guaranteed that this won't happen to you again.

What is the risk for their here?
Ok, I got your point of view. Now can you make an effort to try to put in my position? Imagine that I'm saying the truth and I'm the owner of the account. Imagine that argue about a photo wrongly - once again there is nothing wrong with my photo.

Even playing your game, why would a mother be warmed or threatned by a son to receive over 90000 usd?
How stupid would be being present on a video meeting without knowing the basics of casino?

I'm ready to make any further verification if needed. Once again I would prefer to have a 3rd person impartial to be present, or at least them to release their evidences.

Imagining that I'm saying the truth, what else can I do right now? Shall I open a claim on askgamblers right now? Are they allowed to check casino evidences at least?

I think you are misjudging the situation here. In a KYC procedure, you are obliged to prove that you are actually who you claim to be. If you fail to do so, the other party MUST refuse to approve the KYC - otherwise they may be liable to prosecution, for example if it turns out that the money was used for money laundering (which of course I am not accusing you of).

No platform takes this risk, not even an exchange. If the exchange/casino/... has even the slightest suspicion that someone else could be behind the account, they must refuse KYC approval. The penalties for a KYC that is too lax or incorrectly issued are exorbitantly high here in Europe and would, for example, exceed your winnings many times over.

The fact that BC.Game even gave you an extra round with a video call here is to their credit, not many other platforms would have done that.

He keeps making a fool of himself.
This is like a sketch comedy show with the worst comedian of all time.
But hey, at least he is persistent in his efforts, just not consistent with his story, hahaha.

You see how he suddenly adds mistakes in his spelling, he must think we are stupid.

You also make those mistakes while telling the real story to other people?

This guy doesn’t fail to amaze me every single time. Pure comedy.

That is simply not true. I asked for my son help to translate, once the meeting would be in english - just that. I asked the meeting to be in my language and they denied it. Also they didn't provide any translator for myself and they agree with that.
BC.Game is accusing me so I require them to show evidences. I'm the victim of the accusation, so they should proof their point of view with evidences.
They omissed all the questions I was able to answer correctly. This is why I suggested to have this meeting with a 3rd party present to judge it.

I'm not clueless about my account, don't be fool or bias! I provided a lot of information! I don't know what my son tells or not to them - because I dont speak english - so I can't be responsible for that. Get me someone that speaks my language and I don't need anyone to help me saying how do I play on crush or bigwin, or to deposit. Now, dont ask me things about bonus or vip because im not familiar with that.

Isn't 90.000 USD worth of a public trial? or a 3rd entity present on it? and an official translator? In my understanding I answered all the questions.

So concluding BC.Game can stop everyone account saying the very same they said to me without showing any evidence and you will be happy with this, is it?
What if it were you? what else can I do?

What part of terms tells that the player need to study their terms IN ENGLISH and all their features to do an exam?

Thank you for clarifying this, that a staff who speaks the language is being present, to minimize the possibility that you draw a baseless conclusion that the son is leading and supplying answer. With someone speaking the language, I think it is safe to assume you made your findings [that the mother is clueless and the translation is not a simple translation but also consist of prompts] not from a guess but rather from an understanding what actually transpired between the two.

---

OP, instead of grasping at straws and ask for things that you know very well BC can't provide here due to the privacy policy, do you perhaps more interested in explaining why your son need to prompt you and supplying you details while you --the one who operates the account-- seems clueless about the details of your own accout?

I'm sorry to say it so directly, but that's absolute nonsense. If you had followed the thread here, you would know that OP has already been proven to be multi-accounting (that alone would be enough to block his account), he originally rejected the offer of a video call immediately (we now know why) and he is still receiving support from proven KYC sellers here in the thread.

KYC on a platform like BC.Game is not an "oh, it'll be fine" thing. The platforms themselves are legally responsible for approved KYC data. So if BC.Game has even the slightest suspicion that the KYC data might not be correct, they MUST refuse to verify the account. Otherwise, as already mentioned, they themselves are liable to prosecution in the event of a case, and no platform takes this risk.

You also have to keep this in mind: BC.Game pays out significantly higher amounts every day than the 90k we are talking about here. So why should they refuse to pay out here if everything is legal?

---

BC.Game has already explained why they refused KYC verification, and this will not change even if the video is published.

Please share the call so everyone can see how wrong you are and judge. Why was it in English then and not in my language as I requested?
So you prefer having a translator from my side that isn't a translator than speaking my native language? I wouldn't need assist of anyone if it was in tamil. Do you consider the answers you got were manipulated multiple times since it was translated two times?
I give you my permission to show everyone the video call. I have nothing to hide and everyone will see that Im not under threat.

So I assume that BC made a claim on the relevant authorities for abuse, right? You have all my data, please share evidence of that in case you did.

Also I request you to share what specific term of kyc I violated, as you stated.

The events during the video call verification highlight potential concerns about KYC abuse happening because someone is being forced. The scenario was as follows: During the video call, which was meant for verification, the conversation was in English. However, the person, supposedly the account holder's mother, couldn't respond in English. Her son stepped in, saying he would translate, and started talking to her in Tamil. This happened while our Tamil-speaking colleagues, there for documentation, were present.

The son's role in supposedly translating the conversation raises red flags, particularly when you consider his mother's apparent lack of knowledge about her own account. This situation suggests that the son, or maybe another individual, could be pressuring or forcing the account holder to take part in the KYC process, not of her own free will. Such circumstances suggest the account is at risk of being used for purposes other than its intended use, which would be a form of KYC abuse and violates BC.GAME’s terms of service.

Furthermore, the account's previous freezing due to indications of threat or being classified as 'under duress' adds to the seriousness of the situation. This history, combined with the recent observations during the verification call, including the son having to prompt his mother about specific games—without any clue from her side, he specifically mentioned "Crash" and detailed types as "Classic/Trenball," along with color sequences "Green > Red > Yellow"—highlights the forced participation of KYC abuse.

First of all, I knew this KYC call would never go through because I have the confirmation that HE is not the account holder. And on a call you can find this out very easy, just with simple questions. OP does this for a living but he still acts like an amateur. Proof is how he handles all his account here in our forum.
Are real pro would have prepped the ID person for every question ( that what I also spoke about with bc support when I suggested them to do such a call) . Yet this poor woman didn't even know the basics of the site. 

Also, if you think this person is OP's mother then  . Seriously?
So pretending to be that person in the ID before here in this forum and basically lying to everyone from the beginning is normal behaviour?

He has COUNTLESS accounts, not just "family members" . This guy is a wannabe pro. He operates so many accounts on bitcointalk alone, there are much more than those at least 5 here.

So this case matured from a photo of duress during the KYC process itself to failing it coupled with multi accounting...

Just out of curiosity, does BC.Game allow same members of the family to play on its platform, Yes or No?

And in this instance nothing has been mentioned of any bonus abuse, or say arbitrage gambling  one that gets most  players banned...and in this scenario does the player have any chance of getting a dime off their account or everything will be confiscated??

Do you realise that had this KYC gone through, this user would have gotten paid  

Btw, that's why I mentioned in my earlier posts that BC.game cuts ties with all family members linked to the OP as the business relationship has gone sour as one party tries to take advantage of the other.

---

Edit:

If questions came as you have described them, the legitimate account holder should have answers off the top of their head , guess things aren't looking good for the OP.

Watching from the terraces .

No further comment from me after this  

There is SO much evidence against this guy, you yourself know it for 1000% yourself because of the reasons I already spoke about.

OP is a blackmail scammer moving from casino to casino trying a sob story to get losses back ( and opening a scam accusation thread ) and when he wins and gets called out (investigated) for his bullshit he opens a scam accusation as well.

If you think he should get paid you are insane.
Seems like you are just another clown that will do anything for some empty promise, you know what I mean.
Shame on you and good bye scam supporter.