Topic: [SCAM] BC Game closed account with my winnings! >$90.000 - page 5. (Read 2237 times)

Ohoh, hahahah. Nice catch holydarkness.
I guess that brings us a tick closer to proving Joana226 and ghostingura2 are the same person.
I mean how many hints are they keeping to give us, it's hilarious.

Going to "both" people's posting history it shows that both were massive into creating multiple accounts on 1xbit and then complain about stuff. It's getting more and more easy to collect all that proof.

So, which one is it? What state are we currently in? Legal proceedings or not?




And this. Have you been reaching out to your lawyer and acting under his advise from when the issue first arose, or only recently? Or was it when you first started your thread?

You said [as shown above] that you reached to the lawyer by advise of another user, which wouldn't be too far fetched to assume that he told you to do so and give you the contact only after you made your situation known to public [unless he's somewhat a mind reader], and if that's the case, then it should be around 7th of March for the earliest, while your case has been around since September [if we count back six months from mid-March].


Yet, the once they asked, you refuse to provide?


No they doesn't have the right to freeze an account if the player can prove their credibility. And that's what we try to achieve now, verifying you. If you passed it, they shouldn't be allowed to confiscate your winning. But, instead of doing so and de-escalating it, you didn't even bother to come, which... understandably --especially with what transpires this far-- will probably make them even more suspicious.

Nonetheless, I'll say that you should be given another chance of that video verification. So, BC.Game Support, can you please arrange another one? This one through the channel and procedure that OP preferred?


It's actually "provable" [pun intended] and can be clarified if one do enough research [which, I believe, is actually part of your lawyer's duty] but here:



Did you also tell him that they attempted to do the verification [thus, an update], of which you didn't attend because he [the lawyer advised you to receive the invitation through email, because PM [a written statement from them] doesn't hold any weight in a court room while an email does?

What does he say about sarcasm being used against you in court, as a statement?


Now, talking about accounts being related, I'm not gonna comment further other than pointing out this coincidence, without prejudice, since I'll let people make their own opinion.

---

Edit: ackk... This hectic days of mine really kills me. I typed my long post in between spare time, and realized after posting it that BC already provide the invitation.

BC.Game Support, ignore my invitation above. I understand you've send the link through email? If asked and necessary, IF, are you willing to provide a screenshot to prove that you've invited OP through the channel they requested?

Edit: correcting mis-quote

Thank you all for providing the information. We have begun investigating the issue of alt accounts in several cases.

At the same time, we would like to inform OP that we have sent an email from BC official inviting you to attend tomorrow's video call.

To be honest, I'm not so sure that the fact that OP operates multiple accounts - and obviously also at BC.Game itself, where multiaccounting is prohibited in the TOS - is so irrelevant here. Also, it would really be a problem if he pretends to be a woman, submits pictures of a woman to KYC, but in reality a man owns the account.

These are all points that cast serious doubt on OP's credibility. It's hardly surprising that the alarm bells are ringing at BC.Game too.

Apart from that, I agree with you that the issue can only be resolved now if the video call takes place. If there is even the slightest doubt about the identity of the OP, BC.Game must of course refuse to pay out from a purely legal point of view.

LOL, what a childish behaviour. But that's just what I, and I assume many other by now, expect from you.

Your "lawyer" really gives you bad advise I must say. From a senior partner you would expect better.
Looking forward to the outcome of the video call, I am eager to read about it when it never happens. 

PS: Oh and suddenly you changed your mind yet again, now a call via bitcointalk PM is suddenly sufficient? What happened to email only? This is the 4th time you have changed your mind about this call. 

By the way, a woman would never say the stuff you just did, yet another own goal.

You are no god, you aren't BC, you are nobody, I have no obligations to answer anything to you. I lost too much time already, from now you are muted from my side.
After receiving it, I'll send you the $700, I promise.

I'll do the video meeting in case you didn't realize and I'll get it. Thanks
I would accept it obviously. We can arrange a meeting through bitcointalk PM's with holy, me and bc representative. I show my ID, I answer any questions, and it would be a public commitment. After the meeting the 1h counter would start ticking. I'm down for it.

Stop asking me for nudes in PM btw AHOYBRAUSE. You are muted from now.

Explain the super obvious connections to the other accounts please.
How is it you all wake up or register in the same time, and you all make scam accusations and support each other's ?

Its funny you comment on this but not on me asking a serious question and pointing out that it's it not nice to fight with a casino over won money.

Oh by the way, what did your lawyer say? Did he tell you to not babble any longer since you just incriminate yourself more and more?
What would happen if bc would guarantee that you would get your money 1 hour after a successful KYC call, would you still skip it? I mean of course you would, since you can never show your face in a video, because you are a male playing with female credentials. Photoshop would not help you with a video and I doubt you are professional enough to use DeepFakes, just having 1 picture as a template.

All you will get is a warm handshake goodbye.

@ blossom Why post this nonsense again?

I have taken the time to read through the OP's post to understand why they didn't go ahead with the video call. I missed some critical information due to the amount of irrelevant comments and brigading in this thread, which appears to be an obvious attempt to obfuscate and derail the discussion.

The OP clearly stated here ....

The OP does not trust BC Games after being messed about for 5 months, and they want the invite link sent to their registered email address from BC Games' official communication channel. It is also worth noting that the OP requested publicly that BC Games should send the invite to their email address days before BC Games sent the invite via PM:


English does not seem to be the OP's first language, so there may be some miscommunication here.

They were also transparent in stating that they would record the video call, just in case they're not paid. Obviously, the OP does not trust BC Games and doubts they would be paid after the video call.

It won't take BC Games a minute to send the invite to the OP’s email address from their official email. I implore them to accommodate this request as the OP clearly doesn't trust communication via PM on this forum. Moreover, it is also in BC Games' interest to resolve this issue as soon as possible.

Wow

In first I represent your brand <3 so lovely bias

After I got my funds, I give you the $500+$200 you need. I promise here. Take a rest.

I am interested in the truth, just not your truth. You are a person that deals, or has been dealing, with other people's documents, basically identity theft. And in this case there is a high chance identity theft is involved.

Also, I was not the first to link you, other people did that part. But the way you act it is obvious you have a horse in the race here. Whatever that horse is, I don't know and don't care. But there is something wrong with your involvement.
Funny you say "could you tell us why..." . You basically confirm, haha.
So Joana226 or Blossom15 or whatever your name is. You should change the way you speak, otherwise it is really too easy to see your connection.   

And about me being "biased", check my reply to bc when they asked me something some days ago. I will blurr their question and 1 part of my reply ( since it would a scammer a strategical advantage ). This should show from the beginning I wanted this to be handled clean.



Now after all these accounts came to light, with all the connections, I am strongly siding with bc.
Also because OP willingly skipped the KYC call even though this could have solved the whole situation. Only somebody hiding something would act that way.
You not seeing and even question this strongly suggests you have something to do with this as well. But thanks for sharing your useless information. Just like his other alt account (members of the same group) you didn't do your cause a big favour with your involvement.

Them, them, who are they? LOL. You’re obviously batshit crazy or on drugs. Is your mother part of the gang? 

Your stupid attempt to link me with the OP holds no weight, and anyone with two brain cells can see that.

Since you've appointed yourself the official spokesperson for BC Games, could you please tell us why it's so difficult for them to send the invite link from their official email to the OP’s registered email address with BC Games?

I won’t be engaging with you any more, you’re biased and full of shit. I don't want to derail the thread with your nonsense. It would be a disservice to the OP and those interested in the truth.

You convinced me, you are are part of them, just as it was already mentioned twice in here before.

Same writing style, same demands, same words used, and you are so involved defending this person, it’s not normal.

By the way, to your stupid comment about the currency. Everybody in this forum uses $, but only Indian people would use " I won 10 to 20 lakh rs“ obviously.

Anyway, try to blend people all you want, your intentions here are obvious. There are 3 scenarios here, you are OP , you are part of his group or you sold them the documents. Choose as you like.
Every normal thinking person can see there is something wrong with you, and the multiple accounts this month, all accusing bc at the same time are connected. They are now exposed and possible to see.

You made a mistake trying to think people in this forum are fools.

You seem very invested in this issue, and aside from the OP, the only accounts that have posted here more are you and @holydarkness.

I understand Holydarkness's involvement, as they genuinely see themselves as some type of online sleuth and are trying to help. Unlike you, my opinion is not bought.

The thread title also says $90,000 - does that mean the OP is in the US? I won't play your stupid games, and I'd rather stick to the facts.

The facts are:

BC Games has offered the OP a video call to resolve the impasse and has sent them an invite link via PM.

The OP requested they send the invite to their registered email, which, in my opinion, is not an unreasonable request.

Let's see how it plays out.

For you it's irrelevant, for bc it's an issue dealing with alts.
I am sure this person has more than 1 account, 100%. It's basically already confirmed. And if he does not accept the call, which he won't cause he can't, there won't be a solution.

Oh and by the way, a quick google search showed another lie by OP which stated telegram is banned where he lives. He wrote:
 "I believe I can't send you PM, thats why. Telegram is blocked in my region as you may know.
Send me an email to my registered email, and share a meeting URL so we can do that via Teams for example."

Google says:
Anyway, I wonder why you are so eager to defend OP. 

I'd rather focus on the issue at hand than speculate on irrelevant nonsense like alt accounts, or whether they are white, gay, black, Indian, or Chinese, boy or girl.

This is clearly a KYC issue, and it's up to the OP to clear that with BC Games. If they are stalling for time, BC Games can end that by sending the invite to the OP’s email and put this to bed once and for all.

Well, if OP is indeed an alt that also made a different scam accusation ( for a different bc account ) in this forum, this would prove that he is also multi accounting on bc, which would be against their TOS.
Of course, the original problem for BC was the suspicious picture that was sent for KYC, no word about multi accounting. This only came to light because of the many suspicious activities here in this forum. Talking about shooting himself in the foot. 
Now that in this thread several people commented that have some kind of link to OP -> see the connections in the alt account thread in the reputation section, this case goes in a totally different direction.
There are many connections that it's hard to see them as coincidences.

Also, do you personally believe this is a woman? From India? The type he/she is writing here, no chance.
And that's exactly why he/she won't do the call.
Maybe they are also trying to buy time. Trying to get in contact with the real person from the ID. That's why he/she skipped the call and asking for emails and stuff.

To be honest, that was my immediate impression when I read the thread here for the first time. From a psychological point of view, reading the OP's posts, you would never get the idea that they were written by a woman. So if he behaved in the same way in the chat with the BC.Game support staff, I'm not surprised that the alarm bells went off there.

In my opinion, the immediate rejection of a video call confirms the assumption that there is more to this. This was an honest and above all very simple method on the part of BC.Game to get the matter out of the way, why OP rejected it remains a mystery to me. The statement that the request for the call from BC.Game must come from an official e-mail account also only points to a further dilution and distortion of the case for me.

The obvious use of several alternative accounts here in the forum - possibly even with known KYC sellers - of course adds to this

Whether or not the OP has alts is not the issue here. It could be that they do, but the fact remains that BC Games has acknowledged that this OP has an account with them, holding a substantial balance of at least $90,000, which they are denying to the OP, justly or unjustly.

@OP, you came to the forum seeking a solution, and they are offering you one now. It's either you do the video call or not - but keep in mind that this may mean forfeiting your payment. I don’t see any difference that sending the invite to your email will make, but it's obviously very important to you for some reason.

That being said, in the spirit of fairness and to move things along, I'd implore BC Games to send an invite for the video call to the OP’s email. At that point, the ball would be in the OP's court. It shouldn't be difficult to do since they have the OP's email address.

Sorry but facts are facts, there is only a number of possible coincidences but with you it's a whole new level.
Let others be the judge.
Everybody that is reading this thread knows for damn sure you are 1000% not an Indian woman, never ever.
And that is exactly why you refuse and skip the call verification, because your whole house of cards would collapse if you take that call. But let's ask your lawyer about this, shall we?

And by the way, I think identity theft is a serious matter. 

From their trust feedback page:


It's very evident from the patchy posting that the UID is someone's alt - but is it yours?  Or, are you just trying to muddy the waters?