Topic: [SCAM] BC Game closed account with my winnings! >$90.000 - page 4. (Read 2142 times)

Asking a rhetorical question will not gonna improve your case. BC will only accept all the bets that are done in a fair way regardless of the result. There’s a lot of player on BC that is natural high roller that is not encountering any problem which means that if your assumption is correct then you can see tons of scam accusation against them here with same narrative as yours.

Your account background makes it very hard to believe on your side now that many new account with previous violation on the casino exists.BC will easily solve your case if it’s a genuinely game play because they already have a history of resolving all their pending issue here in the forum.

BC responded because you were smart enough to create a good support for you in this forum. They felt the pressure and decided to take you seriously. This is the power of this community.

Anyway, it seems the case is done?

The account freezing due to threat signals, or "under duress" according to their term, as previously and repetitively being mentioned, is a concern that the person conducting the KYC [with current info from recent development] is the mother, against her will, to facilitate the son's [or someone else's] attempt to multi-acc abuse. Which kinda proven by the video call, as she has zero clue of her own account


Casinos are most likely uses someone who speak the language of the user to conduct their video KYC. There was an instance where a video verification needed to be scheduled for days because the user speak a language that's only one staff speak of.  Just to give you a better picture the length a casino take to facilitate and validate a video verification.

Yes, maybe the one speak to you uses English [I'm asking BC's confirmation below] but we can almost certain that a staff speaking the language is present during the session, to help with difficulties and/or to simply verify if there's a foul play being involved during the KYC verification, much like what happened to your session.

---

BC.Game Support, is the language being used is OP's local language or English? I assume correctly that your staff speaking the language of OP is present? And they can vouch from his understanding of the dialog happened between OP and her... son is simply not translating her what's being asked, but rather prompting her to answer things and guided het to answer about details that's heavily related to the account?

Same stupid questions he is asking with his alt account ghostingura2 in his other "scam" accusation against bc.
Bet next you will ask for your deposits back because of you gambling addiction.

Just found another connection between these accounts. ghostingura2 = SimpleMachin34 was already confirmed weeks ago in the reputation section.
But too bad they make the same posts all the time.



So weak...




HAHAHA.
So now we already have 4 accounts confirmed (blossom might be a 5th or he just loves scammers), 3 of them made scam accusation threads against bc and 1 was lucky enough to basically steal 1000$ from them, but lost it back anyway.
I wonder how many more accounts he has here and/or at bc.

My question to BC Game Support:

What would happen if I deposited the $99000 and lost all in the very same game?
Or you are only voiding the won bets on this scenario?

Would you void the lost bets aswell? Please answer this. Thanks

Thanks for the summary BC.Game. So your initial suspicion that there was KYC abuse here was justified and OP's accusations have thus vanished into thin air ...

---

It would be easier if you accepted defeat and at least apologized for the false accusations against BC.Game.

Keep making a fool of yourself.   
A translator, lol. I thought YOU played and won?
Starting post: "I've been playing on in a short time. I won 10 to 20 lakh rs at a time and withdrew, there were never any problems, I made large deposits and everything was fine."

Your English seems fine to me.

Anyway, all your lies are exposed, now suck it up and bounce, and take your several alt accounts with you.
Also, why didn't you add your "lawyer" to the call? 

And, I want to add again that I advised them to deal with this by making a verification call and ask questions an actor (that's what your ID stand-in did, acting) could not answer because she never used the account. Just because I like to expose people like OP. You are welcome.

Because of people like OP casinos are overly careful sometimes which makes it hard for honest players to get their money fast.
Let that sink in.

Did you still see any threat signals? I believe that was the reason why it was stopped.

There isn't much more to add. Next time you should add a translator so it would be better for both sides.
If you aren't paying the winnings it will be resolved in other levels.

Thanks for the update. I guess we'll wait for the OP's side of the event, but if they don't, then that's that.

Following a detailed review of the complaint and subsequent video KYC verification, we have concluded that the individual presenting the complaint lacks direct knowledge and familiarity with our platform and its various features. During the verification process, it was evident that the respondent relied on assistance to answer basic questions related to gameplay, VIP levels, cashback schedules, and site-specific terminologies.

Key observations include:
- Uncertainty and inconsistency in identifying game types and features, with reliance on external prompts to answer questions about the platform's games and VIP levels.
- Lack of knowledge concerning transactional details, such as recharge icons and cashback timing, further indicating unfamiliarity with the platform's operational aspects.
- Dependence on a secondary individual for information, who appeared to have direct knowledge of the account and its activities.

Based on these findings, we have reasons to believe that the person presenting the complaint is not the genuine player or account holder but was attempting to represent the account without adequate knowledge or authority. This conclusion is reinforced by the need for external prompting and the incorrect responses to standard operational queries of our platform.

We take matters of account security and representation very seriously and must ensure that all activities and complaints are genuinely and accurately presented by the actual account holders. Therefore, we cannot proceed with the claims or requests made in this complaint as it fails to meet our verification standards.

Edit: Additionally, the individual prompting the user in the video call (self-identified as the son) has documents linked to another ID on our platform (ID: 25022188), with KYC-supported documents belonging to a different user. It is reasonable to infer that the individual operating these accounts is indeed the son, who has previously submitted misleading information and incorrect KYC details twice.

As we are not expecting the OP to post here again, I hope BC Game would update us if the video call really happened. They will confirm whether it took place and if it did, what happened in the course of the questions and answers. If the video call did not take place and the OP does return here, there are many other excuses that could be used (that are not connected to a lawyer) such as the internet connection failed... maybe?

I'll second Cantsay's bet, "my lawyer is not present".


I have to agree with this one, and the saddest truth is, if she managed to get into this person [which, I believe she'll get her hand to her, eventually, sooner or later] BC can't do much but to release the fund [this part is not the worse actually] and people will think they're the wrong one here and they falsely accuses OP, given she can [eventually] prove her credibility, thus tainted BC's reputation.

I am taking bets on what the excuse of OP will be to not show up in the forum and to the kyc call today.
My guess is he will say he was sick.
Any other bets ?
Oh and by the way, all of his alt accounts are missing as well, only blossom was only for a minute, guess to check if there are updates here, haha.

It’s obvious what’s going on, it was obvious when he first denied , then accepted, then denied again and accepted again.
This person is trying to buy time (most likely to find the women to get her to make the KYC call), I have mentioned this before.
Every single move by this individual is so terribly planned, it’s amazing he hasn’t been busted before. I mean all the obvious alt accounts in the forum here, the hilarious claim with the fancy lawyer, the delay of the call.

Worst and most amateur scammer so far this year, and he is the one making a scam accusation.  

Many self claimed experts here.  

I saw someone recommend that BC should post the KYC information here (blurry, but anyway), You cant seriously believe it yourself that this actually would happen?? That's would and will never happen ever.
Don't forget that you are only random users in a random forum and nothing more or less. You have absolutely zero power to affect this is any way whatsoever rather then share your opinions.

So BC.GAME i guess you have filled a police report since someone is under threat? You can save life's here come on! I guess that was the first thing you did! Right?
But if not... you haven't done that and don't think its necessary then it's only one way to act and that's is to pay out OP's winnings. Nothing more to discuss.
Isn't the hundred of millions you still make in a normal way enough for you to put food on the table?

Please. Show your good side and pay out the winnings or fill a police report so police can save the person that is under threat, it's only two options for you to act here and it's up to you what way you want to go.
5 months............ come on, start to be human.

And I recommend OP to ignore all self claimed experts here that only are random users, they cant help you a dime, focus on BC.GAME and try as best as you can to follow their demands and I assure you this case will be solved if you're story is straight. In the end I hope the right thing will stand as end decision no matter who ends up as a "winner".

Good luck to both parties!

I am late to this this thread but since BC Game were mentioned I ended up noticing it. I wear the signature therefore have an interest whenever any allegation is made against a project/company I advertise.

For someone such as myself that has just entered the thread, I think a good starting point would be this post. BC Game have sent an email inviting the OP to a video call and anything that is stated by either party afterwards can be addressed in the thread post-video call. If the OP decides to follow through with the video call tomorrow it will be a significant moment as BC Game will have the opportunity to verify who they are speaking to.

I can't believe this case has dragged on, when a solution was presented !!!

A simple TG video call would have solved this $90K dilema and we would have all moved on by now, but dodging all these quick solutions kind of vindict BCs instinct for the verification because I thought it was some unfair KYC withdraw process you have been subjected too, but then again having to deal with thousands of users and dealing with all kinds of cases.. I believe they have the systems to flag players for any wrong doing... Otherwise good luck with getting this resolved with lawyers which will prolong this case now...

---

OP, If $90K was really money you valued, that video call must have been one you have done the very day the request came in, but chose to be elusive & threaten for legal action..honestly I don't get it  

Now that BC has decided to send you the invitation link through the official e-mail I'm waiting for the next excuse you're going to come up with.

Let me guess; “your lawyer was not present so you couldn't take the call”.

They are sending you invite link, if there is no problem with your KYC then join the video call and clear all doubts. The document, photo that you used while doing KYC verification of your account is of a woman, now if this account is controlled by a man and if you have used any fake document then there will be problem with that, because if that woman is not really with you. And you know very well what you have done and what is the story behind it. So you are putting all the blame on BC.Game to cover up your work so that your story is covered up. So my request is to join you on video call and solve your account issue if you have done everything with real documents.

That's what I actually try to get to know better. OP initially said on the opening post that she... he... s/he played only recently, and that s/he recently won big, where that's when the problem begin, implying it happened only a short time ago. Then come the added information of five and six months, with multiple attempt to resolve it to no avail. OP did not get into details on this, so we can't be sure about what actually transpires. I hope OP can revisit this matter.

But, my reply to your post was actually focused and limited to the topic about why a casino [and their provider] conduct an investigation following a big bet and flagged the account upon finding signs of abuse.

Yeah I’m aware on this method but not to the point of 5 months duration with KYC involved. I knew a lot of user that win much larger amount than the amount involved here that doesn’t encounter problem like this. That’s why I'm asking to the BC to disclose what’s their findings because they surely have or else they will not hold this user fund and ask for complicated KYC.

What makes me wonder and always wonder on case like this is why the need to undergo of KYC if the casino already concluded and find what makes the OP breach the ToS.

---

After reading the trust feedback of this OP and the way he behaves now. I’m ignoring already this issue. The user is now obviously very dodgy now that his alt account was exposed with breach of ToS history. What a waste of time to give sympathy on scam accusation board. Sighhh.