A couple points:
1) With regards to the first quotation (see emboldened phrases): I dislike assumptions. I try to avoid them if possible. In this case, it is.
Also, I find the idea that knowledge is embedded between processing modules problematic, at least inasmuch as it would be relevant to, well...processing modules. Practically, this consideration seems to fall by the wayside of any relevance, both as a response to my comment and to you or I.
2)
əˈmōSH(ə)n/
noun
a natural instinctive state of mind deriving from one's circumstances, mood, or relationships with others.
"she was attempting to control her emotions"
synonyms: feeling, sentiment; More
instinctive or intuitive feeling as distinguished from reasoning or knowledge.
"responses have to be based on historical insight, not simply on emotion"
synonyms: instinct, intuition, gut feeling; More
Since we know pre-limbic living things learn, too, I'm focusing on the emboldened characteristics of the word "emotion." Accordingly, I'm having a hard time understanding why learning requires experiencers who care about experiences.
ˈlərniNG/Submit
noun
the acquisition of knowledge or skills through experience, study, or by being taught.
"these children experienced difficulties in learning"
synonyms: study, studying, education, schooling, tuition, teaching, academic work; research
"a center of learning"
knowledge acquired through experience, study, or being taught.
"I liked to parade my learning in front of my sisters"
synonyms: scholarship, knowledge, education, erudition, intellect, enlightenment, illumination, edification, book learning, information, understanding, wisdom
"the astonishing range of his learning"
Based upon these definitions: 1) Emotion is defined independent of reason or knowledge; 2) Learning is knowledge acquisition.
Original claim: Learning requires experiencers care about their experiences.
Premise 1: Emotion = not reason or knowledge
Premise 2: Learning = acquiring knowledge
Premise 3 (Introduced): Caring is an emotional experience.
Rephrased claim: Those able to acquire knowledge are enabled by an unreasonable, unknowledgeable experience.
Edit: To clarify, I understand the differences between general experience, emotional experience, and learning from emotional experience (e.g. "This makes me feel bad/good"). I just don't find it convincing at all that a learner requires an emotional experience, which by definition provides no reason or knowledge upon which to act. I think we can learn just fine by following logical rules of inference which yield sound conclusions whether we give a damn or not.
Edit 2: I'd like to give some further thought to whether incentives are required for learning.