Author

Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 315. (Read 845654 times)

sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 250
March 13, 2015, 06:26:31 PM
Be very carefull what you tell my mind.. you CAN, or COULD kill everything with ONE wrong word.. come on, where's your god..?

Wanna test the theory?

DICKHEAD?

I keep telling you to STOP.

You wont. As a representative of the bible, will you or wont you?

EDIT: VERY IMPORTANT:

This was meant to be a direct reply to badeckers post..

(one after the other, I answered when I came home), now who would like to ask another question before I fuck off for good, cause this convo get's stale awfy quick when your speaking the truth, and ON YOUR OWN.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 102
\m/
March 13, 2015, 03:41:39 PM
All Hail Sequoia!!

All hail woodcoin!

I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

While all of the points mentioned can in fact be good arguments to the existence of a creator of sorts, it does not lend any credence to the existence of a christian god. It certainly does not pertain to the bible in any way. The 'proof' that is mentioned could also be transported to defend the existence of the flying spaghetti monster or any other entity you wish to put in it's place.

Religion has been the cause of so much suffering throughout our recorded history. If we could all agree that fighting amongst ourselves isn't the answer then maybe we could make some real progress in this world. People don't seem to acknowledge the fact that all major religions are saying basically the same thing.

I tend to believe that while we are in fact descendants of the great apes, our DNA was in fact 'edited' to create what we know today as homo sapiens. The reasons for this are unclear, but speculations on this predate the bible by thousands of years.

When it comes down to it, we are beings of energy that inhabit a physical body. The law of conservation of energy, the first law of thermodynamics and the theory of special relativity can all be used to strengthen the argument that what we consider to be 'the self' is not a corporeal entity. Take that as you will, but it doesn't support (or deny) the existence of a creator. We cannot prove or disprove that we aren't all trapped in the Matrix.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020
March 13, 2015, 03:13:21 PM
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.



Chocolate is good stuff    Roll Eyes

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.

Smiley
The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.





Sorry, those don't in anyway disprove God. Intelligent design is a theory about the nature of reality, not about phenotypical changes over successive generations, the age of the Earth, or how a planet took shape.  In no way do any of these disprove intelligent design.

The bible stats that the earth is around 6.500 years old, by proving its not we prove the bible is bullshit and since the bible is the only book that talks about God there you go. ( im talking about Bible God)

Okay, well it seems you're making a distinction between Intelligent Design in general and the biblical description of intelligent design, so that's good.  The three cases you mention in no way disprove Intelligent Design in general.

Actually, if I wanted to get really nitpicky, the Earth may accurately be described as ~6,500 years old depending upon your location in spacetime.  Approach the event horizon of a black hole and Earth's age will appear drastically different than the ~4.5 billion years we're familiar with.  But, this is a pretty irrelevant consideration because we both know BadDecker would never present such an argument.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
March 13, 2015, 02:54:42 PM
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.



Chocolate is good stuff    Roll Eyes

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.

Smiley
The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.





Sorry, those don't in anyway disprove God. Intelligent design is a theory about the nature of reality, not about phenotypical changes over successive generations, the age of the Earth, or how a planet took shape.  In no way do any of these disprove intelligent design.

The bible stats that the earth is around 6.500 years old, by proving its not we prove the bible is bullshit and since the bible is the only book that talks about God there you go. ( im talking about Bible God)
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
March 13, 2015, 02:42:27 PM
A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.
Sure, but don't get annoyed when others don't accept it.

Who's annoyed? God gives you the freedom to choose. I ain't the guy who has the right to take that away from you.

How many times have your posted your false proof link? Must be around 20 times now. You got a bee in your bonnet over something. That isn't normal behaviour is it.

People keep asking the question about proof for God. Which would you rather have? My link? Or the whole post? It's is up to you to click the link or not, or accept the proof or not.

Well I guess if you stopped claiming to have proof, people would stop asking to see it. But of course, that's what you want isn't it.  Wink
Anyway I don't want to interupt you. Your no doubt busy researching Sequoia trees at the moment. We await eagerly for your lengthy verbose refute.

legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020
March 13, 2015, 02:36:24 PM
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.



Chocolate is good stuff    Roll Eyes

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.

Smiley
The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.





Sorry, those don't in anyway disprove God. Intelligent design is a theory about the nature of reality, not about phenotypical changes over successive generations, the age of the Earth, or how a planet took shape.  In no way do any of these disprove intelligent design.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
March 13, 2015, 02:32:22 PM
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.



Chocolate is good stuff    Roll Eyes

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.

Smiley
The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.





A scientist usually looks for answers. The answers are found by examining the things that make things happen. It's called cause and effect. The better the scientist, the more he attempts to find the causes that produce the effects he observes. Scientists have not dis-proven the existence of God. They may have not found enough information, or they may have come to a wrong conclusion about the evidence they have, or they might just simply be making a decision to not believe. The proof for God is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.

Smiley


The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 13, 2015, 02:30:57 PM
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.



Chocolate is good stuff    Roll Eyes

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.

Smiley
The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.





A scientist usually looks for answers. The answers are found by examining the things that make things happen. It's called cause and effect. The better the scientist, the more he attempts to find the causes that produce the effects he observes. Scientists have not dis-proven the existence of God. They may have not found enough information, or they may have come to a wrong conclusion about the evidence they have, or they might just simply be making a decision to not believe. The proof for God is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.

Smiley

EDIT: Besides, scientists die. God lives forever.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
March 13, 2015, 02:28:48 PM
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.



Chocolate is good stuff    Roll Eyes

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.

Smiley
The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

Those are not proof of non existence of god, as this proof cannot exist.
It *could* be proof of against a religion though, which is a different thing altogether.


No, it is proof for his non existance ( im talking about BIBLE GOD) how to disprove bible god? Easy disprove the bible since its the only book that exists that talks about him if we prove that the bible is bullshit we prove god does not exist so there is the proof
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
March 13, 2015, 02:26:22 PM
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.



Chocolate is good stuff    Roll Eyes

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.

Smiley
The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.

Those are not proof of non existence of god, as this proof cannot exist.
It *could* be proof of against a religion though, which is a different thing altogether.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 13, 2015, 02:23:47 PM
A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.
Sure, but don't get annoyed when others don't accept it.

Who's annoyed? God gives you the freedom to choose. I ain't the guy who has the right to take that away from you.

Smiley

How many times have your posted your false proof link? Must be around 20 times now. You got a bee in your bonnet over something. That isn't normal behaviour is it.

People keep asking the question about proof for God. Which would you rather have? My link? Or the whole post? It's is up to you to click the link or not, or accept the proof or not.

Smiley
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
March 13, 2015, 02:21:54 PM
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.



Chocolate is good stuff    Roll Eyes

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.

Smiley
The proof for the non existance of God can be found here:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

http://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/


So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm.



legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020
March 13, 2015, 02:19:27 PM
Come on BADecker, bow to Sequoia!!

What will you say when scientists look at Pinus longaeva when it dies, and there is NO proof of any flood previous to it's currently 5064 year old life?

Nowt, cause you know not to.

Oi, BADecker.. not speaking anymore?

To scared to admit I got ya?

By the baws, baw bag, now screeeeeeeam for your god.. you fuckin need him now huh?

Just out of curiosity, how come I dont believe in god, but by your definition, he helped me to defeat those false prophet's like you?

No? I guess your away picking on weaker, more gullable fools.. people that dont know not to get you started. Please, someone write to the vatican for an explanation of these tree's that are alive today, yet older than the oldest biblical personage..

BADecker, your credibility is now officially absolute 0.. all you do now is look a bigger fool than you did a second ago, and continue to do so. Why?

Lack of evidence.

It's not you I feel sorry for.. it's the billions that will suffer due to YOUR ignorance of the FACT's around you, keeping in mind, you are all in it together yeah?


More proof of life: http://www.livescience.com/41191-ancient-microbe-fossils-found.html

3.5 BILLION years old.. please, die very FUCKIN QUICK.


However, I DO feel sorry for you... a little.

Even if you believe in God for salvation, the fact that you continuously write as you do, shows that, if you have faith, it is waning fast.

Unfortunately, when your faith dies (if you have any), you will die spiritually right along with it. And if you don't have any faith, you are already dead. That's probably most of the reason why your words mean very little. Only the dead in Christ can speak.

So, why should I feel even a little sorrow for you? Either you are gone, and it is entirely useless, or you are almost gone, and nothing can stop you from going.

I choose to feel happy in the lord, and joyful in His presence with me.

Smiley

So you avoid talking about the tree, interesting...

Keep in mind that he spent about 10 posts rejecting the idea that the fallacy of induction also applies to him, and then I find out that he thinks I'm talking about fucking electrical superconductors.

Yes but, the proof for the existence of God can be found at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395, induction or no induction. Wanna talk induction? Why not start an induction thread? The proof at the link is dynamic proof. It doesn't have anything to do with induction. A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.

Smiley

Lol make a thread about induction?

By citing evidence as certain proof, you are using inductive reasoning.  Inductive reasoning *by definition* cannot possibly yield certain proof.  How can you not understand this simple sentence?  You can't inductively conclude God exists because inductive reasoning doesn't allow you to.  It's.  Not.  Possible.

You could have 1,000,000 pages of evidence, or 1,000,000,000, or even 1,000,000,000,000...and it would still be impossible.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 13, 2015, 02:15:46 PM
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.



Chocolate is good stuff    Roll Eyes

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.

Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
March 13, 2015, 02:14:05 PM
A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.
Sure, but don't get annoyed when others don't accept it.

Who's annoyed? God gives you the freedom to choose. I ain't the guy who has the right to take that away from you.

Smiley

How many times have your posted your false proof link? Must be around 20 times now. You got a bee in your bonnet over something. That isn't normal behaviour is it.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 13, 2015, 02:11:08 PM
A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.
Sure, but don't get annoyed when others don't accept it.

Who's annoyed? God gives you the freedom to choose. I ain't the guy who has the right to take that away from you.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
March 13, 2015, 02:08:52 PM
A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.
Sure, but don't get annoyed when others don't accept it.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020
March 13, 2015, 02:04:06 PM
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.



Chocolate is good stuff    Roll Eyes

The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables.  The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common.  But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 13, 2015, 01:56:11 PM
Come on BADecker, bow to Sequoia!!

What will you say when scientists look at Pinus longaeva when it dies, and there is NO proof of any flood previous to it's currently 5064 year old life?

Nowt, cause you know not to.

Oi, BADecker.. not speaking anymore?

To scared to admit I got ya?

By the baws, baw bag, now screeeeeeeam for your god.. you fuckin need him now huh?

Just out of curiosity, how come I dont believe in god, but by your definition, he helped me to defeat those false prophet's like you?

No? I guess your away picking on weaker, more gullable fools.. people that dont know not to get you started. Please, someone write to the vatican for an explanation of these tree's that are alive today, yet older than the oldest biblical personage..

BADecker, your credibility is now officially absolute 0.. all you do now is look a bigger fool than you did a second ago, and continue to do so. Why?

Lack of evidence.

It's not you I feel sorry for.. it's the billions that will suffer due to YOUR ignorance of the FACT's around you, keeping in mind, you are all in it together yeah?


More proof of life: http://www.livescience.com/41191-ancient-microbe-fossils-found.html

3.5 BILLION years old.. please, die very FUCKIN QUICK.


However, I DO feel sorry for you... a little.

Even if you believe in God for salvation, the fact that you continuously write as you do, shows that, if you have faith, it is waning fast.

Unfortunately, when your faith dies (if you have any), you will die spiritually right along with it. And if you don't have any faith, you are already dead. That's probably most of the reason why your words mean very little. Only the dead in Christ can speak.

So, why should I feel even a little sorrow for you? Either you are gone, and it is entirely useless, or you are almost gone, and nothing can stop you from going.

I choose to feel happy in the lord, and joyful in His presence with me.

Smiley

So you avoid talking about the tree, interesting...

Keep in mind that he spent about 10 posts rejecting the idea that the fallacy of induction also applies to him, and then I find out that he thinks I'm talking about fucking electrical superconductors.

Yes but, the proof for the existence of God can be found at https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395, induction or no induction. Wanna talk induction? Why not start an induction thread? The proof at the link is dynamic proof. It doesn't have anything to do with induction. A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 13, 2015, 01:51:44 PM
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons:
1. The thread title seems to ask the question;
2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death.

God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to.

Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me.

Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well.

Smiley

Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything.  Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg.



Chocolate is good stuff    Roll Eyes
Jump to: