Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 370. (Read 845809 times)

Sorry if I hurt your fragile feelings Decksperiment...

edit: Actually... no I'm not... Fuck You and your esoteric crack fueled bullshit!

So you want more proof huh? That there are a right pair of TIT's here huh?

I'm finished with educating you's dumb fuck's, please note, I am only refering to the idiot's in this thread, in particular, the ones who cant handle the truth.. In fact, I'd love to say there are 5 of them, no more, but then since I'm a fuckin arse as well, I guess we could estimate 6 total fuckin arse's.. the difference being, that if you take the cancerous growth from the right fuckin TIT and call him vod, from the wrong fuckin TIT called oyo, we find god made one major mistake, and that was placing this complete pair of TIT's above the pussy, when they should have been placed above the fuckin arse, cause when they are one, They dont just look like a fuckin arse, we find they are not just a right fuckin pair of TIT's, but they are so fuckin ticht, ye canny fit an american express card between the them cheeks of their arse, for whilst TITs are excellent for depositing cash, these two lumps look more like a fuckin arse when combined with the truth, for when hit with the truth, they dinae half spout some fuckin shite. Any one else wanna join us in being the complete collection of arse's that bitcointalk.org has to offer? Feel free.. just take it to your own fuckin thread, cause from now on, your on your fuckin own, for this pussy is away to get laid..

Enjoi thinkin am gonna answer any the five epic arseholes in this forum, ever again..

All negative responses afer this will show to whom I am refering..

Go on, be an epic arse.. you know you want to.. join in below..

Any application of truth, fraud, invalidity, etc., that you apply to the Bible can be applied just as easy to whatever you are talking about. Proof of falseness? Same KIND of proof that you would use.

Prove that the things that are written by your sources are not written by people. However, if an AI wrote them, the AI was originally programmed by people. Or, prove that this is not so.

However, there is one major difference with the Bible. The difference falls into these parts and others:
1. The Bible has an extremely coherent message. This can be observed by reading it.
2. The Bible has real-life application. This can be observed by reading it.
3. The Bible has been written by different people as can be attested to by the various writing styles. It was not written by one or two people who decided to write a book.
4. The Dead Sea Scrolls and other manuscripts provide proof that the Old Testament has been around for well over 2000 years.
5. The traditions of the Hebrews and early Christian Church fathers, as found in their writings, supports the claim of age and authenticity of the Bible.
6. Based on 5, above, the miracles and wonders that are recorded in the Bible are true.
7. The fact that there are many ancient copies and fragments of the Bible numbering many times those of any other "holy" book, shows that there is something special about the Bible.
8. The fact that there are millions of people around the world, people of a wide range of ethnic backgrounds, who have copies of the Bible in their own language, shows that there is a promoting of the Bible that is far greater than any other book, and greater than what people could do alone.

This is a start. If you are interested, simply research the history of how the Bible came into being. It is a book that is impossible to have been written the way it has been. It is impossible to have bee handed down to people the way it has. Yet it is here in great abundance, permeating the whole world.

When are you going to realize that your silly Phoenix Journals, etc., will never catch up to the strength and power of the Bible?

I put it to you that you are unable to fully comprehend and distill the article.

I did read the article, his main argument (it was very boring to pick through Pyes' garbage padding) is that there are unexplainable gaps in the development of farming/domestication, a few posts back I explained in my own words how those gaps could be naturally filled without having to resort to spirituality or other such nonsense.

Read that post and argue against it...

Not interested in that. More interested in this:


Debates should use the Socratic Method.

If it is truth, it does not matter the source; why do you try to get me to re-hash the truth for you? For the truth, you go to the source, not to me.

On the AECES site, you can see the salient points (explicitly identified) for the Eisenbeiss case. The headings can suffice as points for the Pye article.

I will not distill anything for you, because it is all right there; enjoy.

Any proof of that, BADecker? Proof that the Bible is the WORD?

When will you expose my truth as a fraud or a joke?

I have already told you that the Bible has nothing to do with God; it was written by men.

Interesting question. Let's see what comes back.
 

Fair enough, thread finished, superstar says he exists, he has the proof! (can't be bothered writing it though).

Note the "he"... so we can all be pretty certain god has cock and balls, just like many of us, he must be a chronic fapper unless there's a mrs god also. Yes that'll be it mr and mrs god, I hear they plan on resurfacing their driveway in spring, a thouroughly nice couple.

I have instances of both - exist and not exist but fairly yes he does , i am not in mood to write the whole proof, but yeah he is !!

Decksperiment, I have a simple question.

Do you burden the same quality of proof that oYo and I are the same person, as you do that your god exists?

Again, I will restate, please distill any salient points, let's take them one at a time, no need to rush. Bring forth your argument to the table, let an orderly debate commence, it is you who called for it.

If I require a link I will ask.

EDIT: let's not either of us consider ourselves students or teachers, let's have a debate... mmmkay.

I will address an article penned by your good self.

If you want a link war then I'm not the droid you are looking for.  If you want a dick waving competition then at least have the good manners to wave your own dick around instead of some other mans.

But really... all that you think is "true" is a subjective opinion based on your perceptions, that's 101 philosophy.

For example, just let's say that tomorrow everyone had a small popup appear in their vision that read:

"you are in a simulation"

You would probably start to change your opinion of what you consider "real" pretty quickly.

I'm not saying this will happen, just as you can't say (with absolute 100% certainty) that it won't.

So we all have opinions and we are all ignorant of some things, I will be ignorant of subjects you may be well versed in and vise verse.

I await your debate.

All you need to do is apply all the negatives that you say about the Bible to anything that you present, and then things come to an even ground. You can do this because your stuff comes from questionable sources, way more than the Bible does. Once on even ground, the Bible has way more evidence than anything that you preach.

And before that there was Francisco Scaramanga (Christopher Lee) in Ian Fleming's The Man with the Golden Gun, along with James Bond (Roger Moore) who donned an extra tit temporarily, just to make his way through the bad guys' world.

I am happy to post the truth here (in full) and let truth-seekers investigate for themselves.

Students have to ask good questions, teachers only need to show the path.

You may debate with me but I prefer that you ask good questions and read it ALL so that you can judge in wisdom of knowledge.

In comes cooldgamer with... ignorance


The whale.to site is controversial, that is for sure.

You can read Pye's article elsewhere, like here.

There are many points in that article; you would do well to address all of them if you want a well-substantiated opinion. Of course, you are free to speculate, but don't try to pass that off as "the full truth". Speak for yourself. Opinions and ignorance is all that YOU have...

Do you realize who you're citing as a credible source?  This guy is a fucking lunatic, not even going to bother reading that wall of text.  http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Lloyd_Pye

I got a WOT warning just trying to go to that site, that says something

But I'm the truth bearer!

I am happy to debate with you BlackJaguar, but you only need to post links if I ask you for them, I would prefer it if you could distill the salient points of any texts into easy reading posts, it will speed things up that way.