Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 436. (Read 845834 times)

Now in this regard, I am a highly spiritual person..

Dont be thinking I'm dissin the dude, it's just strange that at 62, he still does'nt know that the light of god exists within, so why he would look up there when god is apparently everywhere.. hmmm...

Indeed, but that Spirituality.
However Religion is exploiting Spirituality to make people actually do things, some of them good, others not at all, around imaginary Gods.

Kinda strange that someone who prays to god so much does'nt realise that the answers he seeks come from within his own heart, by praying to him up there, which there is really no proof of, he will never find the answers he seeks, for god exists within man, it's only the light that is above..

In a pitch black room, see your own light reflected

Jim Stephens, author of 101 proofs for God blog, just wrote very interesting article about his motivation to start such blog, and why he decided  to write “101 Proofs For God for the Common Man.”
You can read full article here: http://appliedunificationism.com/2014/10/13/blogging-about-101-proofs-for-god/#more-3005
You don't need to agree with his scientific theories but I think we should really appreciate his effort to explain and prove God based on scientific facts only, without any theological arguments.

Feckin hell, go away for a while, come back and look at the depths of depravity this thread has sunk to!

There was a time when this inevitable conversation came up between myself, and son and daughter, and my lad asks, why is rape so bad? I answer in the best pc way I can think of, trying not to offend my daughter.. um.. The thing with sex bud, is that the womans body is designed to receive pleasure from the act of having sex, and this is why rape is so bad. And those who rape should be shot. My girl jumps in, and what if the girl gets pregnant? I say, well, touch wood it dont happen to you, but if it did, I'd like to think ma wee girl would get rid of it, since getting pregnant is nothing more than an act of pure love, and I'd hate to think you would want a rapists kid, for then you'd be admitting, you 'loved', and will continue to do so. It's a sad husband that sticks with a wife who keeps a rapists kid. You may like the idea that it's not the kid's fault. I agree. By even thinking it's acceptable to give birth to a rapists kid.. ouch.. glad am no a woman in this department, but then you know I'd get rid of it..

The problem with this kinda crap, is that, thanks to the gays, having a rapists kid is becoming more and more acceptable as woman dumps family, so that there are 10 women for every man (Albert Pike - Morals and Dogma) and becomes so desperate for sex, anything becomes acceptable, including paying men under the guise of 'friend's - with benefit's lol..

Thing is, what does this have to do with god?

Edit: Watch the japanese movie 'star of david'

Now tell me you'd have a rapist's kid? Sad!!

I like how the bible thumpers only quote the good ones.   

How did I even miss this. This is a great example of the ridiculous nonsense that is written there.
Someone raped you? Oh I'll just make the offender marry you. Logic level: God. 

I know what existed before God

And the universe along with Heaven are the context!  

EDIT: 'Cause God spoke it all into existence. Word of God!

Tangentially, I just noticed you and I are having a back-and-forth in three different threads.  I wasn't paying attention to forum names.

So, hello.

I'm bowing out of this one though. I've made my points, you've made yours. There's no sense further bashing our heads against the wall.

The blood of one stricken calls out to me, as does that of those he struck.

Sorry my worldview and unwillingness to accept killing doesn't satisfy your bloodlust. Also, the i know you are but what am I method of response doesn't make you look as smart as you apparently think.

Your valuation of humanity is yet more "primitive."

Or you could imprison them, that would stop them from killing again. I'd rather leave all the primitive ideas on 'justice killing' in the eras that made the world such a terrible place to live.

(I emphasized an actual operative word, "executors.")

They are made to depart for their dispositions—nothing more, nothing less.

Why are you guys arguing this?  It is the word of God - it cannot be questioned or used out of context!!

I emphasized the key word in your statement. You don't punish someone based on what they might do. Preemptive punishment is not legitimate.

If you leave executors alive, they may execute. Should you spare all but those others that do not so spare, all (and, then, yourself) shall spare.

(That dilemma is comparable to that between pure and authoritarian anarchism.)

These two statements are not consistent. How about we stick with just not executing anyone?

It's fairly clear I'm not talking nonsense.  It's written in the bible.