Topic: Scientific proof that God exists? - page 64. (Read 845654 times)
God exists it is scientific proof because everything happens for any purpose or matter an object can't move by themselves there is something which moves them from where there is every season comes on their time in every year like on summer the ice can't be fall from the sky.
there is much scientific proof that God exists, some examples are the sun and moon are come and go on there fix time and there is not a single day they miss their routine we all know that on morning sun will rise on its time and on evening it goes and the moon will appear this is happens only because of God.
for my opinion god do exists, we are in this world for finding our god and know the purpose what we are living in this world. goodluck finding it bro
The existence of heaven and earth and its contents
The existence of heaven would have to be proved first before it can be used to prove something. The content of earth proves god, why, exactly?
The existence of heaven and earth and its contents
Yes, many of the scientist proves it, they really proof that god exist because of the many things that the scientist invent, also in the universe that they make a theory, formulation and many more but they said that there's only one that made it which is god. 
Many Scientists now believe the existence of God is not only possible but probable.
You brainwashed fools never lie, do you?
Many Scientists now believe the existence of God is not only possible but probable. From their perspective, an intelligent force predating our universe initiated creation.
Many eminent researchers were able to see the evidence of a higher power, of something outside of the naturalistic worldview. Even famous skeptics like Sartre and Anthony Flew ultimately saw the evidence for Infinite Intelligence.https://sites.google.com/site/chs4o8pt/eminent_researchers
1) How do we know God is greater than anything else? Before we have proof of God, we are incapable of defining him.
The basics were already explained here:
https://www.near-death.com/science/evidence/people-have-ndes-while-brain-dead.html#a05
2) Why should a real God be greater than an imaginary God? I can imagine perfection, but I have yet to encounter it in real life. I would argue that imaginary things are often better than their real world counterparts.
Godel's argument uses flawed assumptions, and the German programmers used those same flawed assumptions
Yes, there are a ton of experts that concluded his ''proof'' is flawed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_ontological_proof This is the ontological proof of godel, no one takes it seriously because it's bad.
All you are trying to do is suggest that creation and evolution are the same thing. You are the one who is a little (more than a little) crazy.
Yes, you have made it abundantly clear you believe anyone who will not stick their head in the sand is crazy and childish.
Luckily, science (and 465 pages) have proven gods doesn't exist.
There’s nothing you can do about BADecker. I think his mommy raped his brain with a Bible when he was young and 50 years of therapy wouldn’t be enough to fix that.
Have you heard about this relatively new Christian cult called the quiverfull movement? Those “19 kids and counting” tv show nut jobs are a part of it. They actually claim (not in these words of course) that they are going to out breed nonbelievers until they overtake the world. They believe women should be completely subservient to men and be ruled by their husband like a pet. One of the kids on that show, Josh Dugger, cheated on his wife and fingerbanged his sisters when they were sleeping. His stupid wife didn’t leave him (because men are more important than women) but instead she shit him out another baby. Man, Christians are fucking hilarious.
All you are trying to do is suggest that creation and evolution are the same thing. You are the one who is a little (more than a little) crazy.
Yes, you have made it abundantly clear you believe anyone who will not stick their head in the sand is crazy and childish.
Luckily, science (and 465 pages) have proven gods doesn't exist.
1) How do we know God is greater than anything else? Before we have proof of God, we are incapable of defining him.
The basics were already explained here:
https://www.near-death.com/science/evidence/people-have-ndes-while-brain-dead.html#a05
2) Why should a real God be greater than an imaginary God? I can imagine perfection, but I have yet to encounter it in real life. I would argue that imaginary things are often better than their real world counterparts.
Godel's argument uses flawed assumptions, and the German programmers used those same flawed assumptions
Science will never prove God's existence because no men is higher than God and no men's capability could be equal to God's.
Computer Scientists 'Prove' God Exists
For centuries, many have tried to use this kind of abstract reasoning to prove the possibility or necessity of the existence of God. But the mathematical model composed by Gödel proposed a proof of the idea. Its theorems and axioms -- assumptions which cannot be proven -- can be expressed as mathematical equations. And that means they can be proven.
I actually did, quite in detail actually: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27336707
You might have missed it.
Godel's proof consists of the following argument
God is defined as that which is greater than anything else
We can imagine God
Since a real God is greater than an imaginary God, and God by definition is greater than everything
God must be real
The German scientists took this argument, translated it to math, and proved it works. However, they took Godel's argument as sound, so naturally the came out with the same result. However, his argument has flaws:
1) How do we know God is greater than anything else? Before we have proof of God, we are incapable of defining him.
2) Why should a real God be greater than an imaginary God? I can imagine perfection, but I have yet to encounter it in real life. I would argue that imaginary things are often better than their real world counterparts.
Godel's argument uses flawed assumptions, and the German programmers used those same flawed assumptions
Computer Scientists 'Prove' God Exists
For centuries, many have tried to use this kind of abstract reasoning to prove the possibility or necessity of the existence of God. But the mathematical model composed by Gödel proposed a proof of the idea. Its theorems and axioms -- assumptions which cannot be proven -- can be expressed as mathematical equations. And that means they can be proven.
The bible is the living proof that God exists... It's just like the wind, you don't see it but you can feel it that's why you believe that there's a wind.
Answer to the OPs title: There is no proof.
There is difficulty in proving anything. The evidence for God is extremely great.
Scientists and medical researchers are finding that all of nature acts like a gigantic machine. This nature-machine is extremely complex, way beyond man's present understanding. Yet, they can't find a source that could have built the machine. So they try to attribute it to millions and billions of years of happenstance. The only thing that we see over long periods of time is decay. Never an increase in complexity.
Consider Bitcoin. How many thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of years will it take to crack the encryption in the blockchain? We all accept the complexity involved in Bitcoin. Yet it has taken years for people, "machine makers," to figure the Bitcoin thing out. The best programming technicians might be able to do the programming, but it doesn't make them able to crack the encryption.
Nature is like this, except that we haven't even come close to figuring out the programming, yet. And for sure, if we EVER figured out the programming, it would be untold, unimaginable eons of ADDITIONAL time before we could crack the encryption. But if we could crack the encryption, could we ever figure out what the Programmer of the universe was truly like?
The point is, Whoever, Whatever the Programmer of the universe is, He/She/It is way beyond anything that we will ever find on our own. And this is the reason why we use the word "God." The only way we will ever understand God is if He stoops down and reveals Himself to us (He did it in the Bible).
The REAL question isn't something like, "Are you serious that you think God exists?" Rather, the question is, "What are you doing involving yourself with Bitcoin if you, even slightly, think that God does NOT exist?" Bye!
i dont think that this makes any sense
he hasn't been making any sense in this thread for almost 3 and a half years.
you think he's gonna start now?
So this is the new discovery of the scientists who will break Darwin's theory? Is not this already described in the book, for example as in the Gospels and the Qur'an. I think it's just a matter of Faith.
I have this feeling under me after i read some pointers in the comments here in your thread, and amaze how people disagree about God existence and talk about nothingness and meaninglessness assuming what they say is meaningful.
i dont think that this makes any sense
But do you have any scientific proof that it doesn't?
Jump to: