Regulation for ICO is a very good idea. It is regulation that can save this type of investment from death.
Now investors are showing less and less interest in this kind of investment. This is due to a large number of scammers.
Topic: Should ICOs be regulated - page 34. (Read 24188 times)
More and more often, project managers simply deceive hunters and do not pay anything, and even the negative of articles does not affect this.
Absolutely no, because the regulation is against the principles of crypto currencies. If we would start to regulate projects we would let the governments or other third parties to enter our industry. I do not want to make crypto centralised.
It will surely not be a bad idea if ICO is regulated but we do not want such regulations that will have negative effect in the people,though is a better way of eradicating scam.
I do see many people are suggesting to regulate ICOs but unfortunately no initiatives are being started yet. I wonder why this community is keep on refusing such a suggestion. It is more important to have a healthier environment into this crypto space. When we are allowing scammers to enjoy, you cannot have more number of investors to come and contribute for supporting good ICOs.I'm always keep on recommending to have regulations on ICOs and for new coins. But, nothing has changed so far. Hopefully we will be having a community-based regulation so that we can have a balanced ICO based crypto space.
Yes, I agree with you bro. A regulation must be established to oversee the many ICO projects that are currently emerging. ICO projects that do not qualify for existing regulations must be avoided, so that this will prevent fraud on behalf of the ICO.
SEC is trying to make this regulation, but I don't know when it will be realised on a proper level.
As for me there are chances to be regulated by the end of 2019 year.
As for me there are chances to be regulated by the end of 2019 year.
The lack of regulation sooner or later will lead to the fact that the sphere of ICO investment will die, because fraudulent projects scare away investors and money in this area is becoming less and less
This is already a necessity for the development of ICO. The current ICO market is already facing death, and I can hardly see examples of ICO success. It has almost disappeared now. You can still see the success of the ICO project in June, but you can't see it now. Perhaps only regulation can save the ICO market.
I guess that this industry should be regulated, because there are a lot of scammers who want to steal money from the honest investors.
It will surely not be a bad idea if ICO is regulated but we do not want such regulations that will have negative effect in the people,though is a better way of eradicating scam.
Regulation is the only solution to scam projects that are flooding crypto space lately ,they never cease to exist so if regulation takes place then we will have enough space to breath
A regulatory body is a good idea but where would you set it up? The world is getting united as one because of cryptocurrency. Because crypto is not strictly bound within a political territory. Having said that, you will have a huge body because it will be responsible to oversee the ICO operations across the whole globe. It might be very hard to monitor all ICOs all over the world. My idea is that countries should seriously curb the existence of ICOs within their territories. A regulation should therefore be put into place. And developers who are proven to be part of scam ICOs should be punished accordingly.
I really hope that in the future this way of regulating the ICO market will really appear. Because due to the fall of the crypto market and many instances of fraud, many investors lose confidence and stop investing their money in promising projects.
But now there is one biggest problem. Effectively regulating ICO requires a government agency. Otherwise, regulation will definitely not have much effect. Once the government agencies supervise the ICO, the ICO's vitality may decline, and it will become like stock.
the scammer must be overcome in order not to create ICO became progressively worse. with the tightening of conditions such as the ICO as a rule that exists for the ICO will certainly be able to make or create ICO for the better. but creating the agency oversight to this also cannot be realized instantaneously and takes time.
there are a lot of such organizations that qualitatively evaluate ICO, but the question is why they need us??? They chose the right ICO project, invested in it, in a few years they took a solid amount and then look for new opportunities for investment, only one question remains, what do they need us for? This is the whole difficulty of being a good trader that you could distinguish the reality of this Scam.
All of ICO investment project have been regulated, its will make an investor will be safety about how much their money investment at ICO, some ICO always give lower price after listing at exchange market.
so true. however, ICOs that have rules in it will certainly run quite well. however, in terms of price, I don't think we can determine it, because sometimes, investors and bounties always sell their tokens at a fairly cheap price. however, I think regulation will indeed keep a project running so that the price of the coin will be better.
I think it is high time to bring regulations strictly in place to prevent fake ICOs. There are reports that many new fake ICOs have been cheating bounty hunters and investors. Regulating new ICOs will also help make the market stable, thus attracting more and more investors. Likewise, regulations will also help protect investments.
Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.
I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?
Who will be regulator, i think when ICO get regulated and KYC held, already reduce ICO investor. But actually it is good idea because investor's money will keep safe even project get scam or not success in market. I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?
Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.
I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?
Yes I agree, another year now and still ICO scam shits are free to collect money no one has been jailed for illegal icos authorities in-charge in this ico investment are still sleeping and no actions they are too slow to regulate icos. I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?
Jump to: