I think so. ICOs should be regulated. I am not saying ban or something it's just needed some rules and regulations globally. At this moment in ico ecosystem there is lots of scammy project. Some of them are scammers form the first and some of the project failed after ico phase. Anyway they took the money form general people and vanished. And this kind of problem growing day by day.
That's why people and investors are kind of disappointing. They would not want to invest in altcoins. But by day by day many new project are coming and market conditions are also good
For avoid this kind of problem we need KYC.
Topic: Should ICOs be regulated - page 9. (Read 24211 times)
ICO campaign is needed some regulated from organisation in their country, like in england few ico campaign are regulated in estonia and this is can make investor trusted for investing their money in ico campaign, investor don't want loss their money from uregulated ico project
Yes, ICO must indeed be regulated so that ICO fraud can be eliminated. What they have done of course makes many people suffer heavy losses. Strict regulations must be applied so that their movements are also limited. And this will lead to investor confidence.
Hopefully this is not too late, regulations must be implemented immediately to ensure that investors' money is not lost, if there is no regulation, investors will choose strong coins such as ethereum or Ripple so that new coins are difficult to defeat top ranked coins.
Yes, ICO must indeed be regulated so that ICO fraud can be eliminated. What they have done of course makes many people suffer heavy losses. Strict regulations must be applied so that their movements are also limited. And this will lead to investor confidence.
Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.
I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?
This may be a good hope for investors but regulatory body does not implement any ICO policy, now IEO may be a trend to replace ICO , many people have participated IEO, if anyone can buy the IEO successfully, they will certainly be profitable I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?
Of course, I know that many people do not want to hear about regulations, but this free market is more and more dangerous for investors, more and more scams are created to get quick money. Is that right?
maybe at this time no one has been able to regulate it and that is the weakness of following ico because there is no legal institution that can regulate and bind
I think that only fact that we should think about is how to protect investors from taking part in the scam projects, but the anonymity was the main idea of crypto currencies and I do not think that it worth it to lose anonymity even by such a price.
Will be very funny when during the creation of this regulatory body will be. ICO) And all bounty hunters are deceived. Since such a regulatory body is a pipe dream of bounty hunters.
I'm voting for it to have one, if we cannot have one now, IEO will take over and we will see the end of ICO, there's nothing on ICO that can attract investors, even good projects with good potential are struggling to get their funds.
ICOs should be regulated as this model has been overcome. The ICOs idea is good but so many scam project
destroyed the confidence of the investors. Investors funds should be protected from cheaters.
The more time passes, the more likely it becomes that even regulation will not return investors ' money to the ICO, trust is lost and it will not be easy to return it, especially when there is already a rapidly gaining popularity of the IEO destroyed the confidence of the investors. Investors funds should be protected from cheaters.
I think it's high time we regulated ICOs in the cryptosphere because it seems some bad people want to take advantage of this technology and scam innocent people by launching all sorts of unrealistic projects which have no products but only potential use cases. Some investors are also not well-informed enough to draw the line between some of these scam projects so we need a reputable organization which can ensure that only legitimate ICOs run in the cryptospace.
ICOs should be regulated as this model has been overcome. The ICOs idea is good but so many scam project
destroyed the confidence of the investors. Investors funds should be protected from cheaters.
destroyed the confidence of the investors. Investors funds should be protected from cheaters.
I think in some way it is necessary, because too much scam last time, but regulated only to know if it truth or scam project, thats enough
Cryptocurrency and regulation are incompatible things. Very little time will come out of the projects with ICO in the presence of regulators. We will not get development.
Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.
I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?
I support you from your point of view. Because we cannot work and be exploited in a negligible way. Invest time and personal information leaked out. measures to manage ICOS projects avoid scams and I think KYC should be used for the founders of ICOS coins. I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?
As far i know icos already have regulation, but i dont know why there are still too many scams icos appear. Maybe ico need more regulation so scam icos will decrease in this year.
Your question also occurred to me because I think at the moment there really needs to be a regulation that is able to filter out really serious ICOs and also the responsible team. if the regulation is made, there will be a positive impact on the ICO because what appears on the surface is only a quality ICO.
I also think that, ICOs should be regulated. Due to scam ICOs, many investors are starting to think negatively about crypto. And this situation has negative effects on cryptocurrency. Moreover, due to these scam ICOs, the market is less reliable. That's why I think cryptocurrency needs a supervisory organization to be it a more reliable environment.
Regulation of ICO and IEO projects in the same way should be, and it will be, because today there are very big risks in order to be deceived. If today you see that you have been deceived, then you will also be in charge of the regulation.
ICO must be implemented immediately, when the beginning of the ICO looks promising and many projects easily reach hardcap even it does not take up to 1 month (pre-ICO), but this is used by scammers to seek profits and make too many scam projects that make the market difficult to recover.
Regulation of ICO and IEO projects in the same way should be, and it will be, because today there are very big risks in order to be deceived. If today you see that you have been deceived, then you will also be in charge of the regulation.
ICO must be implemented immediately, when the beginning of the ICO looks promising and many projects easily reach hardcap even it does not take up to 1 month (pre-ICO), but this is used by scammers to seek profits and make too many scam projects that make the market difficult to recover.
Jump to: