That Hernandez - Boufal challenge in the 1st half should have been checked by VAR, to me it looked more like it's a penalty than a yellow card for Boufal.
Morocco was very dangerous in the 2nd half and deserved to score, it will be a tough game against them for the bronze.
I think the Moroccan coach went too far by taking quite a number of unnecessary risks with some injured players, I guessed the players especially the captain might have coerced him into doing so, and for them only to come off a couple off minutes into the game after conceding the first goal, Saiss was a big risk and you could see the bandage in his when he was walking of the pitch, I suppose that's why they opted for 5 at the back rather than their usually four, because how do expect and unhealthy Saiss to fare against Mbappe on the break or Griezmann if they pick him up ?
That Hernandez - Boufal challenge in the 1st half should have been checked by VAR, to me it looked more like it's a penalty than a yellow card for Boufal.
Morocco was very dangerous in the 2nd half and deserved to score, it will be a tough game against them for the bronze.
It really gets ridiculous when VAR does not check situations like this in world cup semi final.
In this case, the referee had already rendered a decision on the situation, so there was nothing VAR could do since the referee's decision is the ultimate. VAR doesn't intervene unless the referee gives signal or missed a situation and he is called to check it. VAR serves as the field's assistant referee, more like,"Hey, don't come in unless I need it." As long as the VAR is under the control of the ref, nothing will change until they act independently.
Perhaps if Boufal had fell too, it would have been a different argument, but I think the first impression the referee had was that the defender had the advantage of possessing the ball, while Boufal was the aggressive challenger going for the tackle/take on, that was what I saw at first too, until I saw the replay and it was evident that Boufal even withdrew his before getting anywhere near contacting the defender, and he was the victim in the end instead, so he got victimized twice, one by the defender and secondly by there ref.
________________________
@igehhh I don't suppose that's how VAR works in total, I know for sure that it doesn't matter what the referee believe he saw at first glance, If the VAR advices him to take a secondly look at the monitor, because the have split decision with themselves, or at least a consensus that is different from what the referee, the referee's say is final but still the I don't think the referee will decline the request or suggestion from the VAR team.