Topic: Stake allocation - page 10. (Read 15706 times)
The ball is in your court to get more stakes if that's what you referring to,you have to try harder and show more devotions to this forum to get ranked up ,don't worry all you have to do is help the forum with genuine posts and leave the rest.
I can't tell if this system is fair or not,of course before it was easier to earn rank than it is now.But the decision is made and it just needs to be taken as a fact.Maybe over time, the system will change a little and become easier.If we talk about the rewards/stakes for bounty,you can also participate in social campaigns,you can study the trading of crypto-currencies and also earn well.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
You should name who among those merit giver that give merit to a useless post, I agree that it's much harder to rank now I have a lot of friends who have given up because of the rank up system but we should respect the decision of the administrators here.
This is the privilege a high rank member could get.
They started early and they stay longer, the merit system was new, before an account can rank up based only in activity, but we have a new system that you have to embrace. Moreover, the signature campaign should give bigger stakes for high rank as they can carry big sig which is more visible and attractive.
The solution to this, is try to rank up by collecting merits, you can do that for sure if you make good posts.
They started early and they stay longer, the merit system was new, before an account can rank up based only in activity, but we have a new system that you have to embrace. Moreover, the signature campaign should give bigger stakes for high rank as they can carry big sig which is more visible and attractive.
The solution to this, is try to rank up by collecting merits, you can do that for sure if you make good posts.
One of the joy of being on the forum, is seeing that you are progressing and growing as a member, but it is more fulfilling when you see you are helping people and providing solutions to problem. By so doing, without you relenting, you will continue to increase in rank until you have attained your desired rank.
I believe in rewarding hardwork.
To get to the rank of full, senior ,hero and even legendary member is a lot of hard work.
It takes much effort to get merit and subsequently rank up.
So if they are getting stakes based on their ranks then it's proper.
If you are not comfortable with it, you then work hard on the forum to rank up and enjoy high stakes with them.
Most of the higher rank members were not ranked up from merit earned,they were given with airdropped merits at the time of merit system implementation and those people after registered here need to rank up through merits and if they did so means they no need to work for these worthless tokens they can get slots on bitcoin paying signature campaigns. To get to the rank of full, senior ,hero and even legendary member is a lot of hard work.
It takes much effort to get merit and subsequently rank up.
So if they are getting stakes based on their ranks then it's proper.
If you are not comfortable with it, you then work hard on the forum to rank up and enjoy high stakes with them.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
Senior ranked accounts get to wear the avatar and also have a large viewable and easy to notice signature code
Which attracts readers faster than a junior member signature code
And why worry about the stakes ? Just get the know how of contents and be a part of it too
When it comes to merit; continue making good and educative posts
Merit will definitely follow suit to your account
I think this system is good where every reward is given based on stake not post, if the reward calculation is given based on the post, there will be more spammers growing here
The stakes depends on the signature space.
The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks.
When I was also new to the forum, I also noticed that but I don't know the history of it, probably that's it.
That caused by you need more effort to make or increase your rank from the newbie to the legendary. The history of stake created by the old system of BTT that gave you 14 weekly activity and you need a certain amount of your activity point to make you able to increase your rank. That's why there was a stake allocation based on level. The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks.
When I was also new to the forum, I also noticed that but I don't know the history of it, probably that's it.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
It's not the post but the visibility of the code on signature campaigner, it should not be equal of course, in fact, those codes from junior members are hardly visible compared to senior or hero members so they are likely to get more click, and awareness.
I believe in rewarding hardwork.
To get to the rank of full, senior ,hero and even legendary member is a lot of hard work.
It takes much effort to get merit and subsequently rank up.
So if they are getting stakes based on their ranks then it's proper.
If you are not comfortable with it, you then work hard on the forum to rank up and enjoy high stakes with them.
To get to the rank of full, senior ,hero and even legendary member is a lot of hard work.
It takes much effort to get merit and subsequently rank up.
So if they are getting stakes based on their ranks then it's proper.
If you are not comfortable with it, you then work hard on the forum to rank up and enjoy high stakes with them.
I think we cannot do to change it and besides the longer you are member here in bitcointalk the higher your rank would be, i think last couple of years the forum rules states that if you are a year in the forum automatically you would become a full member and have to be 100 merits. So its the rule now that the members would earn merits to be able to rank high and have a bigger stakes in the campaigns.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
I understand your sentiment, but unluckily for us being a low rank, we only have small percentage of the stakes, compared to the higher ranks, but what we gonna do for now is to make an effort to improve our ranks, you know investors have more trust to higher ranks compared to lower ranks, that is why they are more rewarded than the lower ranks
The problem you must actively contribute ideas and give good things to the forum. Shares for rankings to help you try to increase your rank.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 4265
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
You're missing the picture here, merit were handed out more in the early days because people didn't really understand what the merit system was all about and those against the system were just offering giveaways to undeserving members all in the sake of pity. Anyone earning merits of recent truely deserve it. You need to understand the world isn't fair you can be a school dropout and except to earn the same wages with a PHD holder. Jnr and snr rank can't earn the same, it makes no sense the only time members of different rank can be giving equal earning opportunity is when their rank range is between snr to legendary and they get paid per post.
if you follow the bounty signature it is fair provision according to. if you want a stake that is balanced with all levels of members. You can follow bounty article. youtube. or social media. all depends on your strategy in participating in the bounty. working on bounty articles in my opinion more easier than working on a signature. the stake obtained is also quite appropriate.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
Higher the rank you get the more signature space you will have which means more bold words on signature can be implemented so it is completely normal that higher rank member receives more rewards so if you want to get more stakes then you have no other option than rankig up even though it is hard but not impossible give the effort and you will gain merits.You can get more merits on local boards so try to stick with it as possible. The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
I think it is reasonable to assign rewards according to the level of the forum. It can only be said that the distribution is relatively fair and human. Coming to the forum is a learning process. The level is similar to the length of time to come to the forum.
Well, now getting new ranks is very difficult for those people who are just entering the cryptocurrency industry. And when new users will come, I think it will be very hard for themNewcomers do seem difficult to be able to increase rankings and this requires more knowledge than expected, and the allocation of the stake will also be adjusted to rank. This is natural and still continues so if migrants want to get a high allocation, they must be able to improve their quality and add merit.
Yes, I think this is only for signature campaigns. You can join Facebook, Twitter and content campaigns. So, your stake allocation will not be determined by your rank.
Yeah, I think it's normal. Actually, that's since I was new to this forum. Yeah, when I was newbie, my stake was also different from the Sr. Members, Hero Members and Legendary. And I think that's normal.
If you want to get the same stake allocation with Legendary, then your rank must be able to reach legendary.
Yeah, I think it's normal. Actually, that's since I was new to this forum. Yeah, when I was newbie, my stake was also different from the Sr. Members, Hero Members and Legendary. And I think that's normal.
If you want to get the same stake allocation with Legendary, then your rank must be able to reach legendary.
I think it is reasonable to assign rewards according to the level of the forum. It can only be said that the distribution is relatively fair and human. Coming to the forum is a learning process. The level is similar to the length of time to come to the forum.
Well, now getting new ranks is very difficult for those people who are just entering the cryptocurrency industry. And when new users will come, I think it will be very hard for them Jump to: