It's so normal if higher rank members are getting better rewards because that's how this forum works, when promoting any project you will see that members with higher ranks displays signatures better, in colors and very informative.
and members with high ranks give the right advice on the forum. people who just came to cryptocurrency cannot assess the quality of the new project 
Topic: Stake allocation - page 5. (Read 15706 times)
You should not compare it like that. if you are newbie from the college and joining the new join will you get the same salary compare with the old employees already working there or employees from the other company joining the same day.
Same like that time they spent and efforts they put to rank up to big level is not same with the newbie or junior member on this forum. So please do not compare in such way. If you do participate in multiple social media campaigns you will get more earning.
Same like that time they spent and efforts they put to rank up to big level is not same with the newbie or junior member on this forum. So please do not compare in such way. If you do participate in multiple social media campaigns you will get more earning.
It's so normal if higher rank members are getting better rewards because that's how this forum works, when promoting any project you will see that members with higher ranks displays signatures better, in colors and very informative.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
Because of this injustice, I almost do not participate in the projects of the podpis. They take time. And in the best result I will get $ 20 for it. I create high-quality content. Of course, I had the idea to create the best anemirovanny content on YouTube, but knowing how many scammers today. I do not want to spend my strength on it.
i get your fustration but it is what it is, the high rank account will get the larger share than the little guys like us, imagin a campaign that last for 3 months and senior accounts will get good rewards for that duration but the jr account who equally work same duration of time will get far far less, sometimes i feel very sory for junior account because the reward don't equals the amount of time and effort you put in to work for the campaign.
It's true it's not easy to rank now because of merits even how good your post is, still depends if someone will give merits to you. In terms of stakes we can do nothing about it since those who are legendary are like the pioneer of bitcointalk.
Rank of sr member or up is high so ofcourse that they have more stakes than you or to lower rank that's fair and I don't see any unfair of that. If you think unfair so you not join because no one forcing you to join to bounty just respect their allocation for the sr member and do better way for you to rank up also like them and to be get more stakes allocation if you join to bounty.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
They deserve it, it's hard to get a big rank like sr.member, hero member and legendary. Also signature space and signature model on high rank is more better than low rank like jr member. That's why more higher your rank more stakes you can get. About merits, you should post a good one to get merits, i know it's hard but that is the only way. The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
In my opinion, the stake allocation given from the bounty campaign is fair, according to the ranking of someone in this forum. Indeed for those who have legendary ranks, hero, sr member gets a high stake because to achieve this rank requires effort that is not easy. They must reach a certain merit to be able to achieve a higher ranking. Therefore, it is very fair if the bounty campaign gets a bigger stake. It's just that we can expect that in allocating the stake it should be routine every week so that when something goes wrong we can immediately report.
I think the allocation of stake depends on the bounty manager, and the average bounty manager provides a fair stake for each account rank. The higher the account rank you have, the more trust you have in this forum, therefore stake allocation is needed and adjusted to your rank in the forum.
The stakes depends on the signature space.
The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks.
When I was also new to the forum, I also noticed that but I don't know the history of it, probably that's it.
That caused by you need more effort to make or increase your rank from the newbie to the legendary. The history of stake created by the old system of BTT that gave you 14 weekly activity and you need a certain amount of your activity point to make you able to increase your rank. That's why there was a stake allocation based on level. The space provided by senior member and hero members are more visible and bigger than the lower ranks.
When I was also new to the forum, I also noticed that but I don't know the history of it, probably that's it.
I can't see the relation of it from why advertisers pays higher stake for higher ranks. And my explanation is likely to be the reason why they pay for good for higher ranks, due to the signature space and color, characters that it can provide.
If it's Signature, if there is a difference in stake between ranks, I think it's natural. This is like an Artist / Actor advertising a product, so the pay will be different from ordinary people. this is to attract interest and trust from investors. If you look at the rules in the social media bounty, you will see that the more followers / friends in an account, it will be more expensive . So basically the experience and popularity have value.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
Because of this injustice, I almost do not participate in the projects of the podpis. They take time. And in the best result I will get $ 20 for it. I create high-quality content. Of course, I had the idea to create the best anemirovanny content on YouTube, but knowing how many scammers today. I do not want to spend my strength on it.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
Because of this injustice, I almost do not participate in the projects of the podpis. They take time. And in the best result I will get $ 20 for it. I create high-quality content. Of course, I had the idea to create the best anemirovanny content on YouTube, but knowing how many scammers today. I do not want to spend my strength on it.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
I think it is also a worthy reward and it is also a fairly reasonable allocation. Because senior members often carry signatures with different colors and will highlight it. It can attract investors. The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The problem with the system before merits was that it encouraged spam and multi-account abuse. It would be nice if the merit system were tweaked a bit, but in any case something had to be done. However, those ranked below senior members can still earn plenty of money by promoting the right projects.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
There are standards that is being classified there, not just considering the fact that, these are high ranking members, but to consider their early existence on crypto currency, they achieve that rank because they've joined earlier, and without them, we are having a hard time understanding what cryptocurrency is.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
There are standards that is being classified there, not just considering the fact that, these are high ranking members, but to consider their early existence on crypto currency, they achieve that rank because they've joined earlier, and without them, we are having a hard time understanding what cryptocurrency is.
Rank is only based on seniority but it doesn't mean that high rank members are more knowledgeable than the low rank.
Maybe some are more knowledgeable but not all of the high rank, based on how I evaluate myself, I still see that there are low rank that are smarter than me.
I don’t want to agree with that completely mate.Maybe some are more knowledgeable but not all of the high rank, based on how I evaluate myself, I still see that there are low rank that are smarter than me.
Yes, they might be very smart and intelligent too but one more quality makes the senior ones smarter and that is why they are able to meet up, We have lots of low rank members that has been in this forum ever since it was created, not because they are not intelligent, just because they fail to keep up with the rules, and anyone who has succeeded in keeping up with forum rules is way smarter than anyone who did not.
So low rank members need to do much more than what they are doing now, ranking is not based on how long you have been in forum, no one rewards for that but how actively you have constructively participated.
I don't know why you're crying about it. If you lead an active life on the forum and give good advice then you will definitely get the title. But the policy of bounty companies is reasonable and proven. Imagine that you are a legend. Are you ready to get as many steaks as Junior Member? The quality of your work on the forum is also indicative.
What i feel that senior number are associated with crypto long before than new bie. When we people came to know about crypto only after mass publicity at social media. So you cant college the reward based on rank only. It is the hard earned respect that they get after so many year. Otherwise if merit will be give on quality post than people way it is biased or whatever. So i think it is fair enough
Jump to: