Topic: Stake allocation - page 7. (Read 15706 times)
I agree with that policy and I think this is a fair decision because I think this is one of the efforts made by this forum to reduce account growth that is so significant, merit is like becoming a new standard that will ensure that only qualified members will get merit and go up the rank
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
A similar job and performance, yet a higher rank. It's the perks of being on a higher level of rank. And with high ranks, we can put many links on the signature space. That's the difference of being a jr member to a higher member. I get your point but that's the rule of every campaign in this forum. You can't argue with the rules.
In my opinion, it is appropriate for higher-ranking members to get a bigger prize because they use a better company brand.
it's just that the comparison is very far from what is done is the same.
so in my opinion, the comparison of the number of stakes doesn't have to be too far.
it's just that the comparison is very far from what is done is the same.
so in my opinion, the comparison of the number of stakes doesn't have to be too far.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
It's only natural that high ranks should have high bounty allocations because their signatures are more visible and emphasized than those below full members. In the case of merit, I found it hard to rank up because of this but it's in the rules so we have to abide by it.
In my own opinion the stake allocation has been fare for everyone even with or without the merit system. The participants in signature campaign is getting paid by wearing or advertising the signature of a particular project the more visible the signature is then the more you get paid and it is not all about the post but there are some campaigns that focus on the quality of post and not by ranks though there are few of them.
Higher ranks on the forum spent more time on the forum in the past, having more posts/comments , wearing avatar and they contribute more to the advertising campaign with their accounts than a lower rank. In the real world you also have pay more for 100 billboards than for 10 billboards. Some differentiation is needed, is it 100% fair ? It will never be, as how many of us, we have that many opinions on that.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
Well have also noticed that but have come to understand that those with higher ranks gets more stakes cos they are been regarded as the Pioneers and with that it also gives those with lower ranks to strive more to attain that higher rank
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
A Junior Member makes 15 posts a week and a Hero makes 15 posts a week. You are right.
However, more stakes go for higher ranks, because their signature design is much more flashy and gets much more attention. Hence, better advertisement.
To solve this problem, I have created a detailed comparative signature campaigns spreadsheet, where you can easily compare the stakes structure between the different ranks and different bounty campaigns.
Feel free to check it out in my website.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
Hey, do you think the jr member signature performance is same as legendary signature performance ? Of course not.
Legendary account can using color, font size and more space than jr member, the performance will be far different from jr member.
I think it is a very fair system for stake distribution in most signature campaigns.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
Yes, the current system is different from the previous one and it can be said that it is more difficult for us to increase our rank from junior to senior so we have to work harder to increase our rank. I think a greater stake allocation for a higher rank is natural because most people start from 0 and it takes years to improve it to reach legendary.The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
For me, those higher rank/positions signature hunter deserves to have a high amount of stakes than other hunters, for the reason that they already existed here in bitcoin forum for a long time while others are just new hunters and most of them are just spam accounts by other people. And the signature of the higher ranks are having more characters than on those lower on them. The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
I think these things are already set. Bigger rank members can wear big signature banner, so they will get high stakes! I don't know which point you are mentioning here, because there is really a big difference between Jr member and Sr, hero members. Big ranks have more experience and they obtain the forum rules perfectly, that's why those accounts are live! You need to agree with these terms. Though It is really very hard to get merits, then I would suggest you, don't be disappointed, try to join other section's campaigns like social, content. Good Luck
Stake allocation for me is kind of unfair because of we have entered the scene of bitcointalk forum the same time sr.members and other legendary enters, we will be sr.members and legendary too. And we work as hard and the same as them that's why I think it is unfair.
That has become a good rule because sharing the stake system will make the members of this group the spirit to be the best and increase the ranking by contributing to this forum to be better so you can get merit to get an increase in ranking .
Stake allocation for me is kind of unfair because of we have entered the scene of bitcointalk forum the same time sr.members and other legendary enters, we will be sr.members and legendary too. And we work as hard and the same as them that's why I think it is unfair.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
Such differences in payments are due to differences in the signature and the ability to wear an avatar. At this forum, the signatures of the participants vary greatly in their abilities depending on the rank and the better the signature, the better this person can advertise the project, respectively, his work will be paid better. Everything is absolutely logical and correctly done IMO.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
when sr.members registered in bitcointalk you did not even hear about cryptocurrency. legends and heroes deserve their stakes. they working here much longer than you.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
Rank sometimes not a determinant. Although, others with higher ranks may earn more, but how you utilize the reward you are being paid will determine how much you will get at the end.
If you still know how to hold a good coin, you will earn more.
If you still know how to hold a good coin, you will earn more.
More percent of stakes goes to senior members like Sr member, hero member or legendary under bounty campaigns. But except for few cases, their performances are similar to those by junior members like member, Jr member.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
The percentage of stakes allocated is much far between senior members and junior members. Moreover, it is really hard to get merit nowadays unlike in the past when merits would be given based on the quantity of posts. Except for few cases, merits are awarded to only the nearer and dearer.
So what do you guys think about it? You are welcome to comment.
when sr.members registered in bitcointalk you did not even hear about cryptocurrency. legends and heroes deserve their stakes. they working here much longer than you.
It's a fair system, I support it. Sometimes some bounty company give stake for messages with merit, but it's very rare because it's really hard to get merit.
Jump to: