Risking to induce headache to anyone reading this cluster-mess of pyramid quote, I'll dive. And for that very reason, I'll only quote snippets of JPR's post that I think is relevant. Some will not followed a quote, but rather a summary of
discussion banter a brain abuse statement, marked in bold and underline.
First, regarding
taking advantage and misleading people:
The only one being misled that when
Pmalek talking about advantage he's referring about money is you. Pretty much sure anyone else understood what he refers to and tries to say: namely you utilizing the bug you discovered to [what I can only describe as] fulfill your personal vendetta because someone used it against you. You said and I quote:
I found the exploit when another player used it against me. I then waited for the same situation to come up for me against the same player who used it against me before (in a 1 USDT tourney) and I used it many times in the same moment in the game as I wanted him to understand that I now know the exploit he is using. As it was very obvious what I was doing, I later understood from the owner of Blackjack.fun that players were complaining about me using this exploit.
Second, and still related to the first matter, about advantage; regarding
never play BJ and/or on their platform:
You asked me this very similar question on your own thread, do I correctly assume the reason is [according to you] if no one ever played on their platform, that person will have no idea of how the game works, i.e.: the free roll etc.? Well, OP has nicely explained it to us
, so it'll be very safe to assume that even no one ever set foot on that platform, just from reading the explanation Eva gave, they'll have a clear idea that there are two kinds of game on their platform, the real one [with real money, losing fund, winning a game, etc] and the beta testing [free entry and lose nothing when someone lose the game]. As you always read every post, I believe you understand and can find the posts I am referring.
As such, just like Pmalek said, the "real money", though someone has a potential of earning a winning money, it's still a free roll, the prize money coming from the owner. If someone lose, they lose nothing, they suffer no financial damage, of which you argued it's still real and people investing time and so on. In relation to the point above, I'd give you a chance to make your stance clear on this matter: it is a free roll and thus when you do what you did over and over [though you're not coming as the winner of that match], it is not taking advantage of anyone because there is no one suffering a loss, since they did not sacrifice anything to join the game, or is it a real money and real investment because even though the prize money coming from the owner, people are still investing their time on it, as such, when you did what you did, you're placing someone at a disadvantage because by manipulating the bug, you're denying someone of the chance that they win something, made them lose their time investment, and not to mention the moral and emotional damage branching from a frustration?
Third,
circumstantial evidence, you can rest assured that the DTs, especially those who oversee the scam accusation thread most likely are not light handed on leaving tag, waiting and looking for enough evidence, be it a direct or circumstantial, to prove beyond reasonable doubt, or to a clear point of which most can agree to a conclusion. That's what Pmalek mean when he said the police and the judge [side note, lest you twist it to drive a narrative: in no way we claim that we are or we think we are the police or the judge] made their decision from evidence being provided, people does not necessarily have to have the exact experience playing on a specific platform just to think the evidence being provided held its weight or not, and whether they incriminate the "suspect".
I believe you should be very familiar with how this works, given that's the very reason why no DT is supporting your thread, nor leaving a tag on BJF [for the time being] in regards to your case, because it lack of proof, evidence provided are circumstantial at best, if not a hearsay, and you can't even spell it out to this point what's the scam is [well, actually you said it on your opening post, but it was not proven, so we demanded what's the remaining and actual scam is]
Next,
mirror, mirror, oh mirror, you claimed that, "
you can go back and read all my posts and you will not find me insulting anyone first. it is only when someone insults me that I will defend myself and I will be his or her mirror." You sure? Go back and read your exchange of communication with me. Up to
this post, all I do was explaining things to you, asking for a clarification about the mystery of what the scam was, made it known that they can't return your deposit because you refused to provide an address, all in a polite manner, and
your reply was, "
Please stop with your lies and wrong info. just read the thread before you give your false info". Was that not an insult? And you're the one throwing it first. Contradicting your own statement of mirror, aren't you? Or did you forget? Or you didn't mean to? But... but... on the other post, you "accuse" those who didn't take your side and instead inquired more [thus, me included] as not reading the whole accusation thread, while factually everyone did.
What's that if not an insult? An attempt to paint someone the way they actually are not? Hmm... what's the term for it, again? Libel?
Now, this one,
[...]
Any child will fall down the stairs or anywhere else, but the question is whether he will hurt his brain like you did! I still have a very high IQ and I am willing to test it against you if the price is high enough![...]
Can we have a proof of it? You having a high IQ. Otherwise, it'll be a circumstantial at best, a hearsay at most. LMAO.
but I assure you that I am not and I will always write/say what I think!
