Standing Strong Against Unjust Attacks: A Call for Community Support - page 9.

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 3507

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: Pmalek on February 19, 2024, 12:29:49 PM

A few questions and comments on the bugs that JackpotRacer found.
What can you tell us about the timer reset bug? Are you working on it, has it been fixed, do you not want to fix it?
JackpotRacer does not have a case, but he did find several bugs. You fixed some, but the timer reset seems to be a major one that directly influences the outcome of a round. If that is true, you shouldn't be hosting real-money games until that is fixed.

Whatever they did with this, I don't believe they will publicly present the current situation here. Imagine if they said here that they haven't fixed the bug yet, wouldn't that encourage potential scammers to start abusing this bug?
Also, if they had solved the issue, I guess that they would have announced it officially because the avoidance of the answer can be interpreted differently.

Pmalek

legendary

Activity: 2730

Merit: 7065

Quote from: holydarkness on February 23, 2024, 12:18:22 PM

I think this is enough. Pmalek, do you have further question regarding PF?

This is not something I can verify on my end since I haven't played any games, and so can't verify the nature of past rounds. Someone who has played Blackjack.Fun's provably fair games can do that. It's positive that the information is there, at least.

Quote from: blackjack.fun on February 23, 2024, 11:05:07 AM

Eva, do you have problems with your eyesight?

Quote from: Pmalek on February 19, 2024, 12:29:49 PM

A few questions and comments on the bugs that JackpotRacer found.
What can you tell us about the timer reset bug? Are you working on it, has it been fixed, do you not want to fix it?
JackpotRacer does not have a case, but he did find several bugs. You fixed some, but the timer reset seems to be a major one that directly influences the outcome of a round. If that is true, you shouldn't be hosting real-money games until that is fixed.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 4554

Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing

Regarding the license, I know it goes to credibility and that's why you guys are asking, but if the license they hold now is verified or able to be verified and noone has been scammed, do we really need to see proof of this or that?

Some will say we need to k now if they are liars or not(which is fine if they respond to what you want), but if they don't show proof and they didn't scam, what's the end game here?

khaled0111

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 3045

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: holydarkness on February 23, 2024, 12:18:22 PM

And this is available on every game that's playable on your platform?

No. The provably fair here refers to their in-house games, only. They have two of them Blackjack and Red or Black and, if memory serves me well, both of them are indeed provably fair (for some reason I couldn't open R&B to verify this is still correct).
Some of the other games from third party providers are pf but not all of them. This is something out of blackjack.fun's control as they are not the one who developed those games.

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1713

Top Crypto Casino

In addition to your questions about the overlapping of licences between Curacao and Anjouan, I have a question because Eva did not provide clarity on the provably fair claims.

I think Eva already mentioned in an earlier post that their provably fair claim was limited specifically to their own in-house House Blackjack game. After that, the next statement was provably fair claims are not being made on all third party games.

I hope Eva can write back with a specific answer as to which games are provably fair and what to do about letting their customers know which games are not provably fair and how that discrepancy would fit in with the provably fair image shown on their website because it is a contradictory statement.

Quote from: holydarkness on February 23, 2024, 12:18:22 PM

Quote from: blackjack.fun on February 23, 2024, 11:05:07 AM

House blackjack provably fair:
(Suggested by Bitcointalk community)

And this is available on every game that's playable on your platform? I think this is enough. Pmalek, do you have further question regarding PF?

Beparanf

hero member

Activity: 2954

Merit: 796

All casinos have a user like the one that attacking you right now. The only difference was you entertained him and given him the opportunity to compromised just to stop the attack.

Just open your ANN thread so all this discussion will be put there instead of creating multiple topic about the situation of your casino. Honestly, the community doesn’t support the user that attacking yet you are making it too big by answering to his repeated accusations that already debunked by reputable members here. @Eva, JackpotRacer is not your only customer, If no other user making a complaint then why making this such a big deal when the community is not even interested to support the one who attacks you.

holydarkness

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 1462

Yes, I'm an asshole

Quote from: blackjack.fun on February 23, 2024, 11:05:07 AM

The legal team has responded, indicating that requests for company documentation cannot be accommodated due to the presence of signatures and personal information within the requested materials.

As what the community wanted to know is whether the statement that you never go license-less, that your Curacao license was valid through 31 December 2023 and your Anjouan license has already been active by 1 January 2024, may I perhaps suggest to provide a proof of documentation that's strictly limited to these aspect without revealing other personal signature and information? So perhaps only the name of the licensee on that certificate and its expiration date. Or perhaps your legal team has a better way to validate this matter? An email from Anjouan informing you that your license is active and from Curacao telling you that theirs was expiring, perhaps?

Quote from: blackjack.fun on February 23, 2024, 11:05:07 AM

House blackjack provably fair:
(Suggested by Bitcointalk community)

Press My bets and then on the bet.
[image snip]

And this is available on every game that's playable on your platform? I think this is enough. Pmalek, do you have further question regarding PF?

CryptSafe

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 421

OP,staying away from this platform is like accepting defeat, which is not a good one. That would validate the complaint your accuser has been lodging against you and also give them the avenue to throw tantrums at your casino. From the unfolding events, the platform knows the real truth but is waiting for the event to unfold itself gradually. I will advise that you continue your work here because taking a break might likely affect your casino since the majority of members here patronize your casino and they would also take a break from your casino since there is no presence of the casino representative here.

blackjack.fun

copper member

Activity: 599

Merit: 241

Honesty is the best policy.

The legal team has responded, indicating that requests for company documentation cannot be accommodated due to the presence of signatures and personal information within the requested materials.

House blackjack provably fair:
(Suggested by Bitcointalk community)

Press My bets and then on the bet.

Pmalek

legendary

Activity: 2730

Merit: 7065

Quote from: blackjack.fun on February 22, 2024, 09:23:53 AM

Our in-house Blackjack game is provably fair, developed by the Blackjack.fun team. This is a game what started the whole Blackjack.fun platform back in the day.

How can I verify that if I wanted to? Are there step-by-step instructions on the website that explain the process of verifying each round of your in-house blackjack game?
Can you please answer the questions I asked in my previous post about the bugs that JackpotRacer found?

Quote from: Pmalek on February 19, 2024, 12:29:49 PM

A few questions and comments on the bugs that JackpotRacer found.
What can you tell us about the timer reset bug? Are you working on it, has it been fixed, do you not want to fix it?
JackpotRacer does not have a case, but he did find several bugs. You fixed some, but the timer reset seems to be a major one that directly influences the outcome of a round. If that is true, you shouldn't be hosting real-money games until that is fixed.

holydarkness

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 1462

Yes, I'm an asshole

Quote from: blackjack.fun on February 22, 2024, 09:23:53 AM

Quote from: JollyGood on February 22, 2024, 09:17:20 AM

I did not look in to any aspect of the provably fair claims as it was the Curacao logo that caught my attention but others have mentioned they do not know the method you apply to your provably fair games. How can your customers/clients check the validity of the provably fair games they have played immediately after the game has ended?

A brief look at the website shows a provably fair icon on the website therefore if by your own admission not all game providers offer provably games should that provably fair icon be shown or removed?

Looking at this from a neutral perspective, would you assume it is better to remove that provably fair icon as it could be deemed as misleading?

Quote from: blackjack.fun on February 22, 2024, 08:48:46 AM

What questions do you have about Provably Fair, and which game are you considering? Not all game providers offer Provably Fair, but many do for certain games.

For inquiries regarding company documentation, please write to [email protected], and our legal team will take it from there. They are well-versed in identifying which documents are publicly accessible.

Our in-house Blackjack game is provably fair, developed by the Blackjack.fun team. This is a game what started the whole Blackjack.fun platform back in the day.

If I may jump in, I think the matter of license will be best to be addressed publicly as it is related to transparency. As such, it might be a better alternative if you reach the legal department yourself and consult to them which document is allowed for public consumption and can be answered and/or displayed here instead of having curious individuals to reach privately.

Regarding PF, coming from an outsider who doesn't have an account on your platform and can't try to check himself, does the game is verifiable to be fair? I mean, if anyone wanted to check if their session is out of any manipulation, can they easily check that through a page in your platform?

blackjack.fun

copper member

Activity: 599

Merit: 241

Honesty is the best policy.

Quote from: JollyGood on February 22, 2024, 09:17:20 AM

I did not look in to any aspect of the provably fair claims as it was the Curacao logo that caught my attention but others have mentioned they do not know the method you apply to your provably fair games. How can your customers/clients check the validity of the provably fair games they have played immediately after the game has ended?

A brief look at the website shows a provably fair icon on the website therefore if by your own admission not all game providers offer provably games should that provably fair icon be shown or removed?

Looking at this from a neutral perspective, would you assume it is better to remove that provably fair icon as it could be deemed as misleading?

Quote from: blackjack.fun on February 22, 2024, 08:48:46 AM

What questions do you have about Provably Fair, and which game are you considering? Not all game providers offer Provably Fair, but many do for certain games.

For inquiries regarding company documentation, please write to [email protected], and our legal team will take it from there. They are well-versed in identifying which documents are publicly accessible.

Our in-house Blackjack game is provably fair, developed by the Blackjack.fun team. This is a game what started the whole Blackjack.fun platform back in the day.

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1713

Top Crypto Casino

I did not look in to any aspect of the provably fair claims as it was the Curacao logo that caught my attention but others have mentioned they do not know the method you apply to your provably fair games. How can your customers/clients check the validity of the provably fair games they have played immediately after the game has ended?

A brief look at the website shows a provably fair icon on the website therefore if by your own admission not all game providers offer provably games should that provably fair icon be shown or removed?

Looking at this from a neutral perspective, would you assume it is better to remove that provably fair icon as it could be deemed as misleading?

Quote from: blackjack.fun on February 22, 2024, 08:48:46 AM

What questions do you have about Provably Fair, and which game are you considering? Not all game providers offer Provably Fair, but many do for certain games.

blackjack.fun

copper member

Activity: 599

Merit: 241

Honesty is the best policy.

What questions do you have about Provably Fair, and which game are you considering? Not all game providers offer Provably Fair, but many do for certain games.

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1713

Top Crypto Casino

Thank you Eva for explaining the licencing questions but I am sure you will understand concern and/or disappointment some members might feel because you displayed a Curacao logo for around the period 1st January 2024 to 20 February 2024 even though you did not have a licence from them.

If you received your licence from Anjouan licencing on 1st January 2024 it means there was no period you were without a licence therefore that would demonstrate you did not operate even one minute without a licence but is it possible for you to provide any sort of verifiable proof that you had both licences at the appropriate times you stated (one for 31st December 2023 from Curacao licencing and one for 1st January 2024 for Anjouan licencing)?

It will be appreciated if you can address the questions asked by other members regarding the provably fair claims.

I think I speak for nearly all of us when I state that JackpotRacer does not have any support in his claim against blackjack.fun in that thread because he exploited the bug in the system and also refused to accept a payment from blackjack.fun therefore he is not part of the discussion.

Quote from: blackjack.fun on February 22, 2024, 08:13:08 AM

It appears crucial to clarify matters concerning our license, although it is unrelated to the current situation. Nevertheless, I will address it.

Until the end of December 2023, we consistently held a Curacao License for many years. Starting from January 1, 2024, we have obtained an Anjouan license.

Various factors influence details concerning a validator link, including front-end development, response times from the license provider via emails, considerations related to the link, and renewal processes, among others. However, it's essential to emphasize that the documentation we possess holds the utmost importance; the validator link merely serves as an additional trust factor.

It's worth noting that JackpotRacer is diligently attempting to find any possible information to tarnish our reputation.

Eva

blackjack.fun

copper member

Activity: 599

Merit: 241

Honesty is the best policy.

It appears crucial to clarify matters concerning our license, although it is unrelated to the current situation. Nevertheless, I will address it.

Until the end of December 2023, we consistently held a Curacao License for many years. Starting from January 1, 2024, we have obtained an Anjouan license.

Various factors influence details concerning a validator link, including front-end development, response times from the license provider via emails, considerations related to the link, and renewal processes, among others. However, it's essential to emphasize that the documentation we possess holds the utmost importance; the validator link merely serves as an additional trust factor.

It's worth noting that JackpotRacer is diligently attempting to find any possible information to tarnish our reputation.

Eva

JollyGood

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1713

Top Crypto Casino

It does seem that way. He was after all offered the $30 (yes all this about $30 as an excuse to attack blackjack.fun) and that happened after he exploited a bug in their system. He wanted that money donated here and there but refused to accept it himself. That incident should be kept separated from the questions some members have asked blackjack.fun about their operation and they have not replied yet.

Quote from: robelneo on February 20, 2024, 09:22:35 AM

Saw the thread in the scam section and he's not serious about getting his issue resolved he just wants to ruin Blackjack and insult members who contradict him, Pmalek is right in saying this guy has a mental issue, Blackjackfun used to have a long campaign here until they experimented on affiliate based signature campaign although it did not work they can still relaunched their campaign, there are a lot of poker players here and when it comes to poker, the community always have Blackjack.fun in their mind.

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: RRZpU on February 20, 2024, 02:35:39 AM

That's what I've been saying since my first post.

Just sue him and make him pay for his sick behaviour.

That is going to be very difficult if they haven't already identified the identity of JackpotRacer with whoever the user is on their platform. Because you can't just walk to the forum administration and ask for IP addresses, and even if you somehow had them, that's not enough information to identify the user's name, address, etc. to say nothing about how are you going to sue someone in a jurisdiction you are very far away from.

Shishir99

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 482

As you can see, the community already support you and they do not rely on what Jackpot racer posted. The only thing he could do was spread lies everywhere. No matter what he writes, just ignore him and go on. Do not take him seriously. Some of the forum members already responded to him. You should start doing the campaigns and other promotions that you were planning to do. There were always some trolls and some people who always wanted to take unfair benefits from casinos by blackmailing them. If you respond to them and keep talking about them, they will think that you are paying attention to him and he will force you to pay him. Just ignore and go on. Good luck!

Mahdirakib

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1026

In Search of Incredible

Finally you have broken your silence! You should have done it earlier. The user JackpotRacer complaint was completely pointless as he thinks everything in a different way. I was also observing the accusation, and I had stopped posting in his thread when I realized it was worthless to convince him. Because he doesn't think everything normally. I can see that you have unlocked Blackjack.fun main ANN thread. In my opinion, the best thing would be to create a self-moderated thread to deal with his poor mentality.

Topic: Standing Strong Against Unjust Attacks: A Call for Community Support - page 9. (Read 3178 times)