I'm still not sure why everyone seems to believe Zhou stole the funds. At this point, it's becoming increasingly obvious that he didn't.
Really? He found a hacker, talked to him and got funds back? From a multimillionaire?
If that guy was real, it would be impossible to prove that he stole money. IMPOSSIBLE. Nice story that Zhou registered his email account at that guy online website?
LOL!
A multimillionaire would rather return funds than get sentenced to prison and lose his multimillionaire status.
If you consider that impossible, why not reflect on Zhou's possible motives for stealing the money? The aurumxchange side contends that he would be dumb enough to steal the money, transfer the USD to another service, and try to sell the
BTC for USD as quick as possible: the next day. I find this story harder to believe than the one involving the relic collector.
I'm still not sure why everyone seems to believe Zhou stole the funds. At this point, it's becoming increasingly obvious that he didn't.
Increasingly obvious? How so exactly? For the record I didn't have funds in Bitcoinica (I wasn't much of a fan from the start) so I have no horse in this race and I'd like to think I can approach it objectively, but I really don't see how Zhou is any less likely to be behind all this than he was from the start. There's certainly no new evidence that would suggest otherwise. Sure there's this whole mystery Chen fella, but right now he's just a phantom. There's no evidence whatsoever to show that he was behind it, or even exists.
Aurumxchange has failed to produce any new evidence, resorting to points that
support Zhou's case. Patrick Murck has become involved.