.96: 24h average - 543Gh/s
.97: 24h average - 547Gh/s (but perf. drop after couple of hours)
.98: 15 minutes average - 563Gh/s
ASIC slot #1 46.5 ℃
ASIC slot #2 51.5 ℃
ASIC slot #3 56.0 ℃
ASIC slot #4 49.5 ℃
ambient: 19℃
Topic: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com - page 1191. (Read 3049528 times)
anyone has a meter for his Jupiter, only ?
seems like higher electricity consumption, but I can't tell exactly as I have several other devices connected to my one
seems like higher electricity consumption, but I can't tell exactly as I have several other devices connected to my one
Careful with this one, guys.. monitor your temps. My machines are running hot. Each chip about 2-4 degrees higher on 0.9.8.
As long as it does not affect HW errors %, 2-4 degrees higher doesnt matter, right?
those chips should be capable of 100°C+. so absolutely no reason to ring the alarm bell here.
yes higher temp mine run
between 560-565gh
between 560-565gh
Put .98 on one of my 3 modual jupiters... seems to like it. Little better WU/min at higher temps.
Careful with this one, guys.. monitor your temps. My machines are running hot. Each chip about 2-4 degrees higher on 0.9.8.
As long as it does not affect HW errors %, 2-4 degrees higher doesnt matter, right?
As long as you are under 100C I would not worry too much about an increase.
Maybe you should be concerned if it hits 80-90C -- maybe not.
In any case below 70C -- quit worrying take the extra hashes.
https://www.kncminer.com/pages/support
I will upgrade after I finish a short outing -- will give additional info tonight.
Maybe you should be concerned if it hits 80-90C -- maybe not.
In any case below 70C -- quit worrying take the extra hashes.
https://www.kncminer.com/pages/support
I will upgrade after I finish a short outing -- will give additional info tonight.
Careful with this one, guys.. monitor your temps. My machines are running hot. Each chip about 2-4 degrees higher on 0.9.8.
As long as it does not affect HW errors %, 2-4 degrees higher doesnt matter, right?
Some people have been doing testing around these chips and they actually have an "optimal" temperature that they hash at. It's not always just "the coolest" = "highest hashrate."
Some people were even creating shrouds around the units to get them to a higher temp.
As long as the HW error % doesn't go up like the guy said, the higher temps are not a reason to "roll back" to .97
.97 Firmware
ASIC slot #1 39.5 ℃
ASIC slot #2 27.0 ℃
ASIC slot #3 43.0 ℃
ASIC slot #4 37.0 ℃
.98 firmware
ASIC slot #1 41.0 ℃
ASIC slot #2 28.0 ℃
ASIC slot #3 45.5 ℃
ASIC slot #4 38.5 ℃
I'll agree with the comments above, this firmware does run hotter than .97. With the increased hashrate I suppose that is to be expected.
ASIC slot #1 39.5 ℃
ASIC slot #2 27.0 ℃
ASIC slot #3 43.0 ℃
ASIC slot #4 37.0 ℃
.98 firmware
ASIC slot #1 41.0 ℃
ASIC slot #2 28.0 ℃
ASIC slot #3 45.5 ℃
ASIC slot #4 38.5 ℃
I'll agree with the comments above, this firmware does run hotter than .97. With the increased hashrate I suppose that is to be expected.
it's harmless imho, this is my jup with 0.95:
KNC 0: 51.0C | 135.6/132.1/126.1Gh/s | A:11149 R:160+0(.46%) HW:160159/4.8%
KNC 1: 50.5C | 134.8/130.0/126.4Gh/s | A:11284 R:126+0(.46%) HW: 82402/2.5%
KNC 2: 47.5C | 135.3/132.0/128.0Gh/s | A:11467 R:109+0(.24%) HW: 91937/2.8%
KNC 3: 40.0C | 142.7/139.5/137.0Gh/s | A:12301 R:132+0(.28%) HW: 33157/.96
let say the I would have used "warmer" rather than "hotter"
Careful with this one, guys.. monitor your temps. My machines are running hot. Each chip about 2-4 degrees higher on 0.9.8.
As long as it does not affect HW errors %, 2-4 degrees higher doesnt matter, right?
.97 Firmware
ASIC slot #1 39.5 ℃
ASIC slot #2 27.0 ℃
ASIC slot #3 43.0 ℃
ASIC slot #4 37.0 ℃
Avg. Hash Rate 544 Gh/s
Difficulty Accepted 21,176,320
Difficulty Rejected 64,512 (0.3 %)
Hardware Errors 1,952,367 (7.8 %)
WU 7,874
Difficulty Stale 8,192
Network Blocks 350
Pool Rejected 0.3 %
Pool Stale 0
Best Share 9,295,152
Found Blocks 0
.98 firmware
ASIC slot #1 41.0 ℃
ASIC slot #2 28.0 ℃
ASIC slot #3 45.5 ℃
ASIC slot #4 38.5 ℃
Last Checked Tue Oct 29 14:45:20 UTC 2013
Avg. Hash Rate 563 Gh/s
Difficulty Accepted 104,960
Difficulty Rejected 512 (0.4 %)
Hardware Errors 2,378 (1.9 %)
WU 7,847
Difficulty Stale 0
Network Blocks 2
Pool Rejected 0.5 %
Pool Stale 0
Best Share 479,722
Found Blocks 0
I'll agree with the comments above, this firmware does run hotter than .97. With the increased hashrate I suppose that is to be expected.
ASIC slot #1 39.5 ℃
ASIC slot #2 27.0 ℃
ASIC slot #3 43.0 ℃
ASIC slot #4 37.0 ℃
Avg. Hash Rate 544 Gh/s
Difficulty Accepted 21,176,320
Difficulty Rejected 64,512 (0.3 %)
Hardware Errors 1,952,367 (7.8 %)
WU 7,874
Difficulty Stale 8,192
Network Blocks 350
Pool Rejected 0.3 %
Pool Stale 0
Best Share 9,295,152
Found Blocks 0
.98 firmware
ASIC slot #1 41.0 ℃
ASIC slot #2 28.0 ℃
ASIC slot #3 45.5 ℃
ASIC slot #4 38.5 ℃
Last Checked Tue Oct 29 14:45:20 UTC 2013
Avg. Hash Rate 563 Gh/s
Difficulty Accepted 104,960
Difficulty Rejected 512 (0.4 %)
Hardware Errors 2,378 (1.9 %)
WU 7,847
Difficulty Stale 0
Network Blocks 2
Pool Rejected 0.5 %
Pool Stale 0
Best Share 479,722
Found Blocks 0
I'll agree with the comments above, this firmware does run hotter than .97. With the increased hashrate I suppose that is to be expected.
is bertmod & enablecores the same thing?
No - Bertmod is used in order to display more details in summary form including disabled cores and hardware error %'s. KNC seem to have approved it for use, as it is not permanent.
Careful with this one, guys.. monitor your temps. My machines are running hot. Each chip about 2-4 degrees higher on 0.9.8.
Rolling back to 0.97 for now.
Rolling back to 0.97 for now.
absolute values? before and after?
is bertmod & enablecores the same thing?
not at all
Careful with this one, guys.. monitor your temps. My machines are running hot. Each chip about 2-4 degrees higher on 0.9.8.
Rolling back to 0.97 for now.
Rolling back to 0.97 for now.
yes the same
any reports on .98 firmwares? 
So far, my hashrate in CG miner has gone from 540 gh/s to 550
cgminer version 3.6.6 - Started: [2013-10-29 14:29:59]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):627.6G (avg):566.4Gh/s | A:27648 R:512 HW:594 WU:7846.7/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 NB: 1 LW: 29933 GF: 0 RF: 0
Take this all with a grain of salt, it has been hashing for about 20 seconds - havent applied bertmod quite yet.
what was your hash rate with your prev fw?
is bertmod & enablecores the same thing?
i have 2 separate .bin files but neither 'seem' to change anything.
i have 2 separate .bin files but neither 'seem' to change anything.
any reports on .98 firmwares?
So far, my hashrate in CG miner has gone from 540 gh/s to 550
cgminer version 3.6.6 - Started: [2013-10-29 14:29:59]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):627.6G (avg):566.4Gh/s | A:27648 R:512 HW:594 WU:7846.7/m
ST: 2 SS: 0 NB: 1 LW: 29933 GF: 0 RF: 0
Take this all with a grain of salt, it has been hashing for about 20 seconds - havent applied bertmod quite yet.
Jump to: