2. You are forgetting - RESALE. People are still eagerly buying 333Mh/s usb miners on ebay today. There will still be a market for a 400GH/s miner in 12 or 15 months, so the warranty should extend that far too.
Please don't order from KnC if their 1 Year warranty is an issue to you.
Order from BFL, they have a lifetime warranty!
Also as far as I'm aware resale often negates warranties. Certainly does with Sony.
Why? Most manufacturers rarely give you more than a year unless they are forced to. Fact is US won't be dropping a bomb on China, and if it does, you'll have a hell of a lot more to fear than hashrate.
"add an extra 1 year warranty for only $3000!" option.
Ooh ooh, a slight on knc. Dive in and save them bitcoinorama!
Ok, I've realised you're just here to troll now. This is a pointless waste of time.
This is how things are, i.e. this is fact (which people read)
but do your own research (which people ignore, because they are lazy)
So they are left believing the first statement as fact/truth.
I'm pointing that out to you so you can realise, if you don't, that that is what you do.
You have a massive influence over the direction of everything discussed in this thread or any other thread related to knc. You seem to pop up in all of them.
All my questions about components, warranty etc are valid. And you jump all over them, try to dismiss them. You like to dissipate them with no facts, e.g. "Fact is US won't be dropping a bomb on China, and if it does, you'll have a hell of a lot more to fear than hashrate." Like most of the things you say, you don't know whether that will or won't happen. But you like to confidently assert you know all the facts, like YOU know the truth for sure.
On "will America drop a bomb on China" (aka doing a bitcoinorama)
Factual assertion: It definitely won't happen.
Disclaimer: Do your own research, read up news media in your own country. Don't take my word for it
Spurious link: http://thediplomat.com/flashpoints-blog/2013/07/12/why-china-and-the-us-probably-wont-go-to-war/
(Spurious link attempts to prove the factual assertion, wiping away the disclaimer. So reader walks away thinking the factual assertion is fact).