Please add RX 560 ! thanks you !
don't wait it at near future ))) 
Topic: tdxminer lyra2z/XZC Miner for AMD GPUs on Linux - page 7. (Read 44574 times)
Please add RX 560 ! thanks you !
Does this miner have any API or something else to connect and read the stats? Like with AwesomeMiner or any other software. Thanks!
Miner doesn't have API
Does this miner have any API or something else to connect and read the stats? Like with AwesomeMiner or any other software. Thanks!
I noticed that some pools with high hash rate is doing something like an attack.
When difficulty is low, they push max hash rate until block is found and the atacker earn most part of block reward and he left the pool for a while until difficulty decreases. So i noticed that sometime the pool has huge hash rate like 3gh/s~7gh/s at gincoin for example and when block is found and diff increase it has only 150mh/s. It is like a cheat.
So, tiny poor guys like me with my 8x RX570 cant earn shit.
I was mining at zergpool and my reward after 24h mining at 22mh/s was 0.30gin instead 1.00.
But there are other pools that has same attack.
So the best for most users will be the pool that has a stable hash rate.
I was mining good at pickaxe.pro or gos.cx, it has low rash rate but it is stable, but you need to be patient because some days block is not found, but another day can found 2 or 3 blocks. After a week my average earns was higher than the calcs and much times higher than the attacked pools.
When difficulty is low, they push max hash rate until block is found and the atacker earn most part of block reward and he left the pool for a while until difficulty decreases. So i noticed that sometime the pool has huge hash rate like 3gh/s~7gh/s at gincoin for example and when block is found and diff increase it has only 150mh/s. It is like a cheat.
So, tiny poor guys like me with my 8x RX570 cant earn shit.
I was mining at zergpool and my reward after 24h mining at 22mh/s was 0.30gin instead 1.00.
But there are other pools that has same attack.
So the best for most users will be the pool that has a stable hash rate.
I was mining good at pickaxe.pro or gos.cx, it has low rash rate but it is stable, but you need to be patient because some days block is not found, but another day can found 2 or 3 blocks. After a week my average earns was higher than the calcs and much times higher than the attacked pools.
I agree. But the increasing pools are attacked by poolhopers. And for example minecore.pro doesn't return my GIN. Therefore I look for another.
how to disable --api-bind-telnet and --api-bind-http ?
Ive also been trying to mine Lyra2z and have been getting poor results from bigger mining pools, @ 20 mhs I am getting around .5 gin a day...
I noticed that some pools with high hash rate is doing something like an attack.
When difficulty is low, they push max hash rate until block is found and the atacker earn most part of block reward and he left the pool for a while until difficulty decreases. So i noticed that sometime the pool has huge hash rate like 3gh/s~7gh/s at gincoin for example and when block is found and diff increase it has only 150mh/s. It is like a cheat.
So, tiny poor guys like me with my 8x RX570 cant earn shit.
I was mining at zergpool and my reward after 24h mining at 22mh/s was 0.30gin instead 1.00.
But there are other pools that has same attack.
So the best for most users will be the pool that has a stable hash rate.
I was mining good at pickaxe.pro or gos.cx, it has low rash rate but it is stable, but you need to be patient because some days block is not found, but another day can found 2 or 3 blocks. After a week my average earns was higher than the calcs and much times higher than the attacked pools.
When difficulty is low, they push max hash rate until block is found and the atacker earn most part of block reward and he left the pool for a while until difficulty decreases. So i noticed that sometime the pool has huge hash rate like 3gh/s~7gh/s at gincoin for example and when block is found and diff increase it has only 150mh/s. It is like a cheat.
So, tiny poor guys like me with my 8x RX570 cant earn shit.
I was mining at zergpool and my reward after 24h mining at 22mh/s was 0.30gin instead 1.00.
But there are other pools that has same attack.
So the best for most users will be the pool that has a stable hash rate.
I was mining good at pickaxe.pro or gos.cx, it has low rash rate but it is stable, but you need to be patient because some days block is not found, but another day can found 2 or 3 blocks. After a week my average earns was higher than the calcs and much times higher than the attacked pools.
can i mined coin lyra2 algorthm used tid miner?
Hello,
can somebody please help me. I spent three days and still can't get it work on my test rig (vega and 2 x 580)....frustration: level 1000
I have fresh ubuntu 16.04, ROCm 1.8.0 speed is set to GEN2.
Vega card works great but system/miner can't recognize my 580s if they are attached via risers...works fine if they are plugged in directly on motherboard.
It also works if Vega is connected 1x via riser and rx580s directly in 16x.
I tried to switch risers, completely reinstall ubuntu and rocm 1.8 drivers but 580s still won't work in linux via risers.
rockminfo/clinfo shows only one gpu (vega) but when I start lm sensors to check the gpu temp all three amd cards are displayed.
Any suggestions are welcome.
Thank you.
can somebody please help me. I spent three days and still can't get it work on my test rig (vega and 2 x 580)....frustration: level 1000
I have fresh ubuntu 16.04, ROCm 1.8.0 speed is set to GEN2.
Vega card works great but system/miner can't recognize my 580s if they are attached via risers...works fine if they are plugged in directly on motherboard.
It also works if Vega is connected 1x via riser and rx580s directly in 16x.
I tried to switch risers, completely reinstall ubuntu and rocm 1.8 drivers but 580s still won't work in linux via risers.
rockminfo/clinfo shows only one gpu (vega) but when I start lm sensors to check the gpu temp all three amd cards are displayed.
Any suggestions are welcome.
Thank you.
I've tried searching this thread, but couldn't find anything about f2pool. Did anyone manage to connect to f2pool with tdxminer?
I'm getting this:
[2018-07-17 14:36:53] Pool xzc.f2pool.com successfully subscribed.
[2018-07-17 14:36:53] Pool xzc.f2pool.com set difficulty to 0.499992
[2018-07-17 14:36:53] Pool xzc.f2pool.com received new job. (job_id: TwpsMsYn3u)
[2018-07-17 14:36:53] Pool xzc.f2pool.com authorization failed. Error code: 24 - Bad address or user name
This is my command line:
./tdxminer -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.f2pool.com:5740 -u workername.001 -p x
The official guide says the worker name should be with a dot and a number.
However, I can't see what the password should be.
I'm getting this:
[2018-07-17 14:36:53] Pool xzc.f2pool.com successfully subscribed.
[2018-07-17 14:36:53] Pool xzc.f2pool.com set difficulty to 0.499992
[2018-07-17 14:36:53] Pool xzc.f2pool.com received new job. (job_id: TwpsMsYn3u)
[2018-07-17 14:36:53] Pool xzc.f2pool.com authorization failed. Error code: 24 - Bad address or user name
This is my command line:
./tdxminer -a lyra2z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.f2pool.com:5740 -u workername.001 -p x
The official guide says the worker name should be with a dot and a number.
Quote
Set miners' name to worker + '.' + any numbers, like worker.001, worker.002, etc. Each name corresponds to a miner.
However, I can't see what the password should be.
If you are good in linux I believe you can do vega undervolting all ready.
https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/361
I failed to make tdxminer running under this Linux build but undervolting works.
Can be also usefull. https://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=AMD-ROCm-1.8.2-Beta
https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/361
I failed to make tdxminer running under this Linux build but undervolting works.
Can be also usefull. https://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=AMD-ROCm-1.8.2-Beta
This is very interesting. I have to look into that.
What was your problem with running tdxminer?
Opencl problem in general. Creator of tdxminer requested testing and implementation of miner to this Linux build.
We need advenced linux user to give some tip how to make it work
https://github.com/tekcomm/AMD-rocm-rippa/issues/3
I think the magician tekcomm already did that. But since I'm in 1% as inteligent as he is it will take days before I will sort it out.
I will sort it out eventually because I am as stubborn as he is
https://github.com/tekcomm/linux-kernel-amdgpu-binaries
If you are good in linux I believe you can do vega undervolting all ready.
https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/361
I failed to make tdxminer running under this Linux build but undervolting works.
Can be also usefull. https://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=AMD-ROCm-1.8.2-Beta
https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/361
I failed to make tdxminer running under this Linux build but undervolting works.
Can be also usefull. https://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=AMD-ROCm-1.8.2-Beta
This is very interesting. I have to look into that.
What was your problem with running tdxminer?
Opencl problem in general. Creator of tdxminer requested testing and implementation of miner to this Linux build.
We need advenced linux user to give some tip how to make it work
https://github.com/tekcomm/AMD-rocm-rippa/issues/3
I had 2 rigs with Vega 56 cards and both recently stopped working/mining.
When I try to start miner I get following error:
tdxminer version 0.2.2.2
This is a beta release and may be unstable on some hardware.
[2018-07-16 09:41:00] Failed to list OpenCL platforms.
I did not changed anything on them, so I dont get why they stopped working.
lspci |grep VGA
03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Device 687f (rev c3)
/opt/rocm/bin/rocminfo
hsa api call failure at line 900, file: /home/jenkins/jenkins-root/workspace/compute-rocm-rel-1.8/rocminfo/rocminfo.cc. Call returned 4104
Any solution?
When I try to start miner I get following error:
tdxminer version 0.2.2.2
This is a beta release and may be unstable on some hardware.
[2018-07-16 09:41:00] Failed to list OpenCL platforms.
I did not changed anything on them, so I dont get why they stopped working.
lspci |grep VGA
03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Device 687f (rev c3)
/opt/rocm/bin/rocminfo
hsa api call failure at line 900, file: /home/jenkins/jenkins-root/workspace/compute-rocm-rel-1.8/rocminfo/rocminfo.cc. Call returned 4104
Any solution?
If you are good in linux I believe you can do vega undervolting all ready.
https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/361
I failed to make tdxminer running under this Linux build but undervolting works.
Can be also usefull. https://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=AMD-ROCm-1.8.2-Beta
https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/361
I failed to make tdxminer running under this Linux build but undervolting works.
Can be also usefull. https://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=AMD-ROCm-1.8.2-Beta
This is very interesting. I have to look into that.
What was your problem with running tdxminer?
If you are good in linux I believe you can do vega undervolting all ready.
https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/361
I failed to make tdxminer running under this Linux build but undervolting works.
Can be also usefull. https://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=AMD-ROCm-1.8.2-Beta
https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/361
I failed to make tdxminer running under this Linux build but undervolting works.
Can be also usefull. https://phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=AMD-ROCm-1.8.2-Beta
I probably have real hardware problems.
After a crash my miner is no longer running.
tdxminer => Failed to list OpenCL platforms
clinfo => Number of platforms 0
rom-smi shows both GPU
Does somebody has any idea? Thanks.
tdxminer => Failed to list OpenCL platforms
clinfo => Number of platforms 0
rom-smi shows both GPU
Does somebody has any idea? Thanks.
what GPU do you have
did you undervolt them?
Any idea what is the power consumption of AMD RX580 mining with tdxminer on lyra2z algo? More than Nvidia GTX 1080Ti or better?
I think they wont release the windows version?
I think they wont release the windows version?
IT DEPENDS on what core/memory/voltage you set
clocking in a correct form for sure better than 1080ti
my 7 470 use 700W
My electric cost is so much so i really care that one.
250W/ cards is really high for lyra2z algo.
My GTX 1080 Ti cards power consumption is 125W per card.
250W/ cards is really high for lyra2z algo.
My GTX 1080 Ti cards power consumption is 125W per card.
My 10 RX 570 give me 30 MH hashrate for lyra and 1100 W for electricity.
With this price, this algo is still profit but not too much ( after electricity bill )
Jump to: