Topic: The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings? - page 72. (Read 7705 times)
In general, I agree that the longer a bounty goes the less you will receive. As a bounty keeps running longer, it gives more people a chance to join which means more people are sharing the prize pool. From the project's Point of view in makes sense to run as long as possible with as many people as possible to spread the word. I am weary of projects that keep extending their campaign for months at a time.
The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings this i true , If they postpone and delay couple of times, you should leave them as quickly as possible.
Well, some bounties have been running for several months, as more and more people have participated in these bounties, so your rewards would also be fewer. It would be better to participate in bounties that don't run for a long time, you would get good rewards by the end. If the project is good then there is no need to run bounty for a longer period of time. Some bounties which have run for a long time have also failed.
I think yes, the longer the company of generosity lasts, the less it manages to earn on this project. The point is that while the people do not wake up, you need to register and receive your earnings on advertising. The longer the generosity lasts and the more people learn about this project, the reward for advertising becomes less.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
In many cases, that is true.
If you take a bounty campaign which lasts a long time, you should expect more rewards.
If the rewards remains relatively the same, you should quit.
If the ICO is not likely to succeed, you should quit too.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
it basically depends with the category of bounty you participating in, if its translation slots are usually fixed and for signatures the long you remain in a sig campaign the higher your stakes but for bloogs, facebook and twiter your friend might be right as stakes are diluted while more participants join to support this project .
there is some truth. the amount of earnings is affected by many factors. the number of participants, the amount of capital, the number of coins, the value of coins for the ICO.
I think there are too many participants in a bounty so that the number of allocations is small. you can see at this time one gift has thousands of participants, take the example of social media gift the number of participants can reach 5000 participants. total allocation in for the participants that you can predict how you can get it.
Yes it is especially in the signature campaigns it wont give you much when there too many high ranking participants,you have worked for 2months and and these high ranks will only post for 2weeks and they will have more than stakes that you will get? isnt that unfair for the lower ranks? that is why i dont usually join campaigns which has a lot of high rank participants.
I think it depends on the bounty campaign itself, usually, they determine how much participants will get in the first time they started the bounty. sometimes, the rewards are big if we can stay for a long time after the bounty is finished, sometimes the short-term bounty can also give a big bounty. and it's our choice to join in whatever bounty campaign and I think we should know how much we will get that rewards and if we think that the rewards are not good enough for us, then we don't have to join.
I choose campaigns that last no more than a month. You can get a lot more for them. Campaigns that last long have too many participants.
No this is not true if the total pool of bounty is small, and the payment will be small, and everything will hang how many people participate in the bounty. I recently participated in a 2 month bounty and there paid well))
I don't like long term bounty campaign, because The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings this is true ,i part in many times .
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
This has happened to me as well. Originally the bounty campaign was supposed to run for 1 month, but they extended it by another 3 months. The reward remains the same, so in the end it is the participants who lose out.
I disagree with you, there are different situations . I met with various projects . It turned out the opposite, the longer you spend the project the more you pay
It is depended on company's position, if they have set the limits on quantity of the members. If yes then the profit is more, but if there is no limits , in the end of project there are too many members and the profit is very low.
Of course, we need to consider the bounty in terms of efficiency by time. In addition, when the ICO is postponed, it is a signal to consider whether it is worth continuing to participate in this campaign. This does not apply to bad times, when the market falls heavily.
Indeed. I completely agree with the fact that the longer the bounty campaign, the less you earn. This statement can be shown in a simple example.
With the same bounty and reward conditions, you can wear a 1 month signature and earn $ 1,000. Or you can stretch a similar campaign for 6 months
and also earn 1 thousand dollars. In this case, your monthly income will be a little over $ 150.
With the same bounty and reward conditions, you can wear a 1 month signature and earn $ 1,000. Or you can stretch a similar campaign for 6 months
and also earn 1 thousand dollars. In this case, your monthly income will be a little over $ 150.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Well as a bounty hunter, you must consider first if a project is well known or well graded by top websites that gives their prediction on the future of an ICO. There are many sites where we can compare their thoughts if an ICO is worth the time we are giving or nonsense at all. Some ICO's took a long time before ending their sale but became successful in the long run. Patience is a virtue bro.
the more the people in the bounty game the the lesser is the bounty for everyone and the longer you the ico takes time to release the more its tiring so it is completely your decision to either leave or stay
Jump to: