Topic: The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings? - page 73. (Read 7674 times)
It seems so but not always so, some bounty pays more when it last more than people initially anticipated, also it depend on so amny factor, the amount the team is looking to raise, the amount allocated to the bounty campaigns and the number of people that join the campaign. Most people always look at the current valuation and the future prospect of the token
Not at all, your friend is completely wrong, it is instead the opposite, the longer the campaign, you will get more token. And most of the time, the longer the campaign increase the success chance of that ICO. But still you need to do research on that ICO, their team, their whitepaper, roadmap, etc. But my point is when ICO do a long run on campaign, they usually pay more token to the participant.
It's because there's a chance that you will not get paid so your friend started to leave the bounty.
And there are many people who joined the bounty so the pool will be rewarded to many people.
More participants = lower share for stakes.
thats just when they join in bounty social media, bounty pool for social media is small and so many members join 1000-3000 but not for signature the coins they are get its bigger when join in signature and i think its just a doubt your friend, maybe bounty not reach terget or have problem And there are many people who joined the bounty so the pool will be rewarded to many people.
More participants = lower share for stakes.
It depends on the number of participants. If the bounty campaign has few participants it would be profitable but if the more participants the less you will get.
And last but not the least everything depends on the outcome of the campaign. It seemes to me that ICO that was delayed so many times cant be very successful. It is my opinion
And last but not the least everything depends on the outcome of the campaign. It seemes to me that ICO that was delayed so many times cant be very successful. It is my opinion
No. It all depends on the company. If the company is good and promising, you can get a lot more in a month than with a bad bounty.
Yes it depends. Sometimes the longer the bounty, the bigger the earnings but sometimes it endend up to be a small amount. If the campaign did not get the support, the earning will be low.
If the campaign getting longer, its probably means that the sale not reached the target. The longer the bounty would mean fewer earnings because the participants would be growing But it's possible that the team project also raises the bounty rewards.
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
Yeah that's true for the lower rank, i seen many ICO's with that scenario and the reward was not good as the longer the bounty campaign those higher ranks participants will get the bigger slice of the reward but we can't argue about that as that's the rules of the forum. 
I think it depends more on the number of participants in the campaign, if there are a lot of them, and you will get fewer rewards
If the project is successful, then you will earn a certain number of tokens, no matter if you participated 1 month or more. If you have already undertaken this, then go to the end. You will receive one of these things anyway.
No. It all depends on the company. If the company is good and promising, you can get a lot more in a month than with a bad bounty.
According to this, No, this is not true if the total amount of the prize is small, and the payment is small, and it will all hang how many people participate in the gift. And you just have enough patience to wait until it is over and you also need a lot of effort to post every day or whatever the instruction says. But be careful choosing the right project to the campaign.
Yes the longer the bounty the fewer the earnings for low ranks . Rewards are always stated on the campaign thread showing what each rank will earn. What a hero or legendary member earns in a week is what a Jr member earns in a month. Example shown below and so the longer the bounty program the more the higher rank earns
Jr Member: 100 stakes per week
Member: 140 stakes per week
Full Member: 250 stakes per week
Sr Member: 300 stakes per week
Hero/Legendary Member: 400 stakes per week
Jr Member: 100 stakes per week
Member: 140 stakes per week
Full Member: 250 stakes per week
Sr Member: 300 stakes per week
Hero/Legendary Member: 400 stakes per week
so i read every commentar in this thread. and i do agree that many good projects had a longterm ico and bounty phase. especially when crypto went down, not many ppl decided to spend money on ico, because nearly every ico crashed right after the start.
bounty is an important piece of crypto currency platforms. you need a bit of luck to find the right bounty. It is a very bad situation if you have a long time and a low profit.
No I donot think so it depends on what type of bounty you are doing, some bounties have limited participant and also depends on your rank . How many followers you have on Facebook, telegram etc.So all these things matter , what will you earn from you bounty. In some cases I have seen the participants did very hard work and get nothing as compare to his hard work. Atlast it is only experience that helps you to choose your bounty.
to be honest, there is no guessing . There are projects that go on for a long time, but it is very well paid . Is, on the contrary , projects that run for 2 weeks , but pay more
My friend just told me recently that he is leaving the bounty that we both joined last January. The ICO has been delayed many times and it is getting longer. He said that the longer the bounty period of an ICO, the fewer the coins that you will earn. So it is true based from your experience? Should I also leave or stay?
It will depend upon the bounty campaign that you are joining because in my experience in ARVR project in which it took me 5 months of working hard last year but the result was good because it awarded me a lot of stakes in which after it hits the exchanges the value is huge in which i earned more than enough than i expected. If you want to quit then better to tell the bounty manager so that your stakes will be possibly counted if the ICO become successful and your time will not be wasted.
I think this argument is straight away wrong. Only good projects pay good amounts of bounties so longevity doesn't matter at all. I really love how some million dollar projects pay like thousand dollars to its supporters.
In most cases bounty budget is set in advance so it doesn't matter how long the bounty will last you still get the same amount. So I used to skip bounties which last for several months, because I already had a bad experience where I got about 10$ for 12 weeks for work.
Wow! This can be very annoying and frustrating at the same time. How do you pay $10 for 12 weeks of work? I feel it will feel a lot better if it was for a shorter period however, it's also best to study the project behind the bounty before joining any bounty program. It could look like a lot of work but it's worth it.
I think that that is not true because the largest income when you follow the signature campaign would be a great result. After the longer, the project is running, of course, too much income. And you get a small gift when joined facebook social media campaign, twitter, telegram and sagging because participants who join are already too much.
Jump to: