I'm not so sure if not having a leader would really have a dramatic impact at this point. It doesn't really feel like people care too much about "leaders" in the West to begin with. Although the US keeps turning their elections into a superbowl kind of spectacle...
In either case, I don't really care too much either way. If there were no leaders people would start finding ways to make profit out of keeping cities clean and stuff like that. In places were official law enforcement is literally useless citizens start creating their own "policeforce" as well, so I'm certain it would work out in one way or another. Whether or not that kind of society would be better or not is not something that anybody on this planet could answer though, at least not currently since we don't have any comparisons.
Topic: The world without leaders? - page 31. (Read 8857 times)
If the world have no leaders, war will erupt day by day and lots of lives will perish. It will be what they so called survival of the fittest. Even animals have leaders what more for humans. Yes there are lots of negative effect of having a leader but the negativity can't outweigh the positive effects.
The world cannot exist without centralized control. A simple example of bitcoin. Power over the bitcoin distributed between miners, developers and users. It cannot be called centralized control, but decentralization is not called. Even this relative freedom leads to constant forks. However, only 1% of the population uses bitcoin. Imagine what would happen in the world?
What do you think will happen to the world without leaders like the President, Prime Ministers, King, Queen,etc.?
If Man does not have the same leaders as humans have no direction and there will be no law or regulation, even humans in ancient times have their group leadersI guess I am misinformed. Please tell me, who is the global leader that everyone listens to?
God, if he/she really exists. 
A world without leaders will become like the animal world in which people break into flocks and protect their offspring. This will lead to great chaos and many deaths.
Some peoples in Africa and in South America in particular had lived without any leader with a perfect equality between members. It can work on a small scale.
And I'd like to believe it could be possible at the world scale. But I am not sure humans will be able to coexist all together.
And I'd like to believe it could be possible at the world scale. But I am not sure humans will be able to coexist all together.
There will always be a leader. If there isn't one, then you're somehow misinformed and you don't know who the real leader is.
I guess I am misinformed. Please tell me, who is the global leader that everyone listens to?
I think we go back to ancient times where there is still a system of slavery, human trade, and evil everywhere. now that there is clearly a leader, there is still another war if not there. a system whereby the powerful becomes the ruler.
A world without leader is like a ship without it's captain and crew, yes they would float at the sea but got nowhere to go. The world needs leaders, leaders who has the will and the heart to truly bring our world higher and higher. The kind of leaders that would never abandon the people and will always bring the best out of everyone.
There will always be a leader. If there isn't one, then you're somehow misinformed and you don't know who the real leader is.
The masses would ignore global warming until the human species went extinct.
That is what is happening now with no global leader.
That is what is happening now with no global leader.
Global leaders such as Donald Trump are not very convinced on the global warming theory. So how this is going to help? That said, the world needs leaders, no matter how much decentralized the administration is. No nation can survive without a strong and capable leader. And this is what happened to the Soviet Union in the late 1980s.
Leaders are the representation of people.
People's thought are made by the society.
Thus, places with bad leaders have something wrong with their society.
The masses would ignore global warming until the human species went extinct.
That is what is happening now with no global leader.
That is what is happening now with no global leader.
Global leaders such as Donald Trump are not very convinced on the global warming theory. So how this is going to help? That said, the world needs leaders, no matter how much decentralized the administration is. No nation can survive without a strong and capable leader. And this is what happened to the Soviet Union in the late 1980s.
What do you think will happen to the world without leaders like the President, Prime Ministers, King, Queen,etc.? I mean if we accused our leaders of being corrupt, oppressive and all other things, if they are not in the position, what will happen?
The masses would ignore global warming until the human species went extinct.
That is what is happening now with no global leader.
Anarchy would not be an stable society.
Humans will be no different from animals.
Every civilized group needs a leader in one form or other.
What do you think will happen to the world without leaders like the President, Prime Ministers, King, Queen,etc.? I mean if we accused our leaders of being corrupt, oppressive and all other things, if they are not in the position, what will happen?
The masses would ignore global warming until the human species went extinct.
That is what is happening now with no global leader.
What do you think will happen to the world without leaders like the President, Prime Ministers, King, Queen,etc.? I mean if we accused our leaders of being corrupt, oppressive and all other things, if they are not in the position, what will happen?
Jump to: