I can hardly remember the two-legged confrontation in which the final result could be explained by luck. It is obvious that there are elements of luck in every action, but at a distance of 180 minutes of playing time (plus additional) the winner is determined quite accurately.
True but there could be matches where the first 90 minutes or the next is the main difference. I'm taking into account other factors such as the timing, the players available on those dates, and who they will play against. If a fully fit team A will be paired with an injury-ravaged team B then they are lucky.Agree. On the other hand, the depth of the squad is the same factor in the strength of the team as any other, which is why the top clubs at a distance look much stronger than the smaller ones whose squad is much less variable. But then I remembered a good example of a random factor: in the 2010 Inter - Barcelona match, the team from Spain was forced to travel by bus instead of flying due to a volcanic eruption, and this was later called the reason for the weak game and defeat 1-3.
not just juventus and roma in seria A ,we have alot more teams still on their nerves ;brighton or Liverpool will make them lie flat just like what they did formerly before now.
