Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ - page 42.

mprep

global moderator

Activity: 3794

Merit: 2652

In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce

Quote from: Zephir on March 02, 2015, 03:48:04 AM

Quote from: dserrano5 on March 01, 2015, 03:58:13 PM

Quote from: mprep on February 28, 2015, 08:02:37 PM

Bump. Removed the question marks from a few rules as I encountered enough situations for me to fully confirm that those rules are still active. The list/thread is somewhat complete although good suggestions and new rules as they come out will be added. Made a few minor changes to the text (removed or changed) to reflect that.

Do you happen to have a list of changes? Improbable, I know, but I have to try Wink

. It's for updating the spanish translation.

Yeah, would be nice for the german translation too. I can see there are no question marks any more.

Yeah, no question marks. I updated the text above the "Forum rules" title to:

Quote

The list is somewhat complete but I still will be adding rules as I encounter them. I'm open to suggestions on formatting, sources, mistakes, rules, removal from the list, etc.

Removed the text at the bottom of the FAQ, above the guidelines as questions are more or less done, unless I find a good one. That's it, I think. Haven't made any important changes so didn't think that a changelog would be needed.

Zephir

hero member

Activity: 533

Merit: 539

Quote from: dserrano5 on March 01, 2015, 03:58:13 PM

Quote from: mprep on February 28, 2015, 08:02:37 PM

Bump. Removed the question marks from a few rules as I encountered enough situations for me to fully confirm that those rules are still active. The list/thread is somewhat complete although good suggestions and new rules as they come out will be added. Made a few minor changes to the text (removed or changed) to reflect that.

Do you happen to have a list of changes? Improbable, I know, but I have to try Wink

. It's for updating the spanish translation.

Yeah, would be nice for the german translation too. I can see there are no question marks any more.

dserrano5

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1030

Quote from: mprep on February 28, 2015, 08:02:37 PM

Bump. Removed the question marks from a few rules as I encountered enough situations for me to fully confirm that those rules are still active. The list/thread is somewhat complete although good suggestions and new rules as they come out will be added. Made a few minor changes to the text (removed or changed) to reflect that.

Do you happen to have a list of changes? Improbable, I know, but I have to try Wink

. It's for updating the spanish translation.

mprep

global moderator

Activity: 3794

Merit: 2652

In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce

Bump. Removed the question marks from a few rules as I encountered enough situations for me to fully confirm that those rules are still active. The list/thread is somewhat complete although good suggestions and new rules as they come out will be added. Made a few minor changes to the text (removed or changed) to reflect that.

Muhammed Zakir

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 509

I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!

Quote from: mprep on February 28, 2015, 07:40:07 AM

That's a slippery matter. As I experienced, most of the threads in Reputation is to allow users leave feedback. As this is focused on the negative aspect and aimed at one situation rather than reputation in general, I think that Scam accusations somewhat fits. If any other mod thinks otherwise, he'd move it.

Threads in 'Reputation' are about positive feedback but a few negatives are also there. I don't think it is mainly focused for feedback but it all we can see.

It was first posted in 'Meta'. When I reported the post, IIRC it was moved to 'Reputation' but then it was moved to 'Scam Accusations'. I don't think this was done by one mod. Thanks for replying!

If any other staff/mod see this, I would like to get a reply on this. Different persons may have different opinions/views. Thanks!

-MZ

mprep

global moderator

Activity: 3794

Merit: 2652

In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce

Quote from: Muhammed Zakir on February 28, 2015, 07:23:12 AM

What about posts like these^[1]? Shouldn't it actually fit in Reputation? It's not like a 'Scam Accusation' but more like about 'Reputation'.

[1] https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/tecshare-is-a-liar-and-a-vindictive-abuser-of-the-trust-system-969863

-MZ

That's a slippery matter. As I experienced, most of the threads in Reputation is to allow users leave feedback. As this is focused on the negative aspect and aimed at one situation rather than reputation in general, I think that Scam accusations somewhat fits. If any other mod thinks otherwise, he'd move it.

Muhammed Zakir

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 509

I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!

What about posts like these^[1]? Shouldn't it actually fit in Reputation? It's not like a 'Scam Accusation' but more like about 'Reputation'.

[1] https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/tecshare-is-a-liar-and-a-vindictive-abuser-of-the-trust-system-969863

-MZ

mprep

global moderator

Activity: 3794

Merit: 2652

In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce

Quote from: shorena on February 28, 2015, 05:27:35 AM

Bump and I also have a question. I am not sure if posts like these[1] should be in scam accusation, but rather in gambling. I could not find a definite post about this, but isnt scam accusations about individuals and not about services, casinos, etc.?

[1] https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unbelievable-999dice-fixes-their-system-and-sneaks-in-a-new-scam-tactic-971447

I think it fits in Scam accusations as it highlights unfair and unethical methods used by the owner. Gambling is for gambling site announcements and general Bitcoin gambling discussion. Positive or semi-positive threads about gambling sites should go to Service discussion and the negative ones to Scam accusations.

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1562

No I dont escrow anymore.

Bump and I also have a question. I am not sure if posts like these[1] should be in scam accusation, but rather in gambling. I could not find a definite post about this, but isnt scam accusations about individuals and not about services, casinos, etc.?

[1] https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unbelievable-999dice-fixes-their-system-and-sneaks-in-a-new-scam-tactic-971447

mprep

global moderator

Activity: 3794

Merit: 2652

In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce

Quote from: botany on February 22, 2015, 11:34:03 AM

Is there a rule that threads like these should be moved to the archival board?

Depends. Some threads that might not have any replies would just be deleted while those qith several replies get moved to Archival. It also depends on the mod that handles the situation.

Muhammed Zakir

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 509

I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!

Quote from: botany on February 22, 2015, 11:34:03 AM

Is there a rule that threads like these should be moved to the archival board?

Partial yes. Some posts are moved to Archival rather than deleting for public proofs.

Quote from: mprep on July 21, 2014, 12:27:51 PM

1. No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads.

-MZ

botany

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1064

Is there a rule that threads like these should be moved to the archival board?

MadZ

hero member

Activity: 908

Merit: 657

Quote from: hilariousandco on February 04, 2015, 06:39:50 PM

Perhaps you and any anyone else could add it to yours?

Sure, hopefully some people will benefit from it, I just thought it would most be effective among the staff.

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 4046

Merit: 2732

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Perhaps you and any anyone else could add it to yours?

MadZ

hero member

Activity: 908

Merit: 657

Quote from: hilariousandco on February 04, 2015, 05:55:10 PM

Personally I think it should be stickied. I think adding a link to this thread that gets sent along with the deleted posts urging people to read the rules would be a good idea also.

Perhaps it would be a good idea for staff to add a link to this thread in their signature as well.

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 4046

Merit: 2732

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Personally I think it should be stickied. I think adding a link to this thread that gets sent along with the deleted posts urging people to read the rules would be a good idea also.

mprep

global moderator

Activity: 3794

Merit: 2652

In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce

Bump (will delete this when someone posts after this).

qwk

donator

Activity: 3542

Merit: 3413

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: Mitchell on January 21, 2015, 11:56:22 AM

Going to bump this thread as it should be known by everyone and maybe even stickied.

Yep.

--Encrypted--

copper member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1007

hee-ho.

Quote from: Mitchell on January 21, 2015, 11:56:22 AM

Going to bump this thread as it should be known by everyone and maybe even stickied.

I was just going to say that

this thread is very useful, it should be stickied

Mitchell

copper member

Activity: 3948

Merit: 2201

Verified awesomeness ✔

Going to bump this thread as it should be known by everyone and maybe even stickied.

Topic: Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ - page 42. (Read 1087510 times)