Pages:
Author

Topic: Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ - page 38. (Read 1055299 times)

copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
Is rule 21 actually enforced? Very few people follow it, and the couple of times I have reported it, nothing seemed to be done. Is it worth reporting at all?

Yes it is. I always report them and they're handled eventually and I handle the ones I can (made by newbies), but I think there's a lack of Global Moderators and Marketplace mods that can handle them, not to mention they're probably not a top priority and deleting posts, especially many, takes longer than dealing with other reports etc.

hillarious, what about the necro bumps here by Quickseler/ACCTSeller: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11140169

These bumps were part of a smear campaign to dig up potential dirt on me.  Certainly this is not how people on Default Trust are supposed to be behaving?

Necros are fine if they are on topic and contribute to the discussion. Whether or not Quickseller contributed to the disccusion or "just brought it back" is certainly subjective.

-snip-
Regarding necro posting, if the necro post is substantial (doesn't break the rule especially rule 1 and 2 (2014/07/21 version)), then it's OK.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1081
I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.
Is rule 21 actually enforced? Very few people follow it, and the couple of times I have reported it, nothing seemed to be done. Is it worth reporting at all?

Yes it is. I always report them and they're handled eventually and I handle the ones I can (made by newbies), but I think there's a lack of Global Moderators and Marketplace mods that can handle them, not to mention they're probably not a top priority and deleting posts, especially many, takes longer than dealing with other reports etc.

hillarious, what about the necro bumps here by Quickseler/ACCTSeller: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11140169

These bumps were part of a smear campaign to dig up potential dirt on me.  Certainly this is not how people on Default Trust are supposed to be behaving?
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
https://dadice.com | Click my signature to join!
Just wondering if a sensible choice to get rid o +1, thank you, etc. posts is to put something like this in the rules: You should edit your original post instead and add a line there, like e.g.: Edit: Thank you to for your help/clarification.

See also:

===>>> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/posts-deleted-1029540
===>>> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/are-members-of-sig-ad-campaigns-only-banned-or-other-members-as-well-are-banned-1028881
That's kind of covered by rule 1. If people post zero value posts now, they'll post them even if a new rule is in place.

+1. However, a suggestion remind could still help.....at least lazy people!  Wink
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2612
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
Just wondering if a sensible choice to get rid o +1, thank you, etc. posts is to put something like this in the rules: You should edit your original post instead and add a line there, like e.g.: Edit: Thank you to for your help/clarification.

See also:

===>>> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/posts-deleted-1029540
===>>> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/are-members-of-sig-ad-campaigns-only-banned-or-other-members-as-well-are-banned-1028881
That's kind of covered by rule 1. If people post zero value posts now, they'll post them even if a new rule is in place.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
https://dadice.com | Click my signature to join!
Just wondering if a sensible choice to get rid o +1, thank you, etc. posts is to put something like this in the rules: You should edit your original post instead and add a line there, like e.g.: Edit: Thank you to for your help/clarification.

See also:

===>>> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/posts-deleted-1029540
===>>> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/are-members-of-sig-ad-campaigns-only-banned-or-other-members-as-well-are-banned-1028881
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
=snip=
Also, when new faucets and faucet rotators are released, they spam in Beginners and Help. It doesn't look right IMHO. Any reason why no action is taken?

There was some discussion about moving new faucet announcements to it's own subforum. Not sure if the demand was enough to actually do it, but a large percentage of posts are currently about faucets anyways.

I didn't mean faucets and faucet rotators in Service Announcements. It is fine but these threads in Beginners & Help isn't right IMHO. It should eitherbe deleted or moved to Archival because of most of these are already announced in Service Announcements.

To your post: A new board is necessary but it will take sometime like it took time for Trashcan v2.0(aka Investor-based Games).
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Why does BTCJam forum name verification in Games and Rounds? Shouldn't it be in Services?
Might be due to the fact that they generate a lot of low value posts, just like giveaways in Games and rounds.

It is possible. I reported it one or two times but report was probably ignored or marked as bad. So want to know the reason. Thank you!

Also, when new faucets and faucet rotators are released, they spam in Beginners and Help. It doesn't look right IMHO. Any reason why no action is taken?

There was some discussion about moving new faucet announcements to it's own subforum. Not sure if the demand was enough to actually do it, but a large percentage of posts are currently about faucets anyways.
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2612
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
Why does BTCJam forum name verification in Games and Rounds? Shouldn't it be in Services?
Might be due to the fact that they generate a lot of low value posts, just like giveaways in Games and rounds.

It is possible. I reported it one or two times but report was probably ignored or marked as bad. So want to know the reason. Thank you!

Also, when new faucets and faucet rotators are released, they spam in Beginners and Help. It doesn't look right IMHO. Any reason why no action is taken?
I, at least, handle such reports and move the threada but other moderators might think otherwise.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
Why does BTCJam forum name verification in Games and Rounds? Shouldn't it be in Services?
Might be due to the fact that they generate a lot of low value posts, just like giveaways in Games and rounds.

It is possible. I reported it one or two times but report was probably ignored or marked as bad. So want to know the reason. Thank you!

Also, when new faucets and faucet rotators are released, they spam in Beginners and Help. It doesn't look right IMHO. Any reason why no action is taken?

Many things fit into beginners and help, faucets included. I recently saw MiningBuddy clean the section though. I would still report it, regardless if it gets moved or not. We dont know how most reports are handled anyway. The rare exception is when you report a post and a mod takes action a few seconds later. Makes me want to hi5 them sometimes. Wink
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
Why does BTCJam forum name verification in Games and Rounds? Shouldn't it be in Services?
Might be due to the fact that they generate a lot of low value posts, just like giveaways in Games and rounds.

It is possible. I reported it one or two times but report was probably ignored or marked as bad. So want to know the reason. Thank you!

Also, when new faucets and faucet rotators are released, they spam in Beginners and Help. It doesn't look right IMHO. Any reason why no action is taken?
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2612
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
Why does BTCJam forum name verification in Games and Rounds? Shouldn't it be in Services?
Might be due to the fact that they generate a lot of low value posts, just like giveaways in Games and rounds.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
Why does BTCJam forum name verification in Games and Rounds? Shouldn't it be in Services?
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
Yes. Did you report them?

Yes, I did before posting here.* I wanted to know whether they are spam because some of these posts are still around here(IIRC). Thank you for replying! I will try to report rest of them(if any).

* https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--1018906
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2612
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
I found something whilst reading some old topics which I do from time to time and discovered a title naming guide by theymos. Might be worth mentioning in the original post. Pretty helpful. Somethings I'm guilty of not doing some of the recommendations.

Moderators here typically don't require you to use good titles for topics, but I thought I'd post some guidelines for anyone wondering how best to write a title.

Include enough info in the title so that readers can mostly guess what your topic is about. Try to condense your topic's main idea into a few sentences. Ideally, people should be able to write useful, on-topic replies by just reading the title (though this sometimes isn't possible).

Terrible titles include:
- "A question"
- "I was wondering..."
- "Someone help me"
These titles are better, though still not great:
- "A question about Bitcoin-Qt"
- "Survey of the community"
- "I have a problem with the forum"
These titles are good:
- "Bitcoin-Qt takes too long to start. How can I speed it up?"
- "Poll: What is your gender?"
- "Whenever I try to send a PM, the forum gives me an error"

When asking a question, never use a title like "How to send BTC"; it makes the topic look like a guide on how to do something instead of a question about how to do it.

Some people like to put "tags" in the title within brackets. Like "[GLBSE] [ANNOUNCE] ASDF: Generic asset". I personally don't like this style. I prefer to include the tag info within the sentence, like "Announcing ASDF, a generic asset on GLBSE". When tags are really necessary, it may indicate that a new subforum should be created.

Use normal capitalization, not "newspaper capitalization". "Thread title style guide" instead of "Thread Title Style Guide". Capitalize the first letter of the title unless it a trademark like "eMachines".

Omit unimportant leading words. "Selling $100" instead of "I'm selling $100". Other than that, it's best to write a grammatically correct sentence if doing so does not make the title annoyingly long.

If the title is composed of only one sentence, don't include a period at the end. If it contains two or more sentences, put a period after each sentence, including the last. Questions must end with a question mark.
Added to the FAQ, thanks:

Quote
Q: How should I name my thread? / Are there any guidelines to naming threads?
A: A post from the admin, theymos, explains it pretty well. See: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/topic-title-style-guide-102944
global moderator
Activity: 4018
Merit: 2728
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Yes. Did you report them?
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
Isn't posts like below post considered spam? It looks similar to "+1" posts but these posts are still undeleted.

Quote from: usrname
Quote


Cheesy Cheesy
staff
Activity: 3304
Merit: 4115
I found something whilst reading some old topics which I do from time to time and discovered a title naming guide by theymos. Might be worth mentioning in the original post. Pretty helpful. Somethings I'm guilty of not doing some of the recommendations.

Moderators here typically don't require you to use good titles for topics, but I thought I'd post some guidelines for anyone wondering how best to write a title.

Include enough info in the title so that readers can mostly guess what your topic is about. Try to condense your topic's main idea into a few sentences. Ideally, people should be able to write useful, on-topic replies by just reading the title (though this sometimes isn't possible).

Terrible titles include:
- "A question"
- "I was wondering..."
- "Someone help me"
These titles are better, though still not great:
- "A question about Bitcoin-Qt"
- "Survey of the community"
- "I have a problem with the forum"
These titles are good:
- "Bitcoin-Qt takes too long to start. How can I speed it up?"
- "Poll: What is your gender?"
- "Whenever I try to send a PM, the forum gives me an error"

When asking a question, never use a title like "How to send BTC"; it makes the topic look like a guide on how to do something instead of a question about how to do it.

Some people like to put "tags" in the title within brackets. Like "[GLBSE] [ANNOUNCE] ASDF: Generic asset". I personally don't like this style. I prefer to include the tag info within the sentence, like "Announcing ASDF, a generic asset on GLBSE". When tags are really necessary, it may indicate that a new subforum should be created.

Use normal capitalization, not "newspaper capitalization". "Thread title style guide" instead of "Thread Title Style Guide". Capitalize the first letter of the title unless it a trademark like "eMachines".

Omit unimportant leading words. "Selling $100" instead of "I'm selling $100". Other than that, it's best to write a grammatically correct sentence if doing so does not make the title annoyingly long.

If the title is composed of only one sentence, don't include a period at the end. If it contains two or more sentences, put a period after each sentence, including the last. Questions must end with a question mark.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
1. Such posts like "SELL SELL SELL", "I agree", "+1", "Support", "Watching", "Interesting", "LOL", "SCAM", "LEGIT", "FAKE", other one word posts, posts consisting mostly of swearing, quote pyramids,useless introduction threads, threads about a topic already recently discussed in several other threads.


Question - Are there exceptions to this rule? Are posts like this, this or this considered okay?


all of those posts should be reported as plus one spam. Just because something breaks the rules does not mean it will get deleted if they are not brought to the attention of a moderator.

In the past, there have been cases where they haven't been deleted after bringing it to the mods' attention.
Specifically, in this case, I did report a post (~24 hrs ago). I am not sure if action by mods in the Politics & Society board is slower, or these posts are considered ok in some circumstances.

Edit: See that all of them have now been deleted. That answers my question.  Embarrassed
the politics section doesn't have any moderators so only globals (and admins) can handle reports unless it is a newbie posting no naturally the handling of reports is going to be slow. This is similar to how matketolace reports were before we got two active mods there.

Since kluge and chief Ramsey have not been active there (or at all) I haven't really paid attention to that section although there has always been a good amount of junk there. We probably need a moderator for that section.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
1. Such posts like "SELL SELL SELL", "I agree", "+1", "Support", "Watching", "Interesting", "LOL", "SCAM", "LEGIT", "FAKE", other one word posts, posts consisting mostly of swearing, quote pyramids,useless introduction threads, threads about a topic already recently discussed in several other threads.


Question - Are there exceptions to this rule? Are posts like this, this or this considered okay?


all of those posts should be reported as plus one spam. Just because something breaks the rules does not mean it will get deleted if they are not brought to the attention of a moderator.

In the past, there have been cases where they haven't been deleted after bringing it to the mods' attention.
Specifically, in this case, I did report a post (~24 hrs ago). I am not sure if action by mods in the Politics & Society board is slower, or these posts are considered ok in some circumstances.

Edit: See that all of them have now been deleted. That answers my question.  Embarrassed
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
1. Such posts like "SELL SELL SELL", "I agree", "+1", "Support", "Watching", "Interesting", "LOL", "SCAM", "LEGIT", "FAKE", other one word posts, posts consisting mostly of swearing, quote pyramids,useless introduction threads, threads about a topic already recently discussed in several other threads.


Question - Are there exceptions to this rule? Are posts like this, this or this considered okay?


all of those posts should be reported as plus one spam. Just because something breaks the rules does not mean it will get deleted if they are not brought to the attention of a moderator.
Pages:
Jump to: