Pages:
Author

Topic: US Presidential Election 2020 - page 15. (Read 6260 times)

legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1460
July 19, 2020, 10:12:59 PM
I would not say this factor or particular issue will far outweigh other socio-economic issues-- domestics ones to be exact-- that a lot of Americans are probably more critical about.

As an Asian and whose country is under constant territorial threat from the bully China, this particular issue is very important for me. But I cannot tell whether or not an ordinary American finds this specific issue equally important that it may determine his/her vote.

I am from India, and my country had a major unprovoked territorial fight with the Chinese a few weeks back. For Asians, Chinese aggression is a big concern. Not sure whether the same will be reflected in the United States, because they don't have any direct territorial dispute with China. At least in this case, I have to say that Trump is more effective when compared to Biden.

China has become an expansionist. Their government is expanding to your country, to the South China sea and they have passed a security law in Hong Kong which removes some of its citizens' freedoms and rights. It also has concentration camps of uighur muslims.

When was the last time a country acted like this and which country was it?
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1214
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
July 19, 2020, 08:57:13 PM
Just read an interesting article. Prof. Helmut Norpoth developed a prediction model that correctly predicted the outcome of the last 25 of 27 elections. He had already predicted a probability of victory for Trump in 2016 of 67 to 88 percent. But the interesting thing is what he predicts about the upcoming election: A 91% probability for re-election of Trump.  

More in this article:
https://local12.com/news/nation-world/professors-model-predicts-trump-having-91-chance-of-winning-re-election-cincinnati

Interesting article indeed and he has a very nice track record!
However, I more believe in the Oxford prediction that Biden will win thanks too the mismanagemt of Trump in this pandemic.
The lack of management is being found in each and everything. A president should always look for the words of the common people, but here the decisions were self made. This is the reason for such a result on the survey. Another thing I learned is his business policy. In each and everything he tries to do business forgetting humanity. Anyhow we can get the real results by November.
hero member
Activity: 2506
Merit: 645
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
July 19, 2020, 12:40:58 PM
I would not say this factor or particular issue will far outweigh other socio-economic issues-- domestics ones to be exact-- that a lot of Americans are probably more critical about.

As an Asian and whose country is under constant territorial threat from the bully China, this particular issue is very important for me. But I cannot tell whether or not an ordinary American finds this specific issue equally important that it may determine his/her vote.

I am from India, and my country had a major unprovoked territorial fight with the Chinese a few weeks back. For Asians, Chinese aggression is a big concern. Not sure whether the same will be reflected in the United States, because they don't have any direct territorial dispute with China. At least in this case, I have to say that Trump is more effective when compared to Biden.

So what was the root cause of this Chinese aggression ? I am sure united nation would have taken necessary steps to normalize the situation in the borders.  Asia is becoming a tension hub.  Sad
STT
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1452
July 19, 2020, 12:39:49 PM
It really is tragic to see deaths that didnt have to happen, its just a case of waiting for a vaccine and read a book for a year.   Some people have no choice but to engage risks and do so as safely as possible but the rest is just so unfortunate people wont step back, alot of this mixing and infection spreading is unrequired gatherings.    Anything outdoors I can get might not be so bad especially with distance but the Trump rally for example was unrequired close proximity so the President can directly be blamed for that poor attitude without a doubt he has the power to arrange the crowd seating however is required but chose not to.
    I was going to say its really down to the people themselves not the government bodies in charge to force people, literally they nailed doors shut in Wuhan I remember and we dont live in an authoritarian state like that but alot of policy stance is poor straight from the President, its fairly clear and he is to blame for some of these deaths.

Quote
A 91% probability for re-election of Trump.

Thats way too much, 50/50 because of this screw up is where I will look for it by default.   It would have been far more had we been in November where we were in Jan just coasting on various measures of health and prosperity.    Ultimately people dying and out of work is the bell toll for a one term presidency, its not the norm but if we see an end of office thats how it occurs in past and also this present.   Biden I just dont have any judgement on, maybe its best he just shuts up but ideally he'd have at least one ground breaking speech to get people behind him.
tyz
legendary
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1533
July 19, 2020, 11:30:07 AM
Just read an interesting article. Prof. Helmut Norpoth developed a prediction model that correctly predicted the outcome of the last 25 of 27 elections. He had already predicted a probability of victory for Trump in 2016 of 67 to 88 percent. But the interesting thing is what he predicts about the upcoming election: A 91% probability for re-election of Trump.  

More in this article:
https://local12.com/news/nation-world/professors-model-predicts-trump-having-91-chance-of-winning-re-election-cincinnati
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1159
July 19, 2020, 09:32:26 AM
I would not say this factor or particular issue will far outweigh other socio-economic issues-- domestics ones to be exact-- that a lot of Americans are probably more critical about.

As an Asian and whose country is under constant territorial threat from the bully China, this particular issue is very important for me. But I cannot tell whether or not an ordinary American finds this specific issue equally important that it may determine his/her vote.

I am from India, and my country had a major unprovoked territorial fight with the Chinese a few weeks back. For Asians, Chinese aggression is a big concern. Not sure whether the same will be reflected in the United States, because they don't have any direct territorial dispute with China. At least in this case, I have to say that Trump is more effective when compared to Biden.
The US made all the right noises during the Ladakh standoff which means that Trump pretty much has the Indian diaspora in his pocket for this very reason. Yet, all the issues that have been mishandled within the country seem too big to be just covered up by making it about CCP. Who could have thought that USA, the country that gave much of the modern world's medical standards and pharma research to the world, would lead the pandemic's body count. I don't know how any straight thinking, patriotic American can accept that without hanging their head in shame for such inept administration.

In terms of absolute count and even deaths, a country like India will cross the US, yet, the vast difference in population density and medical facilities just does not justify the kind of human calamity that COVID-19 turned out to become for the US. 140K dead. How is that not the most monumental failure ever for any American president?? The fact that media outlets and "independent" mouthpieces can still sway his core base to believe that Mr. Cheetos did everything right and it just happened the way it was meant to happen, will one day be counted as one of the most ridiculous tragedies of the information era.
sr. member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 453
July 19, 2020, 07:31:09 AM
I would not say this factor or particular issue will far outweigh other socio-economic issues-- domestics ones to be exact-- that a lot of Americans are probably more critical about.

As an Asian and whose country is under constant territorial threat from the bully China, this particular issue is very important for me. But I cannot tell whether or not an ordinary American finds this specific issue equally important that it may determine his/her vote.

I am from India, and my country had a major unprovoked territorial fight with the Chinese a few weeks back. For Asians, Chinese aggression is a big concern. Not sure whether the same will be reflected in the United States, because they don't have any direct territorial dispute with China. At least in this case, I have to say that Trump is more effective when compared to Biden.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1860
July 18, 2020, 10:40:51 PM
@adamistraybar. Trump might win because the people might see that he has the political will to fight the new threat. China.

I would not say this factor or particular issue will far outweigh other socio-economic issues-- domestics ones to be exact-- that a lot of Americans are probably more critical about.

As an Asian and whose country is under constant territorial threat from the bully China, this particular issue is very important for me. But I cannot tell whether or not an ordinary American finds this specific issue equally important that it may determine his/her vote.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1460
July 18, 2020, 10:12:53 PM
@adamistraybar. Trump might win because the people might see that he has the political will to fight the new threat. China.

Biden has dealings with China through his son Hunter Biden.

This speech from Trump's attorney general. This is very close on declaring war, I reckon.



It is a privilege to be here to speak about what may prove to be the most important issue for our nation and the world in the twenty-first century — that is, the United States’ response to the global ambitions of the Chinese Communist Party.  The CCP rules with an iron fist over one of the great ancient civilizations of the world.  It seeks to leverage the immense power, productivity, and ingenuity of the Chinese people to overthrow the rules-based international system and to make the world safe for dictatorship.  How the United States responds to this challenge will have historic implications and will determine whether the United States and its liberal democratic allies will continue to shape their own destiny or whether the CCP and its autocratic tributaries will control the future.

Several weeks ago, National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien spoke about the CCP’s ideology and global ambitions.  He declared, and I agree, that “[t]he days of American passivity and naivety regarding the People’s Republic of China are over.”


Source https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-william-p-barr-delivers-remarks-china-policy-gerald-r-ford-presidential
hero member
Activity: 2646
Merit: 582
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
July 18, 2020, 09:04:54 AM
I guess November is right there in few months and there are so many people dying as well. Just recently some television spokesperson that keeps promoting Trump (you know the ones) and keep saying that media and the medical industry is faking it and there isn't a real virus and people are not dying and the numbers are all made up because if it was true we would have seen hundreds of thousands of dead people somewhere, we wouldn't be unaware of it yet he didn't see any sick person.

Well, his son got sick and got the corona virus, he apologized to all doctors on live TV. This is what Biden is basically fighting against, this is what the war on ignorance is all about, people who vote Trump do that not because they are bad but because they are morons, you can't fight a war against moron people, so you should at least out vote them.
STT
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1452
July 17, 2020, 06:32:15 PM
Sounds like a very dangerous strategy when its not completely sure why some suffer so badly and others do not, roughly we know theres an age correlation but thats a heck of a risk over just waiting it out.   Hard to understand how people think they have no other option but to catch something thats like russian roulette.

Quote
a vaccine is developed in the US
The time line for a vaccine is that it wont be available before end of year and into 2021.   Some might receive it earlier in special cases but even those will likely be past the election date so far as I know.    Would be good to hear otherwise but Ive not heard of that and even December would be exceptional response time considering not many took this serious initially.

Quote
https://www.malaymail.com/news/world/2019/12/31/state-media-china-probes-pneumonia-outbreak-for-sars-links/1823554
The figures at the end there are nonsense most likely and relevant now that China is opaque and unreliable in its current figures also.

Trump on Epstein in 2015 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0SuZQZGKqo
hero member
Activity: 2086
Merit: 575
July 17, 2020, 04:42:29 PM

 I do not think that even vaccine would help them out. Plus I do not really think that people realize how serious this is neither. I just read on reddit that some families actually bring in kids with covid and kids without covid together so that kids would get it and get better so they wouldn't get sick later on when its "worse" and actually planned infection would allow them to take care of the kids better. Now we are talking about voters like this, and you are telling me trump has no chance to win? He is the king moron in the land of morons, he ALWAYS has a chance to win. Do not consider for one second that he hates being under favored in the bets and polls, he loves that, he loves being under dog so that he could fight his way up, if he had to fight down he would have lost because he doesn't know how to fight down and neither does his voters.
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 646
July 17, 2020, 04:03:54 PM

The opposite of that would happen in November. Although the numbers does not favor the government at the moment if the virus is gone by that time or a vaccine is developed in the US, this will give a big boost to the white house and the current president will take all the credit and votes may go in his favour.

What makes you so confident that we will have a vaccine by then? I wouldn't be so sure about that. But yeah, right now it seems like the US is fully counting on exactly that - a vaccine. Otherwise you can't explain how Trump is handling the whole crisis. I don't understand why they didn't take the Covid response of (some) European countries as an example. But that's a topic for a different thread.

It takes some weeks/months to properly pimp them Wink You can't go from 100% to 0% in days. You gradually go lower step by step, maybe imitating the curves of countries that were successful in controlling the virus. By late October you then a have a situation, where Trump can brag about these "achievements". This won't work, if numbers stay as high as currently, but when numbers improve a bit, you can improve them more with a system you control and nobody will take notice.
If hospitals are at (over-)capacity it's hard to cover up imo, because the media will be all over it, but when a hospital reports 70% full (with downward tendency), you can easily make that 50% or 40% and nobody will even notice or be suspicious about it.

But again, how exactly should the numbers start to improve a bit? Just take a look at what's going on in Georgia for example. Or the numbers from Florida ... I know October/November is still relatively far in the future, but right now I'm just beeing pessimistic. However, if a working vaccine is approved by then and Trump can buy everything that is available worldwide ("America first" ...), he will be able to glorify himself as a saviour from the pandemic. But as I said above, I wouldn't count on that.
 
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1671
#birdgang
July 17, 2020, 03:10:58 PM
But right now ... I don't really see how the White House would benefit from currently manipulated numbers.

It takes some weeks/months to properly pimp them Wink You can't go from 100% to 0% in days. You gradually go lower step by step, maybe imitating the curves of countries that were successful in controlling the virus. By late October you then a have a situation, where Trump can brag about these "achievements". This won't work, if numbers stay as high as currently, but when numbers improve a bit, you can improve them more with a system you control and nobody will take notice.
If hospitals are at (over-)capacity it's hard to cover up imo, because the media will be all over it, but when a hospital reports 70% full (with downward tendency), you can easily make that 50% or 40% and nobody will even notice or be suspicious about it.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1483
July 17, 2020, 03:09:04 PM
trump's odds per betfair are at 34%/2.9 again. are we finally gonna see 3.33+?! https://odds.watch/trump-2020

with the coronavirus doing what it's doing, i think this might be the time. disapproval of trump's coronavirus response is swelling.

Does anyone else think, that the WH bypassing the CDC with Corona reporting is just to possibly manipulate the data ?

absolutely, 100%. there is no doubt in my mind. trump has been heading this direction for a while, suggesting repeatedly that we should stop testing people because the numbers only hurt the economy.

it's hilarious and depressing at the same time. things have gotten so bad that the USA is literally stooping to china's level re data censorship. unfavorable data will be spun to look good or outright suppressed if it makes things look bad enough. they've been doing it for months already with economic data, so why not?
full member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 105
July 17, 2020, 03:04:04 PM
@STT. That is only clickbait to sell her book hehe.

In any case, the major hacks on the blue check accounts on Twitter and Trump's new executive order on Hong Kong's normalization might not be a coincidence.

This gives Trump emergency powers to block anyone in America to invest in Chinese companies or deal with them.

Source https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidents-executive-order-hong-kong-normalization/

I reckon that the setting for war is ready. I speculate that the beginning might occur before November.
It is hard for trump to decide for war it needs the decision of majority coming from different states.

In relation to prohibition against the chinese or hongkong company to deal with or invest with might sound political also.This because hongkong is not a part of china so it can decide on their own. China is a communist country and are dealing with investments coming from different countries around the world. It is just a matter of how regulations to contribute the smoth flow of investment. Somehow they need other country for them to benefit in the development of the economy. So this is why Trump has decided for normalization from these country.

War is certainly not a solution. It will only create more tension and make the life difficult not only for the Americans themselves but also for the USA president. The best thing here the president cannot make a decision single handedly and all the states will never agree to start a war and hence i don't see a traditional war. However trade war is on going and will continue.
hero member
Activity: 2506
Merit: 645
Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!
July 17, 2020, 02:44:46 PM
[...]

With the election coming closer and closer, it could be an advantage to have some control over the official numbers. But right now ... I don't really see how the White House would benefit from currently manipulated numbers. The daily numbers are already looking horrible. Each day a new record in new cases. If they are playing down the numbers now (already) without doing any counter measures to contain the virus, things will spiral out of control anyway. Or is their plan that in November most are too sick to vote?

The opposite of that would happen in November. Although the numbers does not favor the government at the moment if the virus is gone by that time or a vaccine is developed in the US, this will give a big boost to the white house and the current president will take all the credit and votes may go in his favour.
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 646
July 17, 2020, 01:50:02 PM
[...]

With the election coming closer and closer, it could be an advantage to have some control over the official numbers. But right now ... I don't really see how the White House would benefit from currently manipulated numbers. The daily numbers are already looking horrible. Each day a new record in new cases. If they are playing down the numbers now (already) without doing any counter measures to contain the virus, things will spiral out of control anyway. Or is their plan that in November most are too sick to vote?
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1849
Crypto for the Crypto Throne!
July 17, 2020, 12:28:10 PM
But I find it interesting and plan to monitor the odds movements regularly and compare (maybe every 2 weeks or so). And if there is no huge opposition against it, I will post my findings here and then we can discuss the changes, if any. But it will still be only a snapshot until we are in November Wink

This is what figmentofmyass talked about before. I mean to catch any opportunity to get a golden middle or some good odds. I doubt that such opportunities still exists (for example to bet on Biden), but for parties, like democrats of republicans maybe this variant still exist. But for me, to use odds under 1.4 is not a good idea. I mean there still enough probability that your bet will fail, but potential reward is few enough.

Bad risk/reward i mean.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1671
#birdgang
July 17, 2020, 06:22:43 AM
Does anyone else think, that the WH bypassing the CDC with Corona reporting is just to possibly manipulate the data ? The official reasoning was something along the lines the CDC being too slow:

Quote
"The CDC's old data gathering operation once worked well monitoring hospital information across the country, but it's an inadequate system today," Caputo said in a statement shared with reporters. "The President's Coronavirus Task Force has urged improvements for months, but they just cannot keep up with this pandemic."
Source: https://www.mprnews.org/story/2020/07/15/npr-white-house-strips-cdc-of-data-collection-role-for-covid-19-hospitalizations

The data has now to be sent to a system, which was set up by a private company with a $10mln award given according to the article. I buy the fact that the CDC is probably slow (or slower than a more lean private company is), but I can't get rid of the feeling that the real reason is something else, i.e. getting the numbers down by using different calculation methods or whatever.
You could have just implemented a different system in the CDC or optimize the current system, they should have enough funding for that.

Opinions ?
Pages:
Jump to: