Topic: Video call for KYC verification - page 15. (Read 40829 times)
If the video call is kyc in ico and bounty to find out who is using multiple accounts in the bounty of bounty but I think others do not agree with it and the distribution of tokens to ico and bounty is over because of too much participating in ico and bounty and video call kyc think it's too long this job does not really prevent someone from having multiple accounts because they want their income but I think it's a lender to others bounty ico and bounty I also know sometimes very difficult to be able to get the kycs approved because it reviews it thoroughly.
this is very difficult to do, because the verification process using video calls will take a long time, and this is not at all effective, why is that ?. because there are too many participants, hundreds or even thousands.
A lot of support will be needed to resolve thousands of investors. Also, as you say, it takes time, and it won't be complete with just one video call
Video call for kyc verification?? Is it possible? Do you think it is the best way , rather than uploading your documents for kyc verification process? Most bounty campaigns and ICOs nowadays required a kyc.
If video call for Kyc verification is possible, what is the best and secure app to you use for video call
One of the most popular websites for freelancers - upwork dot com doing this kind of verification. I think it's too hard for cryptocurrency. Noone wants to create this system when they doing ICO. It's easier to just ask the KYC. If video call for Kyc verification is possible, what is the best and secure app to you use for video call
In my opinion, KYC verification does have to use video calls, because if you only use your identity, there are still many who can cheat to get the prize, so the best step might be from video calls. so that in the future those who participate in ICO gifts can be disciplined and not cheat to get that gift.
In my opinion its not necesary because it will take so much time & i dont like give my private information. Not all investor or bounty hunter can speak english that will be a problem. Another issue is the participant is huge not hunder people but almost thousand people and more.
What is just not come up with in order to formally confirm its seriousness. I do not participate in ICO where I need to confirm KYC. I do not want my personal data to be posted online.
This is quite realistic, and to be honest, to me this way of passing KYC seems to be the most suitable!
this is very difficult to do, because the verification process using video calls will take a long time, and this is not at all effective, why is that ?. because there are too many participants, hundreds or even thousands.
it's not as difficult as you imagine, not even long. I've done it in a liquid exchange and actually the video call is good enough to prevent cheating because now using the id card doesn't make them sure 
this is very difficult to do, because the verification process using video calls will take a long time, and this is not at all effective, why is that ?. because there are too many participants, hundreds or even thousands.
Yes, I think it's the best way to prove your identity. You just make a video call and show your face with a passport in hand. It will take very little time and confirm that it is really you, and your data will not get to third parties.
Actually things like this can also be dangerous. because in my opinion right now someone's personal data can be misused by people to be able to benefit. there should be a procedure governing kyc
I think I agree with that having a video call as a KYC verification is really convenient but still I don't want to recommend because it will just give us a conflict in our time in our participants, we all know that all the investors and bounty participants are not in the same places that could easy to make a video call to them and it would be a hard thing to make an effort to the investors if they can't manage to get a chance to make a time to it.
Yes, I think it's the best way to prove your identity. You just make a video call and show your face with a passport in hand. It will take very little time and confirm that it is really you, and your data will not get to third parties.
I think vedio call is not necesary at all, the purpose of kyc is to know the person identity and I think documents with selfie is really enoughf for it, I believe that kyc needs a valid documents so it is really an amazing ways of knowing someone's personality. So I think selfie is not really necessary to do.
poeple think about their privacy if some project request kyc to received token or coins.more over that projects based not in usa , so nothing worry about their fund source if us restricted in their project. 
I think vedio call is not necesary at all, the purpose of kyc is to know the person identity and I think documents with selfie is really enoughf for it, I believe that kyc needs a valid documents so it is really an amazing ways of knowing someone's personality. So I think selfie is not really necessary to do.
This is a very bad idea
does it have to be KYC to use video calls?
in my opinion, KYC is not important for bounty hunters
does it have to be KYC to use video calls?
in my opinion, KYC is not important for bounty hunters
I think KYC is against the logic of the crypto market. and in no way can I be involved in projects that push KYC.
There is no guarantee that after passing KYC you will receive your payment, so I think that passing it is only a waste of time.
I am thinking how that is going to work, if it is what i am thinking then it means the ICO team will have to attend to every ICO investor video call and bounty hunters as well? Video call for KYC in my own opinion is not achievable.
I wanna totally support this cos i know, kyc in its simplicity as it stands now wastes time and slows down the progress of the project. Video call will only make matters worse.
It's not a bad idea at least it's assures the company that they are dealing with the right persons but the question is how long can they hold on to this process can they keep up with it? If he says then it's. a good one
Even ICO investors haven't been put under such obligation. This is a very tideous process which will not only consume time but more resources from the project team. To me its not an option worth considering.
Jump to: