Topic: Video call for KYC verification - page 19. (Read 40829 times)
It is also understandable why this is enacted, essentially this is to minimize the truth data, ensure that the data indicated it's true existence with its owner. as time went on I think crypto will progressively tighten all his system. for that, inevitably, if we decided to join in the crypto then must follow the rules of the game.
Yes I think its possible. Specially now that there are a lot of social media outlet out there. They can use facebook and skype to do that but I don't think that its necessary and practical anymore. First is that they don't have that much time to interview all the investors. Second, not all investors will like that due to security and privacy reasons.
with the Kyc document system there are still many gaps that made many people fill up with fake data.
Kyc with a video call system is very good if it can be used in all ICOs or bounties, because it can reduce fraud that occurs.
but if it implemented many people will surely disagree because that will eliminates one of the advantages of cryptocurrency, which is confidentiality.
Kyc with a video call system is very good if it can be used in all ICOs or bounties, because it can reduce fraud that occurs.
but if it implemented many people will surely disagree because that will eliminates one of the advantages of cryptocurrency, which is confidentiality.
Yes, the technical ability to check such the KYC is not everywhere.
Let's look at this discussion from the side. This recognition of defeat. No KYC! As a bounty hunter, I repeatedly refused to receive a reward when the team demanded KYC. And survived it. As an investor, I bought assets on exchanges without verification.
Let's look at this discussion from the side. This recognition of defeat. No KYC! As a bounty hunter, I repeatedly refused to receive a reward when the team demanded KYC. And survived it. As an investor, I bought assets on exchanges without verification.
Video call for kyc verification?? Is it possible? Do you think it is the best way , rather than uploading your documents for kyc verification process? Most bounty campaigns and ICOs nowadays required a kyc.
If video call for Kyc verification is possible, what is the best and secure app to you use for video call
I think that's good. We, after uploading the document, there must be fear if our documents will be misused by them. If the verification via video call is good. The problem is that internet networks sometimes don't support accessing video calls in different countries. Then it will definitely be difficult to enter the call because many people will make a video call. If video call for Kyc verification is possible, what is the best and secure app to you use for video call
So many bounty are scams and thus KYC data may not be safe if hacked. But if bounty is not a scam , then video call KYC verification is not a big deal.
Well, even if the project is a scam, they will not be able to use any of your data taken through the video call. I think this identity check would be possible. 
I don't think that video call for KYC verification is a good idea and current uploading of documents looks better and faster.
- Of course, video calling to verify KYC can be said to be a bad idea and upset the participants because a lot of people don't have enough equipment for that problem, and even they don't want to reveal their faces via webcam because if the project has any problems and the information is leaked, they will be in trouble. In addition, with a project that many people participate, developers will also not have enough time and manpower to make video calls for all, uploading document files will be faster as you say or do not need KYC will be what makes people more comfortable
So many bounty are scams and thus KYC data may not be safe if hacked. But if bounty is not a scam , then video call KYC verification is not a big deal.
I think it's too complicated, because it's troublesome for the bounty hunter, he must have a camera and a good signal. and troublesome the bounty Manager because he has to ensure that the data obtained is Valid to report 
It seems to me that giving away personal data for an ico company is an unjustified risk, because we do not know who is storing personal data and what is the guarantee that there is no leakage of information. The presence of KYC in the ico company still does not give a guarantee about its positive results.
I think it's too complicated, because it's troublesome for the bounty hunter, he must have a camera and a good signal. and troublesome the bounty Manager because he has to ensure that the data obtained is Valid to report
I don't think that video call for KYC verification is a good idea and current uploading of documents looks better and faster.
I dont think that's possible because not everyone has a good internet connection to do a video call and the biggest hassle of doing video kyc is accommodating thousands of users at the same time. But i think its way better than uploading documents in a company or project that your not sure if you can trust your personal information with.
It is better than the present uploading of documents because despite the promise of the project team that they will never harm you with your documents but who knows what they will do at last. So if video calls can be used for KYC/AML it will go along way to restore integrity on both parties. I know a lot of my friends who decline to do any bounty that required KYC and also many who have been denied their reward because they did not do KYC.
If it is only a videos call without requiring any other document then I think it will be a good way to verify all customers. I do not take it easy sharing my passport everyday because most of them end up as scam and I am thinking what these scammers want to do with our documents.
IMHO, this is the most inconvenient method of KUS from all possible. I went through it once, it's terrible. I felt like a monkey in a circus who was ordered to do something. So it should not be, the maximum - the documents. I am a supporter of electronic signature.
This won't work out for me, there too many apps that can modify faces of the people that's in the video.
But I think this is a pretty good idea for those who are not comfortable of sending their ID's but it will really not gonna work for me.
But I think this is a pretty good idea for those who are not comfortable of sending their ID's but it will really not gonna work for me.
KYC video verification is impossible because no merchants are willing to increase service spending, and I believe that no hunters are willing to sell more privacy for participating in bounty activities.
I hope it is a very good IDEA for verification in the form Video cal verification instead of submitting the documents because this will improve the standards of verification procedure but till now i don't company is following this type of procedure for verification.
KYC is a procedure that now has many Bounty projects using this for Bounty participants. I personally strongly agree, but it must be considered that there will be many difficulties in running this application. And I hope that every Bounty project procedure is announced at the start of the Bounty project.
That idea is not that bad but it would stress the bounty manager out ,it won't be easy work because he/she will have to verify all bounty participants one by one through video call lol that is impossible, only of there is a way to fasten up the process then it would be great
with so many participants participating in the Bounty, managers will be very troubled if they have to make video calls for KYC. not necessarily all participants answered immediately because Bounty participants from many countries had different times so the manager also needed to determine the time before making a video call and it was very troublesome. Jump to: