Pages:
Author

Topic: What do you think about IEO (Initial Exchange Offering) - page 11. (Read 4051 times)

hero member
Activity: 2436
Merit: 503
Cryptocasino.com
I think IEO will be on top over ICO, with our current situation there are a lot of scam project makes ICO too risky for investment there is no guarrateed that the project is a real one. In IEO, when the coins is offered in good exchange, what everyone will think? Ow okey, this is a good one because binance take it for advertising,. An exchange like binance cant easily accept projects without basis. This will be mud for their reputation so IEO has less risk and be our future in investment
Although the IEO scheme look stronger than ICO which is why investors trust in it but i dont any reason why IEO guarantee safety of investors and we must not forget that the IEO issued by an exchange site does not mean the project won't vaporize off the market or be a scam project. Do you know that the project handle by binance are also not qualify?
Binance has some requirements need to be surpassed by the ico that will be listed on its launch pad, but IEO has a lot of chance to be manipulated especially from the binance exchange itself. This is the main problem that a lot of investors have been talking about.
sr. member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 344
win lambo...
I’m not sure that IEO can completely replace ICO, because the exchanges take projects with a small cup under their wings to make it easier to artificially arrange the growth of project tokens.
Also, not all developers will agree to give part of the profit from investments to the exchanges.
That is why I think that ICO and IEO will move in parallel.
We can't see its effectivity right now since IEO is not fully adopted and some project owners still in the ICO program. But it too positive that it will give to us some changes and it may help to improve the market trust with investors , and possible more investors will encourage to put their money in crypto.
Let see what it can do within this year  and what we could benefits from this.
member
Activity: 554
Merit: 11
CurioInvest [IEO Live]
I’m not sure that IEO can completely replace ICO, because the exchanges take projects with a small cup under their wings to make it easier to artificially arrange the growth of project tokens.
Also, not all developers will agree to give part of the profit from investments to the exchanges.
That is why I think that ICO and IEO will move in parallel.
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 10
This IEO is really turning to a big trend in the crypto space. It's just what is talked about in almost all the groups I get into these days. If it continues like thi, am afraid even these scam exchanges being created by scammers will join in conducting IEO and investors funds will be at high risk.
copper member
Activity: 364
Merit: 1
Am yet to understand the whole fuss on IEO. One thing I have noticed also is that such hypes do not last. Soon, if not already, most exchanges even the weak ones will start adopting IEO and before you know, it will be a mess.
full member
Activity: 672
Merit: 100
The very idea is very relevant today, because in general, a very large percentage of people already simply do not believe in investing and, as we see today, many projects simply cannot understand how to do the placement correctly.
jr. member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1
The truth is ICOs can no longer survive on the tradition method of fundraising for their projects. The investors are out there on the sideline waiting for a kind of guarantee or assurance before jumping into any project. And here is IEO which offers a kind of guarantee knowing fully well that a lot of resources has been put together by the exchange into vesting the particular project. I think IEO ushers in new era and more guarantee way of raising funds for new projects.
full member
Activity: 980
Merit: 109
I think that at the moment IEO has great prospects than ICO. Here, at least some kind of guarantor is the site, which houses the IEO. I do not think that the exchange will risk its reputation and host a project that has not carefully verified.
hero member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 566
I think IEO will be on top over ICO, with our current situation there are a lot of scam project makes ICO too risky for investment there is no guarrateed that the project is a real one. In IEO, when the coins is offered in good exchange, what everyone will think? Ow okey, this is a good one because binance take it for advertising,. An exchange like binance cant easily accept projects without basis. This will be mud for their reputation so IEO has less risk and be our future in investment
Although the IEO scheme look stronger than ICO which is why investors trust in it but i dont any reason why IEO guarantee safety of investors and we must not forget that the IEO issued by an exchange site does not mean the project won't vaporize off the market or be a scam project. Do you know that the project handle by binance are also not qualify?
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 251
I believe that it is a new era in the ICOs market, because traditional methods of fundraising are slowly dying, because there are a lot of fraud projects at the market. I hope IEOs will be more secured and they will guarantee at least a small profit for all participants of their token sale.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 250
IEO is selling tokens that occur on the market, many exchanges that make IEO, arguing that the IEO is more affordable and faster in selling tokens with the session sessions held, new projects prefer to use IEO rather than ICO
hero member
Activity: 1460
Merit: 573
ICO and IEO are almost the same. I think IEO is more interesting for developers, project owner and investors. However, it is important not to write off ICO.
Not fo all devs and owners, because not every project has enough money to pay for listing on exchange.
Not for all investors, bacuse only the holder of a verified account on the exchange can participate in IEO, and not anyone who wishes.
IEO is a new trend and I think project developers will be able to choose an exchange for IEO which they will be able to pay an affordable fee. Exchanges and project owners need each other to get ahead.
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 250
http://unidapp.app
I think the idea of the IEO is really necessary at this time because most of the current ICO projects are fraudulent and it is very difficult to develop well in this market. I believe that with this widespread development will make the IEO the next trend and investors can be more secure in liquidity because after each IEO the token will be traded immediately.
hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 644
https://duelbits.com/
With recent happenings in crypto currency regarding token sale,
i think icos are beginning to find their feet because binance conducting the crowdfunding event for BitTorrent and Fetch.AI has raised the hyped again.

And now, Bittrex has also announced a crowdfunding event too, an IEO, 


so can you give your opinion on whether IEO or ICO will survive on the long run
Basically, IEO is an ico which already verified by exchange site and that exchange site wanna create a cooperation with that ico. this just like a symbiosis mutualism. You must understand the definition from both of these things.
means that if an exchanger cooperates with a project to carry out an IEO, will the coin be automatically traded to the exchanger who has verified it? is that what you mean?
The IEO makes selling tokens through their launchpad, everyone can participate to buy IEO provided they have an Exchanger account. when the sale is finished, the coin will be traded there.
like Celer from binance, the celer will be traded at binance.
full member
Activity: 658
Merit: 100
With recent happenings in crypto currency regarding token sale,
i think icos are beginning to find their feet because binance conducting the crowdfunding event for BitTorrent and Fetch.AI has raised the hyped again.

And now, Bittrex has also announced a crowdfunding event too, an IEO, 


so can you give your opinion on whether IEO or ICO will survive on the long run
Basically, IEO is an ico which already verified by exchange site and that exchange site wanna create a cooperation with that ico. this just like a symbiosis mutualism. You must understand the definition from both of these things.
means that if an exchanger cooperates with a project to carry out an IEO, will the coin be automatically traded to the exchanger who has verified it? is that what you mean?
full member
Activity: 966
Merit: 111
With the existence of the IEO it is now possible to treat longing for the ICO. Because all people are against the IEO. Unlike the ICO which is not so popular anymore because many are scam. I think this IEO in the future will be very good and become the first choice for investment people.
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 32
I think it is the new trend that has been currently followed by lots of people something will be accepted by the people very easily so IEO is also in that case I definitely sure it will play an important role in the future.
full member
Activity: 1382
Merit: 105
As you know ICO's are scam mostly and now investors don't like to invest in ICO's, So IEO is a good opportunity to invest in crypto and make good profit .
member
Activity: 602
Merit: 10
Well Initial Exchange Offering or IEO is not a new thing, LAtoken already own it since long time. But yeah I think IEO is better than ICO, because we only need to do KYC once for many projects, also the tokens will automatically listed on the exchange that host their IEO.
The IEO at LAToken is not much interested because there are a lot of projects that are not clear there, LAToken does not care about the projects listed there are good or not they only prioritize volume to become the biggest exchanger, but the reality is not that easy to become a big exchanger
Listing on exchanger is about agreement between developers team and exchanger. Sometimes, developers team consider on market condition and when IEO on LAToken ended, listing paused. Many factor why developers team consider about listing and i think its about strategy to maintain the price on their token or coin
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 104
Well Initial Exchange Offering or IEO is not a new thing, LAtoken already own it since long time. But yeah I think IEO is better than ICO, because we only need to do KYC once for many projects, also the tokens will automatically listed on the exchange that host their IEO.
The IEO at LAToken is not much interested because there are a lot of projects that are not clear there, LAToken does not care about the projects listed there are good or not they only prioritize volume to become the biggest exchanger, but the reality is not that easy to become a big exchanger
Pages:
Jump to: