Pointless
The point of you exclaiming you're blocking my PM's is what exactly?
This thread is a very good example of what is wrong with the trust system.
Topic: What's wrong with Vod, and Hhampuz - page 4. (Read 4587 times)
The point of you exclaiming you're blocking my PM's is what exactly?
This thread is a very good example of what is wrong with the trust system.
You're hurling ad-hominem attacks, making baseless assertions that you're unwilling to explain, back-up or justify, but somehow I am the one taunting.
These re-caps keep looking more ridiculous.
Vod says I Lied
Ask what
Vod says TAUNTING!
Ask how I taunted
Vod says TAUNTING!
If we're going to be against virtue-signaling can we also be against the victimhood-mentality being expressed here?
The situation is actively developing, and all I can do is draw conclusions based on what I have in front of me. I wouldn't have reached out to you, and offered to change my feedback if I was already set-in-stone about how I feel here.
These re-caps keep looking more ridiculous.
Vod says I Lied
Ask what
Vod says TAUNTING!
Ask how I taunted
Vod says TAUNTING!
If we're going to be against virtue-signaling can we also be against the victimhood-mentality being expressed here?
I think you've made up your mind. 
The situation is actively developing, and all I can do is draw conclusions based on what I have in front of me. I wouldn't have reached out to you, and offered to change my feedback if I was already set-in-stone about how I feel here.
For me, it was to avoid the taunting.
And you continue, so on ignore you go.
Do whatever you want, just don't piss on me and call it rain.
You're not worth listening to
Somehow I'm worth responding to, and making it publicly known that you will no longer accept my PMs.
Despite the fact that none of it involves you.
For me, it was to avoid the taunting.
At least your response is relevant to the conversation.
You claimed I lied. I politely asked you about what.
Which part of that is taunting?
You lied in your feedback.
You're bought.
Another assertion that I'm assuming you're unwilling to explain or justify.
The point of you exclaiming you're blocking my PM's is what exactly?
For me, it was to avoid the taunting. Then like a child, you posted the taunts publicly.
You're bought.
The point of you exclaiming you're blocking my PM's is what exactly?
You're not worth listening to, wind changes its direction all the time. Pointless
The point of you exclaiming you're blocking my PM's is what exactly?
I've blocked you too.
You do love a good bandwagon! 
Let's re-cap:
-snip-
I've blocked you too.
You do love a good bandwagon!
Let's re-cap:
Vod DOXes OG.
I proclaim that "DOXing is bad, can lead to harm and is magnified if you claim there is money at the address."
Remove Vod from Trust-list for Doxing
Trust-Inclusions go from 9 to 5.
Leave Vod Negative feedback for their actions.
Trust-Inclusions go from 5 to 3. (maybe from 4 to 3, hard to tell without a timeline)
Vod Claims my feedback is a lie.
Ask Vod what the lie is.
Blocked by Vod.
Blocked by Lauda
? ? ? ?
I'm just leaving this here.
Vod claims I am lying, but will not tell me about what.
How can this situation progress in any productive manner when this is how it is being approached?
I'll join in on this: I've blocked you too. I despise virtue signalling more than inaction. Vod claims I am lying, but will not tell me about what.
How can this situation progress in any productive manner when this is how it is being approached?
Vod claims I am lying, but will not tell me about what.
I could tell you, but I think you've made up your mind.
I'm just leaving this here; we've gone completely childish now, and this is probably where I take my leave from Reputation. This board is a mess.
Vod claims I am lying, but will not tell me about what.
How can this situation progress in any productive manner when this is how it is being approached?
Sent you a PM about the "lie", I'd love clarification on what you're talking about and I would happily correct any inaccuracies.
No worries. Do what you want.
You lied in your feedback. :/
People who speak disparagingly of things that they cannot attain would do well to apply this story to themselves.[4]
People who speak disparagingly of things that they cannot attain would do well to apply this story to themselves.[4]
I don't see how your story is relevant here. Does an analogy count as a story?
I'm already in DT, not disparaging it from the outside.
Sent you a PM about the "lie", I'd love clarification on what you're talking about and I would happily correct any inaccuracies.
Looks like that happened today and his inclusion score has already dropped significantly.
significantly = 1
Thanks for deleting your drunk post from last night. I forgive.
Vod didn't exclude teeGUMES because teeGUMES admitted he made a mistake. Vod forgives.
Everyone who left Vod appropriate red-trust were removed from DT as a result.
Vod currently has red trust from bill gator (DT1). I'd like to point out that Vod didn't exclude teeGUMES.Looks like that happened today and his inclusion score has already dropped significantly. Vod didn't exclude teeGUMES because he is already excluded so that would be redundant at this time. Let him get a few more inclusions and watch what Vod does.
The action of removing Vod from my trust list, had an immediate (might even be fun to see how long such a reaction took - with your hourly breakdown) reaction of my DT "inclusion score" going from 9, down to 4.
following my social media, while pretending to be my friend.
Certainly this is horrible behavior.
At least I didn't post your facebook profile here along with your address and made up claims backed by no evidence to try and get innocent people arrested for perjury... You're such a dimwit Vod. Please don't ever stop digging your hole. I don't much care to be in DT1, but this doesn't speak well to the current status of the trust system, in my opinion.
You lied in your feedback. :/
OG has been posting for years he has 500 btc, and he has been as ass for years. He recently admitted he's been following my social media, while pretending to be my friend.
The "I don't want to be in DT" is nothing more than the well known parable:
Quote
Driven by hunger, a fox tried to reach some grapes hanging high on the vine but was unable to, although he leaped with all his strength. As he went away, the fox remarked 'Oh, you aren't even ripe yet! I don't need any sour grapes.' People who speak disparagingly of things that they cannot attain would do well to apply this story to themselves.[4]
The action of removing Vod from my trust list, had an immediate (might even be fun to see how long such a reaction took - with your hourly breakdown) reaction of my DT "inclusion score" going from 9, down to 4.
See http://loyce.club/other/tmp (times are Amsterdam time), I won't leave this online long as it's raw data. When I have some time, I'll make a change log per user.
The action of removing Vod from my trust list, had an immediate (might even be fun to see how long such a reaction took - with your hourly breakdown) reaction of my DT "inclusion score" going from 9, down to 4.
Now that I've left Vod a negative feedback we are down to 3, and counting.
I don't much care to be in DT1, but this doesn't speak well to the current status of the trust system, in my opinion.
Certainly seems like a strange trajectory to take place from a simple statement "DOXing is bad and can lead to harm", and appropriately leaving negative feedback to the single individual responsible for it.
Now that I've left Vod a negative feedback we are down to 3, and counting.
I don't much care to be in DT1, but this doesn't speak well to the current status of the trust system, in my opinion.
Certainly seems like a strange trajectory to take place from a simple statement "DOXing is bad and can lead to harm", and appropriately leaving negative feedback to the single individual responsible for it.
I've been following this topic for the past days, but didn't post here yet.
If anyone's interested in creating a timeline, I have hourly copies of the Default trust breakdown since April 12.
(My) Merit isn't a "I agree" and also not an endorsement for a post. I hope more people treat Merit this way.
Everyone who left Vod appropriate red-trust were removed from DT as a result.
Vod currently has red trust from bill gator (DT1). I'd like to point out that Vod didn't exclude teeGUMES.If anyone's interested in creating a timeline, I have hourly copies of the Default trust breakdown since April 12.
For the meriters, I can understand the argument for red-trust, but I tend to think that it's at the wrong level. If the meriter was meriting it because they were actively thinking, "I want to make the forum really vicious, where everyone is constantly tearing each other apart for stupid things, and this post moves in that direction," even that's not really a trust-relevant motive, just a very unhelpful motive. And probably the meriters were thinking more innocent things than that.
I never got to see Vod's post (and I don't scrape the Investigations board), but I often use Merit as "worth reading". In some cases that can be because it says a lot about the user who posted it (but again: I didn't get to read the post so can't judge if that was the case here).(My) Merit isn't a "I agree" and also not an endorsement for a post. I hope more people treat Merit this way.
Jump to: