Pages:
Author

Topic: What's wrong with Vod, and Hhampuz - page 3. (Read 4587 times)

Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 14, 2019, 02:20:01 PM
I don't think your rep will ever recover from this.

Didn't realize my rep had been damaged -  just my brain at the thought of naked Tuesdays!   Cheesy

I'm sorry.  I couldn't resist.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1123
May 14, 2019, 02:17:31 PM
So that there is no possible way for my feedback to be misconstrued; I have removed the 500 BTC risked. I can tell that it will create a divide, and distract from the actual issue meant to be tackled. Somehow, I doubt that is going to change anything.

now I am intimidating others by simply ignoring them.

No, you are intimidating others by endangering lives through giving out their address, attaching promises of millions to it and attaching lawsuits to your personal problems. Ignoring me would've been a preferable alternative to you crying about taunting, abusing the trust system and lying about ignoring me.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 14, 2019, 02:17:07 PM
And now I am intimidating others by simply ignoring them.

Liars do not belong on DT1.  Remove Bill Gator!
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 14, 2019, 02:16:48 PM
Your scam has been your undoing.  Smiley

Didn't realize I'd been undone, or was this a clever reference to my naked Tuesdays? Cheesy

I'm sorry.  I couldn't resist.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1268
In Memory of Zepher
May 14, 2019, 02:09:36 PM
I couldn't really care about your trust squabbles, but:

This is literally from the same post you just quoted :
- If you want to make a rating stronger, increase "Risked BTC". 50 extra risked BTC is equivalent to an additional rating.

I don't think this applies anymore. I could be wrong, but I expect that it was changed once theymos realized that it was a bit of a silly idea.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 14, 2019, 02:08:37 PM
Your scam has been your undoing.  Smiley
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 14, 2019, 02:07:17 PM
OG absolutely deserves to lose his house over his scam.  That isn't up for dispute.

Your hate, has been your undoing.  Even I feel bad about telling you to keep digging your hole at this point.  I don't think your rep will ever recover from this.  That is why I gave you multiple chances to apologize for your lies and we could move beyond this.  I didn't even leave you a negative trust rating at the time.  That's looking like it was a pretty good offer at this point now doesn't it?  Maybe I was being reasonable and trying to protect you when I offered that as a solution?  Nice to see you didn't let that stop you from shooting yourself in the foot and then blaming me.  Oh well.  You can't say I didn't try to save your reputation, because I very clearly did, twice.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
May 14, 2019, 02:04:39 PM
Is the only problem that of the 500 BTC risked amount?

Because AFAIK few people have problems with substantiating ratings based on outsider insight (i.e. not being part of the transaction).
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
May 14, 2019, 02:02:45 PM
As far as I know, my tag is the only DT1 tag that stands on Vod.

Because Vod fucked up and sorted it straight away, Vod does some decent shit here tagging people and OG has convinced many people he does decent things here as well.



So leave them to it, go change the tampon and powder your nose till you get your emotions in check and let the two titans fight it out - its none of our business getting in the middle and when it all settles down then tag away with a proper reference and not by saying that vod skammed anyone for 500BTC you penis.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1123
May 14, 2019, 01:55:35 PM
you don't know how to use the trust system.

As you literally cherry-pick a post from theymos, that directly contradicts what you're suggesting for the trust-system.

This is literally from the same post you just quoted :

- If you want to make a rating stronger, increase "Risked BTC". 50 extra risked BTC is equivalent to an additional rating.

Oh, and if you'd be a darling - providing your own re-cap would be some much needed comedic relief, so long as you don't butcher the delivery like Lauda did earlier about merit being based on effort.

Liars

We're all still waiting to hear what the lie is. I'm still standing by to correct myself if this is proven to be the case.

I agree with TMAN. Leave it to them to solve, I'm open to adjusting and changing my feedback/actions/conclusions - as always.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 14, 2019, 01:55:09 PM
His feedback is nothing more than illegitimate negative trust. 500 Risked BTC when no trade happened? 



Thanks for this.  Liars have no place on DT1.
legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 2535
Goonies never say die.
May 14, 2019, 01:54:48 PM
I didn't claim there was a trade that occurred. I claimed that 500 BTC were at risk, which they are; especially if the information supplied within the DOX was accurate. Have you been reading along?

I can tell by your ridiculous "re-cap" that you haven't been following along at all.

I can also tell you don't know how to use the trust system.

- "Risked BTC" is how much money you could have lost if the person you're rating had turned out to be a scammer. Or, if they are a scammer, it's how much you lost. Use the BTC value at the time of reporting.

legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
May 14, 2019, 01:52:14 PM
btcsmlcmnr would you kindly lock this?

Please do not - these two are big enough and ugly enough to sort there own battle online, surely its best if everyone else stops posting (me included) and we let them get to it in one place, itll keep happening in every other fucking thread if not
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 14, 2019, 01:51:53 PM
OG absolutely deserves to lose his house over his scam.  That isn't up for dispute.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1123
May 14, 2019, 01:51:46 PM
His feedback is nothing more than illegitimate negative trust. 500 Risked BTC when no trade happened?  

I didn't claim there was a trade that occurred. I claimed that 500 BTC were at risk, which they are; especially if the information supplied within the DOX was accurate. Have you been reading along?
Besides, theymos himself has said something like "if you want to make a trust-rating more effective, increase the BTC risked"; this is not what I am doing here, but that does not make the feedback illegitimate in anyway.. It never has.

Bill you just wind people up,

Don't tell me you think offering to change my feedback once the inaccuracies are pointed out is "taunting", too?

you are like some clingy bird you can’t get rid off.

I just love you guys so much <3

Dude just chill, if you didn’t really care about DT ...

I care about our forum, our community, Bitcoin, the trust-system (or whatever replaces/supersedes it), I care about the interactions around here making sense and I care about principals that I assumed we all operated by. I do not give a shit to be on DT, but now that I've stuck my nose in a Reputation thread... Can not unsee... You folks are bonkers.

dude what does your tag achieve? And now this fucking stalking is making it worse

As far as I know, my tag is the only DT1 tag that stands on Vod. Don't you think that DT1 should do something when a user does something like this? We are not God, so sometimes it takes more than repentance to atone for our sins. I don't know what you mean about stalking; I read along, asked some questions, slept on it, drew conclusions and then left an appropriate feedback for the situation.

Then there was discussions about trust-list changes, which I had relevant anecdotes to share, then I was accused of lying so I tried to figure out what I was being accused of lying about with a single, polite PM.
legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 2535
Goonies never say die.
May 14, 2019, 01:50:10 PM
His feedback is nothing more than illegitimate negative trust. 500 Risked BTC when no trade happened? 

donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 14, 2019, 01:49:50 PM
Yes vod was a cunt, yes vod realises and removed DOX. Now unheard of levels of cuntness is going on between OG and VOD. But dude what does your tag achieve? And now this fucking stalking is making it worse

Are you serious?  Vod absolutely deserves the negative trust feedback for his behavior.  That isn't up for dispute.  Your post does a nice job of showing some merit source abuse though.  Thanks for the addition to the thread.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
May 14, 2019, 01:49:23 PM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/regarding-recurrent-reproaching-restitutive-responses-5141263
This thread has gone on far too long. It's still holding onto life in a fetid septic chamber echoing a cacophony of distorted rebounding rhetoric.

btcsmlcmnr would you kindly lock this?
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1808
Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do
May 14, 2019, 01:43:20 PM
Bill you just wind people up, you did it with me when I had you excluded initially, you are like some clingy bird you can’t get rid off. Dude just chill, if you didn’t really care about DT you wouldn’t be banging on like when my Mrs was pregnant and I had to go to the fucking shop in the middle of the night to get some specific ice cream. Like seriously dude, you got issues.

Yes vod was a cunt, yes vod realises and removed DOX. Now unheard of levels of cuntness is going on between OG and VOD. But dude what does your tag achieve? And now this fucking stalking is making it worse
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 14, 2019, 01:40:48 PM
Pointless

The point of you exclaiming you're blocking my PM's is what exactly?
Me thinks he wants to virtue signal  Cheesy

This thread is a very good example of what is wrong with the trust system.

Agreed.  Why do we allow people with almost 5 digit negative trust on here ?
Pages:
Jump to: