Quote
Professional shitposter. 59 posts/hr, tested.
LOL - love it!
Topic: What's wrong with Vod, and Hhampuz - page 6. (Read 4587 times)
LOL - love it!
But i don't understand why you are asking ?You are such a big mouth and still let me beg to confirm your facebook profil like last time.
It would take 5 sec.Where is the problem for you to confirm your profil when you claim you are willing to give me your full details ?
Vod you are begging me to open that lawsuite so you don't have 5 sec to confirm your facebook profil ?
Whats up ?
"I just don't understand why you won't want to self-dox and subject yourself to a lawsuit"It would take 5 sec.Where is the problem for you to confirm your profil when you claim you are willing to give me your full details ?
Vod you are begging me to open that lawsuite so you don't have 5 sec to confirm your facebook profil ?
Whats up ?
That is, assuming your words aren't blanket statements... which they often appear to be.
In regards to doxxing, it shouldn't happen if you have the entire picture. When you have enough details to create a case outside of the forum for legal authorities to step in, public doxxing serves as a means to spread their information rather than investigate the user (case-by-case in certain scenarios).
If going after someone you presume is scamming or violating the law and you do not have enough details for their local jurisdiction to act upon, then creating an investigation thread for the purposes of uncovering their details to pursue legal action is more justified.
Let's lock this and stop with the irreverent bickering, aye?
Fast forward to page 4 where Quicksy attempts to dox me, repeatedly and maliciously,
You really should stop being dishonest. The post you are referring to quite literally cited information you posted yourself. You really should stop looking for excuses to dox me but that's not really possible, is it?
If you scroll a few posts up from the post you referenced there is an explanation why Google+ means jack shit as far as someone's identity. Explaining that is in no way a permission to keep doxing me. There is a reason why that information is in Investigations, asshole.
Seems like a bitch move by Vod.
If it walks like a duck...
I was disgusted by the reckless and vicious doxing in this case, where:
- The evidence was very thin.
- Even if all of the allegations were true, it'd likely result only in civil penalties, not criminal.
- The whole thing was motivated merely by past arguments. OgNasty never caused Vod to even lose anything, as far as I know. An utterly ridiculous & disproportionate escalation.
- The evidence was very thin.
- Even if all of the allegations were true, it'd likely result only in civil penalties, not criminal.
- The whole thing was motivated merely by past arguments. OgNasty never caused Vod to even lose anything, as far as I know. An utterly ridiculous & disproportionate escalation.
Thanks Theymos!
*myself
* pmlv5555
* Gerald8
All of the ratings were sent after the rules on doxing were put in place. The two other users appear to have gotten nuked/banned, and I wonder if their actions that lead to their ban was in part caused by frustration of having this information freely available in their trust profile.
Fast forward to page 4 where Quicksy attempts to dox me, repeatedly and maliciously,
You really should stop being dishonest. The post you are referring to quite literally cited information you posted yourself. Any new DT1 member has to go back and fix the failures that people who have been on DT1 for years failed to take a stance on? How far back should I go? All the way to the forum beginning?
How about just page 1 of this thread:
I'd like it to be known that if it was "you" in the same situation I would have your back until it is proven that you were indeed doing something criminal.
Fast forward to page 4 where Quicksy attempts to dox me, repeatedly and maliciously, and you just gloss right over it, choosing instead to attack marlboroza. I guess I've done something criminal then, like speaking out against the almighty most-trusted never-wrong OgNasty, because you wouldn't be such a blatant hypocrite, would you?
Don't attempt to grow a spine, you won't like it.
Look he's doing that cute thing that Lauda does by posting a picture or gif to try to make fun of you. Pretty cute marlie.
Why do you think I am joking? I am very serious, I got myself a brand new pair of horse blinkers.Why is your "discussion" with Vod in my trust wall?
It's not?
It links to this thread because the public doxx post that you decided it was proper to merit was deleted..
I believe you can find that information in my previous post. Further up in your post I see that you have another doxx problem..
Very interesting response to hhampuz's dox. it's unfortunate that DT1 hasn't acted on that back then.
I am sorry to break your speculation, but someone did acted back then on this. Strange, nothing happened.I'd take a look at it but it appears DT1 is okay with doxxing (my negative on Vod has been countered left and right).
It appears that DT1 is not ok with tagging Vod after he removed dox, I am not sure from where all these speculations are coming from. Why are you making things up?Don't let them catch you selling an account though. Bad bad news!
You are not making much sense. Try reading the thread for any other answers you need, I've explained my position many times quite clearly.
As I said, I (me) see everything clearly. Someone even quoted part of theymos's post to look like he said only something while he said many things, they forget to quote this part:But I tend to think that since he edited his post and seems to genuinely regret at least the public doxxing part, it'd be best to forgive.
Here you go:
Red-trusting Vod over this is an appropriate usage of red-trust, since his actions here are highly trust-relevant.
Thank you for the green light theymos. I see connection here
It'd be best to forgive - green light
Yessir, sorry for trying to better myself and staying in tune with community, sir. I will get back in lane now sir!
Yessir! I hold to myself now sir, sorry for speaking my opinion sir.
How long until another of these pops up?https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50521921
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50820769
Very insecure individual.
Anyways I won't let this hit Vod vs OgNasty levels, very easy to press Ignore here.
Yessir! I hold to myself now sir, sorry for speaking my opinion sir.
Further up in your post I see that you have another doxx problem.. it's unfortunate that DT1 hasn't acted on that back then. Not sure what these guys have been doing for years. I'd take a look at it but it appears DT1 is okay with doxxing (my negative on Vod has been countered left and right).
So much for your new-found stance against doxing, lasted less than a day
BTW OgNasty was in DT1 for years, including at the time of Hhampuz dox, and most current members were not. You may have messed up that finger-pointing.
Further up in your post I see that you have another doxx problem.. it's unfortunate that DT1 hasn't acted on that back then. Not sure what these guys have been doing for years. I'd take a look at it but it appears DT1 is okay with doxxing (my negative on Vod has been countered left and right).
So much for your new-found stance against doxing, lasted less than a day
BTW OgNasty was in DT1 for years, including at the time of Hhampuz dox, and most current members were not. You may have messed up that finger-pointing.
Selective enforcement of rules and morals is lovely, just my opinion
Any new DT1 member has to go back and fix the failures that people who have been on DT1 for years failed to take a stance on? How far back should I go? All the way to the forum beginning?
Please tell me more about my morals? I've strongly upheld them. You however flip flop back and forth. Enjoy your time on theymos' list of notes.
All of you guys' hate for OgNasty just continues to shine. You can't even hide it anymore. Visibly shaking.
Further up in your post I see that you have another doxx problem.. it's unfortunate that DT1 hasn't acted on that back then. Not sure what these guys have been doing for years. I'd take a look at it but it appears DT1 is okay with doxxing (my negative on Vod has been countered left and right).
So much for your new-found stance against doxing, lasted less than a day
BTW OgNasty was in DT1 for years, including at the time of Hhampuz dox, and most current members were not. You may have messed up that finger-pointing.
Selective enforcement of rules and morals is lovely, just my opinion
Further up in your post I see that you have another doxx problem.. it's unfortunate that DT1 hasn't acted on that back then. Not sure what these guys have been doing for years. I'd take a look at it but it appears DT1 is okay with doxxing (my negative on Vod has been countered left and right).
So much for your new-found stance against doxing, lasted less than a day
BTW OgNasty was in DT1 for years, including at the time of Hhampuz dox, and most current members were not. You may have messed up that finger-pointing.
"Ok, you got my full attention, talk!"
Look he's doing that cute thing that Lauda does by posting a picture or gif to try to make fun of you. Pretty cute marlie.
Why is your "discussion" with Vod in my trust wall?
It's not? It links to this thread because the public doxx post that you decided it was proper to merit was deleted.. I dinged all four merit posts and because it was the wrong tool to use(there is no longer a post which equals no more merit for doxx) I offered what is on your trust wall as an explanation. You may not have been online when it happened so I didn't want you blindsided.
Further up in your post I see that you have another doxx problem.. it's unfortunate that DT1 hasn't acted on that back then. Not sure what these guys have been doing for years. I'd take a look at it but it appears DT1 is okay with doxxing (my negative on Vod has been countered left and right). Don't let them catch you selling an account though. Bad bad news!
Try reading the thread for any other answers you need, I've explained my position many times quite clearly.
It's good that Vod came to his senses on this after the fact, though doing it at all certainly blemishes his reputation in my mind, and I added to my notes the fact that those users merited such a post. Meriting it is saying basically that we need more posts like this on the forum, and we do not need more posts like this on the forum.
Red-trusting Vod over this is an appropriate usage of red-trust, since his actions here are highly trust-relevant. But I tend to think that since he edited his post and seems to genuinely regret at least the public doxxing part, it'd be best to forgive.
It's irrelevant that Vod came to his senses after the fact. We know thousands of people saw that post and likely dozens of people copied or saved that information. Deleting his post did not undo what was done. He literally risked lives by posting an address and basically said "hey, there's 500 BTC at this location". It's an insanely dangerous precedent to set. What happens when an innocent person or even a child is hurt due to a home invasion because of a post like this? Nearly 3.5M USD is a lot of incentive for a bad person to attempt something terrible.
There was no reason for it, as you already stated. Ognasty isn't running for president as far as I know so his taxes should be no one's business but OG and the IRS. The feigned outrage is comical. No one cares about OG's taxes, they just want to hurt ognasty.
Seems like a bitch move by Vod. Settle your Internet arguments without whining to the US government and doxxing where people live and store their valuables.
For the meriters, I can understand the argument for red-trust, but I tend to think that it's at the wrong level. If the meriter was meriting it because they were actively thinking, "I want to make the forum really vicious, where everyone is constantly tearing each other apart for stupid things, and this post moves in that direction," even that's not really a trust-relevant motive, just a very unhelpful motive. And probably the meriters were thinking more innocent things than that.
I merited many posts where someone has used investigatory skillshttps://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50802606
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48682521
and I also received merit for
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--4508262
There was a video and there was a house from that video, and I automatically pressed merit button without thinking too much and without thinking some people may see it the way they see it, I didn't use it for whatever some of you people are speculating I did.
I have never said I support this doxing, I have never said I support reporting him to government agency and I have never took anything outside this forum, and on side note IIRC I have never received answer to this doxing:
I spoke with Vod and we have had the edited dox post removed.
Why is your "discussion" with Vod in my trust wall?Quote
I would have preferred to be able to talk to you in a mature conversation and change your mind
Ok, no problem, we shall talk. Just give me a second to prepare myself for conversation..."Ok, you got my full attention, talk!"
Whats your issue in confirming your facebook profil ?
Big mouth hiding ?Do you have no balls as you always claim?
Big mouth hiding ?Do you have no balls as you always claim?
Vod is terrified. Deleting evidence and backtracking. A true weasel.
Just have your lawyer contact me, liar. 
How often do you want me to ask for it if you want a case opened against you ?
So if Suchmoon doesn't give you her geocities, you won't sue her either?
:/
I got suchmoons details with legal proof.
But i don't understand why you are asking ?You are such a big mouth and still let me beg to confirm your facebook profil like last time.
It would take 5 sec.Where is the problem for you to confirm your profil when you claim you are willing to give me your full details ?
Vod you are begging me to open that lawsuite so you don't have 5 sec to confirm your facebook profil ?
Whats up ?
Jump to: