Author

Topic: Why do Atheists Hate Religion? - page 160. (Read 901515 times)

member
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
July 01, 2016, 12:55:33 PM
The true definition of Hate  (at all its kinds) : it's the manipulation of some idiots to make them act against other idiots who will make a reaction that pushes the first idiots to act again... etc.

At the end, both idiots will die or disappear or just lose their fight and will remind about what they gained from Hate...

At the same time, the manipulators (who were sitting away and laughing becsuse of their manipulation's success) will govern both of them.

Notice: the manipulators are generally without principles (they can motivate both idiots in their fight by media, infiltrators...) and without feelings  (so they don't share any of the thoughts that they inject in the mass's heads)...
but all what they know that they have after fight their own BENEFITS.

The manipulators will die, too.    Cool
I hope so but as long as there are people acting based on feelings and fellow without conscience... these manipulators will continue their dirty game by making the Hate as a fuel of disputes.  Sad
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
July 01, 2016, 10:48:23 AM
The true definition of Hate  (at all its kinds) : it's the manipulation of some idiots to make them act against other idiots who will make a reaction that pushes the first idiots to act again... etc.

At the end, both idiots will die or disappear or just lose their fight and will remind about what they gained from Hate...

At the same time, the manipulators (who were sitting away and laughing becsuse of their manipulation's success) will govern both of them.

Notice: the manipulators are generally without principles (they can motivate both idiots in their fight by media, infiltrators...) and without feelings  (so they don't share any of the thoughts that they inject in the mass's heads)...
but all what they know that they have after fight their own BENEFITS.

The manipulators will die, too.    Cool
member
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
July 01, 2016, 10:45:23 AM
The true definition of Hate  (at all its kinds) : it's the manipulation of some idiots to make them act against other idiots who will make a reaction that pushes the first idiots to act again... etc.

At the end, both idiots will die or disappear or just lose their fight and will remind about what they gained from Hate...

At the same time, the manipulators (who were sitting away and laughing becsuse of their manipulation's success) will govern both of them.

Notice: the manipulators are generally without principles (they can motivate both idiots in their fight by media, infiltrators...) and without feelings  (so they don't share any of the thoughts that they inject in the mass's heads)...
but all what they know that they have after fight their own BENEFITS.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
July 01, 2016, 10:16:41 AM
They just can't understand why believers wasting their time on "useless stuff" how they think, but most of atheists just don't care about it.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
July 01, 2016, 09:48:04 AM


The concrete evidence of the quote "Ignorance is a bliss." Isn't religious people tend to be more happy and joyful?

I think this sign's message is more of a jab against egotism.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
July 01, 2016, 09:27:18 AM


The concrete evidence of the quote "Ignorance is a bliss." Isn't religious people tend to be more happy and joyful?

Lots of people have great knowledge of novels/science fiction/science theory... but little knowledge of the real, and basic fact, the existence of God.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
July 01, 2016, 09:24:52 AM
Ah, that's right. For you everything is a religion, isn't it? Jobs, philosophies, sports, habits -- anything anyone spends time on is a religion to you.

Can you even name some belief or idea that can't fit your concept of a religion? I can't.


Things become religions for people when they place improper belief in them. When people consider fictitious or potentially fictitious things as truth, and then start to adamantly believe and trust in them as truth, that's when they have a religion going for themselves.

Any and all ideas that a person has, that he doesn't start to adamantly believe in or trust as truth, may not be a religion for him. For example. A beautiful butterfly may cross one's path. It might intrigue the person for a moment. But then the person goes on his way and forgets about it except to mention it to a few friends. No butterfly religion.

A lepidopterist on the other hand, has made butterflies his religion or one of them.

Cool

Interestingly, most people would call a lepidopterist a vocation rather than a religion. Is a vocation a religion in your idiolect?





No point to argue with this imbecile. By his reasoning, study of bridges is a sect of civil engineer's religion.
Never mind cosmologist studying black holes...

He redefines common English terms to fit his skewed worldview.  He is delusional and he knows it, but he tries to convince himself that he is not by inventing "new scientific" terminology and attacking people who point out obvious holes in his "biblical science".




How silly you have become. Don't you realize that anybody who studies bridges, and then adamantly believes stuff that is blatantly not true about the bridges he has studied, especially in the face of being shown that it is not true, has a religion going for himself? His religion might not be a dangerous one, he may not be harmful to himself or others, and people would not even recognize, generally, that he had a religion going. But according to the definition of religion in the dictionaries, that is what he has.

Since you like to express faith in meanings of words that are not dictionary accurate, and then pick on people who use correct definitions, everyone can tell that your formal religion must be totally wrong, just like your informal anti-dictionary religion.

Cool


I guess you missed this: Is a vocation a religion in your idiolect?


You haven't learned to use the dictionary, yet, have you? If a person treats his vocation as a religion, then for him it is a religion, right? By your questions, you are proving that the atheism religion is for the dimwitted.

Cool
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
July 01, 2016, 08:36:20 AM


The concrete evidence of the quote "Ignorance is a bliss." Isn't religious people tend to be more happy and joyful?
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
July 01, 2016, 02:42:56 AM
Ah, that's right. For you everything is a religion, isn't it? Jobs, philosophies, sports, habits -- anything anyone spends time on is a religion to you.

Can you even name some belief or idea that can't fit your concept of a religion? I can't.


Things become religions for people when they place improper belief in them. When people consider fictitious or potentially fictitious things as truth, and then start to adamantly believe and trust in them as truth, that's when they have a religion going for themselves.

Any and all ideas that a person has, that he doesn't start to adamantly believe in or trust as truth, may not be a religion for him. For example. A beautiful butterfly may cross one's path. It might intrigue the person for a moment. But then the person goes on his way and forgets about it except to mention it to a few friends. No butterfly religion.

A lepidopterist on the other hand, has made butterflies his religion or one of them.

Cool

Interestingly, most people would call a lepidopterist a vocation rather than a religion. Is a vocation a religion in your idiolect?





No point to argue with this imbecile. By his reasoning, study of bridges is a sect of civil engineer's religion.
Never mind cosmologist studying black holes...

He redefines common English terms to fit his skewed worldview.  He is delusional and he knows it, but he tries to convince himself that he is not by inventing "new scientific" terminology and attacking people who point out obvious holes in his "biblical science".




How silly you have become. Don't you realize that anybody who studies bridges, and then adamantly believes stuff that is blatantly not true about the bridges he has studied, especially in the face of being shown that it is not true, has a religion going for himself? His religion might not be a dangerous one, he may not be harmful to himself or others, and people would not even recognize, generally, that he had a religion going. But according to the definition of religion in the dictionaries, that is what he has.

Since you like to express faith in meanings of words that are not dictionary accurate, and then pick on people who use correct definitions, everyone can tell that your formal religion must be totally wrong, just like your informal anti-dictionary religion.

Cool


I guess you missed this: Is a vocation a religion in your idiolect?
sr. member
Activity: 441
Merit: 278
It's personal
July 01, 2016, 01:39:46 AM

When a religious story informs you that "they", "them", "those", "heathens", "unrighteous" are condemned and must die, will you obey the illogical untrue indoctrinating story just because it is a religious story and the truth and should be obeyed as such?



legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1130
June 30, 2016, 08:16:39 PM

legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
June 30, 2016, 08:11:30 PM


Age determination made in 5 minutes.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1130
June 30, 2016, 06:19:53 PM
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
June 30, 2016, 11:27:11 AM
Ah, that's right. For you everything is a religion, isn't it? Jobs, philosophies, sports, habits -- anything anyone spends time on is a religion to you.

Can you even name some belief or idea that can't fit your concept of a religion? I can't.


Things become religions for people when they place improper belief in them. When people consider fictitious or potentially fictitious things as truth, and then start to adamantly believe and trust in them as truth, that's when they have a religion going for themselves.

Any and all ideas that a person has, that he doesn't start to adamantly believe in or trust as truth, may not be a religion for him. For example. A beautiful butterfly may cross one's path. It might intrigue the person for a moment. But then the person goes on his way and forgets about it except to mention it to a few friends. No butterfly religion.

A lepidopterist on the other hand, has made butterflies his religion or one of them.

Cool

Interestingly, most people would call a lepidopterist a vocation rather than a religion. Is a vocation a religion in your idiolect?





No point to argue with this imbecile. By his reasoning, study of bridges is a sect of civil engineer's religion.
Never mind cosmologist studying black holes...

He redefines common English terms to fit his skewed worldview.  He is delusional and he knows it, but he tries to convince himself that he is not by inventing "new scientific" terminology and attacking people who point out obvious holes in his "biblical science".




How silly you have become. Don't you realize that anybody who studies bridges, and then adamantly believes stuff that is blatantly not true about the bridges he has studied, especially in the face of being shown that it is not true, has a religion going for himself? His religion might not be a dangerous one, he may not be harmful to himself or others, and people would not even recognize, generally, that he had a religion going. But according to the definition of religion in the dictionaries, that is what he has.

Since you like to express faith in meanings of words that are not dictionary accurate, and then pick on people who use correct definitions, everyone can tell that your formal religion must be totally wrong, just like your informal anti-dictionary religion.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
June 30, 2016, 02:46:13 AM
Ah, that's right. For you everything is a religion, isn't it? Jobs, philosophies, sports, habits -- anything anyone spends time on is a religion to you.

Can you even name some belief or idea that can't fit your concept of a religion? I can't.


Things become religions for people when they place improper belief in them. When people consider fictitious or potentially fictitious things as truth, and then start to adamantly believe and trust in them as truth, that's when they have a religion going for themselves.

Any and all ideas that a person has, that he doesn't start to adamantly believe in or trust as truth, may not be a religion for him. For example. A beautiful butterfly may cross one's path. It might intrigue the person for a moment. But then the person goes on his way and forgets about it except to mention it to a few friends. No butterfly religion.

A lepidopterist on the other hand, has made butterflies his religion or one of them.

Cool

Interestingly, most people would call a lepidopterist a vocation rather than a religion. Is a vocation a religion in your idiolect?


You have checked with most people? People call all kinds of things all kinds of things. Lepidopterology is a branch of science. Science, definitely being a religion, makes lepidopterology a religion as well, or at least a branch of religion.

Cool
donator
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
June 30, 2016, 01:12:26 AM
Ah, that's right. For you everything is a religion, isn't it? Jobs, philosophies, sports, habits -- anything anyone spends time on is a religion to you.

Can you even name some belief or idea that can't fit your concept of a religion? I can't.


Things become religions for people when they place improper belief in them. When people consider fictitious or potentially fictitious things as truth, and then start to adamantly believe and trust in them as truth, that's when they have a religion going for themselves.

Any and all ideas that a person has, that he doesn't start to adamantly believe in or trust as truth, may not be a religion for him. For example. A beautiful butterfly may cross one's path. It might intrigue the person for a moment. But then the person goes on his way and forgets about it except to mention it to a few friends. No butterfly religion.

A lepidopterist on the other hand, has made butterflies his religion or one of them.

Cool

Interestingly, most people would call a lepidopterist a vocation rather than a religion. Is a vocation a religion in your idiolect?



sr. member
Activity: 441
Merit: 278
It's personal
June 30, 2016, 12:23:05 AM

As meaning-making creatures, humans often tell stories to shape the meaning they create. All meaning for all humans is narrative in nature. Religion stories are usually quite good in the meaning it creates. The meaning is created when it is read as words, sentences, paragraphs and chapters - all in ink on paper but nowadays also on digital media. Important though, to remember, is that the meaning is created because it is told as a narrative. We all love stories - in fact we live by stories every single day.


legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
June 28, 2016, 04:33:02 PM


LOL. Not a story you would care to read to young children though.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
June 28, 2016, 02:41:27 PM
It sucks to be a Catholic vegetarian...

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
June 28, 2016, 12:38:32 PM
Jump to: