Author

Topic: Why do Atheists Hate Religion? - page 278. (Read 901367 times)

hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
December 22, 2015, 11:24:04 AM

I was a community (including you) and within an hour you lost your control over it ? Isn't it questionable when it's so hard to prove what you believe.
Looks like the new religions has eradicated logic from human mind ?

You cannot be a Community: a community needs two people (at least) to be called a community.
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community


Best regards.

That was a typo and it was supposed to be " It " ,It still doesn't proves your illogical point of view ? how come you lose the control in such short time span.If you are believing in something then it reflects the foundation of your philosophy.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
December 22, 2015, 11:16:55 AM

I was a community (including you) and within an hour you lost your control over it ? Isn't it questionable when it's so hard to prove what you believe.
Looks like the new religions has eradicated logic from human mind ?

You cannot be a Community: a community needs two people (at least) to be called a community.
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community


Best regards.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
December 22, 2015, 11:13:19 AM
which I have no control over.

It is called Community (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community).

Wikipedia is a community for Knowledge.

Best regards.

I was a community (including you) and within an hour you lost your control over it ? Isn't it questionable when it's so hard to prove what you believe.
Looks like the new religions has eradicated logic from human mind ?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
December 22, 2015, 11:07:12 AM

Is that a fact from wikipedia again ? I didn't knew there was a 'self-control' difference between wild animals.
But sadly self control doesn't proves anything you say , does it ?

The Lion is the King of the Animals because HE HAS self control.

You are obviously angry at Wikipedia: don't use my posts to throw shit on a tool on which I have no control over.

If you can.


Best regards.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
December 22, 2015, 11:01:33 AM

I am surely not a cat and neither i believe anybody posting on the forum is,but maybe your main fact's source (wikipedia) assumes that ? or contains that.

I thought you had more self-control by being a lion.


Best regards.
Is that a fact from wikipedia again ? I didn't knew there was a 'self-control' difference between wild animals.
But sadly self control doesn't proves anything you say , does it ?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
December 22, 2015, 10:48:43 AM

I am surely not a cat and neither i believe anybody posting on the forum is,but maybe your main fact's source (wikipedia) assumes that ? or contains that.

I thought you had more self-control by being a lion.


Best regards.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
December 22, 2015, 10:46:25 AM

I think you are the one who is posting wikipedia links and expressing your concerns and also saying people to trust it .If you care to read the whole page you quoted me first while i was answering the other guy .

Who's the bigger cat?!?


Best regards.
I am surely not a cat and neither i believe anybody posting on the forum is,but maybe your main fact's source (wikipedia) assumes that ? or contains that.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
December 22, 2015, 09:53:43 AM

I think you are the one who is posting wikipedia links and expressing your concerns and also saying people to trust it .If you care to read the whole page you quoted me first while i was answering the other guy .

Who's the bigger cat?!?


Best regards.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
December 22, 2015, 09:48:21 AM
Yes but what community says is not a Fact ? I have seen many articles with all that manipulation regardless of right or wrong.
It is not a source that could be trusted anymore.

This forum is about Bitcoin (a Technology), not about your concern about the solidity of the Wikipedia tool.

Move your concerns on the solidity of the Wikipedia tools somewhere else.

Best regards.
I think you are the one who is posting wikipedia links and expressing your concerns and also saying people to trust it .If you care to read the whole page you quoted me first while i was answering the other guy .
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
December 22, 2015, 09:40:48 AM

He think everything is crap except his own point of view  Smiley
People with very low intelligence usually think that way.

During Medieval times we would have preyed to have tools like Wikipedia.

Throwing shit on something is never a good sign.




Yes but what community says is not a Fact ? I have seen many articles with all that manipulation regardless of right or wrong.
It is not a source that could be trusted anymore.

This forum is about Bitcoin (a Technology), not about your concern about the solidity of the Wikipedia tool.

Move your concerns on the solidity of the Wikipedia tools somewhere else.


Best regards.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
December 22, 2015, 09:38:44 AM

Because anyone can edit the articles/content on their pedia, even if you do some projects based on it then they might not get approved anywhere.

It is called Community (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community).

Wikipedia is a community for Knowledge.

You need to trust people to grow, that's how it works.

Wikipedia is not crap, is you that are grumpy.


Best regards.
Yes but what community says is not a Fact ? I have seen many articles with all that manipulation regardless of right or wrong.
It is not a source that could be trusted anymore.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
December 22, 2015, 09:28:16 AM

Because anyone can edit the articles/content on their pedia, even if you do some projects based on it then they might not get approved anywhere.

It is called Community (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community).

Wikipedia is a community for Knowledge.

You need to trust people to grow, that's how it works.

Wikipedia is not crap, is you that are grumpy.


Best regards.

He think everything is crap except his own point of view  Smiley
People with very low intelligence usually think that way.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
December 22, 2015, 09:22:50 AM

Because anyone can edit the articles/content on their pedia, even if you do some projects based on it then they might not get approved anywhere.

It is called Community (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community).

Wikipedia is a community for Knowledge.

You need to trust people to grow, that's how it works.

Wikipedia is not crap, is you that are grumpy.


Best regards.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
December 22, 2015, 09:10:50 AM
I will share you a scientific research where people speak what they see after they back from the death:
Rofl... dude whatever you see is just what you think and are familiar with and no there is no scientific research on people ever who came back to life after death,Wikipedia is crap.

Why Wikipedia is crap?


Best regards.
Because anyone can edit the articles/content on their pedia, even if you do some projects based on it then they might not get approved anywhere.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
December 22, 2015, 08:56:46 AM
Not all atheists hate religion as not all religious persons hate atheism but I would imagine any atheist who hates religion probably sees religion as a cause of some of the greatest dicisions in society today whether that is right or wrong.Its also possible the persons who were religious may have lost their faith due to personal hardships experienced that led them to believe that their religion failed to save them from but then again most of the saints from certain religions were also persecuted and suffered and held their faith for some reason so its not a simple debate.Its all personal choice and what influences you as an individual.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
December 22, 2015, 08:50:26 AM
I will share you a scientific research where people speak what they see after they back from the death:
Rofl... dude whatever you see is just what you think and are familiar with and no there is no scientific research on people ever who came back to life after death,Wikipedia is crap.

Why Wikipedia is crap?


Best regards.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
December 22, 2015, 08:48:34 AM
I will share you a scientific research where people speak what they see after they back from the death:
Rofl... dude whatever you see is just what you think and are familiar with and no there is no scientific research on people ever who came back to life after death,Wikipedia is crap.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
December 22, 2015, 08:44:49 AM

No, it is not cause if people were that skeptical then there wouldn't be any religions fucking around in 21st century.
you cannot chose any path if you don't have one and make it your believe that it's right.

Are you an atheist?


Best regards.

I have no religion,  only theories none of which include any gods.  And any theories I do have also arent beliefs, just could be 's.. My religion isn't atheism like many people in this thread are getting to push.

You quoted the message that was not directed to you.

Aside from that: Science (and hence theories) come from the Fear of God
Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear_of_God

How can you have theories if you have no God?


Best regards.

Apologies for the wrong quote,  I thought you had quoted me twice so just quoted the last one you made,  I didn't realise you asked the same question to two different people until you mentioned it.  So anyways, back to the question.

I can quote easily have theories without having a god because none of my theories contain any gods,  to me beleif in a God or gods is completely irrational,  someone earlier seemed to take that as me questioning their intelligence which obviously isn't the case.

For example , a theory I could  beleive if is when we die there is nothing,  the same as before we were born.  Thare is no god in this theory and obviously it's very hard to prove but to me a lot less ridiculous than some all powerful all knowing God.

For example , a theory I could  beleive if is when we die there is nothing,  the same as before we were born.  Thare is no god in this theory and obviously it's very hard to prove but to me a lot less ridiculous than some all powerful all knowing God.

Tell me, you were back from the death and you know that after we die there is nothing?

Okay, let me ask you a few question and if you really give me a good answer, then I will be sure that you are the only person who knows the things about religion and God...

1. Tell me, what is the meaning of the word God and is it have any connection to Alien or ET?
2. What is the difference between Supreme, Lord and Christ?
3. You mentioned religion, so I would like to ask you... What will be a definition for the word and how do you describe this people?

Now, lets get back to your theory that after death, there is nothing. I will share you a scientific research where people speak what they see after they back from the death:

1. Light
Most of the people who died, said they saw the famous "light at the end of the tunnel." It is the most common phenomenon that people have when they are technically dead.

2. They could see his body
Many people have this "out of body experience" and saw his lifeless body over them when they were technically dead. That means they were incorporeal spirit hovered over their body. They could not see everything that happens in the room and who's in it. Any attempt to renew the relationship between consciousness and the physical body will fail, leaving a person out of himself a few moments.

3. Guardian Angel
Many people claim to have seen at least one angel or spirit who watches and cares for them during a brief stop in the "death abyss." Some say that the spirit helped through the afterlife before being sent back to their body.

4. A visit from her mother
Many people say that they visited their mother through vision, while they were on their deathbed.

5. Saw deceased relatives
If you have a large family, get ready to see them in the afterlife. Many have died and returned back again in life, they say they saw their relatives died while stopped in the afterlife.

6. The life passing before their eyes
Prepare again to experience your best and worst moments. Many people see life before the eyes right before the coming of death, or even after you switch sides. See their achievements and their memories are appearing before his eyes as a slideshow of her life.

7. They could see and hear all
Many people told that they could see the people who were with them in the room and tried to contact them but could not respond because their body was lifeless and their spirit / consciousness remained awake. Any attempt to get in touch with the people around them in vain.

8. Peace
The majority of deaths that again revived, said they felt a sense of peace and tranquility. It was so powerful and beautiful feeling soul / mind did not know how to find it reassuring experience.

9. Do not want to return
According to numerous reports, the mortal experience is so calming and serene, so many people who have experienced did not want to return to waking life. Imagine how you feel something as well, so you do not want to go back in life that you fought very hard to maintain.

Sorry if there is some mistakes in the translations, because the text is on Macedonian. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
December 22, 2015, 06:40:21 AM

Apologies for the wrong quote,  I thought you had quoted me twice so just quoted the last one you made,  I didn't realise you asked the same question to two different people until you mentioned it.  So anyways, back to the question.

I can quote easily have theories without having a god because none of my theories contain any gods,  to me beleif in a God or gods is completely irrational,  someone earlier seemed to take that as me questioning their intelligence which obviously isn't the case.

For example , a theory I could  beleive if is when we die there is nothing,  the same as before we were born.  Thare is no god in this theory and obviously it's very hard to prove but to me a lot less ridiculous than some all powerful all knowing God.

Infact you don't have to believe in God.

Believing in God gives you lots of things: last of the which is Eternal Life, but you don't have to believe a God to live.


Best regards.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
December 22, 2015, 06:31:53 AM

No, it is not cause if people were that skeptical then there wouldn't be any religions fucking around in 21st century.
you cannot chose any path if you don't have one and make it your believe that it's right.

Are you an atheist?


Best regards.

I have no religion,  only theories none of which include any gods.  And any theories I do have also arent beliefs, just could be 's.. My religion isn't atheism like many people in this thread are getting to push.

You quoted the message that was not directed to you.

Aside from that: Science (and hence theories) come from the Fear of God
Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear_of_God

How can you have theories if you have no God?


Best regards.

Apologies for the wrong quote,  I thought you had quoted me twice so just quoted the last one you made,  I didn't realise you asked the same question to two different people until you mentioned it.  So anyways, back to the question.

I can quote easily have theories without having a god because none of my theories contain any gods,  to me beleif in a God or gods is completely irrational,  someone earlier seemed to take that as me questioning their intelligence which obviously isn't the case.

For example , a theory I could  beleive if is when we die there is nothing,  the same as before we were born.  Thare is no god in this theory and obviously it's very hard to prove but to me a lot less ridiculous than some all powerful all knowing God.
Jump to: